A systematic review and meta-analysis of dropout rates from dialectical behaviour therapy in randomized controlled trials

Amygdala-related electrical fingerprint is modulated with neurofeedback training and correlates with deep-brain activation: proof-of-concept in borderline personality disorder

BACKGROUND

The modulation of brain circuits of emotion is a promising pathway to treat borderline personality disorder (BPD). Precise and scalable approaches have yet to be established. Two studies investigating the amygdala-related electrical fingerprint (Amyg-EFP) in BPD are presented: one study addressing the deep-brain correlates of Amyg-EFP, and a second study investigating neurofeedback (NF) as a means to improve brain self-regulation.

METHODS

Study 1 combined electroencephalography (EEG) and simultaneous functional magnetic resonance imaging to investigate the replicability of Amyg-EFP-related brain activation found in the reference dataset (N = 24 healthy subjects, 8 female; re-analysis of published data) in the replication dataset (N = 16 female individuals with BPD). In the replication dataset, we additionally explored how the Amyg-EFP would map to neural circuits defined by the research domain criteria. Study 2 investigated a 10-session Amyg-EFP NF training in parallel to a 12-weeks residential dialectical behavior therapy (DBT) program. Fifteen patients with BPD completed the training, N = 15 matched patients served as DBT-only controls.

RESULTS

Study 1 replicated previous findings and showed significant amygdala blood oxygenation level dependent activation in a whole-brain regression analysis with the Amyg-EFP. Neurocircuitry activation (negative affect, salience, and cognitive control) was correlated with the Amyg-EFP signal. Study 2 showed Amyg-EFP modulation with NF training, but patients received reversed feedback for technical reasons, which limited interpretation of results.

CONCLUSIONS

Recorded via scalp EEG, the Amyg-EFP picks up brain activation of high relevance for emotion. Administering Amyg-EFP NF in addition to standardized BPD treatment was shown to be feasible. Clinical utility remains to be investigated.

Feasibility, Acceptability, and Potential Efficacy of a Self-Guided Internet-Delivered Dialectical Behavior Therapy Intervention for Substance Use Disorders: Randomized Controlled Trial

BACKGROUND

People with alcohol and substance use disorders (SUDs) often have underlying difficulties in regulating emotions. Although dialectical behavioral therapy is effective for SUDs, it is often difficult to access. Self-guided, internet-delivered dialectical behavioral therapy (iDBT) allows for expanded availability, but few studies have rigorously evaluated it in individuals with SUDs.

OBJECTIVE

This study examines the feasibility, acceptability, and potential efficacy of an iDBT intervention in treatment-seeking adults with SUDs. We hypothesized that iDBT would be feasible, credible, acceptable, and engaging to people with SUDs. We also hypothesized that the immediate versus delayed iDBT group would show comparatively greater improvements and that both groups would show significant improvements over time.

METHODS

A 12-week, single-blinded, parallel-arm, randomized controlled trial was implemented, with assessments at baseline and at 4 (acute), 8, and 12 weeks (follow-up). A total of 72 community adults aged 18 to 64 years were randomized. The immediate group (n=38) received access to iDBT at baseline, and the delayed group (n=34) received access after 4 weeks. The intervention (Pocket Skills 2.0) was a self-guided iDBT via a website, with immediate access to all content, additional text and email reminders, and additional support meetings as requested. Our primary outcome was substance dependence, with secondary outcomes pertaining to feasibility, clinical outcomes, functional disability, and emotion dysregulation, among other measures. All outcomes were assessed using self-report questionnaires.

RESULTS

iDBT was perceived as a credible and acceptable treatment. In terms of feasibility, 94% (68/72) of the participants started iDBT, 13% (9/68) were early dropouts, 35% (24/68) used it for the recommended 8 days in the first month, and 50% (34/68) were still active 4 weeks later. On average, the participants used iDBT for 2 hours and 24 minutes across 10 separate days. In the acute period, no greater benefit was found for the immediate group on substance dependence, although we did find lower depression (b=-2.46; P=.02) and anxiety (b=-2.22; P=.02). At follow-up, there were greater benefits in terms of reduced alcohol (b=-2.00; P=.02) and nonalcoholic substance (b=-3.74; P=.01) consumption in the immediate access group. Both groups demonstrated improvements in substance dependence in the acute (b=-1.73; P<.001) and follow-up period (b=-2.09; P<.001). At follow-up, both groups reported reduced depression, anxiety, suicidal behaviors, emotional dysregulation, and functional disability.

