1
|
Ihara K, Takizawa T, Watanabe N, Nakahara J, Martelletti P. Potential benefits and possible risks of CGRP-targeted multitherapy in migraine. Expert Opin Drug Metab Toxicol 2024; 20:1-4. [PMID: 38323326 DOI: 10.1080/17425255.2024.2316131] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/15/2023] [Accepted: 02/05/2024] [Indexed: 02/08/2024]
Affiliation(s)
- Keiko Ihara
- Department of Neurology, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
- Japanese Red Cross Ashikaga Hospital, Ashikaga, Japan
| | - Tsubasa Takizawa
- Department of Neurology, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Narumi Watanabe
- Department of Neurology, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Jin Nakahara
- Department of Neurology, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Paolo Martelletti
- School of Health Sciences, Unitelma Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Waliszewska-Prosół M, Vuralli D, Martelletti P. What to do with non-responders to CGRP(r) monoclonal antibodies: switch to another or move to gepants? J Headache Pain 2023; 24:163. [PMID: 38053061 DOI: 10.1186/s10194-023-01698-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/27/2023] [Indexed: 12/07/2023] Open
Abstract
In this editorial we aim to provide potential therapeutic options in patients who do not benefit from treatment with CGRP(r) monoclonal antibodies. Based on current real-life studies and analysis of practical and economic aspects, we will analyze the potential benefits of changing CGRP-targeted treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Doga Vuralli
- Department of Neurology and Algology, Neuroscience and Neurotechnology Center of Excellence (NÖROM), Faculty of Medicine, Neuropsychiatry Center, Gazi University, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Paolo Martelletti
- School of Health Sciences, UnitelmaSapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Onan D, Bentivegna E, Martelletti P. OnabotulinumtoxinA Treatment in Chronic Migraine: Investigation of Its Effects on Disability, Headache and Neck Pain Intensity. Toxins (Basel) 2022; 15:29. [PMID: 36668849 PMCID: PMC9862733 DOI: 10.3390/toxins15010029] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/12/2022] [Revised: 12/12/2022] [Accepted: 12/28/2022] [Indexed: 01/03/2023] Open
Abstract
Neck disability and pain are frequently encountered problems in patients with chronic migraine (CM). The long-term stimuli of neurons in the trigeminocervical junction may explain this situation. OnabotulinumtoxinA (ONA) treatment is one of the proven treatments for CM; however, there is no study data on the efficacy of ONA treatment on neck disability and pain in CM patients. Therefore, we aimed to investigate the effect of ONA treatment on disability, neck pain and headache intensity in CM patients. One hundred thirty-four patients who met the inclusion criteria were included in the study. ONA treatment was administered at a dose of 195 U to 39 sites in total as per Follow-the-Pain PREEMPT protocol. The disability was evaluated with the Neck Disability Index and the Migraine Disability Assessment; pain intensity was evaluated with the Visual Analogue Scale; the monthly number of headache days were recorded; quality of life was evaluated with the Headache Impact Test. All assessments were recorded at baseline and 3 months after treatment. After the treatment, neck−migraine disabilities decreased from severe to mild for neck and moderate for migraine (p < 0.001). Neck pain and headache intensities decreased by almost half (p < 0.001). The median number of monthly headache days decreased from 20 days to 6 days (p < 0.000). The quality-of-life level decreased significantly from severe to substantial level (p < 0.001). According to our results, ONA treatment was effective in reducing neck-related problems in CM patients. Long-term follow-up results may provide researchers with more comprehensive results in terms of the treatment of chronic migraine−neck-related problems.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dilara Onan
- Spine Health Unit, Faculty of Physical Therapy and Rehabilitation, Hacettepe University, Ankara 06230, Türkiye
