Glucose-insulin-potassium infusion for the treatment of acute aluminum phosphide poisoning: an open-label pilot study

Prognostic value of PGI score compared to poison severity score (PSS) and simplified acute physiology score (SAPS) II as predictors of mortality and other adverse outcomes in acute poisoning with aluminum phosphide

Aluminum phosphide (AlP) poisoning is a life-threatening emergency prevalent in the Middle East region including Egypt. Early prediction of prognosis is critical for initiating the utmost intensive interventions. Though many scoring systems were studied for predicting the prognosis of AlP poisoning, these scores received wide criticism. Complexity and reliability were the main concerns. Therefore, this retrospective cross-sectional study aimed to evaluate the performance of the recently introduced PGI score as a predictor of case fatality, the need for mechanical ventilation and vasopressor therapy in acute AlP poisoning. Moreover, it compares the performance of PGI with the known poison severity score (PSS), and the simplified acute physiology score (SAPS) II. Among 144 exposed patients, we reported a mortality rate of 61.1%. Non-survivors exhibited significantly higher PGI, PSS, and SAPS II than survivors. Though the PGI, PSS, and SAPS II proved their significance as predictors of mortality and, the need for MV and vasopressors, the PGI score showed a significantly higher area under the curve (AUC) as a predictor of MV (AUC = 0.848) compared to PSS (AUC = 0.731) and SAPS II (AUC = 0.749). Additively, PGI of 2 or more was a significant predictor of mortality (AUC = 0.831, sensitivity = 65.9%, and specificity = 89.3 %) and MV (p < 0.001), while PGI of 1 or more was another predictor of vasopressor need (AUC = 0.881, sensitivity = 89.0% and specificity = 79.4%). Given the PGI score's high AUCs across all outcomes, coupled with its balanced sensitivity and specificity, the PGI score could be a simple, and robust tool replacing the PSS and SAPS II for predicting mortality, clinical decision-making including the need for MV and vasopressor therapy in acute AlP exposure. Adopting the PGI score seems substantially useful in managing acute AlP poisoning, notably in resource-restricted countries.

Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte and platelet-to-lymphocyte ratios as mortality predictors in acute Aluminum phosphide (grain pills) poisoning: clinical insights and risk assessment

Background

Aluminum phosphides (AlP) is a solid fumigant pesticide known for its high toxicity and mortality. Diagnosis of AlP is based on the history and clinical examination. The literature on the early prediction of adverse outcomes following AlP exposure is limited. Therefore, the current study aimed to investigate the role of neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and platelet-to-lymphocyte Ratio (PLR) as early accessible predictors of mortality in AlP-exposed patients.

Method

We conducted a retrospective cross-sectional study on 420 adult patients with acute AlP poisoning.

Results

This study reported mean NLR and PLR of 4.07 ± 3.82 and 182.97 ± 147.29, respectively. Patients with high NLR and PLR showed more severe presentation, indicated by the significantly lower Glasgow scales and higher poison severity score grades. Besides, the need for mechanical ventilation, vasopressor therapy, and ICU admission was significantly higher among patients with high NLR and PLR (P = 0.000). We observed a significantly higher proportion of mortality among patients with high NLR (69.5%) and PLR (87.4%) (P = 0.000). The NLR > 3.42, PLR > 172.5, and their combinations were significant predictors of mortality, showing area under curves above 0.94. Utilizing a combination of NLR and PLR yielded a modestly improved performance as a mortality predictor with a slight increase in the Youden index (0.81). The high NLR and high PLR groups had mean survival times of 28.851 and 16.256 h respectively.

Conclusion

These findings suggest that high NLR and PLR are associated with a worse prognosis and a higher mortality risk among patients with acute AlP poisoning.

