Maternal and neonatal morbidity after elective repeat Cesarean delivery versus a trial of labor after previous Cesarean delivery in a community teaching hospital

Delivery after a previous cesarean section reviewed

At the start of the 20th century, cesarean section (CS) was uncommon in obstetrics. By the end of the century, CS rates had increased dramatically worldwide. Although the explanation for the increase is multifactorial, a major driver in the ongoing escalation is the increase in women who are delivered by repeat CS. This is due, in part, to the fact that there has been a sharp fall in vaginal birth after CS (VBAC) rates as fewer women are offered a trial of labor after CS (TOLAC), due principally to fears of a catastrophic intrapartum uterine rupture. This paper reviewed international VBAC policies and trends. A number of themes emerged. The risk of intrapartum rupture and its associated complications is low and may sometimes be overestimated. Individual maternity hospitals in both developed and developing countries are inadequately resourced to safely supervise a TOLAC. Efforts to mitigate the risks of TOLAC by careful patient selection and good clinical practices may be underutilized. Given the serious short-term and long-term consequences of rising CS rates for women and for maternity services generally, a review of TOLAC policies worldwide should be prioritized and consideration given to convening a Global Consensus Development Conference on Delivery after CS.

Cesarean delivery and metabolic health and inflammation biomarkers during mid-childhood and early adolescence

BACKGROUND

We assessed differences in plasma levels of metabolic health and inflammation biomarkers during mid-childhood and early adolescence between children born by cesarean section vs. vaginal delivery.

METHODS

Mother-child pairs (N = 942) enrolled during pregnancy in obstetric practices and child follow-up started at birth. Risk biomarkers were assessed in blood samples collected at the mild-childhood (median = 7 years) and early adolescence (median = 13 years) in-person visits.

RESULTS

Two hundred and six children (22%) were born by cesarean section. There were no significant differences in biomarker levels between children born by cesarean and children born vaginally in mid-childhood. However, adolescents born by cesarean section had significantly lower adiponectin [% difference (95% confidence interval (CI)) = -11.3 (-18.1, -4.0) µg/mL] compared to vaginal delivery. We also found some suggestion of higher insulin resistance [insulin levels % difference (95% CI) = 11.5 (-0.40, 25.0) µU/mL and HOMA-IR (homeostatic model assessment of insulin resistance) % difference (95% CI) = 9.1 (-2.30, 21.8) U] in adolescents born by cesarean section compared to those born vaginally.

CONCLUSIONS

We found suggestive evidence that adolescents born by cesarean section show differences in certain metabolic health biomarkers relative to adolescents born by vaginal delivery. Further studies are needed to reevaluate these associations since the clinical significance of these differences is unclear.

IMPACT

Multiple studies show that children born by cesarean section are at higher risk of obesity compared to those born vaginally. It is unclear yet to what extent this elevated risk may extend to a more adverse profile of biomarkers of metabolic health and inflammation. Adolescents born by cesarean section show small differences in adiponectin and insulin relative to adolescents born by vaginal delivery. Adolescents born by cesarean section may be at higher risk to a more adverse profile of biomarkers of metabolic health and inflammation, but the clinical significance of these differences is uncertain.

Association of Mode of Obstetric Delivery With Child and Adolescent Body Composition

IMPORTANCE

Although the literature on the association between birth by cesarean delivery and children's anthropometry has continued to increase, only a few studies have examined the association of cesarean delivery with measures of body composition assessed using dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA), which allows the differentiation of fat and lean mass overall and in specific regions of the body.

OBJECTIVE

To investigate whether differences exist in DXA-measured body composition between children and adolescents born by cesarean delivery and those born by vaginal delivery.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS

This prospective cohort study included singleton children of mothers enrolled between April 1999 and July 2002 in Project Viva, a longitudinal prebirth cohort of mother-child pairs in Massachusetts. The children had at least 1 DXA scan at a follow-up visit during middle childhood (2007-2010) and/or early adolescence (2013-2016). Data analysis was performed from October 16, 2020, to May 9, 2021.

