Analysis of Blood Biomarkers in Patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) and with Asthma-COPD Overlap (ACO)

Serum YKL-40 Levels in Patients with Asthma or COPD: A Pilot Study

Background and Objectives: Bronchial asthma (BA) and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) are not only common obstructive respiratory conditions but also major causes of morbidity and mortality worldwide. There is, however, a surprising lack of blood-based biomarkers for separating between these pulmonary disorders. The aim of this study was to assess the practical relevance of using serum YKL-40, single or combined, for this purpose. Materials and Methods: Subjects included Romanian patients with BA (n = 24) or COPD (n = 27). YKL-40, fibrinogen, pre-treatment C-reactive protein (CRP), post-treatment CRP, erythrocyte sedimentation rate, interleukin 6 (IL-6), procalcitonin (PCT), absolute neutrophil count, neutrophil percentage, absolute lymphocyte count, lymphocyte percentage, absolute eosinophil count, and eosinophil percentage were measured and compared between these patients. Results: This is the first study investigating the clinical significance of serum YKL-40 in delineating between COPD and BA in Caucasian populations. Only fibrinogen and YKL-40 levels were different between COPD and BA, with the measured values being significantly elevated. These patients exhibited distinct inflammatory profiles. Using the upper quartiles of these variables for the pooled study population (YKL-40: 5100 pg/mL; fibrinogen: 552 mg/dL) as cut-off values, subjects were classified into high or low groups. High YKL-40 adults revealed significantly increased PCT levels. High fibrinogen subjects, by contrast, showed significantly elevated IL-6 concentrations and pre-treatment CRP levels. Low YKL-40 and fibrinogen patients showed the absence of COPD. Conclusions: Combined use of serum YKL-40 and fibrinogen may be useful for identifying the absence of COPD.

Clinical Indicators for Asthma-COPD Overlap: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Background

Some clinical indicators have been reported to be useful in differentiating asthma-chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) overlap (ACO) from pure asthma/COPD, but the results were inconsistent. This study aims to evaluate the diagnostic value of these indicators for ACO.

Methods

Databases of PubMed, EMBASE, Ovid and Web of Science were retrieved. Pooled standardized mean differences (SMDs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated in random-effects models.

Results

48 eligible studies were included. The pooled results indicated, compared with pure asthma, ACO patients had lower levels of forced expiratory volume in the first second (FEV₁)% predicted (pred) (SMD=−1.09, 95% CI −1.3 to −0.87), diffusion lung capacity for carbon monoxide (DLCO)% pred (SMD=−0.83, 95% CI −1.24 to −0.42), fractional exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO) (SMD=−0.23, 95% CI −0.36 to −0.11), and higher levels of induced sputum neutrophil (SMD = 0.51, 95% CI 0.21 to 0.81), circulating YKL-40 (SMD = 0.96, 95% CI 0.27 to 1.64). However, relative to COPD alone, ACO patients had higher levels of FEV₁% pred (SMD = 0.15, 95% CI 0.05 to 0.26), DLCO% pred (SMD = 0.38, 95% CI 0.16 to 0.6), FeNO (SMD = 0.59, 95% CI 0.40 to 0.78), serum total immunoglobulin (Ig)E (SMD = 0.42, 95% CI 0.1 to 0.75), blood eosinophil (SMD = 0.44, 95% CI 0.29 to 0.59), induced sputum eosinophil (SMD = 0.62, 95% CI 0.42 to 0.83), and lower levels of induced sputum neutrophil (SMD=−0.48, 95% CI −0.7 to −0.27), circulating YKL-40 (SMD=−1.09, 95% CI −1.92 to −0.26).

Conclusion

Compared with pure asthma/COPD, ACO patients have different levels of FEV₁% pred, DLCO% pred, FeNO, serum total IgE, blood eosinophil, induced sputum eosinophil/neutrophil, and circulating YKL-40, which could be helpful to establish a clinical diagnosis of ACO.

