Unicondylar knee replacement for primary osteoarthritis: a prospective follow-up study of 1,819 patients from the Finnish Arthroplasty Register

Cemented versus cementless Oxford unicompartmental knee arthroplasty for the treatment of medial knee osteoarthritis: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

This meta-analysis sought to compare the efficacy of cemented versus cementless Oxford unicompartmental knee arthroplasty(UKA) for the treatment of medial knee osteoarthritis.

METHODS

A comprehensive search of the following databases was conducted: Pubmed, The Cochrane Library, China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), Embase, the Web of Science, and MEDLINE. The objective was to identify literature comparing cemented versus cementless Oxford unicompartmental knee arthroplasty for the treatment of medial knee osteoarthritis. Duplicate literature, low-quality literature, literature with incompatible observations, and literature for which the full text was not available were excluded. Two independent researchers employed the Cochrane Risk Assessment Tool and the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) to evaluate the quality of the included literature. The data then were extracted and subsequently meta-analyzed using RevMan 5.4.

RESULTS

A total of 12 papers were included in the analysis, encompassing a cumulative of 2558 cumulative cases. Of these, 1258 were cemented and 1300 were cementless. A meta-analysis was conducted to compare the outcomes of cemented versus cementless Oxford UKA. The Oxford UKA group exhibited a significantly longer surgery time than the cementless Oxford UKA group [mean difference (MD) = 9.91, 95% confidence interval (CI) (7.64,12.17)]. Additionally, the cemented Oxford UKA group demonstrated a significantly lower knee OKS score compared to the cementless Oxford UKA group. The mean difference (MD) was - 1.58 (95% CI: -2.30, -0.86), indicating a significantly lower score for the cemented Oxford UKA group. Similarly, the mean difference (MD) was - 1.8 for the knee KSS clinical score, indicating a significantly lower score for the cemented Oxford UKA group. The results demonstrated that the knee KSS functional score was significantly lower in the cemented Oxford UKA group than in the cementless Oxford UKA group [MD=-1.72, 95% CI (-3.26, -0.37)]. 95% CI (-3.27,-0.17)], the cemented Oxford UKA group exhibited a significantly higher incidence of radiolucent lines around the prosthesis than the cementless Oxford UKA group [ratio of ratios (OR) = 3.62, 95% CI (1.08,12.13)]. The revision rate was significantly higher in the cemented Oxford UKA group than in the cementless Oxford UKA group [OR = 2.22, 95% CI (1.40,3.53)]. However, no significant difference was observed between the two groups in terms of reoperation rate, five-year prosthesis survival rate, and complication rate.

CONCLUSIONS

The findings indicated that, in comparison to cemented Oxford UKA, cementless Oxford UKA resulted in a reduction in surgical time, an improvement in knee OKS score, KSS clinical score, and KSS functional score, and a decrease in the incidence of periprosthetic radiolucent lines and the rate of revisions.

Comparative long-term outcomes of unicompartmental and total knee arthroplasty in knee osteoarthritis patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

Long-term outcomes for knee osteoarthritis patients undergoing unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) and total knee arthroplasty (TKA) remain inconclusive.

Objectives

This study aims to evaluate the long-term outcomes over five years, including Knee Society Pain Scores (KSPS), Knee Society Scores (KSS), Knee Society Function Scores (KSFS), range of motion (ROM), and survival rates-of UKA vs. TKA in knee osteoarthritis patients.

Design

Systematic review using data from randomized controlled and cohort trials, and world databases.

Data sources

Researchers searched Medline, Embase, Cochrane Controlled Register of Trials, and ClinicalTrials.gov from January 1990 to March 2024.

Eligibility criteria for selecting studies

The researchers selected studies based on adult participants with knee osteoarthritis. Eligible studies compare UKA and TKA reports on clinical or surgical outcomes, including KSPS, KSS, KSFS, ROM and survival rates, over 5 years. The researchers excluded the studies fewer than five years, or if English text was unavailable.

Results

Researchers categorized twenty-nine eligible studies into three groups: five randomized controlled trials, 11 registries and database studies, and 13 cohort studies. The analysis revealed that neither TKA nor UKA definitively outperformed the other in terms of pain (SMD (95% CI): -0.06 [-0.41, 0.28], I 2 = 90%) and KSS scores (SMD (95% CI): -0.07 [-0.23, 0.008], I 2 = 81%) over a period of five years. However, KSFS (SMD (95% CI): -0.30 [-0.43, -0.17], I 2 = 74%) and ROM (SMD (95% CI): -0.78 [-1.11, -0.46], I 2 = 92%) tended to favor UKA, and survival rate favor TKA at 5 or over 5-year follow-up periods.

