Audiologists' perspectives on management of mild bilateral hearing loss in infants and young children

The congenital hearing phenotype in GJB2 in Queensland, Australia: V37I and mild hearing loss predominates

GJB2 was originally identified in severe, non-syndromic sensorineural hearing loss (SNHL), but was subsequently associated with mild and moderate SNHL. Given the increasing utilisation of genetic testing pre-conceptually, prenatally, and neonatally, it is crucial to understand genotype-phenotype correlations. This study evaluated the nature and frequency of GJB2 variants in an Australian paediatric population with varying degrees of SNHL ascertained through newborn hearing screening. Audiograms from individuals with GJB2 variants and/or a GJB6 deletion (GJB6-D13S11830) were retrospectively reviewed (n = 127). Two-thirds were biallelic (homozygous/compound heterozygous) for pathogenic/likely pathogenic variants of GJB2 and/or GJB6 (n = 80). The most frequent variant was c.109 G > A, followed by c.35delG and c.101 T > C. Compared to biallelic carriage of other GJB2 variants, c.109 G > A positive individuals (homozygous/compound heterozygous) were more likely to have mild HL at their initial and latest audiograms (p = 0.0004). Biallelic carriage of c.35delG was associated with moderately-severe or greater SNHL at both initial and latest audiograms (p = 0.007). The c.101 T > C variant presented with milder SNHL and U-shaped audiograms (p = 0.02). In this agnostically identified cohort, mild SNHL predominated in GJB2/GJB6 carriers in contrast to previous studies targeting individuals with significant loss. Consequently, c.109 G > A, associated with milder phenotypes, was the most frequent. This study provides valuable data to support prognostic confidence in genetic counselling.

Impact of Hearing Aids on Language Outcomes in Preschool Children With Mild Bilateral Hearing Loss

This study aimed to investigate the role of hearing aid (HA) usage in language outcomes among preschool children aged 3-5 years with mild bilateral hearing loss (MBHL). The data were retrieved from a total of 52 children with MBHL and 30 children with normal hearing (NH). The association between demographical, audiological factors and language outcomes was examined. Analyses of variance were conducted to compare the language abilities of HA users, non-HA users, and their NH peers. Furthermore, regression analyses were performed to identify significant predictors of language outcomes. Aided better ear pure-tone average (BEPTA) was significantly correlated with language comprehension scores. Among children with MBHL, those who used HA outperformed the ones who did not use HA across all linguistic domains. The language skills of children with MBHL were comparable to those of their peers with NH. The degree of improvement in audibility in terms of aided BEPTA was a significant predictor of language comprehension. It is noteworthy that 50% of the parents expressed reluctance regarding HA use for their children with MBHL. The findings highlight the positive impact of HA usage on language development in this population. Professionals may therefore consider HAs as a viable treatment option for children with MBHL, especially when there is a potential risk of language delay due to hearing loss. It was observed that 25% of the children with MBHL had late-onset hearing loss. Consequently, the implementation of preschool screening or a listening performance checklist is recommended to facilitate early detection.

Language and health-related quality of life outcomes of children early-detected with unilateral and mild bilateral hearing loss

Introduction

We aimed to describe the language and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) outcomes of children early-identified with unilateral or mild bilateral permanent hearing loss. This was a cross-sectional community-based study of children with mild bilateral or unilateral permanent hearing loss (including unilateral auditory neuropathy spectrum disorder (ANSD)), drawn from a population-based databank in Victoria, Australia.

Methods

Enrolment in this databank is independent of early intervention and amplification approaches. Language and caregiver-reported HRQoL outcomes are described by type and degree of loss at three timepoints across child development: at age 2 years (n = 255), 5-7 years (n = 173) and 9-12 years (n = 45).

Results

Across all age groups, average language outcomes were poorer than population normative scores by between a half to two thirds of a standard deviation. Children with mild bilateral hearing loss demonstrated poorer average language outcomes than children with unilateral hearing loss, particularly at younger ages. Children with unilateral ANSD showed language outcomes comparable to their peers with unilateral profound hearing loss. Children had poorer HRQoL psychosocial scores compared to physical scores, without obvious patterns of outcomes linked to degree or type of hearing loss.

Discussion

This study demonstrates children with early-identified unilateral or mild bilateral hearing loss have average language and HRQoL outcomes poorer than population normative expectations from an early age. These outcomes are observed at later ages across childhood. These findings provide a contemporary description of language and quality of life outcomes for children identified but not targeted by universal newborn hearing screening and raise questions of how to provide better support for these populations of children and their families.

Mild matters: trial learnings and importance of community engagement in research for early identified bilateral mild hearing loss

Introduction

Early identification of mild hearing loss has resulted in early hearing amplification without adequate evidence of effectiveness. This paper describes learnings from a pilot trial, combined with a qualitative study, to highlight the importance of community engagement in designing research studies to determine whether early amplification benefits young children with bilateral mild hearing loss.

Methods

PART 1 of the study is a proof-of-concept non-blinded multi-centre randomised controlled trial (RCT) of hearing device fitting vs. no fitting aimed to gather preliminary data and determine its acceptability/feasibility in children <2 years old with bilateral mild hearing loss.

Results

PART 2 is a qualitative study to understand the barriers/enablers to RCT participation. Of 40 potentially eligible families, nine (23%) declined, three were uncontactable (7%), 26 (65%) ineligible: of these, nine (35%) did not meet hearing threshold inclusion criteria, 11 (42%) were already fitted or had made decisions on fitting hearing device, two (7%) had conductive loss and four (16%) were ineligible for other reasons. Two of 11 (18%) eligible families were randomised. With the limited sample size, outcome measures were not compared between groups. Both participants completed the trial, reported the RCT to be acceptable, and neither changed group post-enrolment.

Discussion

Whilst recruitment uptake could potentially be increased by altering the eligibility criteria, better communication with and reimbursement of clinicians as recruiters, and improving awareness of the study amongst external stakeholders, the RCT methodology does not conform to family-centred practice, and potentially raises ethical concerns regarding potential adverse consequences of not offering early amplification. Parental perception of losing control over choice of management due to randomisation is not an easily modifiable factor. Alternative methodological approaches without randomisation are required to determine whether hearing amplification benefits infants with mild hearing loss.Clinical Trial Registration: identifier [ACTRN12618001608257].