Therapeutic Effect of Glucose-Insulin-Potassium (GIK) Infusion Therapy in the Treatment of Acute Aluminum Phosphide Poisoning: An Institutional Study

BACKGROUND

Acute aluminum phosphide (ALP) poisoning presents a significant global medical challenge, particularly in regions where it is commonly used as a pesticide. Despite medical advancements, mortality rates from ALP poisoning remain high. Glucose-insulin-potassium (GIK) infusion therapy has emerged as a potential treatment for ALP poisoning due to its ability to counteract its toxic effects on metabolism and heart function. However, there is limited institutional data on the effectiveness of GIK therapy in treating ALP poisoning. Hence, this study aims to evaluate the therapeutic impact of GIK infusion therapy in managing acute ALP poisoning within our institution. The research aims to provide valuable insights into the efficacy of GIK therapy, with the potential to enhance patient outcomes and guide clinical practices in ALP poisoning management.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This cross-sectional study was conducted at the Resuscitation Unit of the Emergency Department of Lady Reading Hospital (LRH), Peshawar, from February 1, 2021, to May 31, 2021, using convenient sampling of all patients with aluminum phosphide (ALP) poisoning meeting the inclusion criteria. The study group included 15 ALP poisoning cases treated with GIK infusion therapy combined with standard supportive measures and examined individuals with ALP poisoning admitted to the Resuscitation Unit during a specific period, comparing their outcomes to those observed before the introduction of GIK therapy. Randomization was based on time span, as GIK therapy was introduced in October 2020. Inclusion criteria encompassed a confirmed history of ALP poisoning with at least one deranged vital parameter, including patients of all genders and age groups. At the same time, we excluded patients with normal blood pressure on arrival, no deterioration four hours post-presentation, or those who expired before arrival. Data on hospital registration number, gender, age, arrival date, serial blood pressures, supportive measures, GIK infusion usage, and outcomes were analyzed using SPSS version 20.0 to assess the therapeutic impact of GIK infusion therapy.

RESULTS

Among 15 ALP poisoning cases, 20% resulted in fatalities, with 80% either transferred to acute units (40%). Mortality was highest (66%) in the 20-29 age group, contrasting with no deaths in the 1-19 age group. Additionally, 33% mortality occurred in the 30-39 age group. Only 25% of patients with blood pressure below 91/61 succumbed. GIK therapy led to hemodynamic stability, prolonged unit stays, and increased transfers. Patients in acute units had longer stays compared to discharged or expired cases, reflecting the nuanced dynamics of ALP poisoning management.

CONCLUSION

This research aimed to systematically examine the effect of GIK infusion therapy on ALP poisoning cases at LRH, Peshawar, offering insights into its effectiveness compared to previous cases and reducing mortality by enhancing cardiac function.

Evaluation of the Protective Effects of Lugol's Solution in Rats Poisoned with Aluminum Phosphide (Rice Tablets)

Aluminum phosphide (AlP) is the main component of rice tablets (a pesticide), which produces phosphine gas (PH3) when exposed to stomach acid. The most important symptoms of PH3 toxicity include, lethargy, tachycardia, hypotension, and cardiac shock. It was shown that Iodine can chemically react with PH3, and the purpose of this study is to investigate the protective effects of Lugol solution in poisoning with rice tablets. Five doses (12, 15, 21, 23, and 25 mg/kg) of AlP were selected, for calculating its lethal dose (LD50). Then, the rats were divided into 4 groups: AlP, Lugol, AlP + Lugol, and Almond oil (as a control). After 4 h, the blood pressure and electrocardiogram (ECG) were recorded, and blood samples were obtained for biochemical tests, then liver, lung, kidney, heart, and brain tissues were removed for histopathological examination. The results of the blood pressure showed no significant changes (P > 0.05). In ECG, the PR interval showed a significant decrease in the AlP + Lugol group (P < 0.05). In biochemical tests, LDH, Ca2+, Creatinine, ALP, Mg2+, and K+ represented significant decreases in AlP + Lugol compared to the AlP group (P < 0.05). Also, the administration of Lugol's solution to AlP-poisoned rats resulted in a significant decrease in malondialdehyde levels and a significant increase in catalase activity (P < 0.05). Histopathological evaluation indicates that Lugol improves changes in the lungs, kidneys, brain, and heart. Our results showed that the Lugol solution could reduce tissue damage and oxidative stress in AlP-poisoned rats. We assume that the positive effects of Lugol on pulmonary and cardiac tissues are due to its ability to react directly with PH3.