- Department of Clinical and Molecular Medicine, Sapienza University, 000189 Rome, Italy
| | - Enrico Bentivegna
- Department of Clinical and Molecular Medicine, Sapienza University, 000189 Rome, Italy
| | - Paolo Martelletti
- Department of Clinical and Molecular Medicine, Sapienza University, 000189 Rome, Italy
- Regional Referral Headache Centre, Sant’Andrea Hospital, 000189 Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Onan D, Wells-Gatnik WD, Martelletti P. Reaching the Nadir of Medication Overuse in Chronic Migraine. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH 2022; 19:14696. [PMID: 36429413 PMCID: PMC9690126 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph192214696] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/05/2022] [Revised: 10/27/2022] [Accepted: 11/08/2022] [Indexed: 06/16/2023]
Abstract
The introduction of new drug classes for chronic migraine, such as monoclonal antibodies for calcitonin-gene-related peptide or its receptor (CGRPr), or antagonists of the same CGRP, have opened a new scenario in a selected population of individuals with migraine, and those presenting with chronic form of migraine in association with medication overuse. Medication overuse is now considered a complication of chronic migraine and, in fact, the treatment with CGRP(r)-MAbs of chronic migraine with medication overuse results in a clinical improvement of chronic migraine itself, accompanied by a parallel and obvious reduction in the intake of specific and non-specific acute migraine drugs. Education on the correct use of these drugs will be an essential tool to reduce the disability and costs of people suffering from CM complicated by MO, considering the long-term safety of the new therapies targeting the CGRP pathways. Only in this way can medication overuse risk can be reduced at its nadir in the scenario of chronicity of migraines.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dilara Onan
- Back and Neck Health Unit, Faculty of Physical Therapy and Rehabilitation, Hacettepe University, Ankara 06800, Turkey
- Department of Clinical and Molecular Medicine, Sapienza University, 00185 Rome, Italy
| | | | - Paolo Martelletti
- Department of Clinical and Molecular Medicine, Sapienza University, 00185 Rome, Italy
- Regional Referral Headache Center, Emergency Medicine Unit, Sant’Andrea University Hospital, 00189 Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Affiliation(s)
- Lanfranco Pellesi
- Danish Headache Center, Department of Neurology, Rigshospitalet Glostrup, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Ornello R, Baraldi C, Ahmed F, Negro A, Miscio AM, Santoro A, Alpuente A, Russo A, Silvestro M, Cevoli S, Brunelli N, Vernieri F, Grazzi L, Pani L, Andreou A, Lambru G, Frattale I, Kamm K, Ruscheweyh R, Russo M, Torelli P, Filatova E, Latysheva N, Gryglas-Dworak A, Straburzyński M, Butera C, Colombo B, Filippi M, Pozo-Rosich P, Martelletti P, Guerzoni S, Sacco S. Excellent Response to OnabotulinumtoxinA: Different Definitions, Different Predictors. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH 2022; 19:ijerph191710975. [PMID: 36078699 PMCID: PMC9518492 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph191710975] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/26/2022] [Revised: 08/30/2022] [Accepted: 08/31/2022] [Indexed: 05/10/2023]
Abstract
The identification of patients who can benefit the most from the available preventive treatments is important in chronic migraine. We explored the rate of excellent responders to onabotulinumtoxinA in a multicenter European study and explored the predictors of such response, according to different definitions. A pooled analysis on chronic migraineurs treated with onabotulinumtoxinA and followed-up for, at least, 9 months was performed. Excellent responders were defined either as patients with a ≥75% decrease in monthly headache days (percent-based excellent responders) or as patients with <4 monthly headache days (frequency-based excellent responders). The characteristics of excellent responders at the baseline were compared with the ones of patients with a <30% decrease in monthly headache days. Percent-based excellent responders represented about 10% of the sample, whilst frequency-based excellent responders were about 5% of the sample. Compared with non-responders, percent-based excellent responders had a higher prevalence of medication overuse and a higher excellent response rate even after the 1st and the 2nd injection. Females were less like to be frequency-based excellent responders. Chronic migraine sufferers without medication overuse and of female sex may find fewer benefits with onabotulinumtoxinA. Additionally, the excellent response status is identifiable after the first cycle.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Raffaele Ornello
- Neuroscience Section, Department of Applied Clinical Sciences and Biotechnology, University of L’Aquila, Via Vetoio 1 Coppito, 67100 L’Aquila, Italy
| | - Carlo Baraldi
- Digital and Predictive Medicine, Pharmacology and Clinical Metabolic Toxicology-Headache Center and Drug Abuse-Laboratory of Clinical Pharmacology and Pharmacogenomics, Department of Specialist Medicines, AOU Policlinico di Modena, 41125 Modena, Italy
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +39-0594222104
| | - Fayyaz Ahmed
- Department of Neurosciences, Hull University Teaching Hospitals, Hull HU3 2JZ, UK
| | - Andrea Negro
- Department of Clinical and Molecular Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Psychology, Sant’Andrea Hospital, Sapienza University, 00189 Rome, Italy
| | - Anna Maria Miscio
- Headache Center, Unit of Neurology, Fondazione IRCCS “Casa Sollievo Della Sofferenza”, 71013 San Giovanni Rotondo, Italy
| | - Antonio Santoro
- Headache Center, Unit of Neurology, Fondazione IRCCS “Casa Sollievo Della Sofferenza”, 71013 San Giovanni Rotondo, Italy
| | - Alicia Alpuente
- Headache Unit, Department of Neurology, Vall D’Hebron University, 08035 Barcelona, Spain
- Headache and Neurological Pain Research Group, Vall D’Hebron Institute of Research (VHIR), Department of Medicine, Universitat Autonoma de Barcelona, 08193 Barcelona, Spain
| | - Antonio Russo
- Headache Center, Department of Medical, Surgical, Neurological, Metabolic and Aging Sciences, University of Campania “Luigi Vanvitelli”, 81100 Naples, Italy
| | - Marcello Silvestro
- Headache Center, Department of Medical, Surgical, Neurological, Metabolic and Aging Sciences, University of Campania “Luigi Vanvitelli”, 81100 Naples, Italy
| | - Sabina Cevoli
- IRCCS Istituto delle Scienze Neurologiche di Bologna, 40139 Bologna, Italy
| | - Nicoletta Brunelli
- Headache and Neurosonology Unit, Campus Bio-Medico University Hospital, 00128 Rome, Italy
| | - Fabrizio Vernieri
- Headache and Neurosonology Unit, Campus Bio-Medico University Hospital, 00128 Rome, Italy
| | - Licia Grazzi
- Headache Center, Neuroalgology Department, IRCCS Foundation “Carlo Besta” Neurological Institute, Via Celoria, 11, 20133 Milan, Italy
| | - Luca Pani
- Digital and Predictive Medicine, Pharmacology and Clinical Metabolic Toxicology-Headache Center and Drug Abuse-Laboratory of Clinical Pharmacology and Pharmacogenomics, Department of Specialist Medicines, AOU Policlinico di Modena, 41125 Modena, Italy
- Pharmacology Unit, Department of Biomedical, Metabolic and Neural Sciences, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, 41121 Modena, Italy
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Miami, Coral Gables, FL 33146, USA
- VeraSci, Durham, NC 27707, USA
| | - Anna Andreou
- Headache Service, Guy’s and St Thomas’ NHS Foundation Trust, London SE1 7EH, UK
| | - Giorgio Lambru
- Headache Service, Guy’s and St Thomas’ NHS Foundation Trust, London SE1 7EH, UK
| | - Ilaria Frattale
- Child Neurology and Psychiatry Unit, Systems Medicine Department, Tor Vergata University, 00133 Rome, Italy
| | - Katharina Kamm
- Department of Neurology, Ludwig Maximilians University München, 80539 Munich, Germany
| | - Ruth Ruscheweyh
- Department of Neurology, Ludwig Maximilians University München, 80539 Munich, Germany
| | - Marco Russo
- Headache Center, Neurology Unit, Neuromotor and Rehabilitation Department, Azienda USL-IRCCS Di Reggio Emilia, 42122 Reggio Emilia, Italy
