Future Directions in Youth and Family Treatment Engagement: Finishing the Bridge Between Science and Service

Family Support Protocol for Adolescent Internalizing Disorders: Protocol for a Pre-Post Quantitative Treatment Development Study

BACKGROUND

Internalizing disorders (IDs), primarily depression and anxiety, are highly prevalent among adolescents receiving community-based treatment for substance use disorders (SUDs). For such clients, interventions that do not holistically address both SUDs and IDs are less effective.

OBJECTIVE

This pilot treatment development study aims to develop and test a modular treatment protocol for addressing cooccurring IDs among adolescents (aged 13 to 18 years) enrolled in routine care for substance use problems: Family Support Protocol for Adolescent Internalizing Disorders (Fam-AID). As an adjunctive protocol, Fam-AID will not require clinicians to markedly alter existing base practices for SUD. It will be anchored by 3 evidence-based foundations for treating cooccurring adolescent IDs: family engagement techniques, transdiagnostic individual cognitive behavioral therapy techniques, and family psychoeducation and safety planning.

METHODS

This quasi-experimental study will proceed in 2 stages. The pilot stage will use rapid-cycle prototyping methods in collaboration with end-user stakeholders to draft protocol delivery and fidelity guidelines adapted from existing resources, solicit provider and client input on protocol content and delivery via cognitive interviewing, and pilot prototype components on 4 to 6 cases. The second stage will be an interrupted time series study for 60 comorbid SUD+ID cases across 2 sites serving diverse adolescents: 30 will receive treatment as usual (TAU); following clinician training in the protocol, 30 new cases will receive TAU enhanced by Fam-AID. For aim 1, the focus is on evaluating the acceptability of the Fam-AID protocol through therapist and client interviews as well as assessing fidelity benchmarks using therapist- and observer-reported protocol fidelity data. For aim 2, the plan is to compare the effects of TAU only cases versus TAU+Fam-AID cases on family treatment attendance and on adolescent ID and substance use symptoms, with measurements taken at baseline and at 3-month and 6-month follow-ups.

RESULTS

Study recruitment will begin in April 2025.

CONCLUSIONS

We anticipate that Fam-AID will contain 5 treatment modules that can be delivered in any sequence to meet client needs: family engagement of primary supports in treatment planning and services; relational reframing of family constraints, resiliencies, and social capital connected to the adolescent's ID symptoms; functional analysis of the adolescent's ID symptoms and related behaviors; cognitive behavioral therapy to address the adolescent's ID symptoms and functional needs, featuring 3 core techniques (emotion acceptance, emotional exposure, and behavioral activation) to address negative affect and emotional dysregulation; and family psychoeducation and safety planning focused on education about comorbid SUD+ID and prevention of adolescent self-harm. If the abovementioned modules are found to be feasible and effective, Fam-AID will offer a set of pragmatic interventions to SUD clinicians for treating cooccurring IDs in adolescent clients.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT06413979; https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT06413979.

INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID)

PRR1-10.2196/64332.

Mandated Parent Education: Applications, Impacts, and Future Directions

Mandated participation in parent education programs is a common practice across the United States for families who are undergoing divorce or who are involved in the child welfare or juvenile justice systems. Mandates to participate in parenting programs create substantial challenges for families, service providers, and service systems. Furthermore, the type and quality of the parenting services accessed vary widely, and their impacts need to be better understood. To address this need, an overview of the current state of the empirical literature on the impacts and outcomes of mandated parenting interventions for divorce and in child welfare and juvenile justice settings is provided, and suggestions to the field are offered to refine research related to mandated parenting programs. Given the challenges that mandated parenting programs pose, an alternative approach that views parenting through a public health lens is highlighted to build on the growing body of research on the impacts of population-wide applications of parenting support programs, and as a possible way to decrease the number of parents who are required to attend parenting programs. Opportunities to advance universal parenting support within a range of community settings, including primary care, early childhood education, and community mental health systems are offered. Gaps in knowledge regarding mechanisms of action of universal supports and impacts on the number of parents mandated to treatment are highlighted, and future directions for research in this area are suggested.

Adolescent engagement in a stepped care, transdiagnostic mental health intervention delivered in Indian schools

Given the relationship between poor engagement and worse treatment outcomes, improving engagement has been the focus of attention in recent years. Engagement is a particular challenge among minoritized and otherwise challenged youth, such as those from socioeconomically disadvantaged groups, including youth in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), where they face lower levels of access to resources, including mental health treatment. The present study describes engagement challenges that arose in an uncontrolled pre-post evaluation of a school-based, modular, multi-problem, stepped-care intervention delivered in urban Indian communities. Specifically, the study aimed to (1) characterize barriers and facilitators of youth treatment engagement; and (2) evaluate treatment acceptability and fit of treatment from the youth perspective. Youth participants completed semi-structured interviews, which were transcribed and coded using thematic analysis. Participants described numerous facilitators to engagement (e.g., positive therapeutic relationship) and reported high overall satisfaction with the intervention, while also identifying barriers to engagement (e.g., concerns about confidentiality) and offering suggestions to increase fit and acceptability (e.g., more visually appealing treatment materials). Findings highlight ways in which engagement can be enhanced and implementation supports improved to maximize treatment effectiveness among minoritized and disadvantaged youth in LMICs.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s44202-024-00154-1.

Youth-Therapist and Parent-Therapist Match and Mismatch on Internalizing and Externalizing Treatment Goals as Predictors of Treatment Engagement

Therapist-client cognitive match upon key constructs such as treatment goals is purported to be an important component of culturally competent care. For adolescent clients, treatment may involve both youths and their parents, suggesting the need to consider both youth-therapist and parent-therapist perspectives. This longitudinal study examined broadband youth-therapist and parent-therapist treatment goal matching and mismatching in relationship to treatment engagement in a culturally diverse sample of 245 outpatient mental health service-using youth. Although goal matching/mismatching did not uniformly predict treatment engagement as measured by a total score, youth-therapist internalizing goal matching predicted better youth engagement, and parent-therapist externalizing goal mismatch marginally predicted worse parent engagement. When selected post hoc analyses examined relationships to four individual engagement dimensions, youth-therapist internalizing goal matches positively predicted youth Client-therapist interaction, Communication/Openness, Client's perceived usefulness of therapy, and Collaboration with treatment, while parent-therapist externalizing goal mismatch negatively predicted parent Collaboration with treatment. Findings support the importance of cognitive match on treatment goals as well as the consideration of both parent and youth perspectives, matched and mismatched goals, internalizing and externalizing goals, and examining individual dimensions in addition to total scores of engagement.