Intra-incisional liposomal bupivacaine and its impact on postcesarean analgesia: a retrospective study

Long-Acting Bupivacaine for Pain Control After Cesarean Birth

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate women's postcesarean pain levels and total opioid use for standard opioid pain management compared with local anesthetic with patient-requested opioids.

DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study.

SETTING/LOCAL PROBLEM

Rural southeast Ohio. Ohio had a higher rate of opioid use disorder (1.4%) than both the regional average (0.8%) and the national average (0.7%).

PARTICIPANTS

We performed a retrospective study of 402 medical records of women who gave birth by caesarean.

INTERVENTION

Women were provided one of three types of perioperative anesthesia: routine spinal (standard of care group), wound infiltration with liposomal bupivacaine (LB INF), and transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block with liposomal bupivacaine (LB TAP).Data were collected on the amount of opioids taken postoperatively (measured as morphine milligram equivalents [MME]), pain scores, and history of opioid use.

RESULTS

The LB INF and LB TAP groups had significantly lower total and average MME per day than the standard of care group (p < .001). Pain scores for the LB INF group were lower on postoperative day (POD) 0 and POD1, whereas LB TAP pain scores were lower than standard of care pain scores on POD1 (p < .004). Women with a prior history of substance use disorders reported higher pain scores, took more total opioids. and stayed in the hospital longer regardless of type of anesthesia received (p < .001).

CONCLUSION

LB INF and LB TAP were associated with lower amounts of opioids used and with lower postcesarean pain scores compared with the standard of care.

Preoperative pudendal block with liposomal and plain bupivacaine reduces pain associated with posterior colporrhaphy: a double-blinded, randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Pelvic reconstructive surgery may cause significant postoperative pain, especially with posterior colporrhaphy, contributing to a longer hospital stay and increased pain medication utilization. Regional blocks are being increasingly utilized in gynecologic surgery to improve postoperative pain and decrease opioid usage, yet preoperative pudendal blocks have not been used routinely during posterior colporrhaphy.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to compare the effect of preoperative regional pudendal nerve block using a combination of 1.3% liposomal and 0.25% plain bupivacaine vs 0.25% plain bupivacaine alone on vaginal pain after posterior colporrhaphy on postoperative days 1, 2, and 3. We hypothesized that there would be a reduction in vaginal pain scores for the study group vs the control group over the first 72 hours.

STUDY DESIGN

This was a double-blinded, randomized controlled trial that included patients undergoing a posterior colporrhaphy, either independently or in conjunction with other vaginal or abdominal reconstructive procedures. Patients were block randomized to receive 20 mL of either a combination of 1.3% liposomal and 0.25% plain bupivacaine (study) or 20 mL of 0.25% plain bupivacaine (control) in a regional pudendal block before the start of surgery. Double blinding was achieved by covering four 5-mL syringes containing the randomized local anesthetic. After induction of anesthesia, a pudendal nerve block was performed per standard technique (5 mL superiorly and 5 mL inferiorly each ischial spine) using a pudendal kit. The primary outcome was to evaluate postoperative vaginal pain using a visual analog scale on postoperative days 1, 2, and 3. Secondary outcomes included total analgesic medication usage through postoperative day 3, postoperative voiding and defecatory dysfunction, and impact of vaginal pain on quality of life factors.

RESULTS

A total of 120 patients were enrolled (60 in each group). There were no significant differences in demographic data, including baseline vaginal pain (P=.88). Postoperative vaginal pain scores were significantly lower in the combined liposomal and bupivacaine group at all time points vs the plain bupivacaine group. Median pain scores for the study and control groups, respectively, were 0 (0-2) and 2 (0-4) for postoperative day 1 (P=.03), 2 (1-4) and 3 (2-5) for postoperative day 2 (P=.05), and 2 (1-4) and 3 (2-5) for postoperative day 3 (P=.02). Vaginal pain scores increased from postoperative day 1 to postoperative days 2 and 3 in both groups. There was a significant decrease in ibuprofen (P=.01) and acetaminophen (P=.03) usage in the study group; however, there was no difference between groups in total opioid consumption through postoperative day 3 (P=.82). There was no difference in successful voiding trials (study 72%, control 82%, P=.30), return of bowel function (P>.99), or quality of life factors (sleep, stress, mood, and activity).

