Medication taking behaviors in patients taking warfarin versus direct oral anticoagulants: A systematic review

Comparison of the prophylactic antithrombotic effect of indobufen and warfarin in patients with nephrotic syndrome: a randomized controlled trial

PURPOSE

The risk of thromboembolic events is elevated in patients with nephrotic syndrome, and warfarin use has been associated with an increased risk of bleeding. Indobufen, a selective cyclooxygenase-1 inhibitor, is currently being evaluated for the prevention of thromboembolic events in nephrotic syndrome. This study aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of indobufen with that of warfarin in patients with nephrotic syndrome.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This multicenter, randomized, three-arm, open-label, parallel controlled trial involved a total of 180 adult patients with nephrotic syndrome from four centers in China. Patients were randomly assigned to receive 100 mg indobufen (bid), 200 mg indobufen (bid), and 3 mg warfarin (qd) daily for 12 weeks. The primary endpoints included thromboembolic and bleeding events, while laboratory results and adverse events constituted secondary endpoints.

RESULTS

No thromboembolic events occurred in the high-/low-dose indobufen and warfarin groups. Moreover, the use of a low dose of indobufen significantly reduced the risk of minor bleeding events compared with warfarin use (2% versus 18%, p < .05). Finally, adverse events were more frequent in warfarin-treated patients.

CONCLUSIONS

This study found that indobufen therapy provided equivalent effects in preventing thromboembolic events compared with warfarin therapy, while low dose of indobufen was associated with a reduced risk of bleeding events, thus it should be recommended for the prevention of thromboembolic events in clinical practice in patients with nephrotic syndrome.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

ChiCTR-IPR-17013428.

Edoxaban treatment in atrial fibrillation in routine clinical care: One-year outcomes of the prospective observational ETNA-AF study in South Korean patients

BACKGROUND

The real-world outcomes of edoxaban treatment in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) were analyzed in the ETNA-AF (Edoxaban Treatment in Routine Clinical Practice) study involving data from multiple regional registries. This report addresses effectiveness and safety of edoxaban in the Korean ETNA-AF population.

METHODS

One-year data from 1887 Korean ETNA-AF participants were analyzed according to edoxaban dose and patient age and compared with results of other ETNA-AF registries.

RESULTS

Approximately 70% of patients received the recommended doses of edoxaban (60 mg/30 mg); non-recommended 60 mg and 30 mg doses were prescribed to 9.6% and 19.8% of the patients, respectively. The proportions of reference age (<65 years), youngest-old (65-74 years) and middle-old/oldest-old (≥75 years) groups were 21.4%, 40.2%, and 38.4%, respectively. Incidence of major or clinically relevant nonmajor bleeding was similar within dose (0.57%-1.71%) and age subgroups (1.26%-1.63%). Incidence of net clinical outcome, a composite of stroke, systemic embolic event, major bleeding, and all-cause mortality, was also comparable among dose subgroups (1.14%-3.10%) and age subgroups (2.28%-2.78%). The percentage of Korean patients receiving non-recommended 30 mg (19.8%) was over twice that of the European population (8.4%). However, the clinical outcomes were generally similar among different populations included in the ETNA-AF study.

CONCLUSIONS

The outcomes in the Korean ETNA-AF population are like those in the global ETNA-AF population, with overall low event rates of stroke, major bleeding and all-cause mortality across age and dose subgroups. Edoxaban can be used effectively and safely in specific populations of Korean AF patients, including the elderly.

Prognostic implications of adherence to oral anticoagulants among patients with atrial fibrillation: Insights from MISOAC-AF trial

OBJECTIVES

To explore the implications of adherence to oral anticoagulants (OACs) on all-cause mortality and cardiovascular outcomes in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF).

METHODS

This post-hoc analysis of the MISOAC-AF trial included recently hospitalized patients with AF. Adherence to OACs was assessed by the proportion of days covered (PDC). Good adherence was defined as PDC >80 %. Cox regression models were used to associate PDC with clinical outcomes of all-cause death, cardiovascular death (CVD), stroke, and bleeding. A sub-analysis was performed among adherent patients to compare outcomes between vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) and direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs).

