Improving the safety of intravenous iron treatments for patients with chronic kidney disease

Hypersensitive Reactions During Hemodialysis Treatment: What Do We Need to Know?

Kidney replacement therapies (KRTs) including hemodialysis (HD) are one of the treatment options for most of the patients with end-stage kidney disease. Although HD is vital for these patients, it is not hundred percent physiological, and various adverse events including hypersensitivity reactions may occur. Fortunately, these reactions are rare in total and less when compared to previous decades, but it is still very important for at least two reasons: First, the number of patients receiving kidney replacement treatment is increasing globally; and the cumulative number of these reactions may be substantial. Second, although most of these reactions are mild, some of them may be very severe and even lead to mortality. Thus, it is very important to have basic knowledge and skills to diagnose and treat these reactions. Hypersensitivity reactions can occur at any component of dialysis machinery (access, extracorporeal circuit, medications, etc.). The most important preventive measure is to avoid the allergen. However, even with very specific test, sometimes the allergen cannot be found. In mild conditions, HD can be contained with non-specific treatment (topical creams, antihistaminics, corticosteroids). In more severe conditions, treatment must be stopped immediately, blood should not be returned to patient, drugs must be stopped, and rules of general emergency treatment must be followed.

The differential effect of modern intravenous iron on fibroblast growth factor 23 and phosphate in non-dialysis dependent CKD - the exploratory randomized controlled double-blind ExplorIRON-CKD study

BACKGROUND

Intravenous iron is commonly used in patients with non-dialysis-dependent chronic kidney disease (CKD). Modern intravenous iron compounds (e.g. ferric derisomaltose (FDI), ferric carboxymaltose (FCM)) are increasingly utilized with similar efficacy. A differential effect in terms of hypophosphatemia has been noted following administration of FCM, which may be related to fibroblast growth factor 23 (FGF23). This study was designed to examine the comparative effects of FDI and FCM on FGF23, phosphate and other markers of bone turnover.

METHODS

The single-center double-blind randomized controlled trial "Iron and Phosphaturia - ExplorIRON-CKD" primarily assessed the effects of FCM and FDI on intact FGF23 and phosphate, whilst also studying the impact on vitamin D, parathyroid hormone and phosphaturia. Bone markers including alkaline phosphatase, bone-specific alkaline phosphatase, procollagen type 1 N-terminal propeptide and carboxy-terminal collagen cross-linked telopeptide were monitored. Non-dialysis-dependent CKD patients (stage 3a-5) with iron deficiency with/without anemia (serum ferritin < 200 µg/L or transferrin saturation = 20% and serum ferritin 200-299 µg/L) were randomized to receive FDI or FCM in a 1:1 ratio. At baseline 1000 mg of intravenous iron was administered followed by 500-1000 mg at 1 month to achieve replenishment. Measurements were performed at baseline, 1-2 days following iron administration, 2 weeks, 1 month (second iron administration), 1-2 days following second administration, 2 months and 3 months following initial infusion.

RESULTS

Twenty-six patients participated in the trial; 14 randomized to FDI and 12 to FCM. Intact FGF23 increased following administration of iron, and the increase was significantly higher with FCM compared to FDI (Baseline to 1-2 days following 1st administration: FDI: 3.0 (IQR: - 15.1 - 13.8) % vs. FCM: 146.1 (IQR: 108.1-203.1) %; p < 0.001 and Baseline to 1-2 days following 2nd administration: FDI: 3.2 (IQR: - 3.5 - 25.4) % vs. FCM: 235.1 (138.5-434.6) %; p = 0.001). Phosphate levels decreased in the FCM group, causing a significant difference versus FDI 2 weeks following administration of the first dose. A significantly greater decrease in 1,25 (OH)2 Vitamin D was noted with FCM. Several markers of bone turnover significantly changed following administration of FCM but not FDI.

CONCLUSIONS

The study suggests a differential effect on FGF23 following administration of FCM compared to FDI in non-dialysis-dependent CKD patients, similar to other patient groups. This may lead to changes consistent with hypovitaminosis D and alterations in bone turnover with potential clinical consequences. Further definitive studies are required to understand these differences of intravenous iron compounds.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

European Union Drug Regulating Authorities Clinical Trials Database (EudraCT) number: 2019-004370-26 ( https://www.clinicaltrialsregister.eu/ctr-search/trial/2019-004370-26/GB ) (First date of trial registration: 03/12/2019).