CONCLUSION

Preoperative regional pudendal block with a combination of liposomal and plain bupivacaine provided more effective vaginal pain control than plain bupivacaine alone for reconstructive surgery that included posterior colporrhaphy. Given the statistically significant decrease in vaginal pain in the study group, this block may be considered as a potential adjunct for multimodal pain reduction in this patient population.

Regional Anesthesia Abdominal Blocks and Local Infiltration After Cesarean Delivery: Review of Current Evidence

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

In this review, we discuss surgical infiltration and various abdominal wall blocks, including transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block and quadratus lumborum blocks, and review the literature on the evidence behind these approaches and analgesia for cesarean delivery (CD).

RECENT FINDINGS

Adequate pain management in the parturient following CD is important to facilitate early ambulation and neonatal care while also improving patient satisfaction and decreasing hospital length of stay. Neuraxial opioids have been a mainstay for postoperative analgesia; however, this option may not be available for patients undergoing emergency CD and have contraindications to neuraxial approaches, refusing an epidural or spinal, or with technical difficulties for neuraxial placement. In such cases, alternative options include a fascial plane block or surgical wound infiltration. The use of regional blocks or surgical wound infiltration is especially recommended in the parturient who does not receive neuraxial opioids for CD. Adequate postoperative analgesia following CD is an important component of the overall care of the parturient as it helps facilitate early mobilization and improve patient satisfaction. In conclusion, the use of abdominal fascial plane blocks or surgical wound infiltration is recommended in the parturient who does not receive neuraxial opioids for CD.

Enhanced Recovery After Cesarean: Current and Emerging Trends

Purpose of Review

What are the latest enhanced recovery elements for cesarean delivery?

Recent Findings

Enhanced recovery after cesarean delivery (ERAC) provides an evidenced-based system to improve maternal outcomes, functional recovery, maternal-infant bonding, and patient experience. Postsurgical recovery has evolved from a one-dimensional pain score to a holistic multidimensional approach emphasizing faster functional recovery. ERAC involves multidisciplinary efforts of the anesthesiologist, obstetrician, nursing, hospital, and patient. Components of ERAC include preoperative patient education, limited fasting, carbohydrate load, limiting opioids intra- and postoperatively, using scheduled non-opioid analgesics and supplementing with advanced therapies for women at higher risk for pain. ERAC protocols reduce opioid consumption, reduce length of stay, and improve maternal and neonatal outcomes.

Summary

Implementing ERAC standardized care will likely be the most important change you can make in your practice to improve outcomes, improve quality care, help address racial disparities, and minimize opioid exposure and potential for addiction.

Bupivacaine Pharmacokinetics and Breast Milk Excretion of Liposomal Bupivacaine Administered After Cesarean Birth

Very little plasma bupivacaine was transferred into breast milk after liposomal bupivacaine wound infiltration in patients who had undergone cesarean delivery.

To evaluate bupivacaine concentrations in maternal plasma and transfer into breast milk in women undergoing liposomal bupivacaine infiltration in the transversus abdominis plane after cesarean birth.

A randomized controlled trial of liposomal bupivacaine for pain following obstetrical laceration

BACKGROUND

Postpartum pain management is critical after vaginal delivery involving a second, third, or fourth degree laceration as patients heal from their repair. Uncontrolled postpartum pain can affect both the physical and mental recovery period, extend hospital stays, and increase the potential for serious adverse reactions with pain medications. In light of the opioid crisis and increase in dependency after utilization, finding alternatives for pain management after procedures is paramount. The need for a safe, effective, long-acting medication to treat postpartum and postoperative pain has reached a critical point in the current healthcare climate.

OBJECTIVE

To minimize pain after vaginal delivery, we assessed the effectiveness of liposomal bupivacaine vs plain bupivacaine injected into the perineum after second, third, or fourth degree lacerations. We hypothesized that the liposomal bupivacaine study group would have less vaginal pain, analgesic usage, and improved quality of life compared with the plain bupivacaine control group.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This is a single-blinded randomized controlled trial with 120 subjects enrolled at Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Bethesda, Maryland, from February 2018 to February 2019. After vaginal delivery and repair, study participants were randomized into 20-mL liposomal bupivacaine (study group) or 20-mL 0.25% plain bupivacaine (control group) injected into and around the perineal body bilaterally. On postpartum days 1, 3, and 7, pain scores and analgesics were recorded. Our primary outcome was vaginal pain score at postpartum day 3, analyzed with Wilcoxon rank-sum test. Our secondary outcomes included vaginal pain at postpartum days 1 and 7, pain with bowel movement, sleep disturbance, and pain's impact on activity, stress, and mood. Desired statistical power was achieved with 48 patients per group (total of 96 patients).