Insulin-euglycemia therapy in acute aluminum phosphide poisoning: a randomized clinical trial

Introduction: Aluminum phosphide is a pesticide that is used in developing countries. Aluminum phosphide poisoning has a high mortality rate and there is no known antidote. This study aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of insulin-euglycemia therapy in the management of patients with acute aluminum phosphide poisoning.Methods: This trial was prospectively registered in the Pan African Clinical Trials Registry (PACTR202008534546951). A total of 108 patients were randomly allocated to two groups. The intervention group received insulin-euglycemia therapy in addition to standard treatment (norepinephrine and supportive care); the control group received standard treatment plus placebo. The main outcome measures were survival, blood pressure, and laboratory investigations.Results: The two groups had similar baseline parameters. Insulin-euglycemia therapy was associated with a significant reduction in mortality compared with that in the control group (64.8 percent and 96.3 percent, respectively; P value <0.001). Patients randomized to insulin-euglycemia also required lower doses of vasopressors (median was 7 mg versus 26 mg in control group; P value 0.006) and fewer patients needed intubation (61.1 percent versus 81.5 percent in the control group; P value 0.019). Insulin-euglycemia therapy significantly improved blood pressure (systolic, diastolic, and mean arterial pressure) (median at 6h post-admission was 80 mmHg, 55 mmHg and 65 mmHg compared with 20 mmHg, 10 mmHg and 13 mmHg in the control group respectively; P value <0.001) and bicarbonate and lactate concentrations.Conclusion: Insulin-euglycemia therapy appears to be a safe and effective treatment option for patients with aluminum phosphide poisoning. Vasopressor only therapy was associated with very poor outcomes in acute aluminum phosphide poisoning.

Zinc Phosphide Poisoning: From A to Z

Zinc phosphide is a rodenticide that is used in agricultural, urban and industrial environments in México. After ingestion, it reacts with hydrochloric acid, hydrolyzing into phosphine. It causes cellular hypoxia via mitochondrial toxicity, resulting in multiple organ dysfunction and death. There is no antidote or specific treatment for zinc phosphide toxicity. We present the case of a 45-year-old female who ingested zinc phosphide with suicidal intent. On arrival at the emergency department, she had multisystemic disorders. Supportive care, decontamination and antidotal therapy were initiated. Subsequently, she evolved to clinical improvement with a resolution of the biochemical abnormalities of tissue hypoperfusion. She was discharged on day 7 without complications. In this review, we provide updated therapeutic options and discuss their specific pathophysiological basis.

Prognostic significance of poison-related factors and consumption patterns in acute aluminum phosphide poisoning

OBJECTIVES

The prognosis of acute aluminum phosphide poisoning is usually based on toxidrome features, with little focus on poison-related factors. We aimed to study the prognostic significance of poison-related factors, consumption patterns, and time delays to treatment.

METHODS

We performed a prospective cohort study in an academic hospital in North India in patients aged ≥ 13 with aluminum phosphide poisoning from July 2019 to December 2020. During data collection, a particular emphasis was made on the poison formulation, the ingested dose, the reconstitution of poison, vomiting, and time intervals to initiate various treatments. The primary outcome was inhospital mortality.

RESULTS

Fifty-eight patients were enrolled (median age, 32 years; 37 males). The mean dose of the ingested poison was 6.56 (±5.42) g. The predominant formulation of poison was pellet (n = 41), followed by powder (n = 16). Twenty patients performed reconstitution of poison before consumption, and 13 stirred the poison while reconstituting. All patients but three developed vomiting after consumption. Inhospital mortality (n = 23, 39%) was significantly high with a higher ingested dose (P < 0.001), nonstirred reconstitution before consumption (P = 0.042), fewer vomiting episodes (P = 0.010), a delay in detection of the victim by someone (P = 0.001), and delayed initiation of intravenous fluids (P = 0.043). The secondary outcomes (shock and requirement of vasopressor or ventilation) remained unaffected by the stirring in the reconstitution group.

CONCLUSIONS

Poison-related factors and time intervals determine early risk stratification at admission in aluminum phosphide poisoning.

Hopeful News for Physicians Who Involved in the Treatment of Critical Aluminum Phosphide (Rice Pill) Poisoning Patients

Introduction

Aluminum phosphide (rice tablet) was first introduced as a pesticide in India. Rice tablets are commonly used in Iran due to their high efficacy against rodents and insects, low cost, and availability. Aluminum phosphide is a lethal poison without antidote and causes cardiocirculatory collapse and has negative inotropic cardiac effect. Human and animal studies showed that high dose insulin had positive cardiac inotropic effects. GIK (glucose, insulin, and potassium) assists heart uptake of carbohydrates that are the major fuel substrate of the myocard muscle under stressed conditions and leading to correction of acidosis, increased myocardial contractility, and peripheral vascular resistance. Case Presentation. In this manuscript, a young woman with aluminum phosphide poisoning was described to have presented with hypotension, hypoxemia, and severe metabolic acidosis. In contrast to our previous experiences that approximately all rice tablet poisoning patients with shock were dead despite full conservative treatment, this patient miraculously was saved with high dose intravenous regular insulin infusion and was discharged from the hospital with good condition and without any complications.

