Utilitarian Lessons from the COVID-19 Pandemic for Non-Pandemic Diseases

Supporting ethical end-of-life care during pandemic: Palliative care team perspectives

BACKGROUND

Italy was the first European country to be involved with the COVID-19 pandemic. As a result, many healthcare professionals were deployed and suddenly faced end-of-life care management and its challenges.

AIMS

To understand the experiences of palliative care professionals deployed in supporting emergency and critical care staff during the COVID-19 first and second pandemic waves.

RESEARCH DESIGN

A qualitative descriptive design was adopted, and in-depth interviews were used to investigate and analyse participants' perceptions and points of view.

PARTICIPANTS AND RESEARCH CONTEXT

Twenty-four healthcare professionals (physicians, nurses, psychologists, physiotherapists, and spiritual support) from the most affected areas of Italy were recruited via the Italian society of palliative care and researchers' network.

ETHICAL CONSIDERATIONS

The University Institutional Board granted ethical approval. Participants gave written informed consent and agreed to be video-recorded.

FINDINGS

The overarching theme highlighted participants' experience supporting health professionals to negotiate ethical complexity in end-of-life care. Crucial topics that emerged within themes were: training emergency department professionals on ethical dimensions of palliative and end-of-life care, preserving dying patients' dignity and developing ethical competence in managing end-of-life care.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study showed palliative care teams' challenges in supporting health professionals' ethical awareness in emergencies. However, while they highlighted their concerns in dealing with the emergency staff's lack of ethical perspectives, they also reported the positive impact of an ethically-informed palliative care approach. Lastly, this study illuminates how palliative care professionals' clinical and ethical competence might have assisted a cultural change in caring for dying patients during COVID-19 and future emergencies.

Applying Two-level Utilitarianism and the Principle of Fairness to Mandatory Vaccination during the COVID-19 Pandemic: the Situation in South Korea

In response to the COVID-19 pandemic, Korean society has sought to vaccinate most of its population. Consequently, the Korean government has attempted to make vaccination compulsory by promoting awareness of its benefits. The administration has pushed for mandatory vaccination by claiming that vaccination is more beneficial than harmful, based on a utilitarian view. However, this view is difficult to justify based on the two levels of utilitarianism presented by R. M. Hare. Compulsory vaccination cannot satisfy the universalizability, nor the satisfaction of preference, and exposes the difficulties of utilitarianism. In addition, mandatory vaccination is difficult to justify based on the perspective of fairness theory, that is, "justice as the fairness" of John Rawls and H. L. A. Hart's principle of fairness. From the point of view of Hare's utilitarianism and fairness theory, it has been shown that mandatory vaccination is not easily justified. In reality, the power of the state continues to strengthen, and we should examine this situation from a critical point of view.