| | - Paola Torelli
- Headache Center, University of Parma, 43121 Parma, Italy
| | - Elena Filatova
- Department of Neurology, Institute for Postgraduate Education, Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University (Sechenov University), 119435 Moscow, Russia
| | - Nina Latysheva
- Department of Neurology, Institute for Postgraduate Education, Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University (Sechenov University), 119435 Moscow, Russia
| | | | - Marcin Straburzyński
- Department of Family Medicine and Infectious Diseases, University of Warmia and Mazury, 10-719 Olsztyn, Poland
| | - Calogera Butera
- Neurophysiology Service, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, 71013 Milan, Italy
| | - Bruno Colombo
- Neurology Unit, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, 71013 Milan, Italy
| | - Massimo Filippi
- Neurophysiology Service, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, 71013 Milan, Italy
- Neurology Unit, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, 71013 Milan, Italy
- Neurorehabilitation Unit, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, 71013 Milan, Italy
| | - Patricia Pozo-Rosich
- Headache Unit, Department of Neurology, Vall D’Hebron University, 08035 Barcelona, Spain
- Headache and Neurological Pain Research Group, Vall D’Hebron Institute of Research (VHIR), Department of Medicine, Universitat Autonoma de Barcelona, 08193 Barcelona, Spain
| | - Paolo Martelletti
- Department of Clinical and Molecular Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Psychology, Sant’Andrea Hospital, Sapienza University, 00189 Rome, Italy
| | - Simona Guerzoni
- Digital and Predictive Medicine, Pharmacology and Clinical Metabolic Toxicology-Headache Center and Drug Abuse-Laboratory of Clinical Pharmacology and Pharmacogenomics, Department of Specialist Medicines, AOU Policlinico di Modena, 41125 Modena, Italy
| | - Simona Sacco
- Neuroscience Section, Department of Applied Clinical Sciences and Biotechnology, University of L’Aquila, Via Vetoio 1 Coppito, 67100 L’Aquila, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Serra López-Matencio JM, Gago-Veiga AB, Gómez M, Alañón-Plaza E, Mejía GP, González-Gay MÁ, Castañeda S. Treatment of migraine with monoclonal antibodies. Expert Opin Biol Ther 2022; 22:707-716. [PMID: 35502612 DOI: 10.1080/14712598.2022.2072207] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/04/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION : In the few last years, a new family of drugs, anti-calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) monoclonal antibodies (mAbs), has been developed for migraine therapy. Anti-CGRP mAbs are highly effective, but the current limited experience with their use and their high-cost warrant establishing certain rules of use. AREAS COVERED The present review provides an overview of the management of migraine patients, especially those who are undergoing treatment with anti-CGRP mAbs. EXPERT OPINION Thanks to new research focused on the pathophysiology of migraine, and the discovery that CGRP plays a key role in its etiopathogenesis, new drugs targeting CGRP have been developed. These drugs have led to a paradigm shift, anticipating new and stimulating possibilities in migraine treatment. While physicians and patients are full of expectation about the advantages of this new family of drugs, there are still obstacles to overcome in order to make the best use of them. It is essential to form multidisciplinary teams that can identify patients who will benefit from these therapies, conducting cost-effective treatments. The follow-up of these therapies in the coming years is paramount due to the lack of experience in the management of these drugs and the peculiarity of disease evolution in migraine patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Manuel Gómez
- Methodology Unit. Health Research Institute Princesa (IIS-IP), Madrid, Spain
| | | | - Gina Paola Mejía
- Pharmacology Department, Hospital Universitario de La Princesa, Madrid, Spain
| | - Miguel Ángel González-Gay
