1
|
Jackson K, Karasek D, Gemmill A, Collin DF, Hamad R. Maternal Health During the COVID-19 Pandemic in the United States: An Interrupted Time-series Analysis. Epidemiology 2024; 35:823-833. [PMID: 39230970 DOI: 10.1097/ede.0000000000001779] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 09/06/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The COVID-19 pandemic, and subsequent policy responses aimed at curbing disease spread and reducing economic fallout, had far-reaching consequences for maternal health. There has been little research to our knowledge on enduring disruptions to maternal health trends beyond the early pandemic and limited understanding of how these impacted pre-existing disparities in maternal health. METHODS We leveraged rigorous interrupted time-series methods and US National Center for Health Statistics Vital Statistics Birth Data Files of all live births for 2015-2021 (N = 24,653,848). We estimated whether changes in maternal health trends after the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic (March 2020) differed from predictions based on pre-existing temporal trends. Outcomes included gestational diabetes, hypertensive disorders of pregnancy, gestational weight gain, and adequacy of prenatal care. RESULTS We found an increased incidence of gestational diabetes (December 2020 peak: 1.7 percentage points (pp); 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.3, 2.1), hypertensive disorders of pregnancy (January 2021 peak: 1.3 pp; 95% CI: 0.4, 2.1), and gestational weight gain (March 2021 peak: 0.1 standard deviation; 95% CI: 0.03, 0.1) and declines in inadequate prenatal care (January 2021 nadir: -0.4 pp; 95% CI: -0.7, -0.1). Key differences by subgroups included greater and more sustained increases in gestational diabetes among Black, Hispanic, and less educated individuals. CONCLUSION These patterns in maternal health likely reflect not only effects of COVID-19 infection but also changes in healthcare access, health behaviors, remote work, economic security, and maternal stress. Further research about causal pathways and longer-term trends will inform public health and clinical interventions to address maternal disease burden and disparities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kaitlyn Jackson
- From the Department of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA
| | - Deborah Karasek
- School of Public Health, Oregon Health & Science University and Portland State University, Portland, OR
| | - Alison Gemmill
- Department of Population, Family and Reproductive Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD
| | - Daniel F Collin
- From the Department of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA
| | - Rita Hamad
- From the Department of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Okui T, Nakashima N. Effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on the rates of adverse birth outcomes and fetal mortality in Japan: an analysis of national data from 2010 to 2022. BMC Public Health 2024; 24:1430. [PMID: 38807097 PMCID: PMC11134758 DOI: 10.1186/s12889-024-18905-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/07/2023] [Accepted: 05/21/2024] [Indexed: 05/30/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Although the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic affected trends of multiple health outcomes in Japan, there is a paucity of studies investigating the effect of the pandemic on adverse birth outcomes and fetal mortality. This study aimed to investigate the effect of the onset of the pandemic on the trends in adverse birth outcomes and fetal mortality using national data in Japan. METHODS We used the 2010-2022 birth and fetal mortality data from the Vital Statistics in Japan. We defined the starting time of the effect of the pandemic as April 2020, and the period from January 2010 to March 2020 and that from April 2020 to December 2022 were defined as the pre- and post- pandemic period, respectively. The rates of preterm birth, term low birth weight (TLBW), small-for-gestational-age (SGA), large-for-gestational-age (LGA), spontaneous fetal mortality, and artificial fetal mortality were used as outcomes. An interrupted time series analysis was conducted using monthly time series data of the outcomes to evaluate the effects of the pandemic. In addition, a modified Poisson regression model was used to evaluate the effects of the pandemic on these outcomes using individual-level data, and the adjusted risk ratio of the effect was calculated. RESULTS The adverse birth and fetal mortality outcomes showed a decreasing trend over the years, except for preterm birth and LGA birth rates, and SGA birth rates tended to reach their lowest values after the onset of the pandemic. The interrupted time series analysis revealed that the pandemic decreased preterm birth, TLBW, and SGA birth rates. In addition, the regression analysis revealed that the pandemic decreased the TLBW, SGA, and artificial fetal mortality rates. CONCLUSIONS Analyses performed using national data suggested that the pandemic decreased the TLBW and SGA rates in Japan.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tasuku Okui
- Medical Information Center, Kyushu University Hospital, Maidashi3-1-1 Higashi-ku Fukuoka city Fukuoka prefecture, Fukuoka city, 812-8582, Japan.