CONCLUSIONS

iDBT is a feasible and acceptable intervention for patients with SUDs, although methods for improving engagement are warranted. Although results did not support efficacy for the primary outcome at 4 weeks, findings support reductions in substance dependence and other mental health concerns at 12 weeks. Notwithstanding the limitations of this study, the results suggest the potential value of iDBT in the treatment of SUDs and other mental health conditions.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05094440; https://clinicaltrials.gov/show/NCT05094440.

Therapeutic alliance and dropout in patients with borderline pathology receiving residential dialectical behavior therapy

BACKGROUND

This study focused on the impact of therapeutic alliance on therapy dropout in a naturalistic sample of patients with borderline pathology receiving dialectical behavior therapy (DBT) in a residential setting. We assumed that low therapeutic alliance shortly after admission would be associated with elevated dropout.

METHODS

44 participants with borderline pathology (≥ 3 DSM-5 borderline personality disorder criteria) in a residential DBT program completed a quality assurance questionnaire set assessing demographic information, pretreatment psychopathology and therapeutic alliance during the first seven days of their residential stay. Predictors of dropout were investigated using binary logistic regression analyses.

RESULTS

The dropout rate was 34.1% (n = 15). In binary logistic regression analyses with variables covering demographic and clinical characteristics, comorbidities and childhood trauma history, only the therapeutic alliance significantly predicted dropout (z = -2.371, p = .018).

CONCLUSIONS

This study supports the importance of therapy process variables, here the therapeutic alliance at the beginning of treatment, as predictors of therapy dropout in borderline pathology. If this finding is replicated, it shows the potential importance of monitoring the therapeutic relationship throughout the therapeutic process.

CLINICALTRIALS

gov Identifier: NCT05289583, retrospectively registered on March 11, 2022.

Future Directions in Youth and Family Treatment Engagement: Finishing the Bridge Between Science and Service

The field has spent more than 50 years investing in the quality of youth mental healthcare, with intervention science yielding roughly 1,300 efficacious treatments. In the latter half of this period, concurrent efforts in implementation science have developed effective methods for supporting front-line service organizations and therapists to begin to bridge the science to service gap. However, many youths and families still do not benefit fully from these strategic investments due to low treatment engagement: nearly half of youths in need of services pursue them, and among those who do, roughly another half terminate prematurely. The negative impact of low engagement is substantial, and is disproportionally and inequitably so for many. We contend that to build a robust and "finished" bridge connecting science and service, the field must go beyond its two historical foci of designing interventions and preparing therapists to deliver them, to include an intentional focus on the youths and families who participate in these interventions and who work with those therapists. In this paper, we highlight the significance of treatment engagement in youth mental healthcare and discuss the current state of the literature related to four priorities: conceptualization, theory, measurement, and interventions. Next, we offer an example from our own program of research as one illustration for advancing these priorities. Finally, we propose recommendations to act on these priorities.

Reconstructing dropout: Building from multiple definitions, therapist effects, and center effects

Objective: The literature regarding dropout from psychotherapy has suffered from issues of diverse operationalization of the construct. Some have called for a more uniform definition to aid in generalization across research; this study aimed to assess the viability of such a definition by examining the rate of occurrence for three distinct definitions simultaneously. In addition, therapist and center level variances are explored to further understand the differences between definitions.

Method: We compared the prevalence rates and overlap of three distinct operationalizations of dropout (based on last session attendance, therapist judgment, and symptom change) using data gathered from a national practice research network (N = 2977). Higher-order therapist and center-level effects were assessed for each definition.

Results: There was very little overlap among definitions, with less than one percent of clients simultaneously meeting criteria for all three definitions. Additionally, therapist and center effects were found for each definition, especially notable for therapist-rated and last-session attendance definitions of dropout.

Conclusion: Rather than a singular definition of dropout, these results instead suggest that multiple, specific, and unique definitions more accurately depict clinical reality, and future research might benefit from uncovering predictors of different "classes" of dropouts and examining the different practices of therapists and centers.

