From mother to baby: antenatal exposure to monoclonal antibody biologics

Safety and effectiveness of bDMARDs during pregnancy in patients with rheumatic diseases: Real-world data from the BIOBADASER registry

INTRODUCTION

Inflammatory rheumatic diseases usually affect women of childbearing age treated with biologic drugs. However, there is a lack of literature on the efficacy and toxicity of biologic disease-modifying drugs during pregnancy. The aim of this study was to determine the presence of pregnant patients treated with bDMARDs in a real-world dataset and to examine the impact of pregnancy and lactation on the evolution of rheumatic disease in a registry of Spanish patients.

METHOD

This was a multicentre prospective study with a real-world setting. Information was obtained from BIOBADASER registry. Patients included are women who got pregnant until November 2020 from 19 rheumatology units. We conducted proportions, means, and standard deviations (SD) to describe the study population and the use of treatments. T-test and Chi-square test were applied to assess differences between groups.

RESULT

Ninety cases of pregnancy were registered (n=68 full-term pregnancies; n=22 spontaneous miscarriages). Most of the cases discontinued bDMARDs during pregnancy (78.9%) but 13 cases continued treatment during pregnancy, mainly using certolizumab pegol. These cases were obtaining better management of rheumatic disease, although the differences were not statistically significant [DAS28-CRP, 2.9 (SD: 1.6) vs. 2.0 (1.2), p=.255; DAS28-ESR, 2.2 (1.0) vs. 1.7 (.5), p=.266]. No serious adverse events were reported during pregnancy and lactation.

CONCLUSION

Being pregnant is still an uncommon condition in patients with rheumatic diseases and using bDMARDs. Our results show that rheumatic disease tended to progress better during pregnancy in patients who continued to take bDMARDs.

Immunological effects and safety of live rotavirus vaccination after antenatal exposure to immunomodulatory biologic agents: a prospective cohort study from the Canadian Immunization Research Network

BACKGROUND

People with inflammatory or autoimmune diseases are recommended to continue immunomodulatory biologic agents throughout pregnancy. However, concerns regarding potential immunosuppression in infants exposed to biologic agents have led to recommendations to avoid live vaccines in the first 6-12 months of life. We aimed to examine whether live rotavirus vaccine could be administered safely to infants exposed to biologic agents, assessed in the Canadian Special Immunization Clinic (SIC) Network.

METHODS

In this prospective cohort study, infants exposed to biologic agents in utero were referred to one of six SIC sites in Canada for rotavirus vaccination recommendations. Children with other contraindications to rotavirus vaccination or older than 15 weeks were excluded. Clinical and laboratory evaluations were conducted according to a standard clinical pathway. Data were collected for relevant medical history, pregnancy outcomes, biologic agent exposure history, physical examination, laboratory results of the child, SIC recommendations for rotavirus vaccination, rotavirus vaccine series completion, and adverse events after immunisation. After parental consent, deidentified data were transferred to a central database for analysis. Children recommended for rotavirus vaccination were followed up for 8 months after series initiation to ascertain severe and serious adverse events, including severe diarrhoea, vomiting, and intussusception.

FINDINGS

Between May 1, 2017, and Dec 31, 2021, 202 infants were assessed and 191 eligible infants were enrolled (97 [51%] were female and 94 [49%] were male). When including those exposed to multiple agents, the most common biologic agents to which infants were exposed were infliximab (67 [35%] of 191), adalimumab (49 [26%]), ustekinumab (18 [9%]), and vedolizumab (17 [9%]). Biologic agent exposure continued into the third trimester for 178 (93%) infants. No clinically significant abnormalities in lymphocyte subsets, quantitative immunoglobulins, or mitogen responses were detected. After SIC assessment, rotavirus vaccination was recommended for 187 (98%) of 191 infants, all of whom were followed up. By end of follow-up on Aug 19, 2022, 168 (90%) infants had initiated rotavirus vaccination; 150 (80%) completed the series. No serious adverse events after immunisation were reported, but three (2%) infants required medical attention, one for vomiting and change in stools who was subsequently diagnosed with gastroesophageal reflux disease, one for rash on labia unrelated to vaccination, and one for vomiting and diarrhoea associated with a milk allergy.