| | - Naoki Nakashima
- Medical Information Center, Kyushu University Hospital, Maidashi3-1-1 Higashi-ku Fukuoka city Fukuoka prefecture, Fukuoka city, 812-8582, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Deitch JM, Lee IL, Yates CJ, Kathpal E, Lawton P, Shahid I, Hamblin PS, Dutta D, Krishnamurthy B, Said JM, Steele C, Teale GR, Kevat D. Simplified gestational diabetes screening with a triaging fasting plasma glucose reduces the burden of oral glucose tolerance tests during pregnancy - A large tertiary comparative cohort study. Diabetes Res Clin Pract 2024; 209:111120. [PMID: 38307138 DOI: 10.1016/j.diabres.2024.111120] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/29/2023] [Revised: 01/21/2024] [Accepted: 01/25/2024] [Indexed: 02/04/2024]
Abstract
AIMS The study aimed to evaluate the impact of a simplified screeningapproach for gestational diabetes (GDM) compared to conventional screening on OGTT rates, GDM prevalence, and perinatal outcomes. METHOD A retrospective comparative cohort study included singleton births from 20 weeks' gestation. Pregnancies without diagnostic glucose results from 13 weeks' gestation or incomplete screenings were excluded. Simplified screening consisted of a triaging fasting plasma glucose (FPG), where only those with FPG levels between 4.7 and 5.0 mmol/L proceeded to the 2hr 75 g oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT).The study period was divided into conventional screening (1st January 2019-30th June 2020) and simplified screening (1st January 2021-31st December 2021). RESULTS Out of 15,138 pregnancies, 12,035 met the inclusion criteria: 7385 underwent conventional and 4650 underwent simplified screening. In the simplified group, 82.9 % avoided an OGTT. The simplified screening group also had a lower GDM prevalence compared to the conventional group ((18.7 % vs. 21.7 %, p < 0.001). Perinatal outcomes, including the rate of large-for-gestational-age infants, were similar between the groups. CONCLUSION The simplified GDM screening strategy for significantly reduced OGTTs by over 80% without impacting perinatal outcomes. It suggests that prospective studies are necessary to further evaluate this approach.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jessica M Deitch
- Department of Diabetes & Endocrinology, Western Health, St Albans, Victoria, Australia; Department of Medicine, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - I-Lynn Lee
- Department of Diabetes & Endocrinology, Western Health, St Albans, Victoria, Australia; Department of Medicine, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.
| | - Christopher J Yates
- Department of Diabetes & Endocrinology, Western Health, St Albans, Victoria, Australia; Department of Medicine, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - Esha Kathpal
- Department of Diabetes & Endocrinology, Western Health, St Albans, Victoria, Australia
| | - Paul Lawton
- Department of Diabetes & Endocrinology, Western Health, St Albans, Victoria, Australia
| | - Ibrahim Shahid
- Department of Diabetes & Endocrinology, Western Health, St Albans, Victoria, Australia
| | - Peter S Hamblin
- Department of Diabetes & Endocrinology, Western Health, St Albans, Victoria, Australia; Department of Medicine, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - Deepak Dutta
- Department of Diabetes & Endocrinology, Western Health, St Albans, Victoria, Australia
| | | | - Joanne M Said
- Department of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, Western Health, St Albans, Victoria, Australia; Department of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia; Department of Maternal Fetal Medicine, Western Health, St Albans, Victoria, Australia
| | - Cheryl Steele
- Department of Diabetes & Endocrinology, Western Health, St Albans, Victoria, Australia
| | - Glyn R Teale
- Department of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, Western Health, St Albans, Victoria, Australia
| | - Dev Kevat
- Department of Diabetes & Endocrinology, Western Health, St Albans, Victoria, Australia; Department of Medicine, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia; Department of Obstetric Medicine, Western Health, St Albans, Victoria, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Kleinwechter HJ, Weber KS, Liedtke TP, Schäfer-Graf U, Groten T, Rüdiger M, Pecks U. COVID-19, Pregnancy, and Diabetes Mellitus. Z Geburtshilfe Neonatol 2024; 228:17-31. [PMID: 37918833 DOI: 10.1055/a-2180-7715] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/04/2023]
Abstract
During the severe acute respiratory distress virus coronavirus type 2 (SARS-CoV-2) pandemic, many women were infected during their pregnancies. The SARS-CoV-2-induced coronavirus disease 19 (COVID-19) has an impact on maternal health and pregnancy outcomes; peripartum and perinatal morbidity and mortality are increased. Pregnancy is considered a risk factor for severe COVID-19 course. Additional risk factors during pregnancy are diabetes mellitus, gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM), and obesity. Systemic inflammation can lead to severe metabolic dysregulation with ketoacidosis. The endocrine pancreas is a target organ for SARS-CoV-2 and the fetal risk depends on inflammation of the placenta. Up to now there is no evidence that SARS-CoV-2 infection during pregnancy leads to permanent diabetes in mothers or their offspring via triggering autoimmunity or beta cell destruction. The frequently observed increased prevalence of GDM compared to the years before the pandemic is most likely due to changed lifestyle during lockdown. Furthermore, severe COVID-19 may be associated with the development of GDM due to worsening of glucose tolerance. Vaccination with a mRNA vaccine is safe and highly effective to prevent infection and to reduce hospitalization. Registries support offering evidence-based recommendations on vaccination for pregnant women. Even with the current omicron virus variant, there are increased risks for symptomatic and unvaccinated pregnant women.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Ute Schäfer-Graf
- Department of Obstetrics, Berlin Diabetes Center for Pregnant Women, St. Joseph Hospital, Berlin, Germany
| | - Tanja Groten
- Department of Obstetrics, Competence Center for Diabetic Women, Jena University Hospital, Jena, Germany
| | - Mario Rüdiger
- Saxony Center for Fetal-Neonatal Health, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Dresden, Germany
| | - Ulrich Pecks
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital of Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel, Kiel, Germany
- Department of Obstetrics, University Hospital Würzburg, Maternal Health and Midwifery Science, Würzburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|