Use of iron in perinatal anaemia: Indications for women’s health care policies and procedure

This paper reviews management of obstetric anaemia and the role of intravenous iron for the treatment of obstetric anaemia. Red blood cell transfusions are routinely used for haemoglobin restoration in anaemic women. The decision for red blood cell transfusion is made on a combination of haemoglobin level and clinical status, and it is suggested that transfusions are not necessary in those who are well compensated or when alternative therapy is available. To reduce the risk, intravenous iron infusion is proposed as a bloodless therapeutic approach. There are a variety of iron preparations. Intravenous iron infusion can reduce the requirement for blood transfusion in hemodynamically stable women with perinatal anaemia, especially in resource-scarce settings. It a cost-effective bloodless approach for the treatment of anaemia than can enhance patient outcomes. According to the literature, when haemoglobin is greater than 90 g/L, blood transfusion is not often required. In perinatal women with anaemia, the decision whether to administer blood or iron is based on patient preferences, haemoglobin levels, clinical symptoms, past and present medical conditions and the clinician’s judgement. Nevertheless, due to the lack of rigid criteria for blood transfusions in the majority of clinical settings, it is considered the default treatment for anaemia in perinatal women.

Methodology and Baseline Data of a Comparative Exploratory Double-Blinded Randomized Study of Intravenous Iron on Fibroblast Growth Factor 23 and Phosphate in Chronic Kidney Disease

Modern intravenous iron compounds (e.g., ferric carboxymaltose [FCM] and ferric derisomaltose [FDI]) are utilized in the treatment of iron deficiency anemia in non-dialysis-dependent chronic kidney disease (ND-CKD). Product-specific alterations in the metabolism of fibroblast growth factor 23 (FGF-23) leading to hypophosphatemia have been described for certain intravenous iron compounds, such as FCM, with potential effects on bone and cardiovascular health and quality of life. No prior head-to-head comparison between FCM and FDI exists in ND-CKD. This single-center exploratory double-blind randomized controlled trial primarily aimed to investigate the differential impact of FCM and FDI on FGF-23 and phosphate in patients with iron deficiency +/- anemia and ND-CKD (stages 3a-5 - serum ferritin <200 μg/L or serum ferritin 200-299 μg/L and transferrin saturation <20%). Patients were randomized (1:1) to receive either FCM or FDI over two infusions (1 month apart). Follow-up was 3 months. Measurements of serum intact FGF-23, phosphate, vitamin D metabolites, parathyroid hormone, other bone metabolism, cardiovascular, and quality of life markers were monitored. 168 patients were prescreened. Thirty-five patients were screened; 26 patients were randomized. The mean (standard deviation) age was 67.9 (12.4) years and 17 participants were male. Most participants had stage 4 CKD (median [interquartile range] estimated glomerular filtration rate [eGFR]: 18.0 [11.3] mL/min/1.73 m2). A higher than normal median (interquartile range) level of intact FGF-23 (212.1 [116.4] pg/mL) was noted. Serum phosphate was within normal range, while parathyroid hormone was higher and 1,25 (OH)2 vitamin D lower than the normal range. The "Iron and Phosphaturia - ExplorIRON-CKD" trial will provide important information regarding the differential effect of intravenous iron products in terms of FGF-23, phosphate, and other markers of bone and cardiovascular metabolism, alongside patient-reported outcome measures in patients with ND-CKD.

Prevalence of Iron Deficiency Anemia Indicated for Intravenous Iron Treatment in the Korean Population

We aimed to investigate the number and prevalence of patients indicated for intravenous iron treatment in a large Korean population using criteria based on laboratory test results in an effort to extract indirect information on the need for intravenous iron treatment. Between 1 January 2019 and 31 December 2021, a total of 83,994 Korean patients (30,499 men and 53,495 women) with a median age of 46 years (interquartile range, 30-61) were evaluated using iron deficiency anemia-associated laboratory tests and serum creatinine tests of estimated glomerular filtration rates. The overall prevalence of anemia (Hb ≤ 11 g/dL) was 16.5%, and the proportion of patients with possible chronic kidney disease who had an estimated glomerular filtration rate < 60 mL/min/1.73 m² was 11.4%. The number of patients indicated for reimbursable intravenous iron treatment was higher in women than in men, higher in older patients, and higher in 2021 than in 2019 (all p < 0.001). The prevalence of patients indicated for reimbursable intravenous iron treatment was up to 30.0% in those ≥ 80 years of age in 2019. The results of this study provide basic knowledge about the use of iron deficiency anemia-associated laboratory tests in planning nutritional support programs using an intravenous iron formulation in Korea.

