Key insights from therapeutic drug monitoring in Crohn's disease patients

Therapeutic drug monitoring of methotrexate in patients with Crohn's disease

BACKGROUND

Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) has the potential to improve efficacy and diminish side effects. Measuring methotrexate-polyglutamate (MTX-PG) in erythrocytes might enable TDM for methotrexate in patients with Crohn's disease (CD).

AIM

To investigate the relationship between MTX-PGs and methotrexate drug survival, efficacy and toxicity METHODS: In a multicentre prospective cohort study, patients with CD starting subcutaneous methotrexate without biologics were included and followed for 12 months. Primary outcome was subcutaneous methotrexate discontinuation or requirement for step-up therapy. Secondary outcomes included faecal calprotectin (FCP), Harvey Bradshaw Index (HBI), hepatotoxicity and gastrointestinal intolerance. Erythrocyte MTX-PGs were analysed at weeks 8, 12, 24 and 52 or upon treatment discontinuation.

RESULTS

We included 80 patients with CD (mean age 55 ± 13y, 35% male) with a median FCP of 268 μg/g (IQR 73-480). After the 12-month visit, 21 patients (26%) were still on subcutaneous methotrexate monotherapy. Twenty-one patients stopped because of disease activity, 29 because of toxicity, and four for both reasons. Five patients ended study participation or stopped methotrexate for another reason. A higher MTX-PG3 concentration was associated with a higher rate of methotrexate drug survival (HR 0.86, 95% CI 0.75-0.99), lower FCP (β -3.7, SE 1.3, p < 0.01) and with biochemical response (FCP ≤250 if baseline >250 μg/g; OR 1.1, 95% CI 1.0-1.3). Higher MTX-PGs were associated with less gastrointestinal intolerance. There was no robust association between MTX-PGs and HBI or hepatotoxicity.

CONCLUSIONS

Higher MTX-PG3 concentrations are related to better methotrexate drug survival and decreased FCP levels. Therefore, MTX-PG3 could be used for TDM if a target concentration can be established.

A report on the potential of Rac1/pSTAT3 protein levels in T lymphocytes to assess the pharmacodynamic effect of thiopurine therapy in Inflammatory Bowel Disease patients

The thiopurine derivatives azathioprine (AZA), mercaptopurine (MP) and tioguanine (TG) remain standard treatment of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). The immune suppressive effect of thiopurines is primarily based on blocking the Ras-related C3 botulinum toxin substrate 1 (Rac1) causing apoptosis of T lymphocytes by inhibition of the phosphorylated downstream transcription factor Signal Transducer and Activator of Transcription 3 (pSTAT3). A functional pharmacodynamic marker in T lymphocytes may be useful to predict therapeutic outcome of thiopurine therapy. The aim of this study was to explore whether protein levels of Rac1 and pSTAT3 in T lymphocytes may be applied as a specific pharmacodynamic marker for thiopurine therapy in IBD patients. Rac1 and pSTAT3 protein levels in T lymphocytes were explored in 57 IBD patients (median age 51 years, 56% female), subdivided into six groups based on IBD activity and its treatment: patients with active disease without IBD maintenance medication (1) or patients in remission on AZA/MP (2), TG (3), infliximab (IFX) (4), thiopurine and IFX combination-treatment (5) or without IBD medication (6). Reference values were obtained from healthy subjects. Rac1 and pSTAT3 protein levels in T lymphocytes from patients on thiopurine monotherapy (group 2 and 3) were compared to the other groups, and to healthy subjects. Absolute Rac1 and pSTAT3 protein levels showed no differences between the thiopurine monotherapy groups when compared to patients with active disease. However, the ratio of Rac1 and pSTAT3 protein levels was lower in thiopurine patients groups compared to patients with active disease. Rac1-corrected pSTAT3 protein levels may serve as a pharmacodynamic marker of thiopurine monotherapy and may be a potential tool to predict therapeutic effectiveness in IBD patients.

Current status and future perspectives on the use of therapeutic drug monitoring of thiopurine metabolites in patients with inflammatory bowel disease

INTRODUCTION

Despite new treatment options for inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), conventional thiopurines remain a common treatment option for maintaining remission, particularly in non-Westernized countries. Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) is advised in standard care for optimizing therapy strategies to improve effectiveness, reveal nonadherence and reduce toxicity. Still, the rationale of TDM is debated.

AREAS COVERED

Key insights on TDM of thiopurine metabolites are discussed. The pharmacology of thiopurines is described, emphasizing the interindividual differences in pharmacogenetics, pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics. Pharmacological differences between conventional thiopurines and tioguanine are outlined. Finally, several optimization strategies for thiopurine therapy in IBD are discussed.

