1
|
Kenyon EM, Eklund C, Pegram RA, Lipscomb JC. Comparison of in vivo derived and scaled in vitro metabolic rate constants for several volatile organic compounds (VOCs). Toxicol In Vitro 2020; 69:105002. [PMID: 32946980 DOI: 10.1016/j.tiv.2020.105002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/29/2020] [Revised: 08/26/2020] [Accepted: 09/13/2020] [Indexed: 10/23/2022]
Abstract
Metabolic rate parameters estimation using in vitro data is necessary due to numbers of chemicals for which data are needed, trend towards minimizing laboratory animal use, and limited opportunity to collect data in human subjects. We evaluated how well metabolic rate parameters derived from in vitro data predict overall in vivo metabolism for a set of environmental chemicals for which well validated and established methods exist. We compared values of VmaxC derived from in vivo vapor uptake studies with estimates of VmaxC scaled up from in vitro hepatic microsomal metabolism studies for VOCs for which data were available in male F344 rats. For 6 of 7 VOCs, differences between the in vivo and scaled up in vitro VmaxC estimates were less than 2.6-fold. For bromodichloromethane (BDCM), the in vivo derived VmaxC was approximately 4.4-fold higher than the in vitro derived and scaled up VmaxC. The more rapid rate of BDCM metabolism estimated based in vivo studies suggests other factors such as extrahepatic metabolism, binding or other non-specific losses making a significant contribution to overall clearance. Systematic and reliable utilization of scaled up in vitro biotransformation rate parameters in PBPK models will require development of methods to predict cases in which extrahepatic metabolism and binding as well as other factors are likely to be significant contributors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elaina M Kenyon
- Center for Computational Toxicology and Exposure, U.S. EPA, Office of Research and Development, Research Triangle Park, NC, United States.
| | - Christopher Eklund
- Center for Computational Toxicology and Exposure, U.S. EPA, Office of Research and Development, Research Triangle Park, NC, United States
| | - Rex A Pegram
- Center for Computational Toxicology and Exposure, U.S. EPA, Office of Research and Development, Research Triangle Park, NC, United States
| | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
DeMarini DM. A review on the 40th anniversary of the first regulation of drinking water disinfection by-products. ENVIRONMENTAL AND MOLECULAR MUTAGENESIS 2020; 61:588-601. [PMID: 32374889 PMCID: PMC7640377 DOI: 10.1002/em.22378] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/23/2020] [Revised: 04/07/2020] [Accepted: 04/11/2020] [Indexed: 05/05/2023]
Abstract
Water disinfection, primarily by chlorination, is one of the greatest achievements of public health. However, more than half a century after its introduction, studies in the 1970s reported that (a) chlorine interacted with organic matter in the water to form disinfection by-products (DBPs); (b) two DBPs, chloroform and bromoform, both trihalomethanes (THMs), were rodent carcinogens; (c) three brominated THMs were mutagenic; in six studies chlorinated drinking waters in the United States and Canada were mutagenic; and (d) in one epidemiological study there was an association between bladder cancer mortality and THM exposure. This led the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency to issue its first DBP regulation in 1979. Forty years later, >600 DBPs have been characterized, 20/22 have been shown to be rodent carcinogens, >100 have been shown to be genotoxic, and 1000s of water samples have been found to be mutagenic. Data support a hypothesis that long-term dermal/inhalation exposure to certain levels of the three brominated THMs, as well as oral exposure to the haloacetic acids, combined with a specific genotype may increase the risk for bladder cancer for a small but significant population group. Improved water-treatment methods and stricter regulations have likely reduced such risks over the years, and further reductions in potential risk are anticipated with the application of advanced water-treatment methods and wider application of drinking water regulations. This 40-year research effort is a remarkable example of sustained cooperation between academic and government scientists, along with public/private water companies, to find answers to a pressing public health question.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David M. DeMarini
- Biomolecular and Computational Toxicology Division, Center for Computational Toxicology and Exposure, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Krewski D, Andersen ME, Tyshenko MG, Krishnan K, Hartung T, Boekelheide K, Wambaugh JF, Jones D, Whelan M, Thomas R, Yauk C, Barton-Maclaren T, Cote I. Toxicity testing in the 21st century: progress in the past decade and future perspectives. Arch Toxicol 2019; 94:1-58. [DOI: 10.1007/s00204-019-02613-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 124] [Impact Index Per Article: 20.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/25/2019] [Accepted: 11/05/2019] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
|
4
|
Kenyon EM, Lipscomb JC, Pegram RA, George BJ, Hines RN. The Impact of Scaling Factor Variability on Risk-Relevant Pharmacokinetic Outcomes in Children: A Case Study Using Bromodichloromethane (BDCM). Toxicol Sci 2019; 167:347-359. [PMID: 30252107 PMCID: PMC10448349 DOI: 10.1093/toxsci/kfy236] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/26/2022] Open
Abstract
Biotransformation rates extrapolated from in vitro data are used increasingly in human physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) models. This practice requires use of scaling factors, including microsomal content (mg of microsomal protein/g liver, MPPGL), enzyme specific content, and liver mass as a fraction of body weight (FVL). Previous analyses indicated that scaling factor variability impacts pharmacokinetic (PK) outcomes used in adult population dose-response studies. This analysis was extended to pediatric populations because large inter-individual differences in enzyme ontogeny likely would further contribute to scaling factor variability. An adult bromodichloromethane (BDCM) model (Kenyon, E. M., Eklund, C., Leavens, T. L., and Pegram, R. A. (2016a). Development and application of a human PBPK model for bromodichloromethane (BDCM) to investigate impacts of multi-route exposure. J. Appl. Toxicol. 36, 1095-1111) was re-parameterized for neonates, infants, and toddlers. Monte Carlo analysis was used to assess the impact of pediatric scaling factor variation on model-derived PK outcomes compared with adult findings. BDCM dose metrics were estimated following a single 0.05-liter drink of water or a 20-min bath, under typical (5 µg/l) and plausible higher (20 µg/l) BDCM concentrations. MPPGL, CYP2E1, and FVL values reflected the distribution of reported pediatric population values. The impact of scaling factor variability on PK outcome variation was different for each exposure scenario, but similar for each BDCM water concentration. The higher CYP2E1 expression variability during early childhood was reflected in greater variability in predicted PK outcomes in younger age groups, particularly for the oral exposure route. Sensitivity analysis confirmed the most influential parameter for this variability was CYP2E1, particularly in neonates. These findings demonstrate the importance of age-dependent scaling factor variation used for in vitro to in vivo extrapolation of biotransformation rates.