- Rheumatology Division, Hospital Universitario Marqués de Valdecilla, University of Cantabria, Av. de Valdecilla, 25; 39008 Santander, Santander, Spain
| | - Santos Castañeda
- Rheumatology Division, Hospital Universitario de La Princesa, c/ Diego de León 62, IIS-IP, Madrid, Spain.,Catedra UAM-Roche, EPID-Future, Medicine Department, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid (UAM), Madrid, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Benemei S, Bentivegna E, Martelletti P. Positioning the new drugs for migraine. Expert Opin Drug Metab Toxicol 2022; 18:1-3. [PMID: 35240909 DOI: 10.1080/17425255.2022.2049236] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/06/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Silvia Benemei
- Headache Centre and Clinical Pharmacology Unit, Careggi University Hospital, Florence, Italy
| | - Enrico Bentivegna
- Department of Clinical and Molecular Medicine, Sapienza University, Rome, Italy.,Regional Referral Hedache Center, Sant'Andrea University Hospital, Rome, Italy
| | - Paolo Martelletti
- Department of Clinical and Molecular Medicine, Sapienza University, Rome, Italy.,Regional Referral Hedache Center, Sant'Andrea University Hospital, Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Boinpally R, Jakate A, Butler M, Periclou A. Atogepant and sumatriptan: no clinically relevant drug-drug interactions in a randomized, open-label, crossover trial. Pain Manag 2021; 12:499-508. [PMID: 34898273 DOI: 10.2217/pmt-2021-0073] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/26/2022] Open
Abstract
Aim: To evaluate pharmacokinetic interactions of atogepant with sumatriptan, an open-label, randomized, crossover study was conducted. Patients & methods: Thirty healthy adults received atogepant 60 mg, sumatriptan 100 mg, or coadministered drugs. Primary end point was geometric mean ratios (GMRs) and 90% CIs of interventions for area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time 0 to t (AUC0-t) or infinity (AUC0-∞) and peak plasma concentration (Cmax). Results: Atogepant GMRs for AUC0-t and AUC0-∞ versus with sumatriptan were within 90% CI 0.80-1.25, indicating no interaction; atogepant Cmax was reduced by 22% (GMR: 0.78; 90% CI: 0.69-0.89) with sumatriptan. Sumatriptan GMRs for AUC0-t, AUC0-∞ and Cmax versus with atogepant were within 90% CI 0.80-1.25. Conclusion: Atogepant with sumatriptan had no clinically relevant pharmacokinetic interactions.
Collapse
|
10
|
Ray JC, Allen P, Bacsi A, Bosco JJ, Chen L, Eller M, Kua H, Lim LL, Matharu MS, Monif M, Ruttledge M, Stark RJ, Hutton EJ. Inflammatory complications of CGRP monoclonal antibodies: a case series. J Headache Pain 2021; 22:121. [PMID: 34625019 PMCID: PMC8501661 DOI: 10.1186/s10194-021-01330-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/10/2021] [Accepted: 09/16/2021] [Indexed: 01/14/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) is expressed throughout the body and is a known mediator of migraine, exerting this biological effect through activation of trigeminovascular, meningeal and associated neuronal pathways located in close proximity to the central nervous system. Monoclonal antibodies (mAb) targeting the CGRP pathway are an effective new preventive treatment for migraine, with a generally favourable adverse event profile. Pre-clinical evidence supports an anti-inflammatory/immunoregulatory role for CGRP in other organ systems, and therefore inhibition of the normal action of this peptide may promote a pro-inflammatory response. CASES We present a case series of eight patients with new or significantly worsened inflammatory pathology in close temporal association with the commencement of CGRP mAb therapy. CONCLUSION This case series provides novel insights on the potential molecular mechanisms and side-effects of CGRP antagonism in migraine and supports clinical vigilance in patient care going forward.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jason C Ray
- Department of Neurology, Alfred Hospital, Commercial Melbourne 3004, Melbourne, Australia. .,Department of Neurology, Austin Health, 145 Studley Road, 3084, Heidelberg, Germany. .,Department of Neuroscience, Monash University, Vic, Melbourne, 3004, Australia.