EXPOSURES

Mode of delivery (cesarean vs vaginal).

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

Total lean mass index, total and truncal fat mass indexes, visceral adipose tissue (VAT), subcutaneous abdominal adipose tissue, and total abdominal adipose tissue (TAAT) were estimated using DXA. Multivariable linear regression models were used to estimate the association between mode of delivery and DXA-derived outcomes with adjustment for confounders. Stabilized inverse probability weights were used to control for potential selection bias owing to loss to follow-up.

RESULTS

A total of 975 mother-child pairs were included in the study. The mean (SD) maternal age at study entry was 32.0 (5.5) years, and the mean (SD) self-reported prepregnancy body mass index (BMI; calculated as weight in kilograms divided by height in meters squared) was 25.0 (5.4). Of the children included in the study, 491 (50%) were female; 212 (22%) were born by cesarean delivery and 763 (78%) by vaginal delivery. Body composition in middle childhood as measured by DXA did not differ by mode of delivery. In early adolescence, participants born by cesarean delivery had a significantly greater total lean mass index (β, 0.4; 95% CI, 0.0-0.7), total fat mass index (β, 0.6; 95% CI, 0.1-1.1), truncal fat mass index (β, 0.3; 95% CI, 0.0-0.5), VAT area (β, 4.7; 95% CI, 0.9-8.6), and TAAT area (β, 23.8; 95% CI, 0.8-46.8) in a model adjusted for child sex and age at the time of DXA measurements; maternal age, educational level, race and ethnicity, total gestational weight gain, and smoking status during pregnancy; birth-weight-per-gestational-age z score; and paternal BMI. Associations between mode of delivery and measures of adiposity were found for cesarean deliveries performed in the absence of labor (total fat mass index: β, 1.3; 95% CI, 0.3-2.3; truncal fat mass index: β, 0.6; 95% CI, 0.1-1.0; VAT area: β, 10.7; 95% CI, 3.1-18.3; TAAT area: β, 47.3; 95% CI, 2.3-92.2). There were no associations after adjustment for maternal self-reported prepregnancy BMI (total lean mass index: β, 0.2; 95% CI, -0.1 to 0.6; total fat mass index: β, 0.4; 95% CI, -0.1 to 0.9; truncal fat mass index: β, 0.2; 95% CI, -0.1 to 0.4; VAT area: β, 3.0; 95% CI, -0.6 to 6.7; TAAT area: β, 13.6; 95% CI, -8.2 to 35.3).

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

In this cohort study, adolescents born by cesarean delivery had significantly higher measures of lean mass, fat mass, and central adiposity compared with those born by vaginal delivery, but associations did not remain after adjustment for the mothers' self-reported prepregnancy BMI. The findings suggest that the association between birth by cesarean delivery and adolescent adiposity may partly be explained by maternal self-reported prepregnancy BMI.

Common Complications of Cesarean Section During the Year 2017 in King Abdulaziz Medical City, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia

Cesarean section (CS) is one of the most well-known major obstetrics surgeries and one of the oldest operations in the area of abdominal surgery. It is used for the purpose of delivering the newborn and the placenta through the abdominal wall incision (laparotomy) as well as Uterine incision (hysterotomy), followed by suture of the uterus and abdominal wall layers. Most common maternal complications internationally, according to literature were bleeding and wound infection. Most common fetal complications according to the literature were depressed Appearance, Pulse, Grimace, Activity, and Respiration (APGAR) score, low blood pH and ICU admissions. The aim of this study is to determine the most common CS complications among all the deliveries at King Abdulaziz Medical City (KAMC) in Jeddah in 2017 and to estimate maternal and fetal complication rates following CS. Comparing the rate of complication between residents and non-residents physicians performing a CS was tested as a secondary outcome. To the best of our knowledge, this is a novel research in this medical center at KAMC Jeddah that will aid in quality improvement in both clinical services and training activities of residents. The maternal and fetal complication rates were assessed in a cross-sectional chart review study. In order for this method to be achieved, a secondary data collection sheet was constructed to collect all eligible patient health records. This literature review was based on estimating the rate of CS complications for the mothers and their neonates that founded approximately 7% and 6%, respectively, where the procedure was either performed electively or emergently within the period of 1 January to 31 December 2017. Also, all patients with medical and surgical conditions were included while intrauterine fetal death was excluded. The most common maternal complications documented in our population were bleeding and wound extension, while the most common fetal complications were low APGAR score and NICU admissions. No statistical significance was found in either complications in terms of the correlation between demographical factors, maternal health conditions and gravida status. As for the secondary objective, the association between operator level of training and rate of complications revealed a higher percentage rate of maternal and fetal complications among consultants, which were 6.2% and 8.2%, respectively, mainly because the number and complexity of their cases in comparison to cases held by residents and others.

Association of Birth by Cesarean Delivery With Obesity and Type 2 Diabetes Among Adult Women

Importance

Cesarean delivery is associated with an increased risk of childhood obesity in offspring. However, whether this increased risk also includes obesity-associated conditions remains unclear.

Objective

To evaluate the association of birth by cesarean delivery with offspring's risks of obesity and type 2 diabetes in adulthood.

Design, Setting, and Participants

This prospective cohort study compared the incidence of obesity and type 2 diabetes between birth by cesarean delivery and vaginal delivery among 33 226 women participating in the Nurses' Health Study II who were born between 1946 and 1964, with follow-up through the end of the 2013-2015 follow-up cycle. Participants' mothers provided information on mode of delivery and pregnancy characteristics. Participants provided information every 2 years on weight and diagnosis of type 2 diabetes. Relative risks of obesity and type 2 diabetes were estimated using log-binomial and proportional hazards regression accounting for maternal body mass index and other confounding factors. Statistical analysis was performed from June 2017 to December 2019.

Exposure

Birth by cesarean delivery compared with birth by vaginal delivery.

Main Outcomes and Measures

Risk of obesity and incidence of type 2 diabetes.

Results

At baseline, the participants' mean (SD) age was 33.8 (4.6) years (range, 24.0-44.0 years). A total of 1089 of the 33 226 participants (3.3%) were born by cesarean delivery. After 1 913 978 person-years of follow-up, 12 156 (36.6%) women were obese and 2014 (6.1%) had received a diagnosis of type 2 diabetes. Women born by cesarean delivery were more likely to be classified as obese and to have received a diagnosis of type 2 diabetes during follow-up. The multivariable-adjusted relative risk of obesity among women born by cesarean vs vaginal delivery was 1.11 (95% CI, 1.03-1.19). The multivariable-adjusted hazard ratio for type 2 diabetes among women born by cesarean vs vaginal delivery was 1.46 (95% CI, 1.18-1.81); this association remained significant after additional adjustment for participant's own body mass index (relative risk, 1.34 [95% CI, 1.08-1.67]). These associations persisted when analyses were restricted to women at low risk of cesarean delivery based on maternal characteristics.

Conclusions and Relevance

This study suggests that women born by cesarean delivery may have a higher risk than women born by vaginal delivery of being obese and developing type 2 diabetes during adult life.

Vaginal birth after caesarean versus elective repeat caesarean delivery after one previous caesarean section: a cost-effectiveness analysis in four European countries

BACKGROUND

The OptiBIRTH study incorporates a multicentre cluster randomised trial in 15 hospital sites across three European countries. The trial was designed to test a complex intervention aimed at improving vaginal birth after caesarean section (VBAC) rates through increasing women's involvement in their care. Prior to developing a robust standardised model to conduct the health economic analysis, an analysis of a hypothetical cohort was performed to estimate the costs and health effects of VBAC compared to elective repeat caesarean delivery (ERCD) for low-risk women in four European countries.