Conclusions

UKA shows a trend towards better outcomes in KSFS and ROM, alongside a more favorable survival rate in TKA at the five-year and beyond follow-up periods.

Systematic Review Registration

https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?RecordID=517835, PROSPERO (CRD42024517835).

Annual Trends of High Tibial Osteotomy: Analysis of an Official Registry in Italy

Background and Objectives: Knee osteoarthritis is a serious burden for modern countries. Timing of surgery and treatment choice are still a matter of controversy in the orthopedic literature. The purpose of this study was to ascertain the incidence and hospitalization trends of high tibial osteotomy in Italy from 2001 to 2016. Materials and Methods: Data are sourced from the National Hospital Discharge Reports (SDO) of the Italian Ministry of Health between 2001 and 2016. Results: A total of 34,402 high tibial osteotomies were performed over the study period in Italy. The cumulative incidence was 3.6 cases per 100,000 residents. The age classes 50-54, 55-59 showed the higher number of procedures. In pediatric patients (0-19 years), high tibial osteotomies are also largely performed. The majority of patients having surgery were men with a M/F ratio of 1.5. The mean age of patients was 44.2 ± 19.2 years. Males were significantly younger than females (43.3 ± 20.7 vs. 45.6 ± 17.7). The average length of hospitalization was 6.1 ± 7.3 days. Over the course of the analysis, a declining trend in hospital stay length was seen. The main primary diagnosis codes were "Varus knee" (736.42 ICD-9-CM code, 33.9%), "Osteoarthrosis, localized, primary, leg region" (715.16 ICD-9-CM code, 9.5%). Conclusions: Over the study period, high tibial osteotomies in Italy almost halved. Varus deformity and knee osteoarthritis are the leading causes requiring high tibial osteotomy. Except for the pediatric setting, results showed that from the 20-24 age class to the 50-54 age class, there was an increasing request for knee osteotomy, whereas in those aged >60 years, the incidence progressively decreased. The evident decline in HTO performed over the years in Italy seems to reflect a minor role for knee osteotomy in the management of knee OA, as it seems to be primarily reserved for younger male patients.

Health-related quality of life after total knee arthroplasty and unicompartmental knee arthroplasty for unicompartmental osteoarthritis: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

While previous research has demonstrated potential advantages of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) over total knee arthroplasty (TKA), particularly in terms of clinical outcomes such as function and pain relief, the specific impact on health-related quality of life (HRQOL) remains unclear. This systematic review and meta-analysis aim to address this gap by comparing HRQOL outcomes between UKA and TKA, providing valuable insights for clinical decision-making.

METHODS

We conducted a literature search in the PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Controlled Register of Trials (CENTRAL), and Web of Science databases up to July 15, 2023. Eligible studies assessed HRQOL using EQ-5D, SF-36, or SF-12 and were assessed for methodological quality using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS).

RESULTS

Seven eligible studies were included, comprising a total of 64,585 patients with 35,809 undergoing TKA and 28,776 undergoing UKA. Patient age ranged from 52.0 to 67.7 years with an average BMI ranging from 27.2 to 31.0 kg/m2. Follow-up periods ranged from 6 months to 10 years. Five studies (63,829 patients) that evaluated HRQOL using EQ-5D showed significantly better outcomes for UKA compared to TKA (MD -0.04, 95% CI -0.05 to -0.02). Two studies (756 patients) that evaluated HRQOL using SF-36 showed no significant difference between TKA and UKA. Five studies (63,286 patients) that evaluated functional outcomes using Oxford Knee Score (OKS) showed significantly better functional scores for UKA compared to TKA (MD -1.29, 95% CI -1.86 to -0.72). Four studies (24,570 patients) that reported patient satisfaction showed no statistically significant difference between TKA and UKA (MD 0.97, 95% CI 0.90 to 1.05). Further subgroup analysis did not affect the conclusions.

CONCLUSIONS

Our meta-analysis suggests that UKA is associated with better HRQOL and knee function, as well as similar patient satisfaction, compared to TKA for patients with unicompartmental osteoarthritis.

Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty: More Conversions, Fewer Complications Than Proximal Tibial Osteotomy in a Young Population

BACKGROUND

Patients with isolated medial compartment osteoarthritis requiring surgical intervention generally have two surgical options: unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) and proximal tibial osteotomy (PTO). Outcomes of reoperation rates and survivorship are important for counseling patients on treatment options.

