Pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic considerations for epilepsy - depression comorbidities

Comorbid epilepsy and depression—pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic drug interactions

Background: Major depressive disorder may be encountered in 17% of patients with epilepsy and in patients with drug-resistant epilepsy its prevalence may reach 30%. This indicates that patients with epilepsy may require antidepressant treatment.

Purpose: Both pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic interactions between antiepileptic (antiseizure) and antidepressant drugs have been reviewed. Also, data on the adverse effects of co-administration of antiepileptic with antidepressant drugs have been added. This article was submitted to Neuropharmacology, a section of the journal Frontiers in Pharmacology.

Methods: The review of relevant literature was confined to English-language publications in PUBMED databases. Table data show effects of antidepressants on the seizure susceptibility in experimental animals, results of pharmacodynamic interactions between antiepileptic and antidepressant drugs mainly derived from electroconvulsions in mice, as well as results concerning pharmacokinetic interactions between these drugs in clinical conditions.

Conclusion: Antidepressant drugs may exert differentiated effects upon the convulsive threshold which may differ in their acute and chronic administration. Animal data indicate that chronic administration of antidepressants could reduce (mianserin, trazodone) or potentiate the anticonvulsant activity of some antiepileptics (fluoxetine, reboxetine, venlafaxine). There are also examples of neutral interactions (milnacipran).

How Antidepressant Drugs Affect the Antielectroshock Action of Antiseizure Drugs in Mice: A Critical Review

Depression coexists with epilepsy, worsening its course. Treatment of the two diseases enables the possibility of interactions between antidepressant and antiepileptic drugs. The aim of this review was to analyze such interactions in one animal seizure model-the maximal electroshock (MES) in mice. Although numerous antidepressants showed an anticonvulsant action, mianserin exhibited a proconvulsant effect against electroconvulsions. In most cases, antidepressants potentiated or remained ineffective in relation to the antielectroshock action of classical antiepileptic drugs. However, mianserin and trazodone reduced the action of valproate, phenytoin, and carbamazepine against the MES test. Antiseizure drug effects were potentiated by all groups of antidepressants independently of their mechanisms of action. Therefore, other factors, including brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) and glial-derived neurotrophic factor (GDNF) modulation, should be considered as the background for the effect of drug combinations.

Acute and chronic treatment with moclobemide, a reversible MAO-inhibitor, potentiates the antielectroshock activity of conventional antiepileptic drugs in mice

BACKGROUND

Due to enhancing serotonergic and noradrenergic neurotransmission, moclobemide may influence seizure phenomena. In this study, we examined the effect of both acute and chronic treatment with moclobemide on seizures and the action of first-generation antiepileptic drugs: valproate, carbamazepine, phenobarbital and phenytoin.

METHODS

The effect of moclobemide on seizures was assessed in the electroconvulsive threshold test, while its influence on antiepileptic drugs was estimated in the maximal electroshock test in mice. Undesired effects were evaluated in the chimney test (motor impairment) and step-through passive-avoidance task (long-term memory deficits). Finally, brain concentrations of antiepileptics were determined by fluorescence polarization immunoassay.

RESULTS

Given acutely, moclobemide at 62.5 and 75 mg/kg increased the electroconvulsive threshold. In contrast, chronic treatment with moclobemide up to 75 mg/kg did not influence this parameter. Acute moclobemide applied at subthreshold doses (up to 50 mg/kg) enhanced the antielectroshock effects of carbamazepine, valproate and phenobarbital. Chronic moclobemide (37.5-75 mg/kg) increased the action of all four antiepileptic drugs. All revealed interactions, except these between moclobemide and phenobarbital, seem to have pharmacokinetic nature, because the antidepressant drug, either in acute or in chronic treatment, increased the brain concentrations of respective antiepileptic drugs. In terms of undesired neurotoxic effects, acute and chronic moclobemide, antiepileptic drugs, and their combinations did not produce significant motor or long-term memory impairment.

CONCLUSIONS

Acute and chronic therapy with moclobemide can increase the effectiveness of some antiepileptic drugs against the maximal electroshock test. In mice, this effect was, at least partially, due to pharmacokinetic interactions. So far as the results of experimental studies can be transferred to clinical conditions, moclobemide seems safe for the application in patients with epilepsy and depression. Possibly, in the case of certain antiepileptic drugs combined with moclobemide, their doses should be adjusted downwards.

Interactions of antiepileptic drugs with drugs approved for the treatment of indications other than epilepsy

Introduction: Comorbidities of epilepsy may significantly interfere with its treatment as diseases in the general population are also encountered in epilepsy patients and some of them even more frequently (for instance, depression, anxiety, or heart disease). Obviously, some drugs approved for other than epilepsy indications can modify the anticonvulsant activity of antiepileptics. Areas covered: This review highlights the drug-drug interactions between antiepileptics and aminophylline, some antidepressant, antiarrhythmic (class I-IV), selected antihypertensive drugs and non-barbiturate injectable anesthetics (ketamine, propofol, etomidate, and alphaxalone). The data were reviewed mainly from experimental models of seizures. Whenever possible, clinical data were provided. PUBMED data base was the main search source.Expert opinion: Aminophylline generally reduced the protective activity of antiepileptics, which, to a certain degree, was consistent with scarce clinical data on methylxanthine derivatives and worse seizure control. The only antiarrhythmic with this profile of action was mexiletine when co-administered with VPA. Among antidepressants and non-barbiturate injectable anesthetics, trazodone, mianserin and etomidate or alphaxalone, respectively, negatively affected the anticonvulsant action of some antiepileptic drugs. Clinical data indicate that only amoxapine, bupropion, clomipramine and maprotiline should be used with caution. Possibly, drugs reducing the anticonvulsant potential of antiepileptics should be avoided in epilepsy patients.