METHODS

A decision-analytic model was developed to estimate the costs and the health effects, measured using Quality Adjusted Life Years (QALYs), of VBAC compared with ERCD. A cost-effectiveness analysis for the period from confirmation of pregnancy to 6 weeks postpartum was performed for short-term consequences and during lifetime for long-term consequences, based on a hypothetical cohort of 100,000 pregnant women in each of four different countries; Belgium, Germany, Ireland and Italy. A societal perspective was adopted. Where possible, transition probabilities, costs and health effects were adapted from national data obtained from the respective countries. Country-specific thresholds were used to determine the cost-effectiveness of VBAC compared to ERCD. Deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were conducted to examine the uncertainty of model assumptions.

RESULTS

Within a 6-week time horizon, VBAC resulted in a reduction in costs, ranging from €3,334,052 (Germany) to €66,162,379 (Ireland), and gains in QALYs ranging from 6399 (Italy) to 7561 (Germany) per 100,000 women birthing in each country. Compared to ERCD, VBAC is the dominant strategy in all four countries. Applying a lifetime horizon, VBAC is dominant compared to ERCD in all countries except for Germany (probabilistic analysis, ICER: €8609/QALY). In conclusion, compared to ERCD, VBAC remains cost-effective when using a lifetime time.

CONCLUSIONS

In all four countries, VBAC was cost-effective compared to ERCD for low-risk women. This is important for health service managers, economists and policy makers concerned with maximising health benefits within limited and constrained resources.

Neonatal outcomes following a trial of labor after Caesarean delivery: a population-based study

PURPOSE

To evaluate the neonatal effects of trial of labor after Caesarean (TOLAC) births.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective population-based cohort study using the CDC's Period Linked Birth/Infant Death Public Use File (2011-2013) on women with a live singleton pregnancy and prior Caesarean delivery. Multivariate logistic regression compared neonatal outcomes between women who underwent a TOLAC with women who did not. Secondary analysis compared outcomes of birth with uterine rupture to those without.

RESULTS

A total of 1,036,554 births met inclusion criteria, of which 17.5% underwent TOLAC. Women who had a TOLAC were more likely to deliver infants requiring neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) admission (odds ratios (OR) 1.12, 95%CI 1.09-1.16) and assisted ventilation (OR 1.07, 95%CI 1.03-1.12). Among women with TOLAC, 0.18% of births were in context of a uterine rupture and those neonates had an increased risk of NICU admissions (OR 5.95, 95%CI 4.56-7.76), assisted ventilation (OR 8.89, 95%CI 6.73-11.75), seizures (OR 91.66, 95%CI 42.23-198.93), and death (OR 16.28, 95%CI 5.09-52.08).

CONCLUSIONS

Neonatal morbidity appears slightly increased among women with a TOLAC. However, morbidity and mortality are considerably increased in cases of uterine rupture. Appropriate selection and counseling of women for TOLAC should be undertaken as to minimize uterine rupture risk.

Association Between Cesarean Birth and Risk of Obesity in Offspring in Childhood, Adolescence, and Early Adulthood

IMPORTANCE

Cesarean birth has been associated with higher risk of obesity in offspring, but previous studies have focused primarily on childhood obesity and have been hampered by limited control for confounders.

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the association between cesarean birth and risk of obesity in offspring.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS

A prospective cohort study was conducted from September 1, 1996, to December 31, 2012, among participants of the Growing Up Today Study, including 22 068 offspring born to 15 271 women, followed up via questionnaire from ages 9 to 14 through ages 20 to 28 years. Data analysis was conducted from October 10, 2015, to June 14, 2016.

EXPOSURE

Birth by cesarean delivery.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

Risk of obesity based on International Obesity Task Force or World Health Organization body mass index cutoffs, depending on age. Secondary outcomes included risks of obesity associated with changes in mode of delivery and differences in risk between siblings whose modes of birth were discordant.