Systems Training for Emotional Predictability and Problem Solving for borderline personality disorder: A systematic review

Systems Training for Emotional Predictability and Problem Solving (STEPPS) is a group treatment program for patients with borderline personality disorder (BPD). The program was intended to be highly accessible, both for patients and therapists. During STEPPS, patients are taught emotion regulation and behavior management skills. This systematic review synthesizes the current empirical status of STEPPS, focusing on research designs, quality of studies, target groups, protocols, and outcome. We selected 20 studies, with three randomized controlled trials. Patients with BPD, subthreshold BPD, and patients with BPD and comorbid antisocial personality disorder were investigated. One study was conducted in adolescents. There were no studies in older adults. Results demonstrated STEPPS to be associated with reduced BPD symptoms, improved quality of life, decreased depressive symptoms, and decreased negative affectivity. Mixed results were found for impulsivity and suicidal behaviors. STEPPS has both been studied as an add-on therapy to patients' ongoing treatment, and, with the addition of individual STEPPS sessions, as a stand-alone treatment. High attrition rates were found in patients attending STEPPS, complicating the generalizability of the results. Although the evidence for STEPPS is promising, further research is needed before firm conclusions can be drawn. Recommendations for future research are discussed.

Prädiktion von Behandlungsabbrüchen bei Adoleszenten mit Borderline-Persönlichkeitsstörung

Zusammenfassung: Theoretischer Hintergrund: Die Borderline-Persönlichkeitsstöurng (BPS) kann bereits in der Adoleszenz zuverlässig diagnostiziert und wirksam behandelt werden. Eine möglichst frühe Behandlung der BPS durch störungsspezifische Therapien (z. B. Dialektisch-Behaviorale Therapie), erscheint ist sinnvoll, weil hierdurch selbstschädigende Verhaltensweisen und chronische Verläufe mit häufigen suizidalen Krisen verhindert und die langfristige psychosoziale Entwicklung verbessert werden kann. Mehrere Therapiestudien zur Wirksamkeit der Behandlung in der Adoleszenz zeigten sehr hohe Abbruchraten (bis zu 75 %), bisher sind allerdings nur wenig konsistente Ergebnisse zur Prädiktion von Therapieabbrüchen vorhanden. Fragestellung: Das Hauptziel der vorliegenden Studie war daher im Rahmen einer Beobachtungsstudie a) die Abbruchrate in der Realversorgung und b) die möglichen Prädiktoren (klinische und demographische Variablen) des Abbruchs einer stationären Behandlung mit DBT für Adoleszente an N = 172 Patient_innen im Alter von 15 – 18 Jahren zu untersuchen. Methode: In einer logistischen Regression wurden 18 Prädiktoren (u. a. Alter, Anzahl der Diagnosen, Schwere der Symptomatik) in SPSS untersucht, die im Rahmen einer drei monatigen stationären Behandlung in der Routineversorgung erhoben wurden. Ergebnisse: Lediglich ein jüngeres Alter der Patient_innen war statistisch signifikant mit einem erhöhten Risiko für einen Therapieabbruch assoziiert. Keine statistisch bedeutsamen Zusammenhänge mit einem Therapieabbruch fanden sich hingegen für die untersuchten psychiatrischen Komorbiditäten (bspw. für das Vorliegen einer Essstörung), für die Schwere der BPS-spezifischen Psychopathologie und für BPS-typische problematische Verhaltensweisen (bspw. selbstschädigendes Verhalten oder Hochrisikoverhalten). Diskussion und Schlussfolgerung: Unsere Untersuchung ergibt keinen Anhalt dafür, dass bei stark ausgeprägter Symptombelastung eine erhöhte Gefahr für einen Abbruch einer Behandlung mit DBT besteht. Sollte das Ergebnis einer erhöhten Abbruchrate bei jüngeren Jugendlichen in weiteren Studien repliziert werden, wären systematische Untersuchungen zu Variablen notwendig, die bei jüngeren Jugendlichen eine besondere Bedeutung besitzen und mit einem Therapieabbruch in Zusammenhang stehen könnten (bspw. die Beziehung zu wichtigen Bezugspersonen). Hieraus ließen sich ggf. gezielte Therapiemodifikationen ableiten, die Therapieabbrüchen entgegenwirken.