RESULTS

During a median 31-month follow-up, 778 cardiac patients with comorbid AF who had been prescribed OACs upon hospital discharge were studied. The mean PDC was 0.78; 66 % of patients had good adherence (>80 %) which was associated with lower risk of all-cause death [adjusted hazard ratio (aHR): 0.64; 95 % confidence interval (CI): 0.46 to 0.84, p < 0.001] and CVD (aHR: 0.70; 95 % CI: 0.50 to 0.97, p = 0.03). The risk of stroke and major or non-major bleeding did not differ by adherence status. Among adherent patients to OACs, VKA use was associated with higher rates of all-cause death (p < 0.001), CVD (p < 0.001), and stroke (p = 0.01); no differences were found regarding major or non-major bleeding risk.

CONCLUSIONS

In recently hospitalized patients with AF, good adherence to OACs was associated with a reduced risk of all-cause death and CVD. The rates of stroke or bleeding events were not significantly different. VKAs were associated with more adverse events compared to DOACs.

Informed Decision Making for Anticoagulation Therapy for Atrial Fibrillation

BACKGROUND

Patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) must decide between warfarin and direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs), a decision involving important tradeoffs. Our objective was to understand whether physicians engage patients in informed decision making for anticoagulants.

DESIGN

We performed an analysis of recorded conversations between physicians and anticoagulation-naïve patients in the Verilogue Point-of-Practice database. We assessed the presence of 7 elements of informed decision making, as well as a discussion of financial costs.

RESULTS

Of 37 encounters with 21 physicians, 92% resulted in a DOAC prescription and 8% resulted in a warfarin prescription. Seventy percent met criteria for discussion of pros and cons, 70% for discussion of the alternatives, 43% presented the decision, 30% included an assessment of patient understanding, 22% included an explanation of the patient's role in decision making, 22% included an assessment of patient preferences, and 19% included a discussion of uncertainty. Two encounters (5%) included all 7 elements and 9 (24%) included none. Physicians discussed treatment costs with patients in 43% of encounters.

LIMITATIONS

We assessed informed decision making in a single encounter. Physicians and patients may have had other discussions that were not captured in our data.

CONCLUSIONS

Physicians often presented the alternatives but did not generally engage patients in informed decision making. The high rate of DOAC prescriptions is likely the result of physician preferences, as patient preferences were rarely assessed.

IMPLICATIONS

Strategies to support physicians in engaging patients in informed decision making for anticoagulation are needed.

HIGHLIGHTS

While physicians discussed the alternatives and presented pros and cons with patients, they rarely assessed patient preferences, explained the patient's role in decision making, or addressed uncertainty.The cost of treatment with DOACs versus warfarin was discussed by physicians in less than half of encounters, limiting patients' ability to make informed decisions for anticoagulation.Only 2 encounters (5%) fulfilled all 7 elements of informed decision making.

Reasons for Nonadherence to the Direct Oral Anticoagulant Apixaban: A Cross-Sectional Survey of Atrial Fibrillation Patients

Background

Nonadherence to direct oral anticoagulants to prevent stroke occurs in up to 40% of atrial fibrillation patients. Underlying reasons are poorly understood.

Objectives

This study quantified patient-reported reasons for nonadherence and identified strategies to improve adherence.

Methods

This is a cross-sectional survey of atrial fibrillation patients in 2 academic health systems who reported apixaban nonadherence. We examined patient-reported reasons for nonadherence and level of nonadherence (assessed by a validated 3-item adherence measure) using a multivariable logistic regression model.

Results

Of 419 study patients, 41.5% were women. The mean age was 71.1 ± 10 years and mean CHA2DS2VASc score was 3.2 ± 1.6. About two-thirds had adherence scores ≥80 (mild nonadherence) and one-third scores <80 (poor adherence). In all groups, forgetfulness contributed to nonadherence. Attitudes/beliefs associated with adherence score <80 included: not believing apixaban was needed (odds ratio [OR]: 12.24 [95% CI: 2.25-66.47]); medication cost (OR: 3.97 [95% CI: 1.67-9.42]); and fear of severe bleeding (OR: 3.28 [95% CI: 1.20-8.96]). Strategies that patients with adherence scores <80 selected as helping "a great deal/a lot" to increase adherence included bloodwork to evaluate efficacy (56%), physician counseling about adherence (55%), and having a reversal agent (39%). Almost one-half of all patients did not disclose nonadherence to their providers.