| | - Penelope Allen
- Centre for Eye Research Australia, Royal Victorian Eye and Ear Hospital, East Melbourne, Australia.,Department of Surgery (Ophthalmology), University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia
| | - Ann Bacsi
- Integrated Specialist Medical Care, Sydney, Australia
| | - Julian J Bosco
- Department of Allergy, asthma and clinical immunology, Alfred Hospital, Commercial Road 3004, Melbourne, Australia.,Central Clinical School, Faculty of Medicine Nursing and Health Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Luke Chen
- Department of Neuroscience, Monash University, Vic, Melbourne, 3004, Australia.,Otoneurology Diagnostic Unit, Alfred Hospital, Commercial Rd 3004, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Michael Eller
- Department of Neurology, Monash Medical Centre, Vic, Melbourne, Australia.,School of Clinical Sciences, Monash University, Vic, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Hock Kua
- Department of Pathology, Monash Medical Centre, Vic, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Lyndell L Lim
- Centre for Eye Research Australia, Royal Victorian Eye and Ear Hospital, East Melbourne, Australia.,Department of Surgery (Ophthalmology), University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia
| | - Manjit S Matharu
- University College London (UCL) Queen Square Institute of Neurology and The National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery, Queen Square, University College London, Gower Street WC1E 6BT, London, UK
| | - Mastura Monif
- Department of Neuroscience, Monash University, Vic, Melbourne, 3004, Australia.,Department of Neurology, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Vic, Parkville, 3050, Australia.,MS and Neuroimmunology Department, Alfred Hospital, Vic, Melbourne, 3004, Australia
| | - Martin Ruttledge
- Consultant Neurologist & Headache Clinical Lead, Beaumont Hospital, Beaumont Road, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Richard J Stark
- Department of Neurology, Alfred Hospital, Commercial Melbourne 3004, Melbourne, Australia.,Department of Neuroscience, Monash University, Vic, Melbourne, 3004, Australia
| | - Elspeth J Hutton
- Department of Neurology, Alfred Hospital, Commercial Melbourne 3004, Melbourne, Australia.,Department of Neuroscience, Monash University, Vic, Melbourne, 3004, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Tinsley A, Rothrock JF. Safety and tolerability of preventive treatment options for chronic migraine. Expert Opin Drug Saf 2021; 20:1523-1533. [PMID: 34128746 DOI: 10.1080/14740338.2021.1942839] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/21/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Relative to migraine generally, chronic migraine (CM) imposes greater disability, healthcare utilization and socioeconomic burden. Six therapies currently possess a credible evidence base for prevention/suppression of CM. This review is intended to provide an assessment of their relative utility, defined as a blend of safety, tolerability and efficacy, focusing in particular on their safety and tolerability.Areas Covered: We discuss all six medications currently FDA-approved for migraine prevention which also specifically possess credible evidence of efficacy in treating CM. While we do address the efficacy of each, our primary emphasis involves assessment of safety and tolerability data derived from clinical trials and post-marketing experience.Expert Opinion: Recent research involving CM has led to the identification of highly targeted and typically well-tolerated therapies. For patients who experience obstacles to accessing these newer therapies, topiramate is available as an evidence-based alternative, but contraindications, drug-drug interactions and poor tolerability may limit or prevent its use. Although data to support such intervention presently is limited, clinically challenging CM cases may benefit from combination therapy. 'Real world' studies are needed to evaluate such polytherapy, along with studies intended to assess the long-term safety of the individual therapies and their use during pregnancy and breast-feeding.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amanda Tinsley
- Department of Neurology, George Washington University Medical Faculty Associates, Washington, DC, United States of America
| | - John Farr Rothrock
