Continuous monitoring of vital signs with the Everion biosensor on the surgical ward: a clinical validation study

Implementing Wearable Sensors for Clinical Application at a Surgical Ward: Points to Consider before Starting

Incorporating technology into healthcare processes is necessary to ensure the availability of high-quality care in the future. Wearable sensors are an example of such technology that could decrease workload, enable early detection of patient deterioration, and support clinical decision making by healthcare professionals. These sensors unlock continuous monitoring of vital signs, such as heart rate, respiration rate, blood oxygen saturation, temperature, and physical activity. However, broad and successful application of wearable sensors on the surgical ward is currently lacking. This may be related to the complexity, especially when it comes to replacing manual measurements by healthcare professionals. This report provides practical guidance to support peers before starting with the clinical application of wearable sensors in the surgical ward. For this purpose, the Non-Adoption, Abandonment, Scale-up, Spread, and Sustainability (NASSS) framework of technology adoption and innovations in healthcare organizations is used, combining existing literature and our own experience in this field over the past years. Specifically, the relevant topics are discussed per domain, and key lessons are subsequently summarized.

The Accuracy of Wrist-Worn Photoplethysmogram-Measured Heart and Respiratory Rates in Abdominal Surgery Patients: Observational Prospective Clinical Validation Study

BACKGROUND

Postoperative deterioration is often preceded by abnormal vital parameters. Therefore, vital parameters of postoperative patients are routinely measured by nursing staff. Wrist-worn sensors could potentially provide an alternative tool for the measurement of vital parameters in low-acuity settings. These devices would allow more frequent or even continuous measurements of vital parameters without relying on time-consuming manual measurements, provided their accuracy in this clinical population is established.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to assess the accuracy of heart rate (HR) and respiratory rate (RR) measures obtained via a wearable photoplethysmography (PPG) wristband in a cohort of postoperative patients.

METHODS

The accuracy of the wrist-worn PPG sensor was assessed in 62 post-abdominal surgery patients (mean age 55, SD 15 years; median BMI 34, IQR 25-40 kg/m²). The wearable obtained HR and RR measurements were compared to those of the reference monitor in the postanesthesia or intensive care unit. Bland-Altman and Clarke error grid analyses were performed to determine agreement and clinical accuracy.

RESULTS

Data were collected for a median of 1.2 hours per patient. With a coverage of 94% for HR and 34% for RR, the device was able to provide accurate measurements for the large majority of the measurements as 98% and 93% of the measurements were within 5 bpm or 3 rpm of the reference signal. Additionally, 100% of the HR and 98% of the RR measurements were clinically acceptable on Clarke error grid analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

The wrist-worn PPG device is able to provide measurements of HR and RR that can be seen as sufficiently accurate for clinical applications. Considering the coverage, the device was able to continuously monitor HR and report RR when measurements of sufficient quality were obtained.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03923127; https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03923127.

Determining the Reliable Measurement Period for Preoperative Baseline Values With Telemonitoring Before Major Abdominal Surgery: Pilot Cohort Study

BACKGROUND

Preoperative telemonitoring of vital signs, physical activity, and well-being might be able to optimize prehabilitation of the patient's physical and mental condition prior to surgery, support setting alarms during in-hospital monitoring, and allow personalization of the postoperative recovery process.

OBJECTIVE

The primary aim of this study was to evaluate when and how long patients awaiting major abdominal surgery should be monitored to get reliable preoperative individual baseline values of heart rate (HR), daily step count, and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs). The secondary aim was to describe the perioperative course of these measurements at home.

METHODS

In this observational single-center cohort study, patients used a wearable sensor during waking hours and reported PROMs (pain, anxiety, fatigue, nausea) on a tablet twice a day. Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) were used to evaluate the reliability of mean values on 2 specific preoperative days (the first day of telemonitoring and the day before hospital admission) and randomly selected preoperative periods compared to individual reference values. Mean values of HR, step count, and PROMs per day were visualized in a boxplot from 14 days before hospital admission until 30 days after surgery.

RESULTS

A total of 16 patients were included in the data analyses. The ICCs of mean values on the first day of telemonitoring were 0.91 for HR, 0.71 for steps, and at least 0.86 for PROMs. The day before hospital admission showed reliability coefficients of 0.76 for HR, 0.71 for steps, and 0.92-0.99 for PROMs. ICC values of randomly selected measurement periods increased over the continuous period of time from 0.68 to 0.99 for HR and daily step counts. A lower bound of the 95% CI of at least 0.75 was determined after 3 days of measurements. The ICCs of randomly selected PROM measurements were 0.89-0.94. Visualization of mean values per day mainly showed variable preoperative daily step counts (median 2409, IQR 1735-4661 steps/day) and lower postoperative daily step counts (median 884, IQR 474-1605 steps/day). In addition, pain was visually reduced until 30 days after surgery at home.

CONCLUSIONS

In this prospective pilot study, for patients awaiting major abdominal surgery, baseline values for HR and daily step count could be measured reliably by a wearable sensor worn for at least 3 consecutive days and PROMs during any preoperative day. No clear conclusions were drawn from the description of the perioperative course by showing mean values of HR, daily step count, and PROM values over time in the home situation.