RESULTS

Of the 22 068 offspring (20 950 white; 9359 male and 12 709 female), 4921 individuals (22.3%) were born by cesarean delivery. The cumulative risk of obesity through the end of follow-up was 13% among all participants. The adjusted risk ratio for obesity among offspring delivered via cesarean birth vs those delivered via vaginal birth was 1.15 (95% CI, 1.06-1.26; P = .002). This association was stronger among women without known indications for cesarean delivery (adjusted risk ratio, 1.30; 95% CI, 1.09-1.54; P = .004). Offspring delivered via vaginal birth among women who had undergone a previous cesarean delivery had a 31% (95% CI, 17%-47%) lower risk of obesity compared with those born to women with repeated cesarean deliveries. In within-family analysis, individuals born by cesarean delivery had 64% (8%-148%) higher odds of obesity than did their siblings born via vaginal delivery.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

Cesarean birth was associated with offspring obesity after accounting for major confounding factors. Although additional research is needed to clarify the mechanisms underlying this association, clinicians and patients should weigh this risk when considering cesarean delivery in the absence of a clear indication.

Prediction of successful trial of labor after cesarean - the benefit of prior vaginal delivery

OBJECTIVE

To determine predictive factors for vaginal birth after cesarean section (VBAC).

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study of all women with singleton pregnancies and a prior single low transverse cesarean section (CS) who attempted vaginal delivery in a tertiary hospital (2010-2014). Pregnancy outcome of women with VBAC was compared to those who failed vaginal delivery. Sub-analysis for women with no prior vaginal deliveries was performed. Pregnancies with non-cephalic presentation, estimated fetal weight >4000 g and any contraindications for vaginal delivery were excluded.

RESULTS

Of the 40 714 deliveries, 1767 women met inclusion criteria. Among them 1563 (88.5%) had a VBAC and 204 (11.5%) failed. There was no significant difference between the groups regarding maternal age, comorbidities and pregnancy complications. Predictors for VBAC were (odds ratio, 95% confidence interval) interval from prior CS (1.13, 1.04-1.22, p=0.004), previous VBAC (2.77, 1.60-4.78, p < 0.001), prior vaginal delivery prior to the CS (3.05, 1.73-5.39, p < 0.001) and induction of labor (0.62, 0.40-0.97, p = 0.03). For women with no prior vaginal birth, only birthweight was associated with VBAC (0.99, 0.99-1.00, p = 0.02).

CONCLUSION

While different variables may influence the rate of VBAC, the predictive ability of VBAC for women with no previous vaginal deliveries remains poor.

The cost-effectiveness of a trial of labor accrues with multiple subsequent vaginal deliveries

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to estimate costs and outcomes of subsequent trials of labor after cesarean delivery (TOLAC) compared with elective repeat cesarean deliveries (ERCD).

STUDY DESIGN

To compare TOLAC and ERCD, maternal and neonatal decision analytic models were built for each hypothetic subsequent delivery. We assumed that only women without previa would undergo TOLAC for their second delivery, that women with successful TOLAC would desire future TOLAC, and that women who chose ERCD would undergo subsequent ERCD. Main outcome measures were maternal and neonatal mortality and morbidity rates, direct costs, and quality-adjusted life years. Values were derived from the literature. One-way and Monte-Carlo sensitivity analyses were performed.

RESULTS

TOLAC was less costly and more effective for most models. A progression of decreasing incremental cost and increasing incremental effectiveness of TOLAC was found for maternal outcomes with increasing numbers of subsequent deliveries. This progression was also displayed among neonatal outcomes and was most prominent when neonatal and maternal outcomes were combined, with an incremental cost and effectiveness of -$4700.00 and .073, respectively, for the sixth delivery. Net-benefit analysis showed an increase in the benefit of TOLAC with successive deliveries for all outcomes. The maternal model of the second delivery was sensitive to cost of delivery and emergent cesarean delivery. Successive maternal models became more robust, with the models of the third-sixth deliveries sensitive only to cost of delivery. Neonatal models were not sensitive to any variables.