Conclusions

Patients may not disclose their nonadherence to prescribers, and attitudes related to apixaban nonadherence differ among patients with mild nonadherence versus poor adherence. While all patients may benefit from strategies to address forgetfulness, concerns related to the purpose of apixaban, cost, and bleeding risk may require special attention in those with poor adherence.

Challenges and Possible Solutions to Direct-Acting Oral Anticoagulants (DOACs) Dosing in Patients with Extreme Bodyweight and Renal Impairment

This article aims to highlight the dosing issues of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) in patients with renal impairment and/or obesity in an attempt to develop solutions employing advanced data-driven techniques. DOACs have become widely accepted by clinicians worldwide because of their superior clinical profiles, more predictable pharmacokinetics, and hence more convenient dosing relative to other anticoagulants. However, the optimal dosing of DOACs in extreme bodyweight  patients and patients with renal impairment is difficult to achieve using the conventional dosing approach. The standard dosing approach (fixed-dose) is based on limited data from clinical studies. The existing formulae (models) for determining the appropriate doses for these patient groups leads to suboptimal dosing. This problem of mis-dosing is worsened by the lack of standardized laboratory parameters for monitoring the exposure to DOACs in renal failure and extreme bodyweight patients. Model-informed precision dosing (MIPD) encompasses a range of techniques like machine learning and pharmacometrics modelling, which could uncover key variables and relationships as well as shed more light on the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of DOACs in patients with extreme bodyweight or renal impairment. Ultimately, this individualized approach-if implemented in clinical practice-could optimise dosing for the DOACs for better safety and efficacy.

Association between adherence to warfarin and thrombotic events in patients with antiphospholipid syndrome in Japan: A claims-based retrospective cohort study

PURPOSE

We aimed to evaluate adherence and persistence to warfarin therapy among patients with antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) and investigate the association between adherence and thrombotic events in those patients.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective cohort study using the Japan Medical Data Center claims database from 2005 to 2018. Patients with APS receiving warfarin treatment were included in this study. Adherence and persistence were evaluated using the proportion of days covered (PDS) and refill gap methods, respectively. Demographic characteristics of patients were obtained. Kaplan-Meier curves with log-rank tests and Cox regression models were used to examine the association between adherence or persistence and time to thrombotic events.

RESULTS

A total of 186 patients (mean age: 46.5 ± 12.4 years, females 68.8%) were included in this study. No significant differences were observed in risk factors for thrombosis and cardiovascular diseases among groups. Most patients were adherent (91.4%) and persistent (88.2%) to warfarin treatment. Adherent and persistent patients had a significantly higher rate of thrombotic event-free survival than nonadherent and nonpersistent patients (p < 0.05). Multivariable Cox regression showed that the risk of thrombotic events was higher in nonadherent patients (with a hazard ratio of 3.23 [95% confidence interval CI: 1.15-9.11]) and in nonpersistent patients (with a hazard ratio of 3.45 [95% CI: 1.35-8.82]).

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with APS, nonadherence and nonpersistence to warfarin treatment was associated with a higher risk of thrombotic events, suggesting the careful monitoring of those patients.

Cost Conversations About Anticoagulation Between Patients With Atrial Fibrillation and Their Clinicians: A Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Clinical Trial

IMPORTANCE

How patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) and their clinicians consider cost in forming care plans remains unknown.