Collapse
|
5
|
Jones BC, Srivastava A, Colclough N, Wilson J, Reddy VP, Amberntsson S, Li D. An Investigation into the Prediction of in Vivo Clearance for a Range of Flavin-containing Monooxygenase Substrates. Drug Metab Dispos 2017; 45:1060-1067. [PMID: 28784689 DOI: 10.1124/dmd.117.077396] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/03/2017] [Accepted: 08/04/2017] [Indexed: 11/22/2022] Open
Abstract
Flavin-containing monooxygenases (FMO) are metabolic enzymes mediating the oxygenation of nucleophilic atoms such as nitrogen, sulfur, phosphorus, and selenium. These enzymes share similar properties to the cytochrome P450 system but can be differentiated through heat inactivation and selective substrate inhibition by methimazole. This study investigated 10 compounds with varying degrees of FMO involvement to determine the nature of the correlation between human in vitro and in vivo unbound intrinsic clearance. To confirm and quantify the extent of FMO involvement six of the compounds were investigated in human liver microsomal (HLM) in vitro assays using heat inactivation and methimazole substrate inhibition. Under these conditions FMO contribution varied from 21% (imipramine) to 96% (itopride). Human hepatocyte and HLM intrinsic clearance (CLint) data were scaled using standard methods to determine the predicted unbound intrinsic clearance (predicted CLint u) for each compound. This was compared with observed unbound intrinsic clearance (observed CLint u) values back calculated from human pharmacokinetic studies. A good correlation was observed between the predicted and observed CLint u using hepatocytes (R2 = 0.69), with 8 of the 10 compounds investigated within or close to a factor of 2. For HLM the in vitro-in vivo correlation was maintained (R2 = 0.84) but the accuracy was reduced with only 3 out of 10 compounds falling within, or close to, twofold. This study demonstrates that human hepatocytes and HLM can be used with standard scaling approaches to predict the human in vivo clearance for FMO substrates.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Barry C Jones
- Oncology IMED, Astrazeneca, Cambridge, United Kingdom (B.C.J., N.C., J.W., V.P.R.), DSM Astrazeneca, Cambridge, United Kingdom (A.S.); DSM Astrazeneca, Gothenburg, Sweden (S.A.); and Pharmaron, Beijing, China (D.L.)
| | - Abhishek Srivastava
- Oncology IMED, Astrazeneca, Cambridge, United Kingdom (B.C.J., N.C., J.W., V.P.R.), DSM Astrazeneca, Cambridge, United Kingdom (A.S.); DSM Astrazeneca, Gothenburg, Sweden (S.A.); and Pharmaron, Beijing, China (D.L.)
| | - Nicola Colclough
- Oncology IMED, Astrazeneca, Cambridge, United Kingdom (B.C.J., N.C., J.W., V.P.R.), DSM Astrazeneca, Cambridge, United Kingdom (A.S.); DSM Astrazeneca, Gothenburg, Sweden (S.A.); and Pharmaron, Beijing, China (D.L.)
| | - Joanne Wilson
- Oncology IMED, Astrazeneca, Cambridge, United Kingdom (B.C.J., N.C., J.W., V.P.R.), DSM Astrazeneca, Cambridge, United Kingdom (A.S.); DSM Astrazeneca, Gothenburg, Sweden (S.A.); and Pharmaron, Beijing, China (D.L.)
| | - Venkatesh Pilla Reddy
- Oncology IMED, Astrazeneca, Cambridge, United Kingdom (B.C.J., N.C., J.W., V.P.R.), DSM Astrazeneca, Cambridge, United Kingdom (A.S.); DSM Astrazeneca, Gothenburg, Sweden (S.A.); and Pharmaron, Beijing, China (D.L.)
| | - Sara Amberntsson
- Oncology IMED, Astrazeneca, Cambridge, United Kingdom (B.C.J., N.C., J.W., V.P.R.), DSM Astrazeneca, Cambridge, United Kingdom (A.S.); DSM Astrazeneca, Gothenburg, Sweden (S.A.); and Pharmaron, Beijing, China (D.L.)
| | - Danxi Li
- Oncology IMED, Astrazeneca, Cambridge, United Kingdom (B.C.J., N.C., J.W., V.P.R.), DSM Astrazeneca, Cambridge, United Kingdom (A.S.); DSM Astrazeneca, Gothenburg, Sweden (S.A.); and Pharmaron, Beijing, China (D.L.)
| |
Collapse
|