Brief internet-delivered skills training based on DBT for adults with borderline personality disorder - a feasibility study

OBJECTIVE

Borderline personality disorder (BPD) is characterized by instability in emotions, relationships, and behaviors, such as self-injury and suicidal behavior. Dialectical Behavioral Therapy (DBT) is an established intervention for BPD, but there are long waiting times for treatment. This study aimed to explore if a brief internet-delivered DBT skills training program with minimal therapist support is acceptable, that it can be administered, useful, and does not do harm for patients with BPD.

METHODS

Acceptability was measured through data on recruitment and attrition, utilization of the intervention, reported impulses to drop out, and through ratings on self-injury and suicidality. Participants were interviewed about their experiences of the intervention; analyzed with content analysis.

RESULTS

Twenty patients on the waiting list for treatment at a DBT-clinic were invited and nine female patients (age 19-37 years) volunteered. The participants completed a large part of the intervention, which did not appear harmful since ratings of suicidal and self-harming behavior were similar before and after the intervention. In the interviews, participants stated that they had gained new knowledge and skills to manage situations, e.g. to stop and think before acting. Some even reported decreased levels of self-injury. The time spent on patient contact was short, and some patients reported difficulties to practice on their own and requested more support.

CONCLUSIONS

The intervention seems to be acceptable. Future studies should investigate in what ways some BPD patients are more susceptible to internet-delivered skills training than others, and if this intervention could be delivered within a stepped-care model.

A meta-analytic review of randomized clinical trials of online treatments for anxiety: Inclusion/exclusion criteria, uptake, adherence, dropout, and clinical outcomes

Over the last decade there has been rapid growth in the number of clinical trials examining internet-delivered interventions for anxiety. While there have been numerous analyses of treatment efficacy, few studies have examined treatment engagement. The current meta-analysis examined participant eligibility, uptake, adherence, and drop-out in clinical trials of internet-delivered treatments for anxiety. This meta-analysis used random effects models to obtain estimates of participant inclusion, uptake, adherence, drop-out, and within-group treatment effect size. Moderator analyses examined the effects of anxiety disorder type, treatment type, and level of clinician guidance. After screening, 140 trials with 199 treatment arms (N = 11,021) were included. An average of 46% (95% CI 42, 50) of interested people were included in the clinical trials. In the active treatment arms, 98% (95% CI 97, 99) of participants began treatment, 81% (95% CI 78, 85) of the assigned treatments were completed, 21% (95% CI 18, 23) of individuals dropped out at post-treatment based on questionnaire non-completion, and an overall within-group effect size of g = 1.03 (95% CI 0.94, 1.13) was obtained. Several moderators of interest were significant (e.g., clinical guidance, anxiety disorder type), and there was substantial heterogeneity in estimates. In conclusion, a large number of inclusion and exclusion criteria have been used in trials of internet-delivered treatments for anxiety. Once recruited into a trial, however, most people appear to begin, adhere, and complete internet-delivered treatment for anxiety. Further research exploring various eligibility criteria and their impact on engagement and efficacy is warranted.

Towards optimal treatment selection for borderline personality disorder patients (BOOTS): a study protocol for a multicenter randomized clinical trial comparing schema therapy and dialectical behavior therapy

BACKGROUND

Specialized evidence-based treatments have been developed and evaluated for borderline personality disorder (BPD), including Dialectical Behavior Therapy (DBT) and Schema Therapy (ST). Individual differences in treatment response to both ST and DBT have been observed across studies, but the factors driving these differences are largely unknown. Understanding which treatment works best for whom and why remain central issues in psychotherapy research. The aim of the present study is to improve treatment response of DBT and ST for BPD patients by a) identifying patient characteristics that predict (differential) treatment response (i.e., treatment selection) and b) understanding how both treatments lead to change (i.e., mechanisms of change). Moreover, the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of DBT and ST will be evaluated.

