• Reference Citation Analysis
  • v
  • v
  • Find an Article
Find an Article PDF (4608651)   Today's Articles (327)   Subscriber (49377)
For: Crane JMG, Delaney T, Butt KD, Bennett KA, Hutchens D, Young DC. Predictors of successful labor induction with oral or vaginal misoprostol. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2010;15:319-23. [PMID: 15280123 DOI: 10.1080/14767050410001702195] [Citation(s) in RCA: 30] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/26/2022]
Number Cited by Other Article(s)
1
Bender WR, Hamm RF, Dolin C, Levine LD. The Relationship between Gestational Weight Gain and Cesarean Delivery among Patients undergoing Induction of Labor. Am J Perinatol 2024;41:669-676. [PMID: 37972937 DOI: 10.1055/s-0043-1776975] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/19/2023]
2
Zhou H, Gu N, Yang Y, Wang Z, Hu Y, Dai Y. Nomogram predicting cesarean delivery undergoing induction of labor among high-risk nulliparous women at term: a retrospective study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2022;22:55. [PMID: 35062898 PMCID: PMC8783481 DOI: 10.1186/s12884-022-04386-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/24/2021] [Accepted: 01/05/2022] [Indexed: 12/02/2022]  Open
3
Obeidat RA, Almaaitah M, Ben-Sadon A, Istaiti D, Rawashdeh H, Hamadneh S, Hammouri H, Bataineh A. Clinical predictive factors for vaginal delivery following induction of labour among pregnant women in Jordan. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2021;21:685. [PMID: 34620120 PMCID: PMC8496008 DOI: 10.1186/s12884-021-04151-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/06/2020] [Accepted: 09/23/2021] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]  Open
4
Kajabwangu R, Bajunirwe F, Lukabwe H, Atukunda E, Mugisha D, Lugobe HM, Nakalinzi J, Mugyenyi GR. Factors associated with delayed onset of active labor following vaginal misoprostol administration among women at Mbarara Regional Referral Hospital, Uganda. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2020;153:268-272. [PMID: 33010030 DOI: 10.1002/ijgo.13402] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/07/2020] [Revised: 08/07/2020] [Accepted: 09/28/2020] [Indexed: 11/08/2022]
5
Mariani LL, Mancarella M, Fuso L, Novara L, Menato G, Biglia N. Predictors of response after a second attempt of pharmacological labor induction: a retrospective study. Arch Gynecol Obstet 2020;302:117-125. [PMID: 32445065 DOI: 10.1007/s00404-020-05578-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/28/2019] [Accepted: 04/30/2020] [Indexed: 10/24/2022]
6
Electrohysterographic characterization of the uterine myoelectrical response to labor induction drugs. Med Eng Phys 2018;56:27-35. [DOI: 10.1016/j.medengphy.2018.04.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/16/2017] [Revised: 03/21/2018] [Accepted: 04/10/2018] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
7
Marsdal KE, Sørbye IK, Gaudernack LC, Lukasse M. A comparison of misoprostol vaginal insert and misoprostol vaginal tablets for induction of labor in nulliparous women: a retrospective cohort study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2018;18:11. [PMID: 29304769 PMCID: PMC5756353 DOI: 10.1186/s12884-017-1647-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/20/2017] [Accepted: 12/27/2017] [Indexed: 11/21/2022]  Open
8
Batinelli L, Serafini A, Nante N, Petraglia F, Severi FM, Messina G. Induction of labour: clinical predictive factors for success and failure. J OBSTET GYNAECOL 2017;38:352-358. [PMID: 29058493 DOI: 10.1080/01443615.2017.1361388] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]
9
Hadar E, Hiersch L, Ashwal E, Chen R, Wiznitzer A, Gabbay-Benziv R. Induction of labor in elderly nulliparous women. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2016;30:2146-2150. [PMID: 27677204 DOI: 10.1080/14767058.2016.1240165] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
10
