1
|
Vipler B, Green M, McCall-Hosenfeld J, Haidet P, Tisdell E. A Graphic Transformation: A Qualitative Study of Transformative Learning in Medical Trainees during COVID-19 Using Comics as Data Presentation. TEACHING AND LEARNING IN MEDICINE 2022:1-16. [PMID: 35567316 DOI: 10.1080/10401334.2022.2062362] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/07/2021] [Accepted: 03/21/2022] [Indexed: 06/15/2023]
Abstract
Phenomenon: Transformative learning is a theory in which individuals construct new or revised interpretations of the meaning of an experience. COVID-19 offers a rare opportunity to better understand how individuals respond to and make meaning within the shared context of an extraordinary event. We aimed to examine if and how residents and fellows engaged in transformative learning when caring for COVID-19 positive patients during the initial peak of the pandemic (Spring 2020).Approach: We conducted an interpretive qualitative study to identify themes pertaining to transformative learning. We used semi-structured interviews of residents and fellows who were directly or indirectly involved in the care of COVID-19 positive patients admitted to the inpatient wards or the intensive care units during the first peak of the pandemic (defined as March 11th - May 28th, 2020) at our Mid-Atlantic academic health system. We used the medium of comics to depict select interviewees' experiences during the pandemic as a novel way to represent themes from the interviews.Findings: Three main themes arose from our qualitative analysis. These included "a sense of guilt," "the impact on training," and "venues and processes for reflection." In comparing their experiences with colleagues and friends at other institutions with higher COVID-19 case volume, trainees reflected on how they felt lucky, and this led to guilt, although not necessarily transformation. The impact of COVID-19 on the training environment had transformative potential. Trainees challenged their previously held assumptions on the necessity of various surgeries, in-person visits, and physical examination maneuvers when COVID-19 posed a barrier. Finally, while trainees recalled multiple situations throughout the pandemic when they believed they were engaging in reflection, such reflection did not appear to reach so deep as to alter participants' underlying assumptions until the research interview itself, suggesting that transformation was incomplete.Insights: Our purposive sample of residents and fellows who cared for COVID-19 positive patients during the initial peak of the pandemic made meaning of their experience in multiple ways. The largest shift in worldview due to the pandemic appeared to be related to the instrumental utility of certain common medical practices or procedures. This, in turn, was the most prominent influence on how these trainees felt they would practice in the future, and translated to a shift in how they appraised evidence. However, lack of opportunity for reflection may have adversely impacted the ability for transformation to take place. Given that multiple trainees showed appreciation for the critical reflection venue that was the research interview, academic leadership should ensure similar venues exist during training, even after the pandemic ends.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Benjamin Vipler
- Division of Hospital Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, USA
- Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, Pennsylvania State University College of Medicine, Hershey, PA, USA
| | - Michael Green
- Department of Humanities, Pennsylvania State University College of Medicine, Hershey, PA, USA
- Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, Pennsylvania State University College of Medicine, Hershey, PA, USA
| | - Jennifer McCall-Hosenfeld
- Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, Pennsylvania State University College of Medicine, Hershey, PA, USA
- Department of Public Health Sciences, Pennsylvania State University College of Medicine, Hershey, PA, USA
| | - Paul Haidet
- Department of Humanities, Pennsylvania State University College of Medicine, Hershey, PA, USA
- Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, Pennsylvania State University College of Medicine, Hershey, PA, USA
- Department of Public Health Sciences, Pennsylvania State University College of Medicine, Hershey, PA, USA
| | - Elizabeth Tisdell
- Lifelong Learning and Adult Education, Pennsylvania State University - Harrisburg, Middletown, PA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Kearns C, Eathorne A, Kearns N, Anderson A, Hatter L, Semprini A, Beasley R. How best to share research with study participants? A randomised crossover trial comparing a comic, lay summary, and scientific abstract. J Vis Commun Med 2022; 45:172-181. [PMID: 35382694 DOI: 10.1080/17453054.2022.2056321] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]
Abstract
Healthcare research is traditionally published in academic papers, coded in scientific language, and locked behind paywalls - an inaccessible form for many. Sharing research results with participants and the public in an appropriate, accessible manner, is an ethical practice directed in research guidance. Evidence-based recommendations for the medium used are scant, but science communication advice advocates principles which may be fulfilled well by the medium of comics. We report a randomised crossover study conducted online, comparing participant preferences for research results shared in the medium of a comic, a traditional lay text summary, and the control approach of a scientific abstract. 1236 respondents read all three summaries and ranked their most and least preferred formats. For the most preferred summary, the comic was chosen by 716 (57.9%), lay summary by 321 (26.0%), and scientific abstract by 199 (16.1%) respondents. For the least preferred summary the scientific abstract was chosen by 614 (49.7%), lay summary by 380 (30.7%) and comic by 242 (19.6%). Review of free-text responses identified key reasons for the majority preferring the comic over the others, which included finding this easier to read and understand, more enjoyable to consume, and more satisfactory as a medium of communication.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ciléin Kearns
- Medical Research Institute of New Zealand, Wellington, New Zealand.,Artibiotics, Wellington, New Zealand
| | - Allie Eathorne
- Medical Research Institute of New Zealand, Wellington, New Zealand
| | - Nethmi Kearns
- Medical Research Institute of New Zealand, Wellington, New Zealand
| | | | - Lee Hatter
- Medical Research Institute of New Zealand, Wellington, New Zealand
| | - Alex Semprini
- Medical Research Institute of New Zealand, Wellington, New Zealand.,Victoria University, Wellington, New Zealand.,Western Sydney University, Penrith, Australia
| | - Richard Beasley
- Medical Research Institute of New Zealand, Wellington, New Zealand.,Victoria University, Wellington, New Zealand
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
A Framework for Effective Science Communication and Outreach Strategies and Dissemination of Research Findings for Marine Energy Projects. JOURNAL OF MARINE SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING 2022. [DOI: 10.3390/jmse10020130] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Marine energy is an emerging renewable energy industry with the potential to produce 2300 terawatt-hours per year from resources within the United States. As development and testing of marine energy devices advance, regulatory and permitting decision-makers are concerned about the uncertainty surrounding the potential environmental effects resulting from the introduction of these novel devices in coastal and riverine environments. The Triton Initiative researches and provides recommendations for environmental monitoring technologies and methods to inform industry stakeholders with the data necessary to permit the testing of marine energy systems. Effective dissemination of the research findings is essential for improving the accessibility of data to stakeholders who may use the results to inform policy decisions, yet few frameworks for conducting science communications for marine energy projects exist. In this paper, we present tools, channels, and tactics for developing a science communication framework for marine energy projects, or similar areas of study, using the Triton Initiative’s pilot science communication program as a case study. By leveraging existing bodies of work in disciplines such as communications theory, marketing, public relations, and social science, the presented framework includes audience identification and analysis; channel development, including a website, blog, newsletter, social media, and webinars and presentations; and metrics for determining success. Outcomes from one year of Triton’s case study are presented, including the most effective tactics and lessons learned.
Collapse
|