Feasibility and patient's experiences of perioperative telemonitoring in major abdominal surgery: an observational pilot study

BACKGROUND

Telemonitoring during the perioperative trajectory may improve patient outcomes and self-management. The aim of this study is to assess the feasibility of and patient's experiences with telemonitoring before and after major abdominal surgery to inform future study design.

METHODS

Patients planned for elective major abdominal surgery wore a sensor and answered well-being questions on a tablet daily for at least 2 weeks preoperatively up to 30-days postoperatively. Feasibility was assessed by participation and completion rate, compliance per day, weekly satisfaction scores, and reasons for nonscheduled contact.

RESULTS

Twenty-three patients were included (participation rate of 54.5%) with a completion rate of 69.6%. Median compliance with the wearable sensor and well-being questions was respectively: 94.7% and 83.3% preoperatively at home; 100% and 66.7% postoperatively in-hospital; and 95.4% and 85.8% postoperatively at home. Median weekly satisfaction scores for both wearing the sensor and well-being questions were 5 (IQR, 4-5). Contact moments were related to absence of sensor data and technological issues (76.0%) or patient discomfort and insecurity (24.0%).

CONCLUSIONS

In this study, telemonitoring showed high satisfaction and compliance during the perioperative trajectory. Future trial design regarding the effectiveness of telemonitoring requires embedding in clinical practice and support for patients, relatives, and healthcare personnel.

Wearable Technologies for Pediatric Patients with Surgical Infections—More than Counting Steps?

Reliable vital sign assessments are crucial for the management of patients with infectious diseases. Wearable devices enable easy and comfortable continuous monitoring across settings, especially in pediatric patients, but information about their performance in acutely unwell children is scarce. Vital signs were continuously measured with a multi-sensor wearable device (Everion^®, Biofourmis, Zurich, Switzerland) in 21 pediatric patients during their hospitalization for appendicitis, osteomyelitis, or septic arthritis to describe acceptance and feasibility and to compare validity and reliability with conventional measurements. Using a wearable device was highly accepted and feasible for health-care workers, parents, and children. There were substantial data gaps in continuous monitoring up to 24 h. The wearable device measured heart rate and oxygen saturation reliably (mean difference, 2.5 bpm and 0.4% SpO₂) but underestimated body temperature by 1.7 °C. Data availability was suboptimal during the study period, but a good relationship was determined between wearable device and conventional measurements for heart rate and oxygen saturation. Acceptance and feasibility were high in all study groups. We recommend that wearable devices designed for medical use in children be validated in the targeted population to assure future high-quality continuous vital sign assessments in an easy and non-burdening way.

Novel wearable and contactless heart rate, respiratory rate, and oxygen saturation monitoring devices: a systematic review and meta-analysis

We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to identify, classify and evaluate the body of evidence on novel wearable and contactless devices that measure heart rate, respiratory rate and oxygen saturations in the clinical setting. We included any studies of hospital inpatients, including sleep study clinics. Eighty-four studies were included in the final review. There were 56 studies of wearable devices and 29 of contactless devices. One study assessed both types of device. A high risk of patient selection and rater bias was present in proportionally more studies assessing contactless devices compared with studies assessing wearable devices (p = 0.023 and p < 0.0001, respectively). There was high but equivalent likelihood of blinding bias between the two types of studies (p = 0.076). Wearable device studies were commercially available devices validated in acute clinical settings by clinical staff and had more real-time data analysis (p = 0.04). Contactless devices were more experimental, and data were analysed post-hoc. Pooled estimates of mean (95%CI) heart rate and respiratory rate bias in wearable devices were 1.25 (-0.31-2.82) beats.min^-1 (pooled 95% limits of agreement -9.36-10.08) and 0.68 (0.05-1.32) breaths.min^-1 (pooled 95% limits of agreement -5.65-6.85). The pooled estimate for mean (95%CI) heart rate and respiratory rate bias in contactless devices was 2.18 (3.31-7.66) beats.min^-1 (pooled limits of agreement -6.71-10.88) and 0.30 (-0.26-0.87) breaths.min^-1 (pooled 95% limits of agreement -3.94-4.29). Only two studies of wearable devices measured S_p O₂ ; these reported mean measurement biases of 3.54% (limits of agreement -5.65-11.45%) and 2.9% (-7.4-1.7%). Heterogeneity was observed across studies, but absent when devices were grouped by measurement modality and reference standard. We conclude that, while studies of wearable devices were of slightly better quality than contactless devices, in general all studies of novel devices were of low quality, with small (< 100) patient datasets, typically not blinded and often using inappropriate statistical techniques. Both types of devices were statistically equivalent in accuracy and precision, but wearable devices demonstrated less measurement bias and more precision at extreme vital signs. The statistical variability in precision and accuracy between studies is partially explained by differences in reference standards.

Wearables for Engagement Detection in Learning Environments: A Review

Appropriate teaching-learning strategies lead to student engagement during learning activities. Scientific progress and modern technology have made it possible to measure engagement in educational settings by reading and analyzing student physiological signals through sensors attached to wearables. This work is a review of current student engagement detection initiatives in the educational domain. The review highlights existing commercial and non-commercial wearables for student engagement monitoring and identifies key physiological signals involved in engagement detection. Our findings reveal that common physiological signals used to measure student engagement include heart rate, skin temperature, respiratory rate, oxygen saturation, blood pressure, and electrocardiogram (ECG) data. Similarly, stress and surprise are key features of student engagement.