Conclusion

Rice tablet poisoning has high fatality rate, and to date, no antidote is available. GIK is suggested as a potential life saving treatment for critical rice tablet poisoning patients with symptoms and signs of shock.

Treatment of critical aluminum phosphide (rice tablet) poisoning with high-dose insulin: a case report

BACKGROUND

Aluminum phosphide (rice tablet) is a highly efficient agent for preserving grains against rodents and insects. It accounts for a large number of poisoning cases. Aluminum phosphide poisoning has a high mortality rate of about 90%, and to date, no antidote is available. It releases phosphine gas after exposure to moisture, and this reaction is catalyzed by the acidity of the stomach. Phosphine is then absorbed throughout the respiratory or gastrointestinal tracts and causes toxicity through inhibition of cytochrome c oxidase and formation of highly reactive free radicals. Treatment of patients with aluminum phosphide poisoning is supportive, including mechanical ventilation and vasopressors. The usage of infusion of glucose-insulin-potassium in rice tablet poisoning has been suggested, after its positive beneficial cardiac inotropic effects in patients with beta-blocker and calcium channel blocker poisoning.

CASE PRESENTATION

We report the case of a 30-year-old Iranian woman with critical aluminum phosphide poisoning, presented with hypotension and other signs of shock and severe metabolic acidosis, successfully treated with high-dose regular insulin and hypertonic dextrose and discharged from hospital in good condition. In contrast to our previous experiences, in which nearly all patients with critical aluminum phosphide poisoning died, this patient was saved with glucose-insulin-potassium.

CONCLUSION

Aluminum phosphide poisoning has a high mortality rate, and to date, no antidote is available. Administration of high-dose intravenous regular insulin and dextrose is suggested as a potential life-saving treatment for patients with critical aluminum phosphide poisoning.

OUP accepted manuscript

Introduction

We recently derived a simplified 3-point PGI score (representing blood pH < 7.25, Glasgow coma scale [GCS] score < 13, and impaired systolic blood pressure [SBP] < 90 mm Hg), which accurately predicted in-hospital case fatality ratio (CFR) in acute aluminum phosphide poisoning. The present study aimed to validate the PGI score and compare it with Acute Physiologic Assessment and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) II score, Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score (SOFA), and Simplified Acute Physiology Score (SAPS) II scores.

Patients and Methods

We performed a prospective cohort study in adult patients with aluminum phosphide ingestion admitted in PGIMER, Chandigarh (India), from April 2013 to August 2014. A univariant analysis detected the association of various baseline variables with CFR. Correlation of the PGI score with SOFA, SAPS-II, and APACHE-II scores was performed using Spearman's correlation (r_s , range -1 to +1) and scatter plots.

Results

Seventy-six patients were enrolled (mean age, 28.3 years; 41 males). CFR was 60.5%. PGI score variables-pH, GCS, and impaired SBP predicted CFR (P-value <0.001). Among patients with a total PGI score of 3 or 2, 100% died, compared with 50% in score 1 and 10.7% in score 0. Baseline PGI, SOFA, SAPS-II, and APACHE-II scores predicted CFR (P-value <0.001). There was a positive correlation between the PGI score and SOFA score (r_s , 0.855), SAPS-II score (r_s , 0.861), and APACHE-II score (r_s , 0.883). The P-value for all r_s values was <0.001.

Conclusion

The PGI score is a validated toxidrome-specific and simplified risk-stratification tool. Validation in other populations is warranted to confirm its routine use.

Management of Acute Aluminum Phosphide Poisoning: Has Anything Changed?