METHODS

The BOOTS trial is a multicenter randomized clinical trial conducted in a routine clinical setting in several outpatient clinics in the Netherlands. We aim to recruit 200 participants, to be randomized to DBT or ST. Patients receive a combined program of individual and group sessions for a maximum duration of 25 months. Data are collected at baseline until three-year follow-up. Candidate predictors of (differential) treatment response have been selected based on the literature, a patient representative of the Borderline Foundation of the Netherlands, and semi-structured interviews among 18 expert clinicians. In addition, BPD-treatment-specific (ST: beliefs and schema modes; DBT: emotion regulation and skills use), BPD-treatment-generic (therapeutic environment characterized by genuineness, safety, and equality), and non-specific (attachment and therapeutic alliance) mechanisms of change are assessed. The primary outcome measure is change in BPD manifestations. Secondary outcome measures include functioning, additional self-reported symptoms, and well-being.

DISCUSSION

The current study contributes to the optimization of treatments for BPD patients by extending our knowledge on "Which treatment - DBT or ST - works the best for which BPD patient, and why?", which is likely to yield important benefits for both BPD patients (e.g., prevention of overtreatment and potential harm of treatments) and society (e.g., increased economic productivity of patients and efficient use of treatments).

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Netherlands Trial Register, NL7699 , registered 25/04/2019 - retrospectively registered.

Radical Acceptance of Reality: Putting DBT®-A Skill Groups Online During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Qualitative Study

INTRODUCTION

Emotion dysregulation is a common challenge pertaining to numerous psychiatric disorders in adolescence and is associated with increased morbidity and mortality. Dialectical Behavior Therapy for Adolescents (DBT®-A) has been shown to be an effective treatment, especially in the reduction of self-harm and suicidality. Measures in relation to the COVID-19 pandemic set strict limits on physical contacts with patients. In order to continuously provide evidence-based specialized care to patients suffering from emotion dysregulation, we offered two online DBT®-A skill groups in a video-group-call format.

OBJECTIVE

We aimed at assessing our online DBT®-A skills groups, collect according up- and downsides, and form a basis for advancement of this form of treatment provision. Also, the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on patients was assessed.

METHODS

A physical DBT®-A skill group was switched to a video-group-call format and a second group was initiated de novo online. After five sessions, patients engaged in structured group discussions to reflect experiences. Discussion content was analyzed via Inductive Category Formation within the Framework of Qualitative Content Analysis.

RESULTS

Patients unanimously found the COVID-19 pandemic challenging, but also reported differentially on its impact. Downsides were balanced by subjective "gains" in time and a perceived reduction in stress. Technical problems of the online format were discussed, but did not limit the positive experience of still receiving treatment. Patients of both online DBT®-A skill groups valued the offer, felt connected, and reported benefits from the treatment. The transition group additionally discussed changes in structure and content of the group sessions after the switch to online meetings and reflected differential functions of the group.

DISCUSSION

Although the sample size is small, and conclusions are drawn from Inductive Qualitative Content Analysis, the presented results are of interest. In our investigation, video-group-calls were both safe and beneficial for patients. This alternative to physical meetings is not only interesting for further waves of the current pandemic but also for service provision in remote areas with limited access to specialized care. Further research is needed to challenge and refine our results and to explore extensions to "basic" video-group-calls, such as "break-out sessions," blended therapy, or real-time supervision within an online session.

A qualitative exploration of adolescents’ experiences of digital Dialectical Behaviour Therapy during the COVID-19 pandemic

The UK government implemented national social-distancing measures in response to the global COVID19 pandemic. As a result, many appointments in the National Health Service (NHS) took place virtually, including psychological interventions in out-patient settings. This study explored the experiences of adolescents participating in a dialectical behaviour therapy (DBT-A) programme via teletherapy (i.e. via video or telephone call) in a Children and Adolescent Mental Health Service (CAMHS). Thirteen adolescents with emotion dysregulation and related problems completed an online qualitative survey about their experience and acceptance of DBT-A delivered virtually. Thematic analysis was conducted on the survey data and generated three over-arching themes: (1) sense of loss; (2) feeling uncontained; and (3) benefits of virtual DBT. These over-arching themes were composed of eight subthemes (‘loss of connection with group and therapist’; ‘loss of skills-building opportunities’; ‘limited privacy’; ‘lack of safe therapy space’; ‘difficult endings’; ‘home comforts’; ‘convenience and accessibility’; and ‘easier to participate with others’). This study suggests that adolescents doing virtual DBT-A need approaches that acknowledge and address the additional relational, emotional and practical challenges of online therapy while maintaining fidelity to the evidence-based treatment model. Suggestions for further research and preliminary practice guidelines are discussed.