Stenson D, Wallstrom T, Sjostrand M, Akerud H, Gemzell-Danielsson K, Wiberg-Itzel E. Induction of labor in women with a uterine scar. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2015;29:3286-91. [PMID: 26699657 DOI: 10.3109/14767058.2015.1123242] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022]
11
Tolcher MC, Holbert MR, Weaver AL, McGree ME, Olson JE, El-Nashar SA, Famuyide AO, Brost BC. Predicting Cesarean Delivery After Induction of Labor Among Nulliparous Women at Term. Obstet Gynecol 2015;126:1059-1068. [PMID: 26444107 PMCID: PMC4618703 DOI: 10.1097/aog.0000000000001083] [Citation(s) in RCA: 61] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
12
Hong JS, Romero R, Lee DC, Than NG, Yeo L, Chaemsaithong P, Ahn S, Kim JS, Kim CJ, Kim YM. Umbilical cord prostaglandins in term and preterm parturition. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2015;29:523-31. [PMID: 25758616 DOI: 10.3109/14767058.2015.1011120] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
13
Marques RMCDP, Souza ASR, Costa AARD, Feitosa FEDL, Amorim MMR. Factors associated with vaginal delivery in hypertensive and normotensive pregnant women submitted to labor induction with misoprostol: a cohort study. Hypertens Pregnancy 2014;34:153-70. [PMID: 25549056 DOI: 10.3109/10641955.2014.988351] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022]
14
Berger H, Melamed N. Timing of delivery in women with diabetes in pregnancy. Obstet Med 2014;7:8-16. [PMID: 27512412 PMCID: PMC4934937 DOI: 10.1177/1753495x13513577] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]  Open
15
Seadawy SY, Farag AH, Mohammed MEIDM. Relation between dehydroepiandrosterone sulfate (DHEA-S) and success of labour induction in prolonged gestation. ASIAN PACIFIC JOURNAL OF REPRODUCTION 2013. [DOI: 10.1016/s2305-0500(13)60169-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/25/2022]  Open
16
Cubal A, Carvalho J, Ferreira MJ, Rodrigues G, Carmo OD. Value of Bishop score and ultrasound cervical length measurement in the prediction of cesarean delivery. J Obstet Gynaecol Res 2013;39:1391-6. [DOI: 10.1111/jog.12077] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/28/2012] [Accepted: 01/08/2013] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
17
Melamed N, Yariv O, Hiersch L, Wiznitzer A, Meizner I, Yogev Y. Labor induction with prostaglandin E2: characteristics of response and prediction of failure. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2012;26:132-6. [PMID: 22928537 DOI: 10.3109/14767058.2012.722729] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022]
18
Journet D, Gaucherand P, Doret M. [Adding parity to the Bishop score for term labor induction: a retrospective study]. J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod 2012;41:339-345. [PMID: 22560659 DOI: 10.1016/j.jgyn.2012.03.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/05/2010] [Revised: 03/14/2012] [Accepted: 03/28/2012] [Indexed: 05/31/2023]
19
Schuit E, Kwee A, Westerhuis MEMH, Van Dessel HJHM, Graziosi GCM, Van Lith JMM, Nijhuis JG, Oei SG, Oosterbaan HP, Schuitemaker NWE, Wouters MGAJ, Visser GHA, Mol BWJ, Moons KGM, Groenwold RHH. A clinical prediction model to assess the risk of operative delivery. BJOG 2012;119:915-23. [PMID: 22568406 DOI: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2012.03334.x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 58] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
20
The Bishop Score as a determinant of labour induction success: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Arch Gynecol Obstet 2012;286:739-53. [PMID: 22546948 DOI: 10.1007/s00404-012-2341-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 32] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/24/2011] [Accepted: 04/16/2012] [Indexed: 10/28/2022]
21
Palomäki O, Eerikäinen H, Huhtala H, Kirkinen P. Prediction of successful labor induction by evaluation of maternal symptoms at an early stage of the misoprostol induction protocol. J Perinat Med 2011;39:299-304. [PMID: 21406040 DOI: 10.1515/jpm.2011.032] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