RESULTS

A total of 60 patients were randomized to each group; 108 patients completed the study. Most patients (94%) had regional anesthesia. There was no statistically significant difference in the demographics between these groups. There were 25 obstetric anal sphincter injuries, equally distributed between the 2 groups (P>.99). There was no significant difference between vaginal pain scores at postpartum day 3 (control, 2 [1-3]; study, 2 [0-3]) (P=.63). This was also seen at postpartum day 1 (control, 2 [0-3]; study, 2 [0-3]) (P=.82) and postpartum day 7 (control, 1 [0-3]; study, 1 [0-2]) (P=.47). Cumulative pain scores for postpartum days 1, 3, and 7 failed to reach significance (study, 5 [3-8]; control, 6 [3-8]) (P=.83). Secondary analysis of pain with bowel movement and impact on sleep, activity, stress, and mood found no differences. Given that only 3 patients required outpatient opioids, there were insufficient data to calculate morphine equivalent differences.

CONCLUSION

After obstetric lacerations, there is no proven benefit to lateral and intraperineal injection of liposomal bupivacaine over plain bupivacaine in postpartum vaginal pain scores, quality of life scores, or pain medication utilized. This may be due to low pain scores and opioid usage, both groups benefiting from the intervention, or ineffective perineal injection location.

A review of peripheral nerve blocks for cesarean delivery analgesia

Peripheral nerve blocks have a unique role in postcesarean delivery multimodal analgesia regimens. In this review article, options for peripheral nerve blocks for cesarean delivery analgesia will be reviewed, specifically paravertebral, transversus abdominis plane, quadratus lumborum, iliohypogastric and ilioinguinal, erector spinae, and continuous wound infiltration blocks. Anatomy, existing literature evidence, and specific areas in need of future research will be assessed. Considerations for local anesthetic toxicity, and for informed consent for these modalities in the context of emergency cesarean deliveries, will be presented.

Transversus abdominis plane block with liposomal bupivacaine for pain control after cesarean delivery: a retrospective chart review

Background

Adverse effects of opioid analgesics and potential for chronic use are limitations in the cesarean setting. Regional anesthesia using transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block post-cesarean delivery may improve analgesia and reduce opioid consumption. Effectiveness of TAP block using liposomal bupivacaine (LB) to reduce post-cesarean pain is unknown.

Methods

We performed a single-center retrospective chart review of patients aged ≥18 years who underwent cesarean delivery with a multimodal pain management protocol with or without TAP block with LB 266 mg. Assessments included postsurgical opioid consumption; area under the curve (AUC) of numeric rating scale pain scores from 0 to 3 days; proportion of opioid-free patients; discharge- and post-anesthesia care unit (PACU)-ready time; times to ambulation, solid food, and bowel movement; hospital length of stay (LOS); and adverse events (AEs). Data were analyzed in the total population and in first- and repeat-cesarean subgroups using Wilcoxon, chi-squared, and Student’s t-tests.

Results

Of 201 patients, 101 were treated with LB TAP block (LB-TAPB) and 100 without LB-TAPB. Treatment with LB-TAPB vs without LB-TAPB significantly reduced mean post-surgical opioid consumption (total, 47%; first-cesarean, 54%; repeat-cesarean, 42%; P<0.001 each) and mean AUC of pain scores (total, 46%; first-cesarean, 57%; repeat-cesarean, 40%; P<0.001 each). Patients treated with LB-TAPB had significantly shorter mean discharge-ready times (2.9 vs 3.6 days; P=0.006), PACU-ready times (138 vs 163 minutes; P=0.028), and LOS (2.9 vs 3.9 days; P<0.001). LB-TAPB significantly decreased mean times to ambulation and solid food by 39% and 31% (P<0.01 each), respectively, and numerically reduced mean time to bowel movement (26%; P=0.05). Fewer patients treated with LB-TAPB vs without LB-TAPB reported an AE (34% vs 50%; P=0.026).

Conclusion

These results suggest multimodal pain management incorporating TAP block with LB 266 mg is an effective approach to reducing opioid requirements and improving analgesia post-cesarean delivery.