Key learning aims

(1)

The effectiveness of a short-term DBT skills group in a 'real-world' clinical setting

OBJECTIVE

This study evaluated the effectiveness of a short-term outpatient DBT (DBT-S) skills group for individuals experiencing pervasive emotion dysregulation (PED).

METHOD

Pre-and post-group outcome data consisted of self-report measures and six-month Mental Health admissions and Emergency Department presentations.

RESULTS

Group completers reported significant improvements in psychological distress, depression, borderline symptomatology and functional impairment, increases in 'skills use' and decreases in 'dysfunctional coping', associated with symptomatic improvement. There were reduced numbers of Mental Health presentations and admissions between six months pre- and post-group.

CONCLUSION

Findings support emerging evidence for DBT-S as an effective, viable treatment for PED.

Skills-homework completion and phone coaching as predictors of therapeutic change and outcomes in completers of a DBT intensive outpatient programme

OBJECTIVES

Dialectical behaviour therapy (DBT) emphasizes generalization of skills to the patient's real-world context as a primary mechanism of change in treatment. To promote generalization, DBT includes weekly skills-focused homework assignments and as-needed phone coaching. Despite this central function of generalization in DBT, research on these treatment components is limited. The current study addresses this research gap by assessing the association of homework and phone coaching to DBT treatment outcomes.

DESIGN

A longitudinal study design explored the extent to which (a) completion of skills homework and (b) frequency of phone coaching were associated with therapeutic changes and treatment outcomes in a DBT intensive outpatient programme (DBT-IOP).

METHOD

Medical records and diary cards of 56 patients who had completed a four-month treatment cycle of DBT-IOP were reviewed and coded for proportion of skills homework completed, frequency of phone coaching calls, and reported urges for and engagement in suicide, non-suicidal self-injury, illicit or non-prescribed substance use, and alcohol use behaviours.

RESULTS

Completion of skills homework and frequency of phone coaching were significantly associated with (a) reduced urges for suicide, non-suicidal self-injury, illicit or non-prescribed substance use, and alcohol use from the beginning to end of treatment and (b) a lower likelihood of engaging in any of these behaviours during the final month of treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

Results suggest that within a DBT programme modified for an intensive outpatient setting, skills homework and phone coaching may enhance therapeutic change and outcomes in target behaviours. These generalization methods appear to be important ingredients of DBT effectiveness.

PRACTITIONER POINTS

In dialectical behaviour therapy (DBT), therapeutic skills homework and phone coaching are specifically designed to promote generalization of skills from the therapeutic context to the patient's real-world contexts. In a DBT intensive outpatient programme, patient engagement with therapeutic homework and phone coaching were associated with favourable therapeutic change and outcomes in target urges and behaviours. Clinicians may consider a patient's lack of homework completion and/or phone coaching to be early warning signs of poor therapeutic progress within dialectical behaviour therapy.

Harm minimisation for the management of self-harm: a mixed-methods analysis of electronic health records in secondary mental healthcare

BACKGROUND

Prevalence of self-harm in the UK was reported as 6.4% in 2014. Despite sparse evidence for effectiveness, guidelines recommend harm minimisation; a strategy in which people who self-harm are supported to do so safely.

AIMS

To determine the prevalence, sociodemographic and clinical characteristics of those who self-harm and practise harm minimisation within a London mental health trust.

METHOD

We included electronic health records for patients treated by South London and Maudsley NHS Trust. Using an iterative search strategy, we identified patients who practise harm minimisation, then classified the approaches using a content analysis. We compared the sociodemographic characteristics with that of a control group of patients who self-harm and do not use harm minimisation.

RESULTS

In total 22 736 patients reported self-harm, of these 693 (3%) had records reporting the use of harm-minimisation techniques. We coded the approaches into categories: (a) 'substitution' (>50% of those using harm minimisation), such as using rubber bands or using ice; (b) 'simulation' (9%) such as using red pens; (c) 'defer or avoid' (7%) such as an alternative self-injury location; (d) 'damage limitation' (9%) such as using antiseptic techniques; the remainder were unclassifiable (24%). The majority of people using harm minimisation described it as helpful (>90%). Those practising harm minimisation were younger, female, of White ethnicity, had previous admissions and were less likely to have self-harmed with suicidal intent.