22
Laughon SK, Zhang J, Troendle J, Sun L, Reddy UM. Using a simplified Bishop score to predict vaginal delivery. Obstet Gynecol 2011;117:805-811. [PMID: 21383643 PMCID: PMC3297470 DOI: 10.1097/aog.0b013e3182114ad2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 89] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
23
Memon F, Wijesiriwardana A, Jonker L. Maternal and prenatal factors influencing the outcome of prostaglandin E2 induced labour. J OBSTET GYNAECOL 2011;31:220-3. [DOI: 10.3109/01443615.2010.544424] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022]
24
Kim SN, Park KH, Jung HJ, Hong JS, Shin DM, Kang WS. Clinical and sonographic parameters at 37 weeks' gestation for predicting the risk of primary Cesarean delivery in nulliparous women. ULTRASOUND IN OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY : THE OFFICIAL JOURNAL OF THE INTERNATIONAL SOCIETY OF ULTRASOUND IN OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY 2010;36:486-492. [PMID: 20586108 DOI: 10.1002/uog.7734] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/29/2023]
25
Cheung CW, Leung TY, Sahota DS, Chan OK, Chan LW, Fung TY, Lau TK. Outcome of induction of labour using maternal characteristics, ultrasound assessment and biochemical state of the cervix. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2010;23:1406-12. [PMID: 20230317 DOI: 10.3109/14767051003678135] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022]
26
Factors Predicting Successful Labor Induction With Dinoprostone and Misoprostol Vaginal Inserts. Obstet Gynecol 2009;114:261-267. [DOI: 10.1097/aog.0b013e3181ad9377] [Citation(s) in RCA: 80] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
27
Chan BCP, Leung WC, Lao TTH. Prelabor rupture of membranes at term requiring labor induction - a feature of occult fetal cephalopelvic disproportion? J Perinat Med 2009;37:118-23. [PMID: 18681835 DOI: 10.1515/jpm.2009.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
28
Chan BCP, Lao TTH. The impact of maternal height on intrapartum operative delivery: A reappraisal. J Obstet Gynaecol Res 2009;35:307-14. [DOI: 10.1111/j.1447-0756.2008.00939.x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
29
Misoprostol Vaginal Insert Compared With Dinoprostone Vaginal Insert. Obstet Gynecol 2008;112:801-12. [DOI: 10.1097/aog.0b013e318187042e] [Citation(s) in RCA: 49] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
30
Yanik A, Gülümser C, Tosun M. Ultrasonographic measurement of cervical length in predicting mode of delivery after oxytocin induction. Adv Ther 2007;24:748-56. [PMID: 17901024 DOI: 10.1007/bf02849968] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
31
Crane JMG, Butler B, Young DC, Hannah ME. Misoprostol compared with prostaglandin E2 for labour induction in women at term with intact membranes and unfavourable cervix: a systematic review*. BJOG 2006;113:1366-76. [PMID: 17081181 DOI: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2006.01111.x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 38] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
32
Crane JMG. Factors Predicting Labor Induction Success: A Critical Analysis. Clin Obstet Gynecol 2006;49:573-84. [PMID: 16885664 DOI: 10.1097/00003081-200609000-00017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 114] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
33
Peregrine E, O'Brien P, Omar R, Jauniaux E. Clinical and Ultrasound Parameters to Predict the Risk of Cesarean Delivery After Induction of Labor. Obstet Gynecol 2006;107:227-33. [PMID: 16449105 DOI: 10.1097/01.aog.0000196508.11431.c0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 72] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]
PrevPage 1 of 1 1Next
© 2004-2024 Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved. 7041 Koll Center Parkway, Suite 160, Pleasanton, CA 94566, USA