Markers of Oxidative Stress, Inflammation and Endothelial Function following High-Dose Intravenous Iron in Patients with Non-Dialysis-Dependent Chronic Kidney Disease-A Pooled Analysis

Chronic kidney disease (CKD) represents a state of oxidative stress imbalance, which is potentially amplified by iron deficiency. Intravenous iron is considered safe and efficacious in the treatment of iron deficiency anemia, however, concerns remain regarding its potential pro-oxidant effect, leading to inflammatory and endothelial consequences. This pooled analysis of two pilot randomized controlled trials aimed to group and analyze the potential effect of high-dose intravenous iron (ferric derisomaltose, 1000 mg) on markers of oxidative stress (thiobarbituric acid reactive substance), inflammation (C-reactive protein, interleukins 6 and 10) and endothelial response (E-selectin, P-selectin) in patients with non-dialysis-dependent CKD and iron deficiency with/without anemia. Pulse wave velocity as a surrogate measure of arterial stiffness was measured. Thirty-six patients were included. No statistically significant trend was identified for any of the aforementioned markers. Stratification and comparison of data based on CKD stage did not yield statistically significant trajectories with the exception of the C-reactive protein in CKD stage 3b. These results suggest that high-dose intravenous iron does not impact measures of oxidative stress or inflammation; however, the results are not conclusive. Further research in a larger cohort is necessary to characterize the effect of intravenous iron on oxidative status and inflammation and its potential sequela in CKD.

Safety of Intravenous Iron in CKD Stage 3-5 Patients Not on Dialysis: A Retrospective Cohort Study

Background

Iron deficiency is common in chronic kidney disease (CKD) patients not on dialysis (ND). Restoring depleted iron stores through intravenous (IV) route is faster and associated with less side effects. There is conflicting data regarding intravenous iron use and its impact on clinical outcomes in this population.

Objective

This study aims at evaluating any negative clinical impact associated with IV iron use in CKD patients at stages (3-5) before dialysis.

Design

Retrospective chart review.

Setting and Population

Chart analysis of ND CKD 3-5 (estimated glomerular filtration rate [eGFR] <60 mL/min/1.73 m²) patients who received IV iron between January 2013 and January 2018 in 3 major hospitals in Kuwait.

Methods

Outcomes analyzed were rates of all-cause hospitalizations, infection-related hospitalizations, mortality rates, and eGFR decline over 12 months after IV iron infusion in this population divided into 3 groups according to CKD stage.

Results

A total of 738 patients were included in our analysis. Mean initial hemoglobin concentration was 111.5 ± 15.0 g/L in group 1 (CKD 3: eGFR 30-59 mL/min/1.73 m²), 103.6 ± 17.7 g/L in group 2 (CKD 4: eGFR 15-29 mL/min/1.73 m²), and 99.4 ± 14.5 g/L in group 3 (CKD 5: eGFR < 15 mL/min/1.73 m² but not on dialysis). All-cause hospitalization and infection-related hospitalization were more common among group 3 subjects (adjusted odds ratio =2.12 [95% confidence interval, CI: 1.32-3.41] and 2.02 [95% CI: 1.15-3.55]), respectively. No deaths occurred during 12 months of follow-up.

Limitations

Lack of control group, retrospective study.

Conclusion

Intravenous iron use in CKD 3-5 ND is generally safe. Higher hospitalization rates in patients with eGFR <30 mL/min are possibly associated with lower baseline hemoglobin, lower baseline eGFR, and higher comorbidity burden, and not related to iron infusion.

Analysis of oxidative stress, inflammation and endothelial function following intravenous iron in chronic kidney disease in the Iron and Heart Trial

Iron deficiency commonly affects patients with chronic kidney disease and has an important burden in disease trajectory and quality of life; nonetheless current guidelines do not advocate treatment of iron-deficiency without anemia in this patient group. Concerns exist regarding the potential effects of intravenous iron on oxidative stress, inflammation, and endothelial function. As part of a multicenter double-blinded randomized controlled clinical trial, we examined the effects of a single dose of intravenous iron vs. placebo on biomarkers of oxidative stress, inflammation and endothelial function in non-anemic iron deficient patients (serum ferritin < 100 μg/L and/or transferrin saturation < 20%) with chronic kidney disease (stage 3b-5). Fifty-four individuals were randomized to receive ferric derisomaltose (n = 26) or placebo (n = 28). Ferric derisomaltose was associated with a non-significant decrease in mean F2-isoprostane and no effect on thiobarbituric acid reactive substances when compared to placebo throughout follow up. No effect on inflammatory markers was observed. A modest but statistically significant rise in E-selectin was noted in the intravenous iron group at 1 month and 3 month follow-up (p = 0.030 and p = 0.002 respectively). These results suggest ferric derisomaltose administration in non-dialysis dependent chronic kidney disease patients who are iron deficient does not induce prolonged oxidative stress or inflammation. Larger trials are required to quantify the benefit of intravenous iron administration in this patient group.

