The association between antinuclear antibody and response to rituximab treatment in adult patients with primary immune thrombocytopenia

Efficacy and safety of azathioprine plus prednisone versus prednisone alone as first-line treatment for antinuclear antibody-positive immune thrombocytopenia: a retrospective cohort study

OBJECTIVE

Antinuclear antibody (ANA)-positive immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) patients have an unsatisfactory prognosis due to the more severe conditions of these patients and poor response to first-line glucocorticoids (GCs). The current study intended to compare the efficacy and safety of AZA plus prednisone and prednisone alone as first-line treatment in ANA-positive ITP patients.

METHODS

Fifteen ANA-positive ITP patients receiving AZA plus prednisone (AZA + GC group) and eighteen ANA-positive ITP patients receiving prednisone alone (GC group) as first-line treatment were retrospectively enrolled.

RESULTS

The complete response (CR) rate (60.0% versus 22.2%) (P = 0.038) was increased in the AZA + GC group versus the GC group, while the overall response rate (86.7% versus 55.6%) (P = 0.070) only showed an increasing trend that did not achieve statistical significance. In addition, multivariate analysis revealed that AZA + GC (versus GC) (odds ratio = 31.331, P = 0.018) was independently associated with a higher possibility of achieving CR. Additionally, accumulating relapse-free duration was prolonged in the AZA + GC group versus the GC group (median: 7.8 months versus 3.4 months) (P = 0.038). Additionally, the multivariate analysis suggested that AZA + GC (versus GC) (hazard ratio = 0.306, P = 0.007) was independently correlated with longer accumulating relapse-free duration. The incidence of adverse events did not differ between the two groups (all P > 0.05), and the common adverse events in the AZA + GC group were pneumonia (13.3%), anemia (13.3%), cough (13.3%), nausea (6.7%), and granulocytopenia (6.7%), which were all tolerable and manageable.

CONCLUSION

First-line AZA plus prednisone realizes a better hematological response and relapse-free duration with acceptable adverse events compared to prednisone alone in ANA-positive ITP patients.

Clinical significance of antinuclear antibodies in primary immune thrombocytopenia

There are discrepancies across guidelines about whether the dosage of antinuclear antibodies (ANAs) is of use at the diagnosis of primary immune thrombocytopenia (ITP). This review describes the current knowledge about ANA prevalence in patients with primary ITP, and their potential usefulness as biomarkers for ITP evolution, response to treatments and increased risk of subsequent development of systemic lupus and thrombosis.

Markers of refractory primary immune thrombocytopenia

Refractory immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) is a challenging disease that can be defined by refractoriness to second-line treatments. In this review, we list and comment available evidence about clinical and biological factors associated with refractoriness to splenectomy, thrombopoietin receptor agonists (TPO-RAs), rituximab and fostamatinib, as well as those associated with multirefractory ITP (active disease with failure of rituximab, TPO-RAs and splenectomy).

Anti-topoisomerase 1 Antibody Level Changes after B Cell Depletion Therapy in Systemic Sclerosis

The aim of our study was to assess the relationship between the changes of antinuclear autoantibodies (ANAs) and autoantibodies to topoisomerase 1 (anti-Topo 1) in systemic sclerosis (SSs) patients on rituximab (RTX) therapy. The prospective study included 88 patients (73 women) with a mean age of 47 (17-71) years. The mean disease duration was 5.9 ± 4.8 years. The mean follow-up period was more than 2 years (27 (12-42) months). We documented a statistically significant change in skin score, the disease activity index, improvement of pulmonary function and reduction of mean dose of prednisolone after RTX treatment. There was a significant decrease in the number of patients with high levels of ANA and overall decrease of the ANA and anti-Topo 1 levels. A moderate positive statistically significant correlation was found between ANA and anti-Topo 1 (r = 0.403). In the group of patients positive for anti-Topo 1 there were a more pronounced depletion of B lymphocytes, significantly higher increase in forced vital capacity and diffusion capacity, decrease in the disease activity index, compared with patients negative for anti-Topo 1. We observed the decline in the level of ANA and anti-Topo 1 in SSc patients after RTX therapy, and it was correlated by an improvement of the main outcome parameters of the disease. Therefore, anti-Topo 1 positivity could be considered as a predictor of a better response to RTX treatment, especially in SSc patients with hyperproduction of anti-Topo 1.