Asthma-COPD Overlap: What Are the Important Questions?

Asthma-COPD overlap (ACO) is a heterogeneous condition that describes patients who show persistent airflow limitation with clinical features that support both asthma and COPD. Although no single consensus definition exists to diagnose this entity, common major criteria include a strong bronchodilator reversibility or bronchial hyperreactivity, a physician diagnosis of asthma, and a ≥ 10-pack-year cigarette smoking history. The prevalence of ACO ranges from 0.9% to 11.1% in the general population, depending on the diagnostic definition used. Notably, patients with ACO experience greater symptom burden, worse quality of life, and more frequent and severe respiratory exacerbations than those with asthma or COPD. The underlying pathophysiologic features of ACO have been debated. Although emerging evidence supports the role of environmental and inhalational exposures in its pathogenesis among patients with a pre-existing airway disease, biomarker profiling and genetic analyses suggest that ACO may be a heterogeneous condition, but with definable characteristics. Early-life factors including childhood-onset asthma and cigarette smoking may interact to increase the risk of airflow obstruction later in life. For treatment options, the population with ACO historically has been excluded from therapeutic trials; therefore strong, evidence-based recommendations are lacking beyond first-line inhaler therapies. Advanced therapies in patients with ACO are selected according to disease phenotypes and are based on extrapolated data from asthma and COPD. Research focused on defining biomarkers and evidence-based treatment options for ACO is needed urgently.

Update on Asthma-COPD Overlap (ACO): A Narrative Review

Although chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and asthma are well-characterized diseases, they can coexist in a given patient. The term asthma-COPD overlap (ACO) was introduced to describe patients that have clinical features of both diseases and may represent around 25% of COPD patients and around 20% of asthma patients. Despite the increasing interest in ACO, there are still substantial controversies regarding its definition and its position within clinical guidelines for patients with obstructive lung disease. In general, most definitions indicate that ACO patients must present with non-reversible airflow limitation, significant exposure to smoking or other noxious particles or gases, together with features of asthma. In patients with a primary diagnosis of COPD, the identification of ACO has therapeutic implication because the asthmatic component should be treated with inhaled corticosteroids and some studies suggest that the most severe patients may respond to biological agents indicated for severe asthma. This manuscript aims to summarize the current state-of-the-art of ACO. The definitions, prevalence, and clinical manifestations will be reviewed and some innovative aspects, such as genetics, epigenetics, and biomarkers will be addressed. Lastly, the management and prognosis will be outlined as well as the position of ACO in the COPD and asthma guidelines.

Biomarkers as a Prognostic Factor in COPD Exacerbation: A Cohort Study

The acute exacerbations of COPD (AECOPD) are one of the main causes of hospitalization and morbimortality in the adult population. There are not many tools available to predict the clinical course of these patients during exacerbations. Our goal was to estimate the clinical utility of C Reactive Protein (CRP), Mean Platelet Volume (MPV), eosinophil count and neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio (NLR) as in-hospital prognostic factors in patients with AECOPD. A prospective cohort study was conducted in patients who consulted three reference hospitals in the city of Medellín for AECOPD and who required hospitalization between 2017 and 2020. A multivariate analysis was performed to estimate the effect of biomarkers in the two primary outcomes: the composite outcome of in-hospital death and/or admission to the ICU and hospital length-of-stay. A total of 610 patients with a median age of 74 years were included; 15% were admitted to the ICU and 3.9% died in the hospital. In the multivariate analysis adjusted for confounding variables, the only marker significantly associated with the risk of dying or being admitted to the ICU was the NLR > 5 (OR: 3; CI95%: 1.5; 6). Similarly, the NLR > 5 was also associated to a lower probability of being discharged alive from the institution (SHR: 0.73; CI95%: 0.57; 0.94) and, therefore, a longer hospital stay. It was found that a neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio greater than 5 is a strong predictor of mortality or ICU admissions and a longer hospital stay in patients hospitalized with AECOPD.