INTERPRETATION

Findings from this study suggest that lymphocyte subsets and the safety of live rotavirus vaccination are generally not affected by in-utero exposure to biologic agents. Rotavirus vaccination can be offered to infants exposed to anti-TNF agents in utero.

FUNDING

Public Health Agency of Canada and Canadian Institutes of Health Research through the Canadian Immunization Research Network.

COVID-19 Therapeutics and Considerations for Pregnancy

The COVID-19 pandemic has generated an unprecedented amount of novel and repurposed vaccines and therapeutics that have been rapidly developed and implemented into clinical use. Unfortunately, pregnant persons have been excluded from most phase III clinical studies; therefore, our understanding regarding their safety for use in this population stems from understanding of theoretic risks and observational data. In this review, the authors discuss pregnancy-specific considerations for COVID-19 therapeutics.

An Overview of Antiviral Treatments in Pregnancy

Viral infections pose unique threats to pregnant persons and their infants. As the frequency of epidemics caused by novel pathogens increases, understanding pregnancy-specific considerations for antiviral treatments is critical for obstetric and nonobstetric providers alike. The use of pharmacologic therapeutics in pregnancy, which include antivirals, pathogen-specific antibodies, and vaccines, is limited due to the lack of purposeful, methodologic, pharmacometrics analyses in this special population. Our current understanding regarding dosing, safety, and efficacy stems from our knowledge of potential maternal or neonatal risks, observational data, and rarely clinical trials. In this review, we provide an overview on the use of antivirals during pregnancy.

Do Anti-SARS-CoV-2 Monoclonal Antibodies Have an Impact on Pregnancy Outcome? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) have been used as a rescue strategy for pregnant women affected by COVID-19. To explore its impact on maternal-fetal health, we included all observational studies reporting maternal, fetal, delivery and neonatal outcomes in women who underwent mAbs infusion for COVID-19. Primary outcome was the percentage of preterm delivery. We used meta-analyses of proportions to combine data for maternal, fetal, delivery and neonatal outcome of women treated with mAbs for COVID-19 and reported pooled proportions and their 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for categorical variables or mean difference (MD) with their 95% confidence intervals for continuous variables. Preterm birth was observed in 22.8% of cases (95% CI 12.9-34.3). Fetal distress was reported in 4.2% (95% CI 1.6-8.2). Gestational hypertension and pre-eclampsia were observed in 3.0% (95% CI 0.8-6.8) and 3.4% (95% CI 0.8-7.5) of cases, respectively. Fetal growth restriction was observed in 3.2% of fetuses (95% CI 0.8-7.0). Secondary prophylaxis with mAbs is currently considered the best treatment option for people with mild to moderate COVID-19 disease. More attention should be paid to infants born from mothers who were treated with mAbs, for the risk of immunosuppression.

Ustekinumab during pregnancy and lactation: drug levels in maternal serum, cord blood, breast milk, and infant serum

BACKGROUND

Patients with ulcerative colitis (UC) may be concerned about medication safety during preconception, pregnancy, and lactation, and they should be closely followed up to ensure that UC activity is controlled during the perinatal period. Reported information on the safety of ustekinumab during pregnancy and lactation is limited. In this case report, we examined the safety of ustekinumab in a fetus and breastfed infant with reference to drug concentrations in maternal serum, cord blood, breast milk, and infant serum.

CASE PRESENTATION

A 36-year-old female who developed hematochezia and was diagnosed with ulcerative colitis at age 24 was pregnant with her first child. During pregnancy she was treated with subcutaneous bimonthly ustekinumab, at a dose of 90 mg, until 29 weeks of gestation. Her ulcerative colitis symptoms remained in remission. At 38 weeks of gestation she underwent cesarean section and delivered a healthy female infant weighing 3043 g and with no congenital malformations. The infant received routine vaccinations with no adverse events. Ustekinumab treatment was resumed at 7 weeks postpartum. The ustekinumab concentration in maternal serum at 12 days after injection (30.7 weeks of gestation) was 7968.5 ng/mL, and it decreased to 106.1 ng/mL at 114 days after the last dose. In cord blood, the ustekinumab concentration was 1131.2 ng/mL at 65 days after the last dose; this was 2.5 times higher than that in the maternal serum, which was consistent with a previous report. Ustekinumab was detected in infant serum collected at 71 days after the last maternal dose (299.0 ng/mL), with rapid elimination from the infant's body. In breast milk, the maximum ustekinumab concentrations were 13.6 ng/mL at 9 days after the last maternal dose, respectively. The ratio of the calculated areas under the time-concentration curves of ustekinumab in breast milk and maternal serum was 0.0008 (257.1/327632.7), which was comparable with a previous human study.