Iron deficiency anaemia: pathophysiology, assessment, practical management

The WHO has recognised iron deficiency anaemia (IDA) as the most common nutritional deficiency in the world, with 30% of the population being affected with this condition. Although the most common causes of IDA are gastrointestinal bleeding and menstruation in women, decreased dietary iron and decreased iron absorption are also culpable causes. Patients with IDA should be treated with the aim of replenishing iron stores and returning the haemoglobin to a normal level. This has shown to improve quality of life, morbidity, prognosis in chronic disease and outcomes in pregnancy. Iron deficiency occurs in many chronic inflammatory conditions, including congestive cardiac failure, chronic kidney disease and inflammatory bowel disease. This article will provide an updated overview on diagnosis and management of IDA in patients with chronic conditions, preoperative and in pregnancy. We will discuss the benefits and limitations of oral versus intravenous iron replacement in each cohort, with an overview on cost analysis between the different iron formulations currently on the market.

Treatment of Iron Deficiency Anemia in CKD and End-Stage Kidney Disease

Iron deficiency is common in individuals with chronic kidney disease and plays a major role in the development of anemia. Oral and intravenous iron agents are both available to replete iron in patients with chronic kidney disease diagnosed with iron deficiency. The choice of which agent to use is most often dictated by goals of therapy, tolerability, convenience, and response to prior therapy. Diminished absorption of iron in the gastrointestinal tract and a high incidence of gastrointestinal adverse effects can reduce the efficacy of oral iron agents, necessitating the use of i.v. iron formulations to treat iron deficiency anemia, particularly in patients requiring kidney replacement therapy. Newer oral agents may help to overcome these limitations and help treat iron deficiency in those not requiring kidney replacement therapy. Recent studies have provided new evidence that more aggressive repletion of iron in patients with chronic kidney disease requiring kidney replacement therapy may provide benefits with respect to anemia management and hard clinical outcomes such as cardiovascular disease and survival.

The Impact of Intravenous Iron Supplementation on Hematinic Parameters and Erythropoietin Requirements in Hemodialysis Patients

INTRODUCTION

Anemia is one of the most common complications of chronic kidney disease (CKD). As a result of the side effects of high doses of recombinant human erythropoietin (rhEPO) and the differences in the standard dose of the injectable iron, this study aimed to evaluate the effect of high and low intravenous iron supplementation on hematinic parameters and EPO requirements in patients under hemodialysis.

METHODS

This multicenter, randomized, double-blind clinical trial was conducted on 60 patients with CKD admitted to Sina and 29 Bahman hospitals in Tabriz, Iran in 2019-2020 to undergo hemodialysis. In the two studied groups, low (100 mg/week) and high (400 mg/week) doses of iron were administered and subjects were followed up for 6 months. The incidence of acute myocardial ischemia, stroke, and mortality during 6 months was recorded.

RESULTS

The required rhEPO dosage (mg/week) to maintain hemoglobin levels between 10 and 12 g/dL in the high-dose iron group was significantly decreased during the follow-up period (52,129.03 ± 23,810 vs. 45,760 ± 20,978.71, P ≤ 0.028). Transferrin saturation (TSAT) index had a significant upward trend after iron injection and significant correlations with the serum levels of Fe (r ≥ 0.353, P ≤ 0.007), ferritin (r ≥ 0.315, P ≤ 0.016), and total iron binding capacity (r ≥ 0.219, P < 0.050) during the follow-up period in the studied groups.

CONCLUSION

High-dose intravenous iron (400 mg/week) can reduce the mean dose of rhEPO requirements and increase the TSAT index over a period of 6 months in hemodialysis patients. High-dose IV iron administration can decrease cardiovascular events in hemodialysis patients with iron deficiency anemia.

Hypophosphataemia, fibroblast growth factor 23 and third-generation intravenous iron compounds: a narrative review

Third-generation intravenous (i.v.) iron preparations are safe and efficacious and are increasingly used in the treatment of iron-deficiency anaemia. Hypophosphataemia is emerging as an established side-effect following the administration of certain compounds. Symptoms of hypophosphataemia can be masked by their similarity to those of iron-deficiency anaemia and both acute and chronic hypophosphataemia can be detrimental. Hypophosphataemia appears to be linked to imbalances in the metabolism of the phosphatonin fibroblast growth factor 23. In this narrative review, we discuss the possible pathophysiology behind this phenomenon, the studies comparing third-generation i.v. iron compounds, and the potential implications of the changes in fibroblast growth factor 23 and hypophosphataemia. We also present an algorithm of how to approach such patients requiring i.v. iron in anticipation of hypophosphataemia and how the impact related to it can be minimized.