OBJECTIVE

To identify factors that inform conversations regarding costs of anticoagulants for treatment of AF between patients and clinicians and outcomes associated with these conversations.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS

This cohort study of recorded encounters and participant surveys at 5 US medical centers (including academic, community, and safety-net centers) from the SDM4AFib randomized trial compared standard AF care with and without use of a shared decision-making (SDM) tool. Included patients were considering anticoagulation treatment and were recruited by their clinicians between January 30, 2017, and June 27, 2019. Data were analyzed between August and November 2019.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

The incidence of and factors associated with cost conversations, and the association of cost conversations with patients' consideration of treatment cost burden and their choice of anticoagulation.

RESULTS

A total of 830 encounters (out of 922 enrolled participants) were recorded. Patients' mean (SD) age was 71.0 (10.4) years; 511 patients (61.6%) were men, 704 (86.0%) were White, 303 (40.9%) earned between $40 000 and $99 999 in annual income, and 657 (79.2%) were receiving anticoagulants. Clinicians' mean (SD) age was 44.8 (13.2) years; 75 clinicians (53.2%) were men, and 111 (76%) practiced as physicians, with approximately half (69 [48.9%]) specializing in either internal medicine or cardiology. Cost conversations occurred in 639 encounters (77.0%) and were more likely in the SDM arm (378 [90%] vs 261 [64%]; OR, 9.69; 95% CI, 5.77-16.29). In multivariable analysis, cost conversations were more likely to occur with female clinicians (66 [47%]; OR, 2.85; 95% CI, 1.21-6.71); consultants vs in-training clinicians (113 [75%]; OR, 4.0; 95% CI, 1.4-11.1); clinicians practicing family medicine (24 [16%]; OR, 12.12; 95% CI, 2.75-53.38]), internal medicine (35 [23%]; OR, 3.82; 95% CI, 1.25-11.70), or other clinicians (21 [14%]; OR, 4.90; 95% CI, 1.32-18.16) when compared with cardiologists; and for patients with an annual household income between $40 000 and $99 999 (249 [82.2%]; OR, 1.86; 95% CI, 1.05-3.29) compared with income below $40 000 or above $99 999. More patients who had cost conversations reported cost as a factor in their decision (244 [89.1%] vs 327 [69.0%]; OR 3.66; 95% CI, 2.43-5.50), but cost conversations were not associated with the choice of anticoagulation agent.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

Cost conversations were common, particularly for middle-income patients and with female and consultant-level primary care clinicians, as well as in encounters using an SDM tool; they were associated with patients' consideration of treatment cost burden but not final treatment choice. With increasing costs of care passed on to patients, these findings can inform efforts to promote cost conversations in practice.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02905032.

Reasons for discontinuing oral anticoagulation therapy for atrial fibrillation: a systematic review

Introduction

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common cardiac arrhythmia and can lead to significant comorbidities and mortality. Persistence with oral anticoagulation (OAC) is crucial to prevent stroke but rates of discontinuation are high. This systematic review explored underlying reasons for OAC discontinuation.

Methods

A systematic review was undertaken to identify studies that reported factors influencing discontinuation of OAC in AF, in 11 databases, grey literature and backwards citations from eligible studies published between 2000 and 2019. Two reviewers independently screened titles, abstracts and papers against inclusion criteria and extracted data. Study quality was appraised using Gough’s weight of evidence framework. Data were synthesised narratively.

Results

Of 6,619 sources identified, 10 full studies and 2 abstracts met the inclusion criteria. Overall, these provided moderate appropriateness to answer the review question. Four reported clinical registry data, six were retrospective reviews of patients’ medical records and two studies reported interviews and surveys. Nine studies evaluated outcomes relating to dabigatran and/or warfarin and three included rivaroxaban (n = 3), apixaban (n = 3) and edoxaban (n = 1). Bleeding complications and gastrointestinal events were the most common factors associated with discontinuation, followed by frailty and risk of falling. Patients’ perspectives were seldom specifically assessed. Influence of family carers in decisions regarding OAC discontinuation was not examined.

Conclusion

The available evidence is derived from heterogeneous studies with few relevant data for the newer direct oral anticoagulants. Reasons underpinning decision-making to discontinue OAC from the perspective of patients, family carers and clinicians is poorly understood.

