1
|
Iyer AS, Wells RD, Bechthold AC, Armstrong M, O’Beirne R, Byun JY, Coffee-Dunning J, Odom JN, Buhr R, Suen AO, Kotwal A, Witt LJ, Brown CJ, Dransfield MT, Bakitas MA. Identifying priority challenges of older adults with COPD: A multiphase intervention refinement study. J Am Geriatr Soc 2024; 72:3346-3359. [PMID: 39215557 PMCID: PMC11560595 DOI: 10.1111/jgs.19158] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/25/2024] [Revised: 07/22/2024] [Accepted: 08/01/2024] [Indexed: 09/04/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Identifying priority challenges of older adults with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is critical to designing interventions aimed at improving their well-being and independence. OBJECTIVE To prioritize challenges of older adults with COPD and those who care for them to guide refinement of a telephonic nurse coach intervention for patients with COPD and their family caregivers (EPIC: Empowering People to Independence in COPD). DESIGN Multiphase study guided by Baltes Theory of Successful Aging and the 5Ms Framework: Phase 1: Nominal group technique (NGT), a structured process of prioritizing responses to a question through group consensus. Phase 2: Rapid qualitative analysis. Phase 3: Intervention mapping and refinement. SETTING Ambulatory, virtual. PARTICIPANTS Older adults with COPD, family caregivers, clinic staff (nurses, respiratory therapists), clinicians (physicians, nurse practitioners), and health system leaders. RESULTS NGT sessions were conducted by constituency group with 37 participants (n = 7 patients, n = 6 family caregivers, n = 8 clinic staff, n = 9 clinicians, n = 7 health system leaders) (Phase 1). Participants generated 92 statements across five themes (Phase 2): (1) "Barriers to care", (2) "Family caregiver needs", (3) "Functional status and mobility issues", (4) "Illness understanding", and (5) "COPD care complexities". Supplemental oxygen challenges emerged as a critical problem, and prioritized challenges differed by group. Patients and clinic staff prioritized "Functional status and mobility issues", family caregivers prioritized "Family caregiver needs", and clinicians and health system leaders prioritized "COPD care complexities". Intervention mapping (Phase 3) guided EPIC refinement focused on meeting patient priorities of independence and mobility but accounting for all priorities. CONCLUSIONS Diverse constituency groups identified priority challenges for older adults with COPD. Functional status and mobility issues, particularly related to supplemental oxygen, emerged as patient prioritized challenges. IMPLICATIONS Patient-centered interventions for older adults with COPD must account for their prioritized functional and supplemental oxygen needs and explore diverse constituent perspectives to facilitate intervention enrichment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anand S. Iyer
- Division of Pulmonary, Allergy, and Critical Care Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA
- Division of Gerontology, Geriatrics, and Palliative Care, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA
- Center for Palliative and Supportive Care, Birmingham, AL, USA
- School of Nursing, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA
- Birmingham Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Birmingham, AL, USA
| | - Rachel D. Wells
- Center for Palliative and Supportive Care, Birmingham, AL, USA
- School of Nursing, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA
| | - Avery C. Bechthold
- School of Nursing, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA
| | - Margaret Armstrong
- Center for Palliative and Supportive Care, Birmingham, AL, USA
- School of Nursing, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA
| | - Ronan O’Beirne
- Division of Continuing Medical Education, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA
| | - Jun Y. Byun
- School of Nursing, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA
| | - Jazmine Coffee-Dunning
- Center for Palliative and Supportive Care, Birmingham, AL, USA
- School of Nursing, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA
| | - J. Nicholas Odom
- Center for Palliative and Supportive Care, Birmingham, AL, USA
- School of Nursing, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA
| | - Russel Buhr
- Division of Pulmonary & Critical Care Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
- Department of Health Policy & Management, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
- Center for the Study of Healthcare Innovation, Implementation, and Policy, Greater Los Angeles VA Healthcare System, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Angela O. Suen
- Division of Pulmonary, Critical Care, Allergy and Sleep Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Ashwin Kotwal
- Division of Geriatrics, Department of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
- Geriatrics, Palliative, and Extended Care Service Line, San Francisco Veterans Affairs Medical Center, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Leah J. Witt
- Division of Pulmonary, Critical Care, Allergy and Sleep Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
- Division of Geriatrics, Department of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Cynthia J. Brown
- Department of Internal Medicine, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center, New Orleans, LA, USA
| | - Mark T. Dransfield
- Division of Pulmonary, Allergy, and Critical Care Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA
- Birmingham Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Birmingham, AL, USA
| | - Marie A. Bakitas
- Division of Gerontology, Geriatrics, and Palliative Care, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA
- Center for Palliative and Supportive Care, Birmingham, AL, USA