Risk of seizures with antidepressants: what is the evidence?

Topics for DTB review articles are selected by DTB's editorial board to provide concise overviews of medicines and other treatments to help patients get the best care. Articles include a summary of key points and a brief overview for patients. Articles may also have a series of multiple choice CME questions.

Depression in People with Epilepsy. What is the Connection?

INTRODUCTION

Depression is the most common psychiatric comorbidity in people with epilepsy. It worsens the prognosis and quality of life of these patients. Despite this, depression is poorly diagnosed and when the treatment is given, it is frequently suboptimal.

OBJECTIVE

To perform a narrative review of the medical literature, seeking to collect useful information regarding the relationship between epilepsy and depression.

RESULTS

Narrative reviews, systematic reviews, meta-analyses, clinical trials, and follow-up studies were identified in English and Spanish with no time limit, including epidemiological, clinical, associated factors, etiological explanations, diagnostic and therapeutic approaches to comorbid depression in epilepsy.

CONCLUSION

The relationship between epilepsy and depression is complex. The available scientific evidence suggests the possibility of a bidirectional relationship that could be explained from common aetiopathogenic mechanisms. Despite the high prevalence of depression in epileptic patients, this mental disorder continues to be poorly identified by clinicians. To improve this, we have easy-to-apply instruments that routinely screen this patient population and contribute substantially to making the problem more visible and seek to improve the quality of life for this population.

Awareness and current knowledge of epilepsy

Epilepsy is a severe neural disorder that affects approximately fifty million individuals globally. Despite the fact that for most of the people with epilepsy, convulsions are better controlled by current accessible antiepileptic medicines, yet there are more than 30% of individuals affected with medically intractable epilepsy and around 30-40% of all patients with epilepsy affected by many adverse reactions and convulsion resistance to the present antiepileptic drugs. Consequently, various scientists attempt to develop new strategies to treat epilepsy, for instance, to find out novel antiepileptic ingredients from traditional medicines. This work aims to present a complete summary of natural medicines prescribed as antiepileptic agents all over the world by ethnic groups and different tribes. We undertook an extensive bibliographic analysis by searching peer reviewed papers and classical textbooks and further consulting well accepted worldwide scientific databases. We carried out PubMed, EMbase and CENTRAL searches by means of terms such as "antiepileptic" and "anti-convulsant" activity of plants. Medicinal plants have been prescribed to treat epilepsy and have been recognized as antiepileptic medicines. In this review, a variety of herbs have been reviewed for thorough studies such as Cuminum cyminum, Butea monosperma, Solanum americanum, Anacyclus pyrethrum, Leonotis leonurus, Elaeocarpus ganitrus and Angelica archangelica. This paper shows that it was high time experimental studies are increased to obtain novel potential active principles from medicinal plants. Plant extracts and their chemical constituents should be further evaluated to clarify their mechanisms of action. This paper provides a solid base upon which to further investigate the clinical efficacy of medicinal plants that are both currently prescribed by physicians as traditional antiepileptic agents, but also could be effective as an antiepileptic drug with further research and study.

An update on the problem of osteoporosis in people with epilepsy taking antiepileptic drugs

INTRODUCTION

Antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) have been associated with a negative impact on bone health. Comorbid disorders in patients with epilepsy may require drugs exerting a pro-osteoporotic effect, so a possibility of untoward interactions with AEDs is probable.

AREAS COVERED

This review discusses evidence related to the deteriorating influence of AEDs on bone, demonstrating generally stronger negative effects of conventional AEDs. Lamotrigine seems to be a safer AED in this regard. Further, literature data indicate that generally AEDs can lower the serum concentration of vitamin D. Importantly, pediatric patients are of greater risk of bone problems during therapy with AEDs, which is probably due to their effects on bone-forming processes.

EXPERT OPINION

Supplementation with vitamin D and calcium is frequently recommended in patients taking AEDs chronically. Whether to add a bisphosphonate remains an open question due to the limited data on this issue. A possibility of negative interactions exists between AEDs and other pro-osteoporotic drugs: glucocorticoids, proton pump inhibitors and aromatase inhibitors. Depression is a frequent comorbidity in patients with epilepsy. Clinical data indicate that antidepressant drugs may also increase the risk of fractures. Again, patients with epilepsy and depression may be exposed to a greater risk of osteoporosis.

Pharmacodynamics and common drug-drug interactions of the third-generation antiepileptic drugs

INTRODUCTION

Anticonvulsants that belong to the third generation are considered as 'newer' antiepileptic drugs, including: eslicarbazepine acetate, lacosamide, perampanel, brivaracetam, rufinamide and stiripentol. Areas covered: This article reviews pharmacodynamics (i.e. mechanisms of action) and clinically relevant drug-drug interactions of the third-generation antiepileptic drugs. Expert opinion: Newer antiepileptic drugs have mechanisms of action which are not shared with the first and the second generation anticonvulsants, like inhibition of neurotransmitters release, blocking receptors for excitatory amino acids and new ways of sodium channel inactivation. New mechanisms of action increase chances of controlling forms of epilepsy resistant to older anticonvulsants. Important advantage of the third-generation anticonvulsants could be their little propensity for interactions with both antiepileptic and other drugs observed until now, making prescribing much easier and safer. However, this may change with new studies specifically designed to discover drug-drug interactions. Although the third-generation antiepileptic drugs enlarged therapeutic palette against epilepsy, 20-30% of patients with epilepsy is still treatment-resistant and need new pharmacological approach. There is great need to explore all molecular targets that may directly or indirectly be involved in generation of seizures, so a number of candidate compounds for even newer anticonvulsants could be generated.