IL-8, MSPa, MIF, FGF-9, ANG-2 and AgRP collection were identified for the diagnosis of colorectal cancer based on the support vector machine model

Unraveling the underlying pathogenic factors driving nonalcoholic steatohepatitis and hepatocellular carcinoma: an in-depth analysis of prognostically relevant gene signatures in hepatocellular carcinoma

BACKGROUND

Nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) is a progressive manifestation of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) that can lead to fibrosis, cirrhosis, and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Despite the growing knowledge of NASH and HCC, the association between the two conditions remains to be fully explored. Bioinformatics has emerged as a valuable approach for identifying disease-specific feature genes, enabling advancements in disease prediction, prevention, and personalized treatment strategies.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In this study, we utilized CellChat, copy number karyotyping of aneuploid tumors (CopyKAT), consensus Non-negative Matrix factorization (cNMF), Gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA), Gene set variation analysis (GSVA), Monocle, spatial co-localization, single sample gene set enrichment analysis (ssGSEA), Slingshot, and the Scissor algorithm to analyze the cellular and immune landscape of NASH and HCC. Through the Scissor algorithm, we identified three cell types correlating with disease phenotypic features and subsequently developed a novel clinical prediction model using univariate, LASSO, and multifactor Cox regression.

RESULTS

Our results revealed that macrophages are a significant pathological factor in the development of NASH and HCC and that the macrophage migration inhibitory factor (MIF) signaling pathway plays a crucial role in cellular crosstalk at the molecular level. We deduced three prognostic genes (YBX1, MED8, and KPNA2), demonstrating a strong diagnostic capability in both NASH and HCC.

CONCLUSION

These findings shed light on the pathological mechanisms shared between NASH and HCC, providing valuable insights for the development of novel clinical strategies.

Plasma protein changes reflect colorectal cancer development and associated inflammation

Introduction

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the third most common malignancy and the second leading cause of death worldwide. Efficient non-invasive blood-based biomarkers for CRC early detection and prognosis are urgently needed.

Methods

To identify novel potential plasma biomarkers, we applied a proximity extension assay (PEA), an antibody-based proteomics strategy to quantify the abundance of plasma proteins in CRC development and cancer-associated inflammation from few μL of plasma sample.

Results

Among the 690 quantified proteins, levels of 202 plasma proteins were significantly changed in CRC patients compared to age-and-sex-matched healthy subjects. We identified novel protein changes involved in Th17 activity, oncogenic pathways, and cancer-related inflammation with potential implications in the CRC diagnosis. Moreover, the interferon γ (IFNG), interleukin (IL) 32, and IL17C were identified as associated with the early stages of CRC, whereas lysophosphatidic acid phosphatase type 6 (ACP6), Fms-related tyrosine kinase 4 (FLT4), and MANSC domain-containing protein 1 (MANSC1) were correlated with the late-stages of CRC.

Discussion

Further study to characterize the newly identified plasma protein changes from larger cohorts will facilitate the identification of potential novel diagnostic, prognostic biomarkers for CRC.

Integrated analysis of multi-omics data for the discovery of biomarkers and therapeutic targets for colorectal cancer

The considerable burden of colorectal cancer and the rising trend in young adults emphasize the necessity of understanding its underlying mechanisms, providing new diagnostic and prognostic markers, and improving therapeutic approaches. Precision medicine is a new trend all over the world and identification of novel biomarkers and therapeutic targets is a step forward towards this trend. In this context, multi-omics data and integrated analysis are being investigated to develop personalized medicine in the management of colorectal cancer. Given the large amount of data from multi-omics approach, data integration and analysis is a great challenge. In this Review, we summarize how statistical and machine learning techniques are applied to analyze multi-omics data and how it contributes to the discovery of useful diagnostic and prognostic biomarkers and therapeutic targets. Moreover, we discuss the importance of these biomarkers and therapeutic targets in the clinical management of colorectal cancer in the future. Taken together, integrated analysis of multi-omics data has great potential for finding novel diagnostic and prognostic biomarkers and therapeutic targets, however, there are still challenges to overcome in future studies.

Blood Biomarkers Panels for Screening of Colorectal Cancer and Adenoma on a Machine Learning-Assisted Detection Platform

OBJECTIVE

A mini-invasive and good-compliance program is critical to broaden colorectal cancer (CRC) screening and reduce CRC-related mortality. Blood testing combined with imaging examination has been proved to be feasible on screen for multicancer and guide intervention. The study aims to construct a machine learning-assisted detection platform with available multi-targets for CRC and colorectal adenoma (CRA) screening.

METHODS

This was a retrospective study that the blood test data from 204 CRCs, 384 CRAs, and 229 healthy controls was extracted. The classified models were constructed with 4 machine learning (ML) algorithms including support vector machine (SVM), random forest (RF), decision tree (DT), and eXtreme Gradient Boosting (XGB) based on the candidate biomarkers. The importance index was used by SHapely Adaptive exPlanations (SHAP) analysis to identify the dominant characteristics. The performance of classified models was evaluated. The most dominating features from the proposed panel were developed by logistic regression (LR) for identification CRC from control.

RESULTS

The candidate biomarkers consisted of 26 multi-targets panel including CEA, AFP, and so on. Among the 4 models, the SVM classifier for CRA yields the best predictive performance (the area under the receiver operating curve, AUC: .925, sensitivity: .904, and specificity: .771). As for CRC classification, the RF model with 26 candidate biomarkers provided the best predictive parameters (AUC: .941, sensitivity: .902, and specificity: .912). Compared with CEA and CA199, the predictive performance was significantly improved. The streamlined model with 6 biomarkers for CRC also obtained a good performance (AUC: .946, sensitivity: .885, and specificity: .913).

CONCLUSIONS

The predictive models consisting of 26 multi-targets panel would be used as a non-invasive, economical, and effective risk stratification platform, which was expected to be applied for auxiliary screening of CRA and CRC in clinical practice.

Escaping cell death via TRAIL decoy receptors: a systematic review of their roles and expressions in colorectal cancer

The development of targeted therapy such as tumour necrosis factor (TNF)-related apoptosis-inducing ligand (TRAIL)-based therapy has gained increasing attention as a promising new approach in cancer therapy. TRAIL specifically targets cancer cells while sparing the normal cells, thus, limiting the known side effects of the majority anti-cancer therapies. As more extensive research and clinical trials are conducted, resistance to TRAIL molecule has become one of the significant issues associated with the failure of TRAIL in treating colorectal cancer (CRC). To date, the exact mechanism by which TRAIL resistance may have occurred remains unknown. Interestingly, recent studies have revealed the critical role of the TRAIL decoy receptor family; consisting of decoy receptor 1 (DcR1; also known as TRAIL-R3), decoy receptor 2 (DcR2; also known as TRAIL-R4), and osteoprotegerin (OPG) in driving TRAIL resistance. This review highlights the expression of the decoy receptors in CRC and its possible association with the reduction in sensitivity towards TRAIL treatment based on the currently available in vitro, in vivo, and human studies. Additionally, discrepancies between the outcomes from different research groups are discussed, and essential areas are highlighted for future investigation of the roles of decoy receptors in modulating TRAIL-induced apoptosis. Overcoming TRAIL resistance through modulating the expression(s) and elucidating the role(s) of TRAIL decoy receptors hold great promise for TRAIL-based therapies to be extensively explored in treating human cancers including CRC.