The challenge of establishing treatment efficacy for cutaneous vascular manifestations of systemic sclerosis

Construct validity and reliability of the Assessment of Systemic Sclerosis-Associated Raynaud's Phenomenon (ASRAP) questionnaire

OBJECTIVES

Assessment of construct validity and reliability of a novel patient-reported outcome (PRO) instrument for assessing the severity and impact of RP in SSc.

METHODS

An international multicentre study validation study of the 27-item Assessment of Systemic Sclerosis-Associated Raynaud's Phenomenon (ASRAP) and 10-item short-form (ASRAP-SF) questionnaires. The relationship between ASRAP questionnaires and demographics, clinical phenotype and legacy instruments for assessing SSc-RP severity, disability and pain was assessed. Repeatability was evaluated at 1 week. Anchor-based statements of health status facilitated assessment of ASRAP thresholds of meaning.

RESULTS

A total of 420 SSc subjects were enrolled. There was good correlation between ASRAP (and ASRAP-SF) with RP visual analogue scale (VAS) and Scleroderma Health Assessment Questionnaire RP VAS (rho range 0.648-0.727, P < 0.001). Correlation with diary-based assessment of SSc-RP attack frequency and duration was lower (rho range 0.258-0.504, P < 0.001). ASRAP questionnaires had good correlation with instruments for assessing disability, hand function, pain and global health assessment (rho range 0.427-0.575, P < 0.001). Significantly higher ASRAP scores were identified in smokers, patients with active digital ulceration (DU), previous history of DU and calcinosis (P < 0.05 for all comparisons). There was excellent repeatability at 1 week among patients with stable SSc-RP symptoms (intra-class coefficients of 0.891 and 0.848, P < 0.001). Patient-acceptable symptom state thresholds for ASRAP and ASRAP-SF were 45.34 and 45.77, respectively. A preliminary Minimally Important Clinical Difference threshold of 4.17 (95% CI 0.53, 7.81, P = 0.029) was estimated.

CONCLUSION

ASRAP and ASRAP-SF questionnaires are valid and reliable novel PRO instruments for assessing the severity and impact of SSc-RP.

Systemic pharmacological treatment of digital ulcers in systemic sclerosis: a systematic literature review

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the evidence concerning systemic pharmacological treatments for SSc digital ulcers (DUs) to inform the development of evidence-based treatment guidelines.

METHODS

A systematic literature review of seven databases was performed to identify all original research studies of adult patients with SSc DUs. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and prospective longitudinal observational studies (OBSs) were eligible for inclusion. Data were extracted, applying the patient, intervention, comparison, outcome framework, and risk of bias (RoB) was assessed. Due to study heterogeneity, narrative summaries were used to present data.

RESULTS

Forty-seven studies that evaluated the treatment efficacy or safety of pharmacological therapies were identified among 4250 references. Data from 18 RCTs of 1927 patients and 29 OBSs of 661 patients, at various RoB (total 2588 patients) showed that i.v. iloprost, phosphodiesterase-5 inhibitors and atorvastatin are effective for the treatment of active DUs. Bosentan reduced the rate of future DUs in two RCTs (moderate RoB) and eight OBSs at low to high RoB. Two small studies (moderate RoB) indicate that Janus kinase inhibitors may be effective for the treatment of active DUs, otherwise there are no data to support the use of immunosuppression or anti-platelet agents in the management of DUs.

CONCLUSION

There are several systemic treatments, across four medication classes, that are effective therapies for the management of SSc DUs. However, a lack of robust data means it is not possible to define the optimal treatment regimen for SSc DUs. The relatively low quality of evidence available has highlighted further areas of research need.

Domain reporting in systemic sclerosis-related Raynaud's phenomenon: An OMERACT scoping review

BACKGROUND

Raynaud's phenomenon (RP) is a cardinal feature of SSc and is associated with significant disease-related morbidity that impacts on quality of life. The assessment of SSc-RP is challenging. The aim of this scoping review was to evaluate the outcome domains studied and outcome measures used in clinical studies of SSc-RP.

METHODS

Embase, MEDLINE, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were used to identify randomized control trials (RCTs), quasi-randomized studies, case-control studies, prospective and retrospective cohort studies, case series, and cross-sectional studies of adult participants with SSc-associated RP, written in English. A minimum of 25 participants for studies of imaging modalities and 40 participants for questionnaire-based studies was required for inclusion. Basic laboratory and genetic studies were excluded. No limitations were imposed based on intervention, comparator, or study setting. Study characteristics and primary and secondary target domains in each study were recorded.

RESULTS

58 studies (24 randomized clinical trials) were included in the final analysis. The commonest domains captured were severity of attacks (n=35), frequency of attacks (n=28), and duration of attacks (n=19). Objective assessments of digital perfusion were also commonly used in studies of SSc-RP.