METHODS

A retrospective, comparative cohort study was performed for a consecutive series of patients in the Military Health System who underwent either UKA or PTO between 2003 and 2018. All patients were between 18 and 55 years old and diagnosed with isolated medial compartmental arthritis. Cases with concurrent meniscal or cartilage procedures were included, while cases with concurrent ligament reconstruction were excluded. A minimum 2-year follow-up was required. The primary outcome was conversion to total knee arthroplasty, and the secondary outcome was reoperation for any reason.

RESULTS

A total of 383 procedures were performed for isolated medial compartment arthritis in 303 patients (UKA 270, PTO 113). A multivariate analysis showed that PTO was associated with decreased risk of conversion to TKA compared to UKA (P = .0364). However, the reoperation due to complications was significantly higher in the PTO group (21.2% vs 2.2%; P ≤ .01). The 5-year conversion rate was 13.7% for UKA and 3.5% for PTO (P = .0033) with an average time to conversion of 3.1 years for UKA and 2.9 years for PTO (P = .7805).

CONCLUSIONS

In young patients with isolated medial compartment arthritis, conversion rates to TKA are higher with UKA compared to PTO. However, overall reoperation rate is higher with PTO, secondary to complications and revision procedures. Overall survivorship is acceptable for both procedures.

Implant Alignment and Patient Factors Affecting the Short-Term Patient-Reported Clinical Outcomes after Oxford Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty

This study aims at clarifying implant alignment and other patient factors' influence on clinical outcomes, particularly on patient-reported outcomes (PRO), following Oxford unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (OUKA). A total of 142 patients after OUKA were divided into two groups according to the validated Japanese version of the knee injury and osteoarthritis outcome score (KOOS) for each subscale of pain, symptoms, and activities of daily living (ADL) at postoperative year 1 and 2: group 1 had ≥80 scores and group 2 had <80 scores. Postoperative clinical and radiographical findings were then compared among groups in each subscale. Using postoperative year 1 and 2 data, a multivariable logistic regression analysis was conducted to clarify factors for clinical outcomes' improvement. In the analysis of KOOS subscale of symptoms at postoperative year 1, gender distribution, preoperative body mass index, and postoperative maximum knee flexion angles differed significantly among groups. In the analysis for KOOS subscale of ADL, significant differences were observed in postoperative tibial component varus angles. Multivariable logistic regression analysis revealed that all of these parameters significantly related to ≥80 KOOS scores of each subscale at postoperative year 1. Additionally, at postoperative year 2, larger postoperative knee flexion angles and tibial component varus angles related to ≥80 KOOS subscale of symptoms and ADL were observed. In conclusion, tibial component's larger varus alignment was associated with the better PRO at both 1 and 2 years after OUKA. Importantly, larger postoperative knee flexion angle helped achieve good short-term PRO after OUKA.

Component positioning of the first 300 mobile bearing unicompartmental knee arthroplasties

The Oxford® Partial Knee has excellent long-term survivorship but high surgical times indicate a learn curve. This retrospective review included a radiographic evaluation of component placement of the initial 300 procedures following conversion from fixed bearing implant use. The anteroposterior and sagittal femoral angles were considered inaccurate in 1.7% and 3.9% of cases, respectively. The anteroposterior and sagittal tibial angles were considered inaccurate in 18.7% and 6.0% of cases, respectively. Overall, a learning curve appears to be present regarding the anteroposterior tibial component angle, with the greatest percentage of inaccuracies occurring within the initial 20 cases.

Prosthesis size distribution in Oxford phase III unicompartmental knee arthroplasty - Based on more than 1900 Chinese patients

Introduction

It is difficult to determine the optimal size of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) prosthesis both pre-operatively and intra-operatively. Inappropriate femoral and tibial components are still the leading cause of failure. Several guidelines based on the Western population may not apply to the Chinese patients. We consequently try to investigate distributions of Oxford-UKA prosthesis in Chinese patients in order to provide a good reference for surgeons preoperatively.

Methods

From January 2010 to December 2019, 1909 patients (2307 knees) with primary anteromedial osteoarthritis accepted Oxford phase III UKA. Statistical analyses were performed on the distributions of the femoral, tibial, and matching of the femoral-tibial prosthesis. The possible factors affecting the sizes of femoral components, including gender, height based on gender were investigated.

