Antibody Response for L1, E6 and E7 HPV 16 and HPV 18 Antigens in Tunisian Women with Cervical Cancer and Controls

Causal Link of Human Papillomavirus in Barrett Esophagus and Adenocarcinoma: Are We There Yet?

Esophageal cancer is a relatively common malignancy worldwide with a high mortality (5-year survival of <15%). Despite screening, surveillance, improved imaging and treatment, the exponential rise in OAC continues. The strongest risk factors for OAC are chronic heartburn and metaplastic transformation of the lower third of the esophagus (Barrett's esophagus). The risk profile includes Caucasian race, male gender older age, obesity and smoking. Although the tumor risk in BO has been progressively revised downwards, the exponential rise in OAC remains unchecked. This paradox points to an unidentified missing link. Relatively recently, we provided the world's initial data for a strong association of biologically relevant hr-HPV with BD and OAC. Since then, systematic reviews and meta-analysis have documented HPV DNA prevalence rates in OAC of between 13 to 35%. In this review, we provide some evidence for a probable causal relationship between hr-HPV and OAC. This is challenging given the multifactorial etiology and long latency. Increasingly, high-risk HPV (hr-HPV) is regarded as a risk factor for OAC. This discovery will aid identification of a sub-group of high-risk progressors to esophageal cancer by surveillance and the development of effective preventive strategies including vaccination.

Differential Antibody Response against Conformational and Linear Epitopes of the L1 Proteins from Human Papillomavirus Types 16/18 Is Observed in Vaccinated Women or with Uterine Cervical Lesions

Antibodies against the Human Papillomavirus (HPV) L1 protein are associated with past infections and related to the evolution of the disease, whereas antibodies against L1 Virus-Like Particles (VLPs) are used to follow the neutralizing antibody response in vaccinated women. In this study, serum antibodies against conformational (VLPs) and linear epitopes of HPV16/18 L1 protein were assessed to distinguish HPV-vaccinated women from those naturally infected or those with uterine cervical lesions. The VLPs-16/18 were generated in baculovirus, and L1 proteins were obtained from denatured VLPs. Serum antibodies against VLPs and L1 proteins were evaluated by ELISA. The ELISA-VLPs and ELISA-L1 16/18 assays were validated with a vaccinated women group by ROC analysis and the regression analysis to distinguish the different populations of female patients. The anti-VLPs-16/18 and anti-L1-16/18 antibodies effectively detect vaccinated women (AUC = 1.0/0.79, and 0.94/0.84, respectively). The regression analysis showed that anti-VLPs-16/18 and anti-L1-16/18 antibodies were associated with the vaccinated group (OR = 2.11 × 10⁸/16.50 and 536.0/49.2, respectively). However, only the anti-L1-16 antibodies were associated with the high-grade lesions and cervical cancer (CIN3/CC) group (OR = 12.18). In conclusion, our results suggest that anti-VLPs-16/18 antibodies are effective and type-specific to detect HPV-vaccinated women, but anti-L1-16 antibodies better differentiate the CIN3/CC group. However, a larger population study is needed to validate these results.

Humoral Immune Response Against Human Papillomavirus as Source of Biomarkers for the Prediction and Detection of Cervical Cancer

Cervical cancer (CC) is one of the main causes of death among women of reproductive age. Although there are different tests, the disease tends to be diagnosed at late stages. In recent years, the use of complementary tests or sequential diagnostic tests has been implemented. Nevertheless, the results are variable and not conclusive; therefore, more studies for improving the usefulness of these tests in diagnostics are necessary. The human papillomavirus (HPV) infection has been associated with both benign and malignant proliferation of skin and mucosal tissues. Furthermore, some HPV types have been classified as high risk due to their potential to cause cancer, and HPV16 is most frequently associated with this disease. Although between 70% and 80% of precancerous lesions are eliminated by the host's immune system, there is no available test to distinguish between regressive lesions from those that could progress to CC. An HPV infection generates a humoral immune response against L1 and L2 capsid proteins, which can be protective and a response against early proteins. The latter is not a protective response, but these antibodies can be used as markers to determine the stage of the infection and/or the stage of the cervical lesion. Up to now, the humoral immune response resulting from the HPV infection has been used to study the biology of the virus and the efficacy of the HPV vaccines. Although there are no conclusive results regarding the use of these antibodies for diagnosis, we hereby review the actual panorama of the antibody response against the HPV proteins during the development of the disease as well as their possible use as biomarkers for the progression of cervical lesions and of CC.

A lectin-based diagnostic system using circulating antibodies to detect cervical intraepithelial neoplasia and cervical cancer

In the present study, we developed serological strategies using immunoglobulin fractions obtained by protein A chromatography to screen for cervical cancer and cervical intraepithelial neoplasia I (CIN I). The reactivities of the immunoglobulins purified from sera of women with normal cytology, CIN I and cervical cancer were compared in enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISA) and enzyme-linked lectin assays (ELLAs). To capture the immunoglobulins, ELISAs and ELLAs were performed in protein A immobilized microplates. The reactivity of immunoglobulin in ELISA was in the increasing order normal cytology, CIN I and cervical cancer, while that in ELLAs for detecting fucosylation was in the decreasing order normal cytology, CIN I and cervical cancer. It was confirmed that women with CIN I were distinguishable from women with normal cytology or women with cervical cancer in the ELISA or the ELLA for detecting fucosylation with considerable sensitivity and specificity. Women with cervical cancer were also distinguishable from women with normal cytology with high sensitivity (ELISA: 97%, ELLA: 87%) and specificity (ELISA: 69%, ELLA: 72%). Moreover, the logistic regression model of the ELISA and the ELLA discriminated cervical cancer from normal cytology with 93% sensitivity and 93% specificity. These results indicate that the ELISAs and the ELLAs have great potential as strategies for primary screening of cervical cancer and CIN. It is expected that the ELISA and the ELLA can provide new insights to understand systemic changes of serum immunoglobulins during cervical cancer progression.