EXPERT OPINION

TDM has been a useful, but limited, tool to individualize thiopurine therapy. Pharmacokinetic data on the active thiopurine metabolites, derived from measurements in erythrocytes, associated with clinical response only partially predict effectiveness and toxicity. An additional pharmacodynamic marker, such as Rac1/pSTAT3 expression in leukocytes, may improve applicability of TDM in the future.

Proactive versus Reactive Therapeutic Drug Monitoring: Why, When, and How?

BACKGROUND

Up to a third of inflammatory bowel disease) patients show primary nonresponse to antitumor necrosis factor (anti-TNF) biological therapy, and of those who respond, up to 40% develop secondary loss of response (LOR). Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) plays a crucial role in assessing patients with LOR to guide therapy by giving more of the drug or switching to a different biological agent. Although reactive TDM is suggested or recommended by the majority of gastroenterology associations, proactive TDM seems to be more controversial.

SUMMARY

In this article, we discuss the updated guidelines on TDM and will also discuss the available data supporting proactive and reactive TDM in patients with Crohn's disease and those with ulcerative colitis using the different available biological agents.

KEY MESSAGES

Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) is a valuable tool to aid in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) therapy optimization. Reactive TDM is widely accepted in IBD patients with suspected loss of response, especially in those receiving antitumor necrosis factor (anti-TNF) agents. Proactive TDM is emerging as a reasonable approach to patients initiated on anti-TNF therapy, specifically infliximab and, to some extent, adalimumab, particularly for patients with severe ulcerative colitis and fistulizing Crohn's disease. Similarly, TDM may play a role in patients considering de-escalation from combination therapy. To date, proactive TDM is not widely applied to ustekinumab and vedolizumab and more data are required before this becomes part of clinical practice.

Rac1/pSTAT3 expression: A pharmacodynamic marker panel as a first step toward optimization of thiopurine therapy in inflammatory bowel disease patients

Thiopurine derivatives, such as azathioprine and mercaptopurine, are standard conventional treatment options in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Unfortunately, approximately half of patients discontinue thiopurine therapy within 2 years. To improve the prediction of clinical effectiveness, thiopurine therapy is currently optimized using therapeutic drug monitoring. Ras-related C3 botulinum toxin substrate 1 (Rac1) has been suggested as a potential pharmacodynamic marker of the thiopurine effect in lymphocytes. The active thiopurine metabolite 6-thioguanine triphosphate (6-Thio-GTP) causes T cell apoptosis via Rac1 and the downstream transcription factor signal transducer and activator of transcription 3 (STAT3). The aim of this study was to develop and validate a functional pharmacodynamic multiparameter flow cytometric assay to determine Rac1/pSTAT3 expression in the various leukocyte subpopulations in peripheral blood in order to predict therapeutic response in IBD patients in the future. Peripheral blood samples of healthy subjects (no fever or clinical complaints of active disease, C-reactive protein < 10 mg/L) were used for immunocytochemical labeling, applying an optimized fixation and permeabilization strategy. A gating procedure was performed to separate all leukocyte subpopulations. Quantitative data were obtained by measuring presence and median fluorescent intensity. In vitro, Rac1 presence and expression were detectable in all leukocyte subpopulations. After IL-6 stimulation, used as proxy for inflammation, a distinct pSTAT3 signal could be detected in T lymphocytes of healthy subjects. In vivo, an upregulated pSTAT3 signal was detected in nearly all IBD patients with active disease and differed substantially from the signal found in IBD patients in remission on thiopurines and healthy subjects. We developed and validated a functional flow cytometric assay to assess Rac1 and pSTAT3 presence and expression. This opens a venue for a pharmacodynamic assay to predict thiopurine effectiveness in IBD patients.