CONCLUSION

Although nearly equally effective relative to ERCD for the second delivery, TOLAC becomes less costly and more effective with subsequent deliveries.

A critical review of vaginal birth rates after a primary Caesarean in Queensland hospitals

INTRODUCTION

For women with a lower uterine incision without indication for repeat Caesarean section (CS), vaginal birth for their next pregnancy is a safe option. Although these women should be encouraged to consider vaginal birth after a Caesarean section (VBAC) it is not consistently supported in practice. There is relatively little information on the extent to which maternal preference, birthing decisions and outcomes match best available evidence.

AIM

To describe current VBAC rates for women in Queensland, Australia and compare this to safe, achievable VBAC rates reported in national and international studies.

METHOD

Perinatal data from 2004 to 2011 were reviewed to determine current VBAC rates following a primary CS for women birthing in Queensland. These were compared with VBAC rates reported in the literature.

RESULTS

Queensland has a high overall CS rate and high repeat CS rate compared with the national average. In 2010, Queensland VBAC rates for next birth following primary CS were 14% (range 13-21% public sector, 7-11% private hospitals). This is substantially lower than achievable Australian rates of 24% and international rates.

CONCLUSION

Low VBAC rates reflect low numbers of women commencing labour in a pregnancy subsequent to a primary CS. There is unexplained variation in VBAC rates between maternity facilities. Clinical reviews to support evidence-based practice are warranted.

[Uterine ishtmique transmural hernia: results of its repair on symptoms and fertility]

OBJECTIVE

To study the effect of the surgical repair (isthmorraphy) of the large scar dehiscence after cesarean on symptoms and fertility for women who desire pregnancy.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

In this retrospective study, 14 symptomatic patients, who desire a new pregnancy underwent a surgical repair by laparotomy, laparoscopic or vaginal technique. Five women experienced failure of Assistance Reproductive Technique (IVF or ICSI) for idiopathic secondary infertility. The dehiscent scars were evaluated by ultrasound, hysterography, hysteroscopy and magnetic resonance imaging.

OUTCOME

Symptoms improvement was found in 92% of case. Ten pregnancy (71%) was obtained after surgical repair, 6 spontaneous and 4 after Assistance Reproductive Technique. Among the 5 women initially followed in the reproductive unit, 4 became pregnant, 3 after IVF or ICSI and 1 spontaneous. No operative complication occurred. The subsequent pregnancy was unremarkable with no uterine rupture.

DISCUSSION

Large scar defect after cesarean can take shape of a complete absent of the anterior wall of the uterus. No incident has been proved in this condition. There is a lack of data concerning these isthmocele. The experience of hysteroscopic repair cannot be applied to these real large diverticule of the scar cesarean. The results of this study suggest a link between the isthmocele and reversible symptoms after surgery. The first results concerning the subsequent fertility after surgical repair seem interesting

CONCLUSION

When a large scare defect (isthmocele) is found in symptomatic woman (pelvic pain, bleeding uterine, infertility), a surgical repair can be proposed, especially for woman who desire a new pregnancy.

[Benefits and harms to the newborn of maternal attempt at trial of labor after prior caesarean versus elective repeat caesarean delivery]

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate neonatal outcome after elective repeat cesarean delivery (ERCD) versus trial of labor (TOL) after previous cesarean delivery.

METHODS

This systematic evidence review is based on Pubmed search, Cochrane library and experts recommendations.

RESULTS

The risks of fetal, perinatal and neonatal mortality are low after previous cesarean delivery but significantly higher for TOL as compared with ERCD. The risk of bag-and-mask ventilation and intubation for meconium-stained amniotic fluid are higher for TOL as compared with ERCD. Infants born after ERCD are more likely presented transient tachypnea. The risk of hypoxic encephalopathy/asphyxia is low after previous cesarean delivery but significantly higher for TOL as compared with ERCD. The risk of neonatal sepsis after previous cesarean delivery is significantly higher for TOL as compared with ERCD. There is no significant difference between TOL or ERCD regarding NICU admission. The strength of evidence is low to conclude about the impact of route of delivery upon birth trauma and Apgar score.