Due to its easy availability, rapid and severe toxicity, and no specific antidote, aluminum phosphide has emerged as a lethal toxin, commonly used for suicidal intent in agricultural communities. Despite various advances in medicine, this compound's toxicity is poorly understood, and it still has a very high case fatality rate with no definitive treatment options available. This review aims to understand the mechanism of toxicity, clinical toxidrome of acute aluminum phosphide poisoning, and the available therapeutic options, including recent advances. A literature review was performed searching PubMed, EMBASE Ovid, and Cochrane Library, using the following search items: ("aluminum phosphide poisoning" OR "aluminum phosphide poisoning toxicity" OR "aluminum phosphide ingestion") AND ("management" OR "therapy" OR "treatment"). Selected articles were discussed amongst all the authors to shape this review. High case fatality rate and lack of any specific antidote are persisting challenges. Therapeutic measures need to be implemented from all fronts - reducing easy access to the poison, developing less toxic alternatives for use as a pesticide, and more studies directed at developing an effective reversal agent for phosphine. The advent of promising agents like glucose-insulin-potassium infusion and lipid emulsion is a new ray of hope in the complete recovery in this fatal poisoning. The need of the hour is to find an agent that rapidly and effectively reverses aluminum phosphide's toxic effects. Large multicenter controlled trials are required to establish the role of glucose-insulin-potassium and lipid emulsion.

The Molecular Mechanism of Aluminum Phosphide poisoning in Cardiovascular Disease: Pathophysiology and Diagnostic Approach

Nowadays, poisoning with metal phosphides, especially aluminum phosphide (ALP), is one of the main health threats in human societies. Patients suffer from significant complications due to this type of poisoning, and the heart is one of the main organs targeted by ALP. Therefore, in this study, we discussed the effect of phosphine on cardiac function. This study is based on data obtained from PubMed, between 2002 and 2020. The key keywords included "Aluminum phosphide," "Oxidative Stress," "Mitochondria," "Cardiovascular disease," and "Treatment." The results showed that ALP produced reactive oxygen species (ROS) due to mitochondrial dysfunction. ROS production leads to red blood cell hemolysis, decreased ATP production, and induction of apoptosis in cardiomyocytes, which eventually results in cardiovascular disease. Since ALP has the most significant effect on cardiomyocytes, the use of appropriate treatment strategies to restore cell function can increase patients' survival.

A Simple Tool Predicts Mortality in Aluminum Phosphide Self-poisoning

Incorporating the toxidrome-specific prognostic systems into the daily emergency department practice might become a standard of care in low- and middle-income countries. The PGI score is appealing because it is quick and easy, it accurately identifies high-risk patients at in-hospital mortality, and it shows promise in predicting those at low risk. Although further validation of the PGI score is required in more extensive studies, it can help direct appropriate resources to those most likely to benefit and stratify patients for testing novel clinical interventions. How to cite this article: Pannu AK, Bhalla A. A Simple Tool Predicts Mortality in Aluminum Phosphide Self-poisoning. Indian J Crit Care Med 2020;24(9):755-756.

"PGI Score": A Simplified Three-point Prognostic Score for Acute Aluminum Phosphide Poisoning

Introduction

Aluminum phosphide (AlP) ingestion for self-harm is associated with a high case-fatality rate (CFR) in low- and middle-income countries. A reliable and accurate prognostic scoring tool is required for appropriate triaging, to guide clinical decision-making, and to evaluate the efficacy of therapeutic interventions for the patients with AlP toxicity.

Materials and methods

We performed a prospective cohort study in a tertiary care hospital in north India in patients aged 15 years and over with acute AlP poisoning, investigating the parameters associated with CFR, and developing a reliable and simple prediction score.

Results

The CFR was 51% in this cohort of 105 patients. Three parameters—pH <7.25, score on Glasgow coma scale (GCS) <13, and systolic blood pressure (SBP) <87 mm Hg were most robust predictors of CFR (odds ratio; 12.614, 18.621, and 17.600, respectively; area under the receiver operating characteristic curve—0.808, 0.796, and 0.776, respectively). Based on these parameters (with 1 point to each), a prognostic score was developed, ranging from 0 to 3 points. A total score of 3 had a 98.2% specificity and a positive predictive value of 96.4%, whereas a score ≤1 had a 100% sensitivity and 100% negative predictive value.

Conclusion

A scoring system based on low pH (P), low GCS score (G), and impaired or low SBP (I) (“PGI” score) may provide a simplified predictive model for mortality in AlP poisoning.

How to cite this article

Pannu AK, Bhalla A, Sharma A, Sharma N. “PGI Score”: A Simplified Three-point Prognostic Score for Acute Aluminum Phosphide Poisoning. Indian J Crit Care Med 2020;24(9):790–793.