CONCLUSION

The placental transfer and breast milk secretion of ustekinumab in our case were comparable with previous reports. Use of ustekinumab during pregnancy and lactation was feasible in this case. Further research is needed to clarify the safety of ustekinumab during pregnancy and lactation.

Pregnancy and Management in Women with Rheumatoid Arthritis, Systemic Lupus Erythematosus, and Obstetric Antiphospholipid Syndrome

Management of women with rheumatoid arthritis (RA), systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), and obstetric antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) during pregnancy presents unique clinical challenges. Women with both RA and SLE can have disease flares during pregnancy, leading to pregnancy complications, such as preeclampsia, small-for-gestational-age infants, and preterm delivery. Disease should be under control prior to conception. Women with obstetric APS need to be anticoagulated during pregnancy. Many but not all antirheumatic medications can be used during pregnancy and lactation.

Biologics for Inflammatory Bowel Disease and Their Safety in Pregnancy: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Biologics are used routinely in pregnant women with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), but large-scale data reporting adverse pregnancy outcomes among biologic users are lacking. We sought to estimate the prevalence of adverse pregnancy outcomes in women with IBD on biologic therapies.

METHODS

We searched major databases from inception to June 2020 for studies estimating the prevalence of adverse pregnancy outcomes in IBD when using biologics (anti-tumor necrosis factor [TNF], anti-integrins, and anticytokines). Prevalence and relative risk (RR) were pooled using a random-effects model.

RESULTS

Forty-eight studies were included in the meta-analysis comprising 6963 patients. Biologic therapy in IBD pregnancies was associated with a pooled prevalence of 8% (95% CI, 6%-10%; I2 = 87.4%) for early pregnancy loss, 9% (95% CI, 7%-11%; I2 = 89.9%) for preterm birth, 0% (95% CI, 0%-0%; I2 = 0%) for stillbirth, 8% (95% CI, 5%-10%; I2 = 87.0%) for low birth weight, and 1% (95% CI, 1%-2%; I2 = 78.3%) for congenital malformations. These rates are comparable with those published in the general population. In subgroup analyses of a small number of studies, the prevalence of early pregnancy loss and preterm birth were higher in vedolizumab vs anti-TNF users. Meta-regression did not show an association of disease activity or concomitant thiopurine on adverse outcomes. Continued TNF inhibitor use during the third trimester was not associated with risk of preterm birth (RR, 1.41; 95% CI, 0.77-2.60; I2 = 0%), low birth weight (RR, 1.32; 95% CI, 0.80-2.18; I2 = 0%), or congenital malformations (RR, 1.28; 95% CI, 0.47-3.49; I2 = 0%).

CONCLUSIONS

Adverse pregnancy outcomes among pregnant IBD women using biologics are comparable with that of the general population. PROSPERO protocol #CRD42019135721.

Differences in the placental pharmacokinetics of vedolizumab and ustekinumab during pregnancy in women with inflammatory bowel disease: a prospective multicentre study

BACKGROUND

Vedolizumab demonstrated different placental pharmacokinetics than other immunoglobulin G1 antibodies, leading to lower drug levels in cord blood in contrast to maternal blood at the time of delivery. The placental transfer of ustekinumab seems to have a pattern similar to anti-tumour necrosis factor agents. Current evidence on the placental pharmacokinetics of vedolizumab and ustekinumab is limited. We aimed to assess the placental transfer of ustekinumab and vedolizumab in pregnant patients with inflammatory bowel disease.

METHODS

Consecutive women from a prospective observational study who were exposed to ustekinumab or vedolizumab within 2 months prior to conception or during pregnancy were included. Ustekinumab and vedolizumab levels were measured in maternal and cord blood at the time of delivery.