CONCLUSION

The outcome domains and the associated outcomes used to assess the impact of SSc-RP in research studies are broad and have varied across studies. The results of this study will inform the OMERACT Vascular Disease in Systemic Sclerosis Working Group to establish a core set of disease domains encompassing the impact of RP in SSc.

Multi-Organ System Screening, Care, and Patient Support in Systemic Sclerosis

Systemic sclerosis (SSc) is a heterogenous systemic autoimmune disease of complex multi-organ manifestations with a disease-specific mortality of >50%. The patient journey is fraught with severe, diverse, and diffuse physical impairment, psychological burden, and diminishing health-related quality of life. SSc remains unfamiliar to many clinicians. Delayed/misdiagnosis, inadequate screening, and attention for common complications with potentially preventable disability/death contribute to patients feeling isolated and unsupported. We present actionable standards including screening, anticipatory guidance, and counseling in patient-centered SSc-care emphasizing psycho-social health as the central goal, whereas robust vigilance and efforts to improve biophysical health and survival are imperatives that support this goal.

State-of-the-art evidence in the treatment of systemic sclerosis

Systemic sclerosis (SSc) is a rare autoimmune connective tissue disease with multi-organ involvement, fibrosis and vasculopathy. Treatment in SSc, including early diffuse cutaneous SSc (dcSSc) and the use of organ-specific therapies, has improved, as evident from randomized clinical trials. Treatments for early dcSSc include immunosuppressive agents such as mycophenolate mofetil, methotrexate, cyclophosphamide, rituximab and tocilizumab. Patients with rapidly progressive early dcSSc might be eligible for autologous haematopoietic stem cell transplantation, which can improve survival. Morbidity from interstitial lung disease and pulmonary arterial hypertension is improving with the use of proven therapies. Mycophenolate mofetil has surpassed cyclophosphamide as the initial treatment for SSc-interstitial lung disease. Nintedanib and possibly perfinidone can be considered in SSc pulmonary fibrosis. Pulmonary arterial hypertension is frequently treated with initial combination therapy (for example, with phosphodiesterase 5 inhibitors and endothelin receptor antagonists) and, if necessary, the addition of a prostacyclin analogue. Raynaud phenomenon and digital ulcers are treated with dihydropyridine calcium channel blockers (especially nifedipine), then phosphodiesterase 5 inhibitors or intravenous iloprost. Bosentan can reduce the development of new digital ulcers. Trial data for other manifestations are mostly lacking. Research is needed to develop targeted and highly effective treatments, best practices for organ-specific screening and early intervention, and sensitive outcome measurements.

Assessment of the Systemic Sclerosis-Associated Raynaud's Phenomenon Questionnaire: Item Bank and Short-Form Development

OBJECTIVE

To develop, refine, and score a novel patient-reported outcome instrument to assess the severity and impact of Raynaud's phenomenon (RP) in systemic sclerosis (SSc).

METHODS

The Assessment of Systemic Sclerosis-Associated Raynaud's Phenomenon (ASRAP) questionnaire items were developed with patient insight partner support and grounded in the lived patient experience of SSc-RP. ASRAP items underwent formal qualitative assessment and linguistic testing. An international multicenter study was undertaken to field test the preliminary ASRAP questionnaire.

RESULTS

A preliminary 37-item ASRAP questionnaire was supplemented with 2 additional items following expert review to enhance content coverage before undergoing formal linguistic testing to optimize readability. Patient cognitive debriefing interviews were undertaken to enhance comprehension, ambiguity, cognitive difficulty, relevance, and content coverage of both the ASRAP items and instructions. We enrolled 420 SSc patients from scleroderma centers in the UK and US over 2 consecutive winters. Factor analysis with item response theory was undertaken to remove redundant and poorly fitting items. The retained 27-item long-form ASRAP questionnaire was calibrated and scored using the graded response model. A fixed 10-item short-form ASRAP questionnaire was developed using computerized adaptive testing simulations.

CONCLUSION

The ASRAP questionnaire has been developed with extensive SSc patient input, with items grounded in the lived experience of SSc-RP to ensure strong content validity, with a focus on how patients feel and function. An advanced psychometric approach with expert input has removed redundant and/or poorly fitting items without eroding content validity. Long- and short-form ASRAP questionnaires have been calibrated and scored to permit formal validation.

