[The use of ribonucleic acid as a marker for measuring microbial protein yield in the rumen. 1. Chemical determination of ribonucleic acid]

Ruminal degradability of15N labelled ribonucleic acid in grass

The ruminal degradation of RNA in rye grass (Lolium perenne) was studied using the bag method. A non-lactating cow (BW 550 kg) fitted with a rumen cannula was used and fed twice daily at maintenance level with a chopped grass hay-based ration containing 30% ground barley. Rye grass, labelled during growth by fertilization with 15N2-urea (9.5 atom% 15N, 20 g N/m2), was cut at seven stages of growth and maturity and freeze-dried. RNA-N represented 6 to 17% of total N. Labelled grass samples (milled to 5.0 mm screen, 5.0+/-0.1 g DM) were incubated in polyester bags (100 x 200 mm, pore size 50 microm) in the rumen for periods of 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 24, and 48 h. Data of N and RNA disappearances from the bags were fitted to an exponential equation to estimate parameters of degradation. The effective degradability of RNA in the rumen averaged 90+/-4%, for N it was 11% units lower (P < 0.001). Degradability of RNA was correlated to that of N (R2 = 0.92). Degradability of RNA (R2 = 0.96) and N (R2 = 0.93) decreased with increasing fibre content of grass. Increasing the fibre content by 1% diminished the degradability of RNA and N by 1.1% units and 2.4% units, respectively (P < 0.001). Assuming a microbial protein synthesis in the rumen of 150 g/kg DOM, a N: RNA ratio of 1:1.35 in rumen microbes and a rumen outflow rate of 0.06 h(-1), a model calculation indicates that about 9 to 19% of duodenal RNA are of dietary origin in animals fed grass. This should be taken into account for the calculation of microbial N on the basis of RNA as marker.

Calculation of utilizable crude protein at the duodenum of cattle by two different approaches

The duodenal flow of utilizable crude protein (crude protein minus endogenous protein) in cows was estimated using dietary parameters, first by multiple regression and secondly by the addition of microbial protein and undegraded feed protein. These estimates were compared with 327 results from experiments conducted with fistulated cows in Braunschweig-Völkenrode and Rostock-Dummerstorf. The regressions and the measurements for microbial protein synthesis as well as feed protein degradation and organic matter fermentation in the rumen were based on the same experimental data set. The prediction of utilizable crude protein (uCP) at the duodenum by regression with digested organic matter (kg DOM) and undegraded feed protein (g UDP) as predicting variables, was more accurate than the value given by microbial protein synthesis and rumen protein degradability. The regression model [g uCP = [188.5-(116.5 (UDP/CP))] DOM + 1.03 UDP] had the highest coefficient of determination (r2 = 0.91) and the lowest coefficient of variation (cv = 8.6); indicating the model's superiority over the other method of estimation.

[Evaluation of different markers for the determination of microbial nitrogen flow into the duodenum of dairy cows]

2,6-Diaminopimelic acid (DAPA), ribonucleic acid (RNA), 15N, D-alanine (D-ALA) and the amino acid profiles (AAP) were compared as microbial markers for determination of the microbial protein synthesis in the rumen. Three dairy cows (Schwarzbuntes Milchrind, LW 602 kg), each fitted with a rumen cannula and a re-entrant cannula in the proximal duodenum, were offered four isoenergetic and isonitrogenous diets (mean daily intake 15.0 +/- 0.45 kg DM; forage: concentrate = 50:50) in a periodic experiment. The diets contained soyabean extracted meal, meat and bone meal, pea meal and dried clover as major sources of protein. On the 4th day after administration of 9 g 15N-labelled urea (95 atom-% 15N-excess) per day, samples of rumen fluid and duodenal digesta were obtained 3 h after feeding. The bacteria were isolated by differential centrifugation. Bacteria harvested from the rumen had significantly higher 15N enrichment and D-ALA: N ratio than 'duodenal' bacteria. However, DAPA: N ratio was higher in 'duodenal' bacteria compared to rumen bacteria. There were no differences in RNA: N ratio between rumen and 'duodenal' bacteria. The source of the bacteria in the digestive tract has an influence on the ratio of microbial N: total N, especially when 15N, AAP, DAPA and D-ALA but not RNA were used as markers. The most reproducible method was D-ALA (C.V. 4.7 for rumen and 6.8 for 'duodenal' bacteria) followed by 15N (10.8 resp. 4.8) and RNA (9.7 resp. 8.2). The results obtained with 15N and D-ALA agreed closely at the same source of bacteria. The RNA method reached the level of these markers (15N, D-ALA) when the bacteria were isolated from the duodenum. It is concluded that D-ALA (bacteria isolated from rumen and duodenum) and also 15N (bacteria isolated from duodenum) were the best markers for estimation of the microbial protein synthesis.

[The use of ribonucleic acids as markers for the measuring of microbial protein yield in the rumen. 2. The effect of sample treatment, the time of sampling and the composition of the ration on the RNA:N ratio in rumen microbes]

In two experiments the influence of the treatment of samples, the sampling time and the composition of the rations on the RNA: N ratio in the rumen microbes was checked. Experiment I proved that freezing (-21 degrees C), thawing and freeze-drying of isolated bacteria and protozoa from the rumen fluid and from the duodenal content did not result in a change of the RNA content and the RNA-N: total N relation. If, however, the rumen fluid is stored deep-frozen before the isolation of the bacteria the N content in the DM of the bacteria decreases by 17% and that of RNA by 30%. This results in a change of the RNA: N relation of 16%. In conclusion, the bacteria are to be isolated immediately after rumen fluid sampling. Isolated bacteria can be stored deep-frozen before RNA determination and then freeze-dried. Experiment II showed that the RNA content of the rumen protozoa varies according to the period after feeding. The RNA: N relation was 0.50, 0.92, 0.70 and 0.58 on average 0, 3, 6 and 8 h after feeding, in which the 3rd hour after feeding can obviously be considered the time of increased microbial activity. The conclusion from this variation is that more than one isolation of microbes must be carried out in the course of the day in order to achieve representative samples. These statements apply to easily and not easily fermentable protein as N source in the feed. It could also be proved that no essential variation is to be expected in the RNA: N relation in the microbes isolated from the rumen fluid in the range of 8-21% crude protein in the DM of the ration (roughage: concentrate = 55: 45). On average the rumen microbes contained 1.7 g RNA-N/16 g N, essential differences between bacteria and protozoa could not be ascertained. From the slight variation of the RNA-N: N relation in the isolated bacteria from various cows one can conclude that there is no need to isolate the microbes of each individual animal.