RESULTS

Drug levels were available in 31 infant-mother pairs (15 exposed to ustekinumab and 16 to vedolizumab). The median maternal and newborn ustekinumab levels were 5.3 mg/l and 10.3 mg/l, respectively (the median infant-to-maternal ratio was 1.7), while the median maternal and cord vedolizumab levels were 7.3 mg/l and 4.5 mg/l (the median infant-to-maternal ratio was 0.66). The ustekinumab levels in cord blood positively correlated with the maternal levels at delivery (ρ = 0.751, p = 0.001). However, no correlation with the timing of the last drug administration was found. In contrast, the vedolizumab levels in cord blood demonstrated significant positive correlation with the maternal levels (ρ = 0.831, p < 0.001) along with the gestational week of the last infusion (ρ = 0.736, p = 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Vedolizumab demonstrated different placental pharmacokinetics, leading to lower drug levels in cord blood compared to maternal blood at delivery; in contrast, the placental transfer of ustekinumab seems to have a pattern similar to anti-tumour necrosis factor (TNF) agents.

Exposure to alirocumab during the first trimester of pregnancy: A case report

Background

Familial hypercholesterolemia can be efficiently treated with combined lipid‐lowering drugs. Lipid‐lowering drugs are usually withdrawn for pregnancy and breastfeeding, ideally preconception, followed by lipid apheresis, however, careful plans can be precipitated due to unexpected pregnancy.

Case

A 28‐year old woman with familial hypercholesterolemia due to heterozygous LDLR mutations had an LDL‐cholesterol level at 14.6 mmol/L and Lp(a) at 1150 mg/L. She required a three‐vessel coronary artery bypass graft, drug‐eluting stents, rosuvastatin, ezetimibe, and alirocumab at maximal dosage. Contraception was advised during the following 12 months, with a planned drug withdrawal to bridge with lipid apheresis, such as the direct adsorption of lipoproteins (DALI). However, an unplanned pregnancy required an abrupt stop of all oral medications at six gestational weeks, except for aspirin. Lipid apheresis controlled LDL‐cholesterol in the range of 4.9–7.9 mmol/L (before DALI session) to 1.2–3.2 mmol/L (after DALI session). Later, the regular pregnancy ultrasounds highlighted an isolated agenesis of the corpus callosum later confirmed by magnetic resonance imaging.

Conclusions

A causal link between the early pregnancy exposure to PCSK9 inhibitors (or statins and ezetimibe taken concomitantly) and the observed complete agenesis of the corpus callosum seems unlikely in this case. Guidelines do not specifically recommend preconception measures to lower fetal and/or maternal risks of patients with severe FH considering pregnancy. We argue that lipid apheresis and other measures should be discussed with women with FH and maternity project on an individual basis, until pharmacoepidemiology studies assessing the safety of PCSK9 inhibitors in pregnancy are available.

Safety considerations when using drugs in pregnant patients with systemic lupus erythematosus

Introduction: Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) mainly affects young females during childbearing age; therefore, reproductive issues are of major interest.Areas covered: Pregnancy planning is crucial to adjust the treatment toward drugs that are safe throughout pregnancy and breastfeeding. The evidence about drug safety is limited to post-marketing surveillance, registries, case series, and case reports, as pregnant patients are excluded from randomized clinical trials. The aim of this review is to report the safety considerations when treating pregnant SLE patients. Regarding maternal side effects of drugs, we focused on metabolic, infectious, and hemorrhagic complications. Fetal safety was analyzed looking at drugs teratogenicity, their possible effects on immune system, and on the long-term neuropsychological development of children.Expert opinion: The management of pregnancy in SLE has changed when knowledge about the safety of drugs has become available. Keeping SLE disease activity under control before, during and after pregnancy is of fundamental importance to ensure the best possible outcomes for mother and child. All these issues must be discussed with the patient and her family during preconception counseling. International efforts in terms of pregnancy registries and reproductive health guidelines help physicians improve their communication with SLE patients.

Pregnancy and Management in Women with Rheumatoid Arthritis, Systemic Lupus Erythematosus, and Obstetric Antiphospholipid Syndrome

Management of women with rheumatoid arthritis (RA), systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), and obstetric antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) during pregnancy presents unique clinical challenges. Women with both RA and SLE can have disease flares during pregnancy, leading to pregnancy complications, such as preeclampsia, small-for-gestational-age infants, and preterm delivery. Disease should be under control prior to conception. Women with obstetric APS need to be anticoagulated during pregnancy. Many but not all antirheumatic medications can be used during pregnancy and lactation.