Results

1. The distributions of femoral size components include extra-large (XL) 0, large (L) 1.08%, medium (M) 26.09%, small (S) 59.64%, extra-small (XS) 13.18%; the tibial sizes components were F 0, E 0.69%, D 7.80%, C 19.59%, B 24.79%, A 34.16%, AA 12.96%. 2. The matching of femur-tibia components were L-E 0.52%,L-D 0.52%,M-E 0.17%, M-D 7.28%,M - C 16.60%,M - B 1.95%,M-A 0.13%, M-AA 0.04%, S-C 2.99%, S-B 22.67%, S-A 31.12%, S-AA 2.82%, XS-B 0.17%, XS-A 2.90% and XS-AA 10.10%. The optimal matches between femoral and tibial components were: XL with F; L with E; M with C and D; S with A and B. 3. The patient's gender and height based on gender are necessary considerations for selection of femoral components (P＜0.01).

Conclusion

In Chinese patients, the size of femoral components is mainly small (S) for women, medium (M) for men. The tibial components of female patients are mainly A and B, whereas C is predominant for male patients. The more commonly used matching forms are S-A and S-B.

Lower early revision rates after uncemented Oxford Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty (UKA) than cemented Oxford UKA: A meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

UKA has been proved to offer good results in treating patients with unicompartmental knee osteoarthritis (OA). However, there is still a controversy about the better fixation mode in UKA procedure between cemented and uncemented prosthesis. Therefore, this meta-analysis was conducted to compare clinical and radiological outcomes of cemented versus uncemented Oxford UKA.

HYPOTHESIS

The study surmised that uncemented Oxford UKA was associated with shorter operation time, higher function scores, lower revision rate and less radiolucency than cemented Oxford UKA.

METHODS

A meta-analysis to compare postoperative outcomes between cemented and uncemented Oxford UKA wsa conducted. The primary outcomes included Oxford knee score (OKS), revision rate, and incidence of radiolucency. The secondary outcomes included operation time, knee society score (KSS), Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC), range of motion (ROM). PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, the Cochrane Library and China national knowledge infrastructure were searched until April, 2020 to identify studies for including. Relevant data were analyzed using RevMan v5.3.

RESULTS

We identified nine studies involving 901 patients meeting our inclusion criteria. No significant difference of OKS was found in both groups. Compared with cemented group, uncemented Oxford UKA group was associated with lower revision rate (95% CI: 0.90 to 3.73; OR=1.83) and less radiolucent lines (95% CI: 0.79 to 9.52; OR=2.75) after following up for at least 2years. The operation time was significantly shorter by 10.12minutes (95% CI: p<0.00001) in the uncemented group when compared against the cemented group. The KSS, WOMAC, ROM were not significantly different between two groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Uncemented Oxford UKA had lower revision rate, shorter operation time and less radiolucent lines than cemented Oxford UKA did. There is still need for more long follow-up clinical trials with high evidence level to determine which method of fixation is of preferable for Oxford UKA in the future.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

I.

Patient-reported outcome after patient-specific unicondylar knee arthroplasty for unicompartmental knee osteoarthritis

Background

Unicondylar knee arthroplasty was introduced in the late 1960s and remains a topic of controversial discussion. Patient-specific instruments and patient-specific implants are not yet the standard of care. The question remains whether this time-consuming and costly technique can be beneficial for the patient. The aim of this study was to evaluate whether a custom-made unicondylar knee arthroplasty leads to improved patient-reported outcome.

Methods

This retrospective study evaluates the patient-reported outcome after custom-made unicondylar knee arthroplasty (CM-UKA, ConforMIS™ iUni® G2, ConforMIS Inc., Billerica, MA, USA). We evaluated 29 patients (31 knees) at an average of 2.4 years (range 1.2–3.6 years) after operation for unicondylar osteoarthritis of the knee. The target zone for the postoperative leg axis was a slight under-correction of 0–2° varus. Follow-up evaluation included the Forgotten Joint Score (FJS), the Knee Society Score (KSS), a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) and a radiographic evaluation including a long-leg radiograph. Primary outcome measure was patient satisfaction based on the Forgotten Joint Score.

Results

We found an excellent postoperative health-related quality of life with a mean FJS of 76.8 (SD 17.9) indicating a low level of joint awareness after CM-UKA. The mean preoperative KSS was 66.0 (SD 13.71) and 59.4 (17.9) for the KSS function score. The increase was 22.8 points for the KSS knee score (p < 0.0001) and 34.8 points for the KSS function score (p < 0.0001). The VAS for pain decreased from a mean of 5.4 (SD 1.8) to 1.1 (SD 1.2) (p < 0.0001). The malalignment rate with a postoperative deviation of more than 2° in the leg axis was 29%. There was no evidence of component loosening after a mean follow-up of 2.4 years.