- Department of Neurology, George Washington University Medical Faculty Associates, Washington, DC, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Ornello R, Ahmed F, Negro A, Miscio AM, Santoro A, Alpuente A, Russo A, Silvestro M, Cevoli S, Brunelli N, Vernieri F, Grazzi L, Baraldi C, Guerzoni S, Andreou AP, Lambru G, Frattale I, Kamm K, Ruscheweyh R, Russo M, Torelli P, Filatova E, Latysheva N, Gryglas-Dworak A, Straburzynski M, Butera C, Colombo B, Filippi M, Pozo-Rosich P, Martelletti P, Sacco S. Early Management of OnabotulinumtoxinA Treatment in Chronic Migraine: Insights from a Real-Life European Multicenter Study. Pain Ther 2021; 10:637-650. [PMID: 33778933 PMCID: PMC8119503 DOI: 10.1007/s40122-021-00253-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/13/2021] [Accepted: 03/06/2021] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction OnabotulinumtoxinA (BT-A) quarterly was the first treatment approved specifically for chronic migraine (CM). It is unclear whether three cycles are better than two to assess early BT-A response. Methods We performed a retrospective analysis on real-life prospectively collected data in 16 European headache centers. All the centers provided data on patients treated with BT-A for CM over the first three cycles of treatment. For each treatment cycle we defined patients as “good responders” if reporting a ≥ 50% reduction in monthly headache days compared with the three months before starting BT-A, “partial responders” if reporting a 30–49% reduction in monthly headache days, and “non-responders” if reporting a < 30% reduction in monthly headache days or stopping the treatment before the third cycle. Results We included 2879 patients. Seven hundred and eighty-four (64.6%) of the 1213 patients reporting a good response during the first and/or the second cycle had a good response during the third cycle; 309 (49.3%) of the 627 patients reporting a partial response (but no good response) during the first and/or the second cycle had a good response during the third cycle; only 65 (6.3%) of the 1039 patients who did not respond during both the first two cycles achieved a good response during the third cycle. Multivariate analyses showed that partial or good response during the first or the second cycle were independently associated with good response during the third cycle. Conclusions Our data suggest that patients with CM responding to BT-A during the first two cycles will likely benefit from the third cycle of treatment, while the probability that non-responders to the first two cycles start responding during the third cycle is low. These results can help guide the individual decision to stop or continue treatment after the second cycle in patients who have not responded to the first two cycles. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s40122-021-00253-0.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Raffaele Ornello
- Neuroscience Section, Department of Applied Clinical Sciences and Biotechnology, University of L'Aquila, Via Vetoio 1 Coppito, 67100, L'Aquila, Italy
| | - Fayyaz Ahmed
- Department of Neurosciences, Hull University Teaching Hospitals, Hull, UK
| | - Andrea Negro
- Department of Clinical and Molecular Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Psychology, Sant'Andrea Hospital, Sapienza University, 00189, Rome, RM, Italy
| | - Anna Maria Miscio
- Headache Center, Unit of Neurology, , Fondazione IRCCS "Casa Sollievo Della Sofferenza", San Giovanni Rotondo, Foggia, Italy
| | - Antonio Santoro
- Headache Center, Unit of Neurology, , Fondazione IRCCS "Casa Sollievo Della Sofferenza", San Giovanni Rotondo, Foggia, Italy
| | - Alicia Alpuente
- Headache Unit, Department of Neurology, Vall D'Hebron University, Barcelona, Spain.,Headache and Neurological Pain Research Group, Vall D'Hebron Institute of Research (VHIR), Department of Medicine, Universitat Autonoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Antonio Russo
- Headache Center, Department of Medical, Surgical, Neurological, Metabolic, and Aging Sciences, University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli", Naples, Italy
| | - Marcello Silvestro
- Headache Center, Department of Medical, Surgical, Neurological, Metabolic, and Aging Sciences, University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli", Naples, Italy
| | - Sabina Cevoli
- IRCCS Istituto Delle Scienze Neurologiche Di Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Nicoletta Brunelli
- Headache and Neurosonology Unit, Campus Bio-Medico University Hospital, Rome, Italy
| | - Fabrizio Vernieri
- Headache and Neurosonology Unit, Campus Bio-Medico University Hospital, Rome, Italy
| | - Licia Grazzi
- Headache Center, Neuroalgology Department, IRCCS Foundation "Carlo Besta" Neurological Institute, via Celoria, 11, 20133, Milan, Italy
| | - Carlo Baraldi
- Department of Biomedical, Metabolic and Neural Sciences, Medical Toxicology, Headache and Drug Abuse Research Center, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy
| | - Simona Guerzoni
- Department of Biomedical, Metabolic and Neural Sciences, Medical Toxicology, Headache and Drug Abuse Research Center, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy
| | - Anna P Andreou
- Headache Service, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Giorgio Lambru
- Headache Service, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Ilaria Frattale
