Total artificial heart implantation as a bridge to transplantation: a viable model for the future?

Impact of Temporary Preoperative Mechanical Support on Heart Transplant Outcomes

We sought to assess the impact of temporary preoperative mechanical circulatory support (TPMCS) on heart transplantation outcomes. A total of 4,060 adult heart transplants from June 1, 2006, to December 31, 2019, were identified in the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients database as having TPMCS. Recipients were divided into groups based on their type of TPMCS: intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP), temporary ventricular assist device (VAD), biventricular assist device (BIVAD), and extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO). Perioperative outcomes and survival were compared among groups. Recipients with IABP were associated with older age, a smoking history, and a significantly shorter wait list time ( p < 0.01). Recipients with ECMO had a significantly increased in-hospital mortality as well as an increased incidence of dialysis ( p < 0.01). Kaplan-Meier analysis revealed worse 1 and 5 year survival for recipients with ECMO. Cox model demonstrated a significantly increased risk of mortality with BIVAD (hazard ratio [HR], 1.33; 95% CI, 1.12-1.57; p < 0.01) and ECMO (HR, 1.64; 95% CI, 1.33-2.03; p < 0.01). While patients with IABP have a survival comparable to patients without TPMCS or durable left VAD, outcomes for BIVADs and ECMO are not as favorable. Transplantation centers must continue to make careful choices about the type of TPMCS utilized before heart transplant.

A retrospective chart review evaluating pre-operative dental extractions on patients with end-stage heart failure undergoing advanced surgical cardiac therapies

OBJECTIVES

End-stage heart failure patients are functionally compromised by multiple physiologic mechanisms, placing them at increased risk of peri- and post-operative complications. This study aimed to evaluate if dental treatment performed before advanced cardiac interventions, including orthotopic heart transplant and mechanical circulatory support, increases the risk of adverse events.

STUDY DESIGN

A retrospective chart review spanning January 2011 to December 2020 was performed. Inpatients with end-stage heart disease were evaluated by the hospital dentistry service at UCLA Ronald Reagan Medical Center. Three hundred and five consults met the inclusion criteria. The patients were divided into 2 groups: those who underwent dental treatment and those who did not require dental treatment. The wait time from dental consultation to cardiac intervention (days), dental complications, medical adverse events, and deaths were evaluated.

RESULTS

Dental complications were only experienced in the form of intraoral bleeding. There was no significant difference in the number of medical adverse events or deaths between groups.

CONCLUSIONS

The elimination of oral infection before advanced cardiac interventions does not increase the risk of morbidity or mortality.

Pig-to-human heart transplantation: Who goes first?

Cardiac xenotransplantation has recently taken an important step towards clinical reality. In anticipation of the "first-in-human" heart xenotransplantation trial, we propose a set of patient characteristics that define potential candidates. Our premise is that, to be ethically justified, the risks posed by current state-of-the-art options must outweigh the anticipated risks of a pioneering xenotransplant procedure. Suitable candidates include patients who are at high immunologic risk because of sensitization to alloantigens, including those who have exhibited early onset or accelerated cardiac allograft vasculopathy. In addition, patients should be considered (1) for whom mechanical circulatory support would be prohibitively risky due to a hypercoagulable state, a contraindication to anticoagulation, or restrictive physiology; (2) with severe biventricular dysfunction predicting unsuccessful univentricular left heart support; and (3) adults with complex congenital heart disease. In conclusion, because the published preclinical benchmark for clinical translation of heart xenotransplantation appears within reach, carefully and deliberately defining appropriate trial participants is timely as the basis for ethical clinical trial design.

Use of Ventricular Assist Devices and Heart Transplantation for Advanced Heart Failure

There are only 2 treatments for the thousands of patients who progress to the most advanced form of heart failure despite the application of guideline-based medical therapy, use of ventricular assist devices and heart transplantation. There has been a great deal of progress in both of these therapies that have led to improved outcomes including significant improvement in survival and functional capacity. Heart transplantation offers the best short- and long-term survival for patients with end-stage heart failure, and the majority of these recipients achieve relatively limitless functional capacity for their age. However, the chronic shortage of available donors limits the number of recipients in the United States to an only 2500 patients/y or only a fraction of potential candidates. The significant improvement in outcomes now possible with durable ventricular assist devices has led to a significant increase in their use, which now exceeds the volume of heart transplants in the United States, with the greatest growth in use for those not considered to be candidates for heart transplantation, previously referred to as destination therapy. This article will review the substantial progress that has taken place for both of these life-saving treatment options, as well as the future directions.