Conclusions

Custom-made unicondylar knee arthroplasty (CM-UKA) can provide improved clinical and functional outcomes for patients with isolated knee osteoarthritis of the medial compartment. We found excellent results regarding patient satisfaction and a low malalignment rate for CM-UKA. Further studies are needed to investigate long-term survivorship of the implant.

Level of evidence

Level IV.

Trial registration

Trial Registration number: Z-2014-0389-10 Regensburg Clinical Studies Center (REGCSC) 09/07/2014.

Robotic-assisted surgery in medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: does it improve the precision of the surgery and its clinical outcomes? Systematic review

There is a high prevalence of knee osteoarthritis that affects only the medial tibiofemoral compartment. In this group of patients with severe disease, the medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) is an excellent choice. However, this technique has a great learning curve due to the lower tolerance of improper positioning and alignment. In this context, the robotic-assisted surgery (RAS) arises as an option to improve the accuracy and secondarily enhance the clinical outcomes related to the UKA. The objective in this study is to determine if there are significant advantages with the use of RAS over conventional surgery (CS). In the systematic review of the literature, classification of the results in three main subjects: (A) precision and alignment; (B) functional results and clinical parameters; (C) survivorship. We found 272 studies, of which 15 meet the inclusion and exclusion criteria. There is mostly described that RAS significantly improves the accuracy in position (80-100% of planned versus performed P < 0.05), alignment (2-3 times less error variance P < 0.05) and selection of the proper size of the implants (69.23% of correct size femoral implants versus 16.67% using CS P < 0.0154). Recently, there is mild evidence about benefits in the early rehabilitation and post-operative pain, but in all studies reviewed, there is no advantages of RAS in the long-term functional evaluation. There is no strong literature that supports a longer survival of the prothesis with RAS, being the longest mean follow-up reported of 29.6 months. RAS is a useful tool in increasing the precision of the medial UKA implant placement. However, there is still a lack of evidence that properly correlates this improvement in accuracy with better clinical, functional and survival results.

Self-reported metal hypersensitivity in patients undergoing unicondylar knee arthroplasty

OBJECTIVES

There is ongoing discussion about arthroplasty surgery of patients with metal hypersensitivity. The aim of this study was to compare the functional outcomes and eosinophil counts of unicondylar knee arthroplasty (UKA) patients with and without a history of metal hypersensitivity.

METHODS

A retrospective review was made of the medical records of 148 extremities of 140 consecutive patients who underwent primary UKA between January 2016 and December 2017. The patients who met the inclusion criteria were screened for history of metal hypersensitivity using a questionnaire. The functional outcomes of patients and eosinophil levels were evaluated immediately before and at 6 weeks after surgery.

RESULTS

The mean follow-up period was 37 months (range, 18-48 months). Of the total 128 patients, 13 (10.2%) reported a history of metal hypersensitivity before the operation. There was no statistically significant difference between patients with or without a history of metal hypersensitivity in respect of the functional outcomes or eosinophil counts (p > 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

The results of this study showed that the functional outcomes of patients who underwent UKA using a standard alloy did not change between the groups who reported having or not having a history of metal hypersensitivity. Although the study also showed that the eosinophil counts decreased after surgery compared to the preoperative counts, there was no statistical relationship between the eosinophil count and functional outcomes or metal hypersensitivity history.

Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty, an enigma, and the ten enigmas of medial UKA

Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) is a bone- and ligament-sparing alternative to total knee arthroplasty in the patients with end-stage single-compartment degeneration of the knee. Despite being a successful procedure, the multiple advantages of UKA do not correlate with its usage, most likely due to the concerns regarding prosthesis survivability, patient selection, ideal bearing design, and judicious use of advanced technology among many others. Therefore, the purpose of this study is to review and summarize the debated literature and discuss the controversies as “Ten Enigmas of UKA.”

Clinical validation and accuracy testing of a radiographic decision aid for unicondylar knee arthroplasty patient selection in midterm follow-up

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to examine the predictive value concerning clinical outcome and implant survival, as well as the accuracy of individual tests of a recently published radiographic decision aid for unicondylar knee arthroplasty indication findings.