Use of biologic therapies for psoriasis during pregnancy and long-term outcomes of exposed children: A 14-year real-life experience at a tertiary center in Turkey and review of the literature

Data regarding the use of biologic therapies for psoriasis during pregnancy are scarce with even more limited knowledge about the long-term safety of in utero exposure. We retrospectively evaluated nine pregnancies in six women with psoriasis who were exposed to biologic therapies between 2006 and 2019 in our psoriasis clinic, a tertiary referral center in Turkey. Pregnancy outcomes included the delivery of seven healthy babies without any complications, one elective abortion, and one ectopic pregnancy. All exposed children, aged between 14 months and 13 years (median age: 4.0 years), showed normal growth and neuropsychological development without immunodeficiencies, allergies, malignancies or other diseases. Based on up-to-date collective data in the literature and our real-life clinical experience presented here, exposure to biologic therapies during pregnancy for psoriasis does not seem to be associated with adverse pregnancy or neonatal outcomes. Our results are also reassuring with respect to long-term outcomes of exposed children, but need to be confirmed through further large prospective studies. Nevertheless, use of biologic therapies during late pregnancy, particularly during the third trimester, should be reserved for high-need patients with psoriasis and definitely requires a delicate risk/benefit balance on a case-by-case basis.

Management of Plaque Psoriasis With Biologic Therapies in Women of Child-Bearing Potential Consensus Paper

BACKGROUND

Plaque psoriasis (PsO) is a chronic inflammatory disease that often presents at peak reproductive age in women of child-bearing potential (WOCBP). With the emergence of biologic therapies to treat PsO, guidance on disease management in WOCBP is needed to inform treatment decisions before, during, and after pregnancy.

OBJECTIVES

To develop a practical, up-to-date consensus document, based on available evidence and expert opinion where evidence was lacking, in order to guide both Canadian and international clinicians treating PsO in WOCBP.

METHODS

A panel of 9 Canadian dermatologists with extensive clinical experience managing PsO reviewed the relevant literature from the past 25 years in 3 key domains: overview of PsO in WOCBP and clinical considerations, treatment considerations, and postpartum considerations. The structured literature search focused on WOCBP treated with TNF-alpha inhibitors (adalimumab, certolizumab, etanercept, golimumab, infliximab), IL-23 inhibitors (guselkumab, risankizumab, tildrakizumab), IL-12/23 inhibitors (ustekinumab), and IL-17 inhibitors (brodalumab, ixekizumab, secukinumab). This literature review, along with clinical expertise and opinion, was used to develop concise and clinically relevant consensus statements to guide practical management of PsO in WOCBP. Experts voted on the statements using a modified Delphi process and prespecified agreement cut-off of 75%.

RESULTS AND IMPLICATIONS

After review, discussion, and voting on 19 draft consensus statements at an in-person meeting and remotely, 12 consensus statements were approved by the expert panel. The statements presented here will guide healthcare providers in practical disease management using biologic therapies for the treatment of PsO in WOCBP.

Impact of infections in autoimmune rheumatic diseases and pregnancy

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

To provide an update about the impact of infections in autoimmune rheumatic diseases (ARDs), from the analysis of the role of infections in pregnant women without ARDs, to the identification of maternal-fetal infections and their role in the maternal-fetal outcome of women with ARDs.

RECENT FINDINGS

Recent studies indicate that patients with ARDs and pregnancy are also susceptible to presenting infections of varying degrees, including serious infections, which contribute to the morbidity and mortality observed in pregnancy and postpartum of these patients.Any type of infectious agent will interact with a hormonal, immunological and metabolic environments modified by ARD, treatments, and by the changes inherent in pregnancy. Therefore, infections in the pregnancy of patients with ARDs should be considered as a risk factor for an unfavorable maternal-fetal outcome.