The effect of antinuclear antibody titre and its variation on outcomes in children with primary immune thrombocytopenia

Antinuclear antibody (ANA) can be positive in children with primary immune thrombocytopenia (ITP), but the effect of ANA titre and its variation on outcomes of children with primary ITP remains unclear. Here, we conducted a single-centre retrospective cohort study of children with primary ITP at the Peking Union Medical College Hospital in China. A total of 324 children with primary ITP included in this study were followed for a median time of 25 months. In this cohort, 39.2% had an ANA titre of 1:160 or higher. Results from a generalized estimating equation model revealed that patients with higher ANA titres had lower platelet counts at onset but a higher recovery rate of subsequent platelet counts. Results from Cox regression models adjusted for potential confounders revealed that patients with ANA titres of 1:160 or more were more likely to develop to autoimmune disease (AID) than those without, and the risk of AID development increased with the rise of ANA titres (p value for trend less than 0.001). These data highlight the predictive value of ANA titre for platelet counts and the risk of AID development in children with primary ITP.

Novel Biomarkers for Diagnosis and Monitoring of Immune Thrombocytopenia

Lower-than-normal platelet counts are a hallmark of the acquired autoimmune illness known as immune thrombocytopenia, which can affect both adults and children. Immune thrombocytopenia patients' care has evolved significantly in recent years, but the disease's diagnosis has not, and it is still only clinically achievable with the elimination of other causes of thrombocytopenia. The lack of a valid biomarker or gold-standard diagnostic test, despite ongoing efforts to find one, adds to the high rate of disease misdiagnosis. However, in recent years, several studies have helped to elucidate a number of features of the disease's etiology, highlighting how the platelet loss is not only caused by an increase in peripheral platelet destruction but also involves a number of humoral and cellular immune system effectors. This made it possible to identify the role of immune-activating substances such cytokines and chemokines, complement, non-coding genetic material, the microbiome, and gene mutations. Furthermore, platelet and megakaryocyte immaturity indices have been emphasized as new disease markers, and prognostic signs and responses to particular types of therapy have been suggested. Our review's goal was to compile information from the literature on novel immune thrombocytopenia biomarkers, markers that will help us improve the management of these patients.

How we treat primary immune thrombocytopenia in adults

Primary immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) is an immune-mediated bleeding disorder characterized by decreased platelet counts and an increased risk of bleeding. Multiple humoral and cellular immune abnormalities result in accelerated platelet destruction and suppressed platelet production in ITP. The diagnosis remains a clinical exclusion of other causes of thrombocytopenia. Treatment is not required except for patients with active bleeding, severe thrombocytopenia, or cases in need of invasive procedures. Corticosteroids, intravenous immunoglobulin, and anti-RhD immunoglobulin are the classical initial treatments for newly diagnosed ITP in adults, but these agents generally cannot induce a long-term response in most patients. Subsequent treatments for patients who fail the initial therapy include thrombopoietic agents, rituximab, fostamatinib, splenectomy, and several older immunosuppressive agents. Other potential therapeutic agents, such as inhibitors of Bruton's tyrosine kinase and neonatal Fc receptor, are currently under clinical evaluation. An optimized treatment strategy should aim at elevating the platelet counts to a safety level with minimal toxicity and improving patient health-related quality of life, and always needs to be tailored to the patients and disease phases. In this review, we address the concepts of adult ITP diagnosis and management and provide a comprehensive overview of current therapeutic strategies under general and specific situations.

The association between platelet glycoprotein-specific antibodies and response to short-term high-dose dexamethasone with prednisone maintenance treatment in adult patients with primary immune thrombocytopenia

OBJECTIVE

The aim of the present study was to detect the association between platelet glycoprotein-specific autoantibodies and the patient response to short-term high-dose dexamethasone (HD-DXM) + prednisone maintenance treatment.

METHODS

The data from 112 adult patients newly diagnosed with ITP who were administered first-line HD-DXM + prednisone maintenance therapy between January 2016 and January 2021 were retrospectively analyzed.

RESULTS

A total of 72 patients positive for platelet glycoprotein-specific antibodies were enrolled in the antibody-positive group, and 40 patients not positive for platelet glycoprotein-specific antibodies were enrolled in the antibody-negative group. In the antibody-positive group, six platelet glycoprotein-specific antibody types were found: 41.67% of the patients were anti-GP IIb/IIIa-positive only, 5.56% were anti-GP Ib/IX-positive only, 5.56% were anti-P-selectin-positive only, 19.44% were anti-GP IIb/IIIa- and anti-GP Ib/IX-positive, 16.67% were anti-GP Ib/IX- and P-selectin-positive and 11.11% were positive for all three antibodies. There was no significant difference in the overall response rate between the antibody-positive group and the antibody-negative group (94.44 versus 80.00%, p = .221). However, the CR rate was significantly higher in the antibody-positive group than in the antibody-negative group (69.44% versus 40.00%, p = .032). The logistic regression analysis revealed that platelet glycoprotein-specific antibody positivity and age were two factors that could affect patient response.

CONCLUSIONS

The present study discovered that adult patients newly diagnosed with ITP who had positive platelet glycoprotein-specific antibody test results were likely to achieve a better response after treatment with HD-DXM + prednisone maintenance.

