Bendamustine treatment of haematological malignancies: significant risks of opportunistic viral, fungal and bacterial infections

Signal detection of adverse reactions for bendamustine based on FDA adverse event reporting system

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to analyze the adverse events to bendamustine using data obtained from the Food and Drug Administration open public data project (openFDA) and to provide a reference for its use in clinical practice.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

Adverse events (AEs) due to bendamustine usage reported from 1 January 2008 to 31 March 2023 were collected from the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS). The reporting odds ratio (ROR), proportional reporting ratio (PRR), Bayesian plausible propagation neural network (BCPNN), and multinomial gamma-Poisson distribution shrinking (MGPS) algorithms were used to identify signs of adverse reactions caused by bendamustine.

RESULTS

A total of 4214 AE reports where bendamustine was considered as the first suspected drug were obtained from FAERS. The analysis revealed 214 AE risk signals, among which 141 met the criteria but they were not listed as possible side effects on the drug information sheet provided in the package.

CONCLUSION

Our findings identified numerous common AEs with previously reported clinical observations. We also identified some signs of potential new AEs, indicating the need of careful clinical monitoring of patients treated with bendamustine and further risk identification research about this drug.

Risk and impact of cytomegalovirus infection in lymphoma patients treated with bendamustine

Bendamustine is used to treat lymphoma with excellent efficacy but is known for its immunosuppressive effect. Cytomegalovirus (CMV) reactivation after bendamustine use has been reported. We aim to address the impact of CMV infection in lymphoma patients treated with bendamustine-containing regimens. We retrospectively analyzed lymphoma patients at Taipei Veterans General Hospital in Taiwan between September 1, 2010, and April 30, 2022. Clinically significant CMV infection (CS-CMVi) was defined as the first CMV reactivation after bendamustine use necessitating CMV therapy. Patients' baseline characteristics and laboratory data were recorded. The primary endpoint of the study was CS-CMVi. A time-dependent covariate Cox regression model was used to estimate the risk factors of CS-CMVi and mortality. A total of 211 lymphoma patients treated with bendamustine were enrolled. Twenty-seven (12.8%) had CS-CMVi. The cumulative incidence was 10.1 per 100 person-years during the three-year follow-up period. In the multivariate analysis, lines of therapy before bendamustine ≥ 1 (95% CI 1.10-24.76), serum albumin < 3.5 g/dL (95% CI 2.63-52.93), and liver disease (95% CI 1.51-28.61) were risk factors for CS-CMVi. In conclusion, CS-CMVi (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.23-10.73) was one of the major independent risk factors of mortality. Lines of therapy before bendamustine ≥ 1, hypoalbuminemia, and liver disease were risk factors for CS-CMVi in lymphoma patients treated with bendamustine.

CMV reactivation during pretransplantation evaluation: a novel risk factor for posttransplantation CMV reactivation

ABSTRACT

Cytomegalovirus (CMV) disease occurs occasionally before allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) and is associated with poor post-HCT outcomes; however, the impact of pre-HCT CMV reactivation is unknown. Pre-HCT CMV reactivation was assessed in HCT candidates from the preemptive antiviral therapy (2007-2017) and letermovir prophylaxis (2018-2021) eras. CMV DNA polymerase chain reaction (PCR) surveillance was routinely performed during the pre-HCT workup period, and antiviral therapy was recommended according to risk of progression to CMV disease. Risk factors for pre-HCT CMV reactivation were characterized, and the associations of pre-HCT CMV reactivation with post-HCT outcomes were examined using logistic regression and Cox proportional hazard models, respectively. A total of 1694 patients were identified, and 11% had pre-HCT CMV reactivation 14 days (median; interquartile range [IQR], 6-23) before HCT. Lymphopenia (≤0.3 × 103/μL) was the strongest risk factor for pre-HCT CMV reactivation at multiple PCR levels. In the preemptive therapy era, patients with pre-HCT CMV reactivation had a significantly increased risk of CMV reactivation by day 100 as well as CMV disease and death by 1 year after HCT. Clearance of pre-HCT CMV reactivation was associated with a lower risk of post-HCT CMV reactivation. Similar associations with post-HCT CMV end points were observed in a cohort of patients receiving letermovir prophylaxis. Pre-HCT CMV reactivation can be routinely detected in high-risk HCT candidates and is a significant risk factor for post-HCT CMV reactivation and disease. Pre-HCT CMV DNA PCR surveillance is recommended in high-risk HCT candidates, and antiviral therapy may be indicated to prevent post-HCT CMV reactivation.