Raynaud's phenomenon-an update on diagnosis, classification and management

Raynaud's phenomenon (RP) is used to describe a symptom complex caused by digital vascular compromise. RP is a clinical diagnosis. The typically episodic nature of RP has resulted in a reliance upon patient self-report for diagnosis. The term 'primary RP' is generally applied when no underlying pathology can be demonstrated. Whilst 'primary RP' is currently considered a distinct disorder, there is evidence that the term may comprise several entities that include a functional vasospastic disorder, a physiologically appropriate thermoregulatory response, subclinical atherosclerosis and 'cold intolerance'. Optimal management may differ depending on cause. The term 'secondary RP' encompasses a broad range of rheumatological, haematological, endocrinological and vascular pathology. RP can range from relatively benign but intrusive vasospasm, to the progressive obliterative microangiopathy of systemic sclerosis (SSc), in which severe digital ischaemia can threaten tissue viability. SSc has formed the focus of much of the research into RP but, consistent with most medical symptom complexes, the aetiopathogenesis of RP varies greatly dependent on cause. Vasospasm within the digital macro- and microvasculature occurs in SSc, but digital ischaemia is further compounded by a progressive obliterative microangiopathy. Recent work exploring the patient experience of SSc-RP is challenging the 'episodic' paradigm of 'Raynaud's', with important implications for clinical trials utilising diary-based patient-reported outcome instruments for assessing Raynaud's symptoms. This review shall examine the causes, pathogenesis, clinical features, classification and management of RP. A practical approach to the evaluation and management of RP is outlined, highlighting important knowledge gaps and unmet research needs where applicable. Key Points • Raynaud's phenomenon is a symptom complex related to digital vascular compromise secondary to broad-ranging pathology. • Raynaud's phenomenon, as currently classified, likely encompasses a number of aetiopathogenic processes. • Raynaud's phenomenon causes significant disease-related morbidity in autoimmune rheumatic diseases such as systemic sclerosis.

Factors Influencing Raynaud Condition Score Diary Outcomes in Systemic Sclerosis

OBJECTIVE

Raynaud phenomenon (RP) in systemic sclerosis (SSc) could be influenced by clinical phenotype, environmental factors (e.g., season), and personal factors (e.g., coping strategies and ill-health perceptions). We studied the relative influence of a range of putative factors affecting patient-reported assessment of SSc-RP severity.

METHODS

SSc patients were enrolled at UK and US sites. Participants completed the 2-week Raynaud Condition Score (RCS) diary alongside collection of patient demographics, clinical phenotype, the Coping Strategies Questionnaire, Pain Catastrophizing Scale, Scleroderma Health Assessment Questionnaire (SHAQ), and both patient/physician visual analog scale (VAS) assessments for RP, digital ulcer disease, and global disease. Environmental temperature data were obtained at each site. A second RCS diary was completed 6 months after enrollment.

RESULTS

We enrolled 107 patients (baseline questionnaires returned by 94). There were significant associations between RCS diary variables and both catastrophizing and coping strategies. There were significant associations between RCS diary outcomes and both environmental temperature and season of enrollment. Age, disease duration, sex, disease subtype, smoking, and vasodilator use were not associated with RCS diary outcomes. The best-fitting multivariate model identified the patient RP VAS, SHAQ pain VAS, and SHAQ gastrointestinal VAS subscales as the strongest independent predictors of the RCS.

CONCLUSION

Patient-reported assessment of SSc-RP severity is associated with a number of factors including pain, catastrophizing, and coping strategies. The effects of seasonal variation in environmental temperature on SSc-RP burden has implications for clinical trial design. Treatments targeting SSc-RP pain and the development of behavioral interventions enhancing coping strategies may reduce the burden of SSc-RP.

Management of Raynaud’s phenomenon in systemic sclerosis—a practical approach

Raynaud’s phenomenon is nearly universal in systemic sclerosis. Vasculopathy is part of systemic sclerosis. Raynaud’s phenomenon can cause of complications and impairment, especially when tissue ischemia and digital ulcers develop. There are many treatment options for Raynaud’s phenomenon in systemic sclerosis often with sparse data and few robust studies comparing the different treatment options. Recommendations from guidelines usually include calcium channel blockers as first-line pharmacological treatment. In the clinical setting, multiple variables such as financial factors, geography where access to medications varies, and patient factors, baseline hypotension, can influence the treatment for Raynaud’s phenomenon and digital ulcers. Prostacyclins and PDE-5 inhibitors are reserved for more severe Raynaud’s phenomenon or healing of digital ulcers. Prevention of digital ulcers may also include endothelin receptor blocker (bosentan) in some countries. Other treatments had less consensus. Algorithms developed by systemic sclerosis experts might be helpful in deciding which treatment to choose for each setting, using a step-wise strategy, which intends to complement guidelines. This review focuses on a practical approach to the treatment of Raynaud’s phenomenon and digital ulcers in systemic sclerosis, based on algorithms designed by systemic sclerosis experts using consensus, and we review the evidence that supports treatment from initial to second and third-line options.