Using data mining technology to predict medication-taking behaviour in women with breast cancer: A retrospective study

Aims

Medication‐taking behaviours of breast cancer survivors undergoing adjuvant hormone therapy have received considerable attention. This study aimed to determine factors affecting medication‐taking behaviours in people with breast cancer using data mining.

Design

A longitudinal observational retrospective cohort study with a hospital‐based survey.

Methods

A total of 385 subjects were surveyed, analysing existing data from January 2010 to December 2017 in Taiwan. Three data mining approaches—multiple logistic regression, decision tree and artificial neural network—were used to build the prediction models and rank the importance of influencing factors. Accuracy, specificity and sensitivity were used as assessment indicators for the prediction models.

Results

Multiple logistic regression was the most effective approach, achieving an accuracy of 96.37%, specificity of 96.75% and sensitivity of 96.12%. The duration of adjuvant hormone therapy discontinuation, duration of adjuvant hormone therapy use and age at diagnosis by data mining were the three most critical factors influencing the medication‐taking behaviours of people with breast cancer.

Anticoagulation in sub-Saharan Africa: Are direct oral anticoagulants the answer? A review of lessons learnt from warfarin

Warfarin has existed for >7 decades and has been the anticoagulant of choice for many thromboembolic disorders. The recent introduction of direct-acting oral anticoagulants (DOACs) has, however, caused a shift in preference by healthcare professionals all over the world. DOACs have been found to be at least as effective as warfarin in prevention of stroke in patients with atrial fibrillation and in treatment of venous thromboembolism. In sub-Saharan Africa, however, the widespread use of DOACs has been hampered mainly by their higher acquisition costs. As the drugs come off patent, their use in sub-Saharan Africa is likely to increase. However, very few trials have been conducted in African settings, and safety concerns will need to be addressed with further study before widespread adoption into clinical practice.

Patients' perceptions with dabigatran in patients with atrial fibrillation previously treated with vitamin K antagonists

Aim: To analyze the perception of anticoagulation with dabigatran in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation previously treated with vitamin K antagonists over a 6-month period. Materials & methods: This is a prospective, noninterventional, noncontrolled, multicenter study. To assess patients' perceptions, PACT-Q2 questionnaire was completed. Results: Six hundred and fifty nine patients (73.1 ± 9.4 years, CHA₂DS₂-VASc 3.6 ± 1.6) were included. At baseline, the convenience and satisfaction scores were 60.9 ± 24.9 and 49.9 ± 17.7, respectively. The scores significantly increased along the study. Convenience score was higher in males and in patients with low-moderate thromboembolic risk. Satisfaction score was higher in females. Only 8.0% of patients discontinued dabigatran (3.7% due to side effects). Conclusion: Convenience and satisfaction scores for nonvalvular atrial fibrillation patients treated with dabigatran at 6 months were significantly better than with previous vitamin K antagonists.

Methodological considerations for investigating oral anticoagulation persistence in atrial fibrillation

Aims 

Reports of long-term oral anticoagulant (OAC) therapy for atrial fibrillation (AF) reveal highly variable, and generally suboptimal estimates of medication persistence. The objective of this review is to summarize current literature and highlight important methodological considerations for interpreting persistence research and designing studies of persistence on OAC treatment.

Methods and results 

We summarize differences in study methodology, setting, timing, treatment, and other factors associated with reports of better or worse persistence. For example, prospective compared with retrospective study designs are associated with higher reported persistence. Similarly, patient factors such as permanent AF or high stroke risk, and treatment with non-vitamin K oral antagonists relative to vitamin K antagonists are associated with higher persistence. Persistence has also been reported to be higher in Europe compared with North America and higher when the treating physician is a general practitioner compared with a specialist. We propose a framework for assessing and designing persistence studies. This framework includes aspects of patient selection, reliability and validity of measures, persistence definitions, clinical utility of measurements, follow-up periods, and analytic approaches.

Conclusions 

Differences in study design, patient selection, treatments, and factors such as the countries/regions where studies are conducted or the type of treating physician may help explain the variability in OAC persistence estimates. A framework is proposed to assess persistence studies. This may have utility to compare and interpret published studies as well as for planning of future studies.