SUMMARY

The recognition of infections in the pregnancy of ARDs as a risk factor is the first step to prevent, identify, and treat them in a timely manner, and thus contribute to the favorable course of pregnancy in these patients. Patients with ARDs and major organ involvement, use of high doses of steroids, immunosuppressant and biological therapies, adolescence, and obesity are populations susceptible to developing infections.

Neonatal outcomes of children born to mothers on biological agents during pregnancy: State of the art and perspectives

Biologic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (bDMARDs) are used in pregnant patients with rheumatic diseases. Long-term follow-up data about newborns exposed to bDMARDs during pregnancy are however scarce. Here we summarize the published evidence and available recommendations for use of bDMARDs during pregnancy. We analyse clinical features at birth and at follow-up of 84 children, including: 16 consecutive children born to mothers with autoimmune diseases exposed to bDMARDs in utero; 32 children born to mothers with autoimmune diseases who did not receive bDMARDs; 36 children born to healthy mothers. In our monocentric cohort, children born to mothers with autoimmune diseases had lower gestational age at birth compared to those born to healthy mothers, independently of exposure to bDMARDs. At multivariate analysis, prematurity was an independent predictor of the need for antibiotic treatment, but not for hospitalisation or neonatal intensive care unit (ICU) stay during the neonatal period. Exposure to bDMARDs during pregnancy does not seem to interfere with post-natal development up to infancy. Prospective studies are needed in larger cohorts of pregnant patients to confirm that bDMARDs do not have a negative impact on psychomotor achievements in newborns.

Birth outcomes in women who have taken adalimumab in pregnancy: A prospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

Information is needed on the safety of adalimumab when used in pregnancy for the treatment of certain autoimmune diseases.

METHODS AND FINDINGS

Between 2004 and 2016, the Organization of Teratology Information Specialists Research Center at the University of California San Diego conducted a prospective controlled observational cohort study in 602 pregnant women who had or had not taken adalimumab. Women in the adalimumab-exposed cohort had received at least one dose of the drug in the first trimester for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis or Crohn's Disease (N = 257). Women in the disease comparison cohort had not used adalimumab in pregnancy (N = 120). Women in the healthy comparison cohort had no rheumatic or inflammatory bowel diseases (N = 225). Women and their infants were followed to one year postpartum with maternal interviews, medical records abstraction, and physical examinations. Study outcomes were major structural birth defects, minor defects, spontaneous abortion, preterm delivery, pre and post-natal growth deficiency, serious or opportunistic infections and malignancies. 42/602 (7.0%) of pregnancies were lost-to-follow-up. 22/221 (10.0%) in the adalimumab-exposed cohort had a live born infant with a major birth defect compared to 8/106 (7.5%) in the diseased unexposed cohort (adjusted odds ratio 1.10, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.45 to 2.73). Women in the adalimumab-exposed cohort were more likely to deliver preterm compared to the healthy cohort (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] 2.59, 95% CI 1.22 to 5.50), but not compared to the diseased unexposed cohort (aHR 0.82, 95% CI 0.66 to 7.20). No significant increased risks were noted with adalimumab exposure for any other study outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

Adalimumab exposure in pregnancy compared to diseased unexposed pregnancies was not associated with an increased risk for any of the adverse outcomes examined. Women with rheumatoid arthritis or Crohn's Disease were at increased risk of preterm delivery, irrespective of adalimumab exposure.

In utero exposure to biologic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs and effects to the infant: infectious complications, vaccine response, and safety of live vaccine administration

INTRODUCTION

Biologic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (bDMARDS) are increasingly used in clinical practice for a variety of conditions. Due to concerns surrounding persistence of drug levels and resulting immunosuppression, current case reports recommend against live vaccine administration in the first year of life for an infant exposed to perinatal bDMARDS. As a result, this significantly impacts receipt of rotavirus vaccination, a vaccine recommended in many countries' national immunization program. Area covered: We have reviewed all available published literature to explore the effect of peripartum bDMARDS exposure on infant immune responses, safety of live vaccines, and vaccine efficacy in the first year of life. Expert opinion: We recommend that otherwise healthy newborns with a history of perinatal exposure to bDMARDS should receive rotavirus vaccinations as per the recommended schedule. Bacille Calmette et Guerin vaccine should be withheld in the first year of life. No additional booster doses of inactivated vaccines are required as they appear to mount adequate immune responses to the routine schedule.