Real-world Experience of Rituximab in Immune Thrombocytopenia

Immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) is a relapsing-remitting disease often requiring more than one line of therapy. Rituximab is a recommended second-line therapy, but the real-world data on its efficacy and safety from resource constraint settings is limited. We aimed to analyze the safety and efficacy of rituximab in ITP. This is a single-center, retrospective study. This study was conducted at a tertiary care hospital in Northern India from 2005 to 2019. On audit of medical records, all patients of ITP (n-513) who had received rituximab (n-81) were screened for inclusion. Patients whose response assessment was not possible were excluded. Finally, 66 patients were analyzed using statistical packages of Python v3.7. The cumulative incidence of overall response on day 20 was 30.61%, and day 30 was 51.72%. The median time to response was 28 day (range 21-51 day). Cumulative incidence of complete response was 16.67%, and partial response 37.88%. After a median follow-up of 789 day (range 181-5260 day), the cumulative incidence of relapse was 30.32%, 36.12%, and 56.57% at 1, 2, and 5 years respectively. There was no effect of age, sex, duration of disease, lines of therapy received, and platelet count on either cumulative incidence of overall response or relapse. ANA positivity was significantly related to the better cumulative incidence of overall response (p = 0.012), but not with relapse. Infusion-related reactions were the commonest adverse event noted (n-4, grade ≥ 3 CTCAEv4). Rituximab and its generic version are safe and effective second line agent in ITP with a good overall response and sustained response.

Could Anti-Nuclear Antibody Positivity be a Factor for Affecting Treatment Response in Immune Thrombocytopenia Patients on Eltrombopag?

Objective

Eltrombopag remains a prominent option in the treatment of steroid-dependent or steroid-refractory Immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) patients. Unfortunately, a group of patients did not respond to eltrombopag. Antinuclear Antibody (ANA) positivity can be seen up to 30 % in ITP patients. Despite being widely used, markers to show the response for eltrombopag are lacking and needed. In the present study, we aimed to show the association between ANA positivity and eltrombopag response in ITP patients.

Material and Methods

Patients who were diagnosed with ITP at Trakya University Faculty of Medicine Hematology and who received eltrombopag treatment due to their resistance to steroids and other treatments were included in our study. ANA measurement was made with indirect fluorescent antibody and titers of 1:160 and above were considered positive and ANA measurement was made before starting eltrombopag.

Results

Forty-five patients were included in our study. 33 were female and 12 were male. The mean age of the patients was 45, 73. Years. There were 14 patients with ANA positivity and 31 patients found to be ANA negative. Response rates were higher in ANA negative patients compared to ANA positive patients in the first and sixth months of the eltrombopag treatment (p < 0, 05).

Conclusion

ANA positivity in ITP may indicate unresponsiveness to eltrombopag treatment, and this should be supported by prospective studies involving more patients.

The clinical efficacy of Rituximab administration in autoimmunity disorders, primary immunodeficiency diseases and malignancies

Rituximab (RTX), as a monoclonal antibody-based immunotherapeutic intervention targeting CD20 on B cells, has proven efficacy in the treatment of patients with some immune-mediated diseases. In the present review, we provided information on the immunobiological mechanisms of signaling for RTX and its clinical applications, according to the immune-pathophysiology involved in the microenvironment of multiple diseases. We highlighted combination therapy, dose schedules, and laboratory monitoring, as well as the associated common and rare side effects to avoid. We also discussed the efficacy and safety of RTX-based therapeutic strategies and whether RTX therapy can be used as a promising treatment regimen for autoimmune diseases, primary immunodeficiency diseases, and malignancies. Our review highlights and supports the importance of collaboration between basic medical researchers and clinical specialists when considering the use of RTX in the treatment of various immune-mediated disorders.

Primary Immune Thrombocytopenia: Novel Insights into Pathophysiology and Disease Management

Immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) is an autoimmune disorder defined by a significantly reduced number of platelets in blood circulation. Due to low levels of platelets, ITP is associated with frequent bruising and bleeding. Current evidence suggests that low platelet counts in ITP are the result of multiple factors, including impaired thrombopoiesis and variations in immune response leading to platelet destruction during pathological conditions. Patient outcomes as well as clinic presentation of the disease have largely been shown to be case-specific, hinting towards ITP rather being a group of clinical conditions sharing common symptoms. The most frequent characteristics include dysfunction in primary haemostasis and loss of immune tolerance towards platelet as well as megakaryocyte antigens. This heterogeneity in patient population and characteristics make it challenging for the clinicians to choose appropriate therapeutic regimen. Therefore, it is vital to understand the pathomechanisms behind the disease and to consider various factors including patient age, platelet count levels, co-morbidities and patient preferences before initiating therapy. This review summarizes recent developments in the pathophysiology of ITP and provides a comprehensive overview of current therapeutic strategies as well as potential future drugs for the management of ITP.