Strengthened monitoring and optimized management of Crohn's disease patients

In recent years, the treatment goal of Crohn's disease (CD) has shifted from clinical remission to mucosal healing. In this regard, CD management and monitoring are particularly important. Timely adjustment of treatment regimen according to clinical symptoms and inflammatory markers is helpful to monitor patients and achieve better clinical and endoscopic treatment results. However, there is not enough evidence to recommend an optimal treatment regimen that considers only inflammatory markers. Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) has been used to improve the treatment of thiopurine and anti-tumor necrosis factor (TNF) drugs. Passive TDM is suitable for all drugs. In order to improve the clinical usefulness, the monitoring of anti-tumor necrosis factor drugs should be transformed from passive to active. The effectiveness of active TDM in optimizing non-anti-TNF biologic agents remains to be described. In addition, inflammatory markers can predict CD recurrence after surgery, and regular colonoscopy at 6-12 mo after surgery is also important. Early postoperative anti-TNF therapy should be considered in high-risk CD patients, but the optimal time for prophylactic administration of anti-TNF therapy is still controversial, and the role of non-anti-TNF biologic agents in prophylactic administration after surgery still needs to be studied. This paper mainly summarizes the monitoring of inflammatory markers, drug monitoring, and postoperative monitoring of patients, so as to optimize the management of CD patients and enable more patients to achieve the treatment goal, and emphasizes the importance of close monitoring of CD patients.

Inflammatory Bowel Disease - Non-biological treatment

Nowadays, non-biological treatments remain valuable approaches among the therapeutic armamentarium of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Mesalamine is the core treatment of mild‑to‑moderate ulcerative colitis (UC) and corticosteroids are crucial for the induction of remission of moderate‑to‑severe flares in both UC and Crohn's disease (CD). Even approaches as cyclosporine, tacrolimus, azathioprine, methotrexate, and surgery still have a nuclear position as strategies to induce and/or maintain remission in IBD. Due to their particularities and to the accumulated evidence, each of these strategies conquered peculiar roles in the overall IBD strategy, all of them contributing to better outcomes. This review emphasizes the particular roles that non-biological treatments gained over time: recent mesalamine formulations to increase adhesion rates, higher doses of 5-ASA for high-risk patients, MMX technology to improve drug release and attain higher bowel concentrations, cyclosporine as a bridge to vedolizumab, tacrolimus as a potential alternative to thiopurines or infliximab, azathioprine in combination therapy with infliximab and dubious in monotherapy, and surgery as a mean to a "better end".

Crohn's disease

Crohn's disease is an inflammatory bowel disease that is characterized by chronic inflammation of any part of the gastrointestinal tract, has a progressive and destructive course and is increasing in incidence worldwide. Several factors have been implicated in the cause of Crohn's disease, including a dysregulated immune system, an altered microbiota, genetic susceptibility and environmental factors, but the cause of the disease remains unknown. The onset of the disease at a young age in most cases necessitates prompt but long-term treatment to prevent disease flares and disease progression with intestinal complications. Thus, earlier, more aggressive treatment with biologic therapies or novel small molecules could profoundly change the natural history of the disease and decrease complications and the need for hospitalization and surgery. Although less invasive biomarkers are in development, diagnosis still relies on endoscopy and histological assessment of biopsy specimens. Crohn's disease is a complex disease, and treatment should be personalized to address the underlying pathogenetic mechanism. In the future, disease management might rely on severity scores that incorporate prognostic factors, bowel damage assessment and non-invasive close monitoring of disease activity to reduce the severity of complications.

Pursuing therapeutic success in Crohn’s disease: A matter of definition, tools and longterm outcomes

Management of Crohn’s disease (CD) based on symptom control is a tale of the past as new treatment strategies aim toward a “treat to target” concept and to a patient-tailored approach. Defining treatment goals and assessing therapeutic success have been in the center of IBD research in the past years. Clinical remission and mucosal healing are well-established treatment goals by current recommendations, although prospective data is required to determine whether achieving these targets is enough to alter disease natural course. Furthermore, there is no standard in assessing therapeutic success. Low relapse and hospitalization rates, as well as a low need of surgery are indicators of a successful treatment. Close monitoring is part of the new therapeutic strategy. Monitoring tools are numerous, comprising clinical, biological, endoscopic and imaging scores or parameters but are far from being perfect. The traditional strategy of managing CD patients based on clinical symptoms and response to treatment did not improve the long-term outcomes. Clinical activity scores are frequently used in clinical trials and daily practice, but their use alone is not an accurate measure of inflammation. Endoscopic remission is associated with a lower risk of complications and a better long-term prognostic. Several guidelines include recommendations regarding surveillance endoscopy, but there is an open debate regarding the follow-up intervals. Cross-sectional imaging techniques play a complementary role in assessing transmural inflammation and in identifying extra-intestinal complications of CD and should be used in conjunction with endoscopy. Therapeutic drug monitoring is essential in assessing loss of response and making therapeutic decisions, although firm recommendations are not implemented into daily practice. Extraintestinal manifestations are often disregarded when discussing monitoring protocols. There is no current guideline indication for extraintestinal manifestations monitoring during remission periods.