1
|
Erickson BR, Marti FA, Choi K, Eberhart N, Ashwood JS, Zima B, Montero A, Kataoka S, Bromley E. "They Just Helped Save My Life:" Client Perspectives on the Los Angeles County Full Service Partnership (FSP) Program for Serious Mental Illness. Community Ment Health J 2023; 59:1227-1234. [PMID: 36735205 PMCID: PMC10330294 DOI: 10.1007/s10597-023-01096-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/11/2022] [Revised: 12/18/2022] [Accepted: 01/25/2023] [Indexed: 02/04/2023]
Abstract
The purpose of this qualitative study was to elicit client perspectives on the Los Angeles County Full Service Partnership (FSP) program - an adaptation of Assertive Community Treatment (ACT). Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 20 FSP clients. Qualitative data were analyzed using thematic analysis. Two major themes were identified from the interview data: (1) Clients' acknowledgement of the material benefits of the FSP program; and (2) FSP's impact on restoring and stabilizing clients' social and treatment relationships. Interviewees greatly valued the material (i.e., basic needs, housing assistance) and relational (i.e., relationships with providers, restored personal relationships) aspects of the program, but did not ascribe the same degree of value to mental health treatment. Interviewees' emphases on material and relational aspects reflect the status of assertive mental health treatment as an intervention on intermediary determinants of health in the lives of persons diagnosed with serious mental illness.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Blake R Erickson
- Department of Psychiatry, Columbia University Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons, Manhattan, NY, USA.
- New York State Psychiatric Institute, Manhattan, NY, USA.
| | - F Alethea Marti
- Center for Health Services and Society, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Kristen Choi
- School of Nursing, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
- Department of Health Policy and Management, Fielding School of Public Health, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | | | | | - Bonnie Zima
- Center for Health Services and Society, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
- Department of Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Sciences, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Alanna Montero
- Center for Health Services and Society, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Sheryl Kataoka
- Center for Health Services and Society, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
- Department of Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Sciences, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Elizabeth Bromley
- Center for Health Services and Society, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
- Department of Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Sciences, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Carvalho AP, Furtado JP. Fatores contextuais e implantação da intervenção Housing First: uma revisão da literatura. CIENCIA & SAUDE COLETIVA 2022; 27:133-150. [DOI: 10.1590/1413-81232022271.19642021] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/27/2020] [Accepted: 10/13/2021] [Indexed: 11/22/2022] Open
Abstract
Resumo O Housing First (HF) tem se difundido no cenário internacional como uma intervenção baseada em evidência para superar a situação de rua entre pessoas com agravos de saúde mental. No Brasil, o HF tem sido adotado como referência no desenvolvimento de iniciativas voltadas para pessoas em situação de rua que fazem uso prejudicial de drogas. Estudos apontam a necessidade de maior compreensão da dinâmica implantação do modelo HF em diferentes cenários. De tal modo, utilizando o método de revisão de literatura, analisamos os fatores que facilitam e dificultam a implantação do HF. Foram selecionados 68 artigos, publicados entre 2003 e 2020, nas bases PubMed, Scopus, PsychoINFO, Embase, Lilacs e Scielo. Identificamos fatores em quatro dimensões: características da intervenção, contexto de implantação, aspectos institucionais e processo de implantação. A indisponibilidade de habitações, a falta de coordenação dos serviços necessários aos moradores e a resistência dos agentes implantadores aos princípios do HF são fatores que dificultam a implantação. Por sua vez, agentes com valores, atitudes e competências convergentes ao modelo e educação permanente aparecem como facilitadores. Apontamos a necessidade de se compreender e favorecer o processo de integração do HF aos sistemas de proteção social existentes.
Collapse
|