CONCLUSIONS

The risk of the main neonatal complications is low whatever the route of delivery after previous caesarean delivery. However, the risk of perinatal mortality, bag-and-mask ventilation, perinatal asphyxia, is higher after TOL compared with ERCD. The risk of transient tachypnea is higher after ERCD compared with TOL.

[Management of pregnancies with a previous cesarean]

The cesarean rate in France has reached 21% in 2010. With a maintained fertility rate, management of a pregnant woman with a previous caesarean scar is becoming a daily situation for most obstetrical teams. Considering the small rate of vaginal birth after cesarean (VBAC), we will try to establish an up-to-date review of the benefits and risks of encouraging trial of VBAC. This information can help professionals provide adequate counselling women or couples.

Fetal and neonatal morbidity and mortality following delivery after previous cesarean

This article examines data from a recent systematic evidence review on term deliveries conducted for the National Institutes of Health Consensus Conference sponsored by the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality on vaginal birth after caesarean, from a meta-analysis of associated perinatal outcomes, and subsequent publications that meet stringent quality review standards. We present a summary of fetal and neonatal outcomes emphasizing information that clinicians and patients need to make decisions regarding mode of delivery after prior cesarean and look for areas where future studies may provide important insights.

Birth after previous cesarean delivery: short-term maternal outcomes

An estimated 40% of the 1.3 million cesarean deliveries performed each year in the United States are repeat procedures. The appropriate clinical management approach for women with previous cesarean delivery remains challenging because options are limited. The risks and benefits of clinical management choices in the woman's health need to be quantified. Thus, we discuss the available published scientific data on (1) the short-term maternal outcomes of trial of labor after cesarean and elective repeat cesarean delivery, (2) the differences between outcomes for both, (3) the important factors that influence these outcomes, and (4) successful vs. unsuccessful vaginal birth after cesarean. For women with a previous cesarean delivery, a successful trial of labor offers several distinct, consistently reproducible advantages compared with elective repeat cesarean delivery, including fewer hysterectomies, fewer thromboembolic events, lower blood transfusion rates, and shorter hospital stay. However, when trial of labor after cesarean fails, emergency cesarean is associated with increased uterine rupture, hysterectomy, operative injury, blood transfusion, endometritis, and longer hospital stay. Care of women with a history of previous cesarean delivery involves a confluence of interactions between medical and nonmedical factors; however, the most important determinants of the short-term outcomes among these women are likely individualized counseling, accurate clinical diagnoses, and careful management during a trial of labor. We recommend a randomized controlled trial among women undergoing a TOLAC and a longitudinal cohort study among women with previous cesarean to evaluate adverse outcomes, with focused attention on both mother and the infant.

Previous cesarean section and the risk of postpartum maternal complications and adverse neonatal outcomes in future pregnancies

OBJECTIVE

To assess maternal postpartum and neonatal outcomes associated with previous method of delivery.

STUDY DESIGN

We analyzed prospectively collected maternal and neonatal data from July 2002 to December 2003. Data were collected from dedicated perinatal database and neonatal database from discharge and procedure codes. Groups were: (i) multiparous, prior vaginal delivery (VD), and (ii) multiparous, prior cesarean (CS). This group was subdivided by subsequent pregnancy trial or no trial of labor (No TOL). Results were compared with chi (2)-analysis; significance P<0.05.

RESULTS

There were 17 406 births. Prior CS patients without trial of labor (TOL) required more blood transfusions, intensive care unit admissions and hospital readmissions than women with a prior VD. Prior CS patients with TOL required more aminoglycosides for postpartum infection. Term neonates of (CS) mothers without a TOL were more likely to have prolonged hospitalization and require ventilatory support.