- School of Nursing, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Otto RB, Fields NL, Bennett M, Anderson KA. Positive Aging and Death or Dying: A Scoping Review. THE GERONTOLOGIST 2023; 63:1497-1509. [PMID: 36744720 DOI: 10.1093/geront/gnad006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/28/2022] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES This scoping review aims to examine the extent and the manner in which research that utilizes successful, active, productive, and healthy aging framework(s) includes death or dying. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS An examination of peer-reviewed academic journal articles was conducted following Joanna Briggs Institute's methodological standards for scoping reviews and conforming to Arskey and O'Malley's 5-stage framework. The initial search resulted in 1,759 articles for review, and following the rigorous screening, 35 studies were included for the final review. A qualitative thematic analysis was used to identify how research utilizes the concepts of death and dying in the context of 4 positive aging models. RESULTS The core themes identified include (a) the absence of death and dying dimensions in positive aging models; (b) older adults' outlooks on death and dying while aging well; (c) religious and spiritual dimensions of aging well; (d) negative consequences of positive aging models without death and dying dimensions; and (e) the future of death and dying in positive aging models. DISCUSSION AND IMPLICATIONS The review delivers a critique by researchers on the noticeable absence of death and dying processes within the framework of successful, active, productive, and healthy aging models. These findings represent a rich opportunity for future research on these concepts.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Robin Brown Otto
- School of Social Work, University of Texas at Arlington, Arlington, Texas, USA
| | - Noelle L Fields
- School of Social Work, University of Texas at Arlington, Arlington, Texas, USA
| | - Michael Bennett
- School of Social Work, University of Texas at Arlington, Arlington, Texas, USA
| | - Keith A Anderson
- Department of Social Work, University of Mississippi, Oxford, Mississippi, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Kisvetrová H, Mandysová P, Tomanová J, Steven A. Dignity and attitudes to aging: A cross-sectional study of older adults. Nurs Ethics 2021; 29:413-424. [PMID: 34875911 PMCID: PMC8958642 DOI: 10.1177/09697330211057223] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Abstract
Background: Dignity is a multidimensional construct that includes perception, knowledge, and emotions related to competence or respect. Attitudes to aging are a comprehensive personal view of the experience of aging over the course of life, which can be influenced by various factors, such as the levels of health and self-sufficiency and social, psychological, or demographic factors. Aim: The purpose of this study was to explore the attitudes to aging of home-dwelling and inpatient older adults, and whether dignity and other selected factors belong among the predictors influencing attitudes to aging in these two different groups of older adults. Research design: Cross-sectional study using a set of questionnaires: Patient Dignity Inventory, Attitudes to Aging Questionnaire, and Barthel Index. Pearson and Spearman correlation analyses and multivariable linear regression were used for statistical processing. Participants and research context: 233 inpatients and 237 home-dwelling older adults participated in the research in two regions of the Czech Republic. Ethical considerations: Institutional Review Board approval was received from the authors’ university. Findings: The inpatients had more negative attitudes to aging (M = 74.9±10.9; P <0.0001). The predictors of their attitudes to aging were gender and dignity. Women (β = −2.969, P = 0.045) and inpatients with poor dignity ratings (β = −0.332, P <0.0001) had more negative attitudes to aging. The predictors for home-dwelling older adults were education, living arrangement, and dignity. More negative attitudes to aging were found in older adults with lower levels of education (β = 2.716, P = 0.007) who lived alone (β = 2.163, P = 0.046) and rated their dignity as low (β = −0.325, P <0.0001). Discussion and Conclusions: The results of this study add to the understanding that a sense of dignity is an important predictor of attitudes to aging for both home-dwelling older adults and inpatients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Helena Kisvetrová
- The Centre for Research and Science, Faculty of Health Sciences, 156927Palacký University Olomouc, Czech Republic
| | - Petra Mandysová
- Department of Nursing, Faculty of Health Sciences, 156927Palacký University Olomouc, Czech Republic
| | - Jitka Tomanová
- Institut of Education and Social Studies, Faculty of Education, 161956Palacký University Olomouc, Czech Republic
| | - Alison Steven
- Department of Nursing, Midwifery and Health, Faculty of Health and Life Sciences, 373117Northumbria University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Older people's experiences of oral health and assisted daily oral care in short-term facilities. BMC Geriatr 2021; 21:388. [PMID: 34176481 PMCID: PMC8237451 DOI: 10.1186/s12877-021-02281-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/08/2020] [Accepted: 05/11/2021] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Older people’s oral health has improved, and many retain their natural teeth throughout their life. However, their daily oral care can be more difficult because of compromised general health and the reduced capacity for self-care that often comes with old age. More knowledge is needed about how older people view their oral health and oral care. The aim of this study was to describe how older people in short-term care experience their oral health and daily oral care. Method A descriptive, qualitative study was performed through interviews with 14 older people (74–95 years) recruited from short-term care units in two Swedish regions. Data were analysed using inductive content analysis. Results The findings are described in one main category, three categories and nine sub-categories. The main category was Adapting to a changed oral condition while striving to retain independence. The first category, Wanting to manage daily oral care independently, contained three subcategories: Having always brushed my teeth without help, Being satisfied with my mouth and teeth, and Having to accept help if necessary. The second category, Acceptance of changes in oral condition, had three subcategories: Difficulty in chewing and swallowing, Difficulty with tooth brushing, and Not considering a dentist visit to be worth the cost. The third category, Barriers to receiving assistance from staff, had three subcategories: Staff lacking the time to help, Not wanting to be a burden, and Lack of confidence in staff’s knowledge. Conclusions The participants were generally satisfied with their oral health despite an expressed need for dental treatment. Daily oral care was something they wanted to manage themselves, and they had a strong desire to stay independent for as long as possible. Closer collaboration between dental and health care staff is necessary in order to implement clinical practice guidelines for oral health care and increase nursing staff’s attention towards older peoples’ oral health. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12877-021-02281-z.
Collapse
|