CONCLUSIONS

A small minority of patients who self-harm report using harm minimisation, primarily substitution techniques, and the large majority find harm minimisation helpful. More research is required to determine the acceptability and effectiveness of harm-minimisation techniques and update national clinical guidelines.

Borderline Personality Disorder: A Case for the Right Treatment, at the Right Dose, at the Right Time

There is now compelling evidence that a range of psychotherapeutic treatments are effective in the treatment of borderline personality disorder (BPD). Such treatments are often lengthy, expensive, subject to high rates of incompletion and are rarely available to people with sub-threshold symptoms. There is broad agreement that some combination of vulnerability, invalidating environment, childhood adversity, disrupted attachment in childhood or trauma play a role in the aetiology of the syndrome of BPD. These factors also contribute to problems with the capacity to mentalise, regulate emotions, tolerate distress and impact on psychosocial development with or without self-damaging and suicidal behaviour. This column takes as a given that people with BPD should receive evidence-based psychological treatments such as dialectical behaviour therapy (DBT), interpersonal therapy and cognitive behavioural therapy in a sufficient dose to be helpful. However, to avert an escalating trajectory which may lead to a diagnosis of BPD the right dose of the right therapy at the right time is necessary. Under-dosing or ineffective psychotherapy can be potentially harmful. This column reviews the evidence, such as it is, for therapeutic approaches which may contribute to more skilful negotiation of life's difficulties and which may avert deterioration in mental health and quality of life in vulnerable individuals and families.

Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Patients' Acceptance in E-Health Clinical Trials

INTRODUCTION

Telehealth (TH) interventions with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) management were introduced in the literature more than 20 years ago with different labeling, but there was no summary for the overall acceptance and dropout rates as well as associated variables.

OBJECTIVE

This review aims to summarize the acceptance and dropout rates used in TH interventions and identify to what extent clinical settings, sociodemographic factors, and intervention factors might impact the overall acceptance and completion rates of TH interventions.

METHODS

We conducted a systematic search up to April 2021 on CINAHL, PubMed, MEDLINE (Ovid), Cochrane, Web of Sciences, and Embase to retrieve randomized and non-randomized control trials that provide TH interventions alone or accompanied with other interventions to individuals with COPD.

RESULTS

Twenty-seven studies met the inclusion criteria. Overall, the unweighted average of acceptance and dropout rates for all included studies were 80% and 19%, respectively. A meta-analysis on the pooled difference between the acceptance rates and dropout rates (weighted by the sample size) revealed a significant difference in acceptance and dropout rates among all TH interventions 51% (95% CI 49% to 52; p < 0.001) and 63% (95% CI 60% to 67; p < 0.001), respectively. Analysis revealed that acceptance and dropout rates can be impacted by trial-related, sociodemographic, and intervention-related variables. The most common reasons for dropouts were technical difficulties (33%), followed by complicated system (31%).

CONCLUSIONS

Current TH COPD interventions have a pooled acceptance rate of 51%, but this is accompanied by a high dropout rate of 63%. Acceptance and dropout levels in TH clinical trials can be affected by sociodemographic and intervention-related factors. This knowledge enlightens designs for well-accepted future TH clinical trials. PROSPERO registration number CRD4201707854.

The Impact of Social Distancing on People with Borderline Personality Disorder: The Views of Dialectical Behavioural Therapists

Dialectical Behavioural Therapy (DBT) is an evidence-based treatment for borderline personality disorder and other problems associated with emotional dysregulation. It has traditionally been deployed as a face-to-face programme comprised of attendance at group skills training, individual therapy and phone coaching. Social distancing measures arising from the COVID-19 pandemic led to a cessation of therapeutic programmes in many places. This survey of DBT clinicians in a regional State mental health service in Australia explored the impact of the cessation of DBT programmes in the region and obstacles to engaging with people via online platforms. Clinicians have been able to engage in DBT informed care, but it was perceived that many people have experienced a clinical deterioration or have increased their use of crisis services, which is entirely appropriate, as group skills programmes have ceased. Movement to online platforms of delivery poses problems, as some people do not have the access to internet or privacy in their home environments to engage in online therapy. Ideally, clinicians need to be supported through education, supervision and coaching in the use of telehealth interventions. Social distancing requirements has enabled an opportunity to carefully consider how programmes can be adapted to enable the extension of these programmes to those who have traditionally been unable to access them.