- Child Neurology and Psychiatry Unit, Systems Medicine Department, Tor Vergata University, Rome, Italy
| | - Katharina Kamm
- Department of Neurology, Ludwig Maximilians University München, Munich, Germany
| | - Ruth Ruscheweyh
- Department of Neurology, Ludwig Maximilians University München, Munich, Germany
| | - Marco Russo
- Headache Center, Neurology Unit, Neuromotor and Rehabilitation Department, Azienda USL-IRCCS Di Reggio Emilia, Reggio Emilia, Italy
| | | | - Elena Filatova
- Department of Neurology, Institute for Postgraduate Education, Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University (Sechenov University), Moscow, Russia
| | - Nina Latysheva
- Department of Neurology, Institute for Postgraduate Education, Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University (Sechenov University), Moscow, Russia
| | | | - Marcin Straburzynski
- Headache Clinic, Terapia Neurologiczna Samodzielni, Maurycego Mochnackiego 10, 02-042, Warsaw, Poland
| | - Calogera Butera
- Neurophysiology Service, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Bruno Colombo
- Neurology Unit, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Massimo Filippi
- Neurophysiology Service, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy.,Neurology Unit, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy.,Neurorehabilitation Unit, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Patricia Pozo-Rosich
- Headache Unit, Department of Neurology, Vall D'Hebron University, Barcelona, Spain.,Headache and Neurological Pain Research Group, Vall D'Hebron Institute of Research (VHIR), Department of Medicine, Universitat Autonoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Paolo Martelletti
- Department of Clinical and Molecular Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Psychology, Sant'Andrea Hospital, Sapienza University, 00189, Rome, RM, Italy
| | - Simona Sacco
- Neuroscience Section, Department of Applied Clinical Sciences and Biotechnology, University of L'Aquila, Via Vetoio 1 Coppito, 67100, L'Aquila, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Affiliation(s)
- Paolo Martelletti
- Department of Clinical and Molecular Medicine, Sapienza University, Rome, Italy.,Emergency Medicine Unit, Regional Referral Headache Center, Sant'Andrea University Hospital, Rome, Italy
| | - Michelangelo Luciani
- Emergency Medicine Unit, Regional Referral Headache Center, Sant'Andrea University Hospital, Rome, Italy
| | - Valerio Spuntarelli
- Emergency Medicine Unit, Regional Referral Headache Center, Sant'Andrea University Hospital, Rome, Italy
| | - Enrico Bentivegna
- Emergency Medicine Unit, Regional Referral Headache Center, Sant'Andrea University Hospital, Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Kaytser V, Zhang P. Non-interacting, Non-opioid, and Non-barbiturate Containing Acute Medication Combinations in Headache: A Pilot Combinatorics Approach Based on DrugBank Database. Front Neurol 2021; 12:632830. [PMID: 33679591 PMCID: PMC7925628 DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2021.632830] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/24/2020] [Accepted: 01/25/2021] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: Polypharmacy in abortive medications is often inevitable for patients with refractory headaches. Objective: We seek to enumerate an exhaustive list of headaches abortive medications that are without drug-drug interactions. Methods: We updated a list of acute medications based on the widely used Jefferson Headache Manual with novel abortive medications including ubrogepant, lasmiditan, and rimegepant. Opioids and barbiturate-containing products are excluded. From this resultant list of medications, we then conducted an exhaustive search of all pair-wise interactions via DrugBank's API. Using this interaction list, we filtered all possible two, three, and four drug combinations of abortive medications. The list of medications was then reapplied to DrugBank to verify the lack of known drug-drug interactions. Results: There are 192 medication combinations that do not contain any drug-drug interactions. Most common elements in these combinations are ubrogepant, prochlorperazine, followed by tizanidine. There are 67 three-drug combinations that do not contain interactions. Only two of the four-drug combinations do not yield some form of drug-drug interactions. Conclusion: This list of headaches abortive medications without drug-drug interactions is a useful tool for clinicians seeking to more effectively manage refractory headaches by implementing a rational polypharmacy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Victor Kaytser
- Department of Neurology, Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, New Brunswick, NJ, United States
| | - Pengfei Zhang
- Department of Neurology, Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, New Brunswick, NJ, United States
| |
Collapse
|