CONCLUSIONS

In their subsequent delivery, women with a prior CS delivery are at significant risks for postpartum maternal and neonatal morbidities compared with parous patients who experienced a prior VD.

Trial of labor after one cesarean: role of the order and number of prior vaginal births on the risk of emergency cesarean delivery and neonatal admission

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the influences of mode of immediate preceding delivery and number of prior vaginal births on the risk of repeat cesarean and neonatal admission at attempted vaginal birth after cesarean.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We performed a retrospective study of the risk factors for emergency repeat cesarean delivery and neonatal admission in a trial of labor after prior cesarean section. The study comprised 342 women at term with at least one prior vaginal delivery in addition to one previous lower transverse cesarean. Clinical variables with crude p < 0.2 on Fisher's exact test for the defined primary outcomes of repeat cesarean and neonatal admission were included in the model for multivariable logistic regression analysis.

RESULTS

Cesarean as the immediate preceding mode of delivery (adjusted odds ratio, 5.3; 95% confidence interval, 2.5-10.8) was an independent predictor of emergency repeat cesarean delivery but not of neonatal admission. Higher parity of two or more previous vaginal deliveries compared with only one prior vaginal delivery was not associated with repeat cesarean or neonatal admission.

CONCLUSION

In women who have had prior vaginal birth attempting a trial of labor after cesarean, a vaginal delivery before cesarean delivery is an independent risk factor for repeat cesarean. Women with two or more prior vaginal births have a similar risk for repeat cesarean and neonatal admission to women with only one prior vaginal birth.

Once a cesarean always a cesarean? A computer-assisted decision analysis

OBJECTIVE

A previous decision analysis models for two strategic choices for trial of labor or repeated cesarean after prior cesarean concluded that the degree of wish for an additional future pregnancy appeared to be a major determinant for choice between the two strategic options. We had extended the analysis model to stillbirth and hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy in addition to placental complications while updating most of the outcomes in the decision tree.

STUDY DESIGN

A model was formulated using a decision tree based on reported probabilities for various outcomes and estimated utilities. The question asked was should trial of labor or repeated cesarean be performed after a prior cesarean, with a varying desire for an additional pregnancy. The highest expected outcome determines the preference of our model.

RESULTS

Our model favors repeated elective cesarean (0.9947) over trial of labor (0.9917) after a previous cesarean and is the preferred approach. This approach was preferable irrespective of the probability of additional pregnancy.

CONCLUSION

In contrary to previous models, when taking into account the occurrence of a live infant birth, birth of an infant with hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy stillbirth, neonatal death, abnormal placental implantation, hysterectomy and maternal death the preferred approach for women with previous cesarean is an elective repeated cesarean rather than trial of vaginal delivery.

Ethnic disparity in the success of vaginal birth after cesarean delivery

OBJECTIVE

To estimate whether maternal race/ethnicity is independently associated with successful vaginal birth after cesarean delivery (VBAC).

STUDY DESIGN

A retrospective cohort study from January 1, 1997 to July 30, 2002 of women with singleton pregnancies and a previous cesarean delivery. The odds ratio (OR) for successful VBAC as a function of ethnicity was corrected for age >35 years, parity, weight gain, diabetes mellitus, hospital site, prenatal care provider, gestational age, induction, labor augmentation, epidural analgesia, and birth weight >4000 g.

RESULTS

Among 54 146 births, 8030 (14.8%) occurred in women with previous cesarean deliveries. The trials of labor rates were similar among Caucasian (46.6%), Hispanic (45.4%), and African American (46.0%) women. However, there was a significant difference among ethnic groups for VBAC success rates (79.3% vs. 79.3% vs. 70.0%, respectively). When compared to Caucasian women, the adjusted OR for VBAC success was 0.37 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.27-0.50) for African American women and 0.63 (95% CI 0.51-0.79) for Hispanic women.

CONCLUSION

African American and Hispanic women are significantly less likely than Caucasian women to achieve successful VBAC.