Brain Connectivity and Symptom Changes After Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation in Patients With Borderline Personality Disorder

OBJECTIVES

Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) is an innovative method in the treatment of borderline personality disorder (BPD). We hypothesized that prefrontal rTMS in patients with BPD leads to improved BPD symptoms and that these effects are associated with brain connectivity changes.

METHODS

Fourteen patients with BPD received 15 sessions of individually navigated prefrontal rTMS over the right dorsolateral prefrontal cortex. Clinical effects were measured by the Borderline Symptom List 23, UPPS-P, the Difficulties in Emotion Regulation Scale (DERS), the Zung Self-Rating Anxiety Scale (SAS), and the Montgomery and Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS). Effects of rTMS on brain connectivity were observed with a seed correlation analysis on resting-state fMRI and with a beta series correlation analysis on Go/No Go tasks during fMRI. Assessments were made before and immediately after the treatment.

RESULTS

The assessments after rTMS showed significant reductions in two subscales of UPPS-P, and in DERS, SAS, and MADRS. The brain connectivity analysis revealed significant decreases in amygdala and insula connectivity with nodes of the posterior default mode network (pDMN; precuneus, posterior cingulate cortex, parietal lobules). Connectivity changes were observed both in the resting state and during inhibition. The decrease of amygdala-pDMN connectivity was positively correlated with reduced depression and lack of premeditation after rTMS.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite the study limitations (open single-arm study in a small sample), our findings suggest a possible neural mechanism of rTMS effect in BPD, reduced amygdala connectivity with the pDMN network, which was positively associated with symptom reduction.

Smartphone applications targeting borderline personality disorder symptoms: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Smartphone applications could improve symptoms of borderline personality disorder (BPD) in a scalable and resource-efficient manner in the context limited access to specialized care.

OBJECTIVE

This systematic review and meta-analysis aims to evaluate the effectiveness of applications designed as treatment interventions for adults with symptoms such as anger, suicidality, or self-harm that commonly occur in BPD.

DATA SOURCES

Search terms for BPD symptoms, smartphone applications, and treatment interventions were combined on PubMed, MEDLINE, and PsycINFO from database inception to December 2019.

STUDY SELECTION

Controlled and uncontrolled studies of smartphone interventions for adult participants with symptoms such as anger, suicidality, or self-harm that commonly occur in BPD were included.

STUDY APPRAISAL AND SYNTHESIS METHODS

Comprehensive Meta-Analysis v3 was used to compute between-groups effect sizes in controlled designs. The primary outcome was BPD-related symptoms such as anger, suicidality, and impulsivity; and the secondary outcome was general psychopathology. An average dropout rate across interventions was computed. Study quality, target audiences, therapeutic approach and targets, effectiveness, intended use, usability metrics, availability on market, and downloads were assessed qualitatively from the papers and through internet search.

RESULTS

Twelve studies of 10 applications were included, reporting data from 408 participants. Between-groups meta-analyses of RCTs revealed no significant effect of smartphone applications above and beyond in-person treatments or a waitlist on BPD symptoms (Hedges' g = - 0.066, 95% CI [-.257, .125]), nor on general psychopathology (Hedges' g = 0.305, 95% CI [- 0.14, 0.75]). Across the 12 trials, dropout rates ranged from 0 to 56.7% (M = 22.5, 95% CI [0.15, 0.46]). A majority of interventions studied targeted emotion dysregulation and behavioral dyscontrol symptoms. Half of the applications are commercially available.

CONCLUSIONS

The effects of smartphone interventions on symptoms of BPD are unclear and there is currently a lack of evidence for their effectiveness. More research is needed to build on these preliminary findings in BPD to investigate both positive and adverse effects of smartphone applications and identify the role these technologies may provide in expanding mental healthcare resources.