METHODS

In the retrospective part of the study, 98 consecutive patients who had undergone unicondylar knee arthroplasty (Phase 3 Oxford medial UKA) were included, using revision questionnaires, as well as the Forgotten Joint Score-12 (FJS-12) and Knee Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) and analysed for suitability of the radiographic decision aid. Inappropriate and appropriate indications were then compared concerning the clinical outcome and implant survival. The prospective part of the study assessed the accuracy of the decision aid's radiographic tests (varus and valgus stress views, true lateral view and skyline view), and included 90 patients. Definition as appropriate for UKA procedure included medial bone-on-bone situation in varus stress views, full-thickness lateral cartilage and functional medial collateral ligament in valgus stress views, functional anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) in true lateral views and absence of lateral facet osteoarthritis with bone loss in skyline views. Pre-operative radiographic assessment with respect to the decision aid was then compared with intraoperative articular conditions. The clinical outcome was analysed using non-parametric tests (Mann-Whitney U), and revision rates were compared using the Fisher's exact test. Accuracy assessment included calculations of the sensitivity, specificity, negative predictive value and positive predictive value. A p value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

RESULTS

Appropriate unicondylar knee arthroplasty with respect to the decision aid showed a significantly lower revision rate compared to inappropriate unicondylar knee arthroplasty (7.3% vs. 50.0%, p < 0.0001), as well as higher clinical outcome scores (FJS-12: 53.13 vs. 31.25, p = 0.041 and KOOS-QDL: 68.75 vs. 50.0, p = 0.036). The overall sensitivity (70.1%) and specificity (76.2%) for the radiographic decision aid was comparably low, which was essentially based on false negative cases (22.7%) regarding medial bone-to-bone conditions.

CONCLUSION

The radiographic decision aid is a helpful tool to predict clinical outcome and implant survival of mobile-bearing unicondylar knee arthroplasty. Strict use of the radiographic decision aid may lead to increased exclusion of appropriate patients with unicondylar knee arthroplasty implantation.

Morphologic difference and size mismatch in the medial and lateral tibial condyles exist with respect to gender for unicompartmental knee arthroplasty in the Korean population

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to characterize the geometry of the proximal tibia in both genders in the Korean population. Anthropometric data on the medial and lateral tibial condyles of the osteoarthritic knees of 149 males and 814 females were obtained using three-dimensional magnetic resonance imaging.

METHODS

In the medial and lateral proximal tibial condyles, the anteroposterior (AP) dimension, widest dimension (WD) at defined points, and condylar aspect ratio were evaluated. These measurements were compared with similar dimensions of the tibial components from five commonly used unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) designs in Korea.

RESULTS

Both the AP dimension and WD in the medial and lateral tibial condyles of the male patients were significantly greater than those of the female patients (P < 0.05). In addition, the AP dimension and WD were greater in the medial than in the lateral tibial condyle (P < 0.05). There was WD overhang in three and two prostheses in the medial and lateral tibial condyles, respectively. A decrease in the condylar aspect ratio with an increasing AP dimension was found in the medial and lateral tibial condyles for both the male and female patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Smaller medial and lateral tibial condylar dimensions are more frequent in Korean women than in Korean men. This study highlights the finding that conventional UKA designs lead to size mismatch in the Korean population and may indicate an important guideline on proper gender-specific UKA tibial prostheses with different WD/AP dimension aspect ratios. In addition, this study suggests that the shape of the medial tibial plateau is different to that of the lateral plateau, which can lead to a mediolateral overhang for medial UKA in an attempt to optimize the AP coverage.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III.

Revision of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty using the in situ referencing technique

OBJECTIVE

Revision of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) to total knee arthroplasty (TKA) with the in situ referencing technique aiming to preserve as much ligament function and epi-metaphyseal bone stock as possible.

INDICATIONS

Aseptic loosening, progression of osteoarthritis, periprosthetic fracture, periprosthetic infection, arthrofibrosis, polyethylene wear, malalignment, instability, femoro-tibial impingement.

CONTRAINDICATIONS

Unexplained pain, localized or systemic active infection (anywhere).

SURGICAL TECHNIQUE

Referencing for the tibia and the femur cuts is performed prior to implant removal. The tibial cutting jig and the initial tibial resection level is set in a way that the sawblade just fits under the tibial implant. In case too much bone needs to be removed to achieve flush implant sitting on both the medial and lateral tibia, a step cut needs to be performed to build up the medial defect with an augment. Prior to femoral component removal, rotational alignment is determined and intramedullary referencing for the distal femur osteotomy is performed. Level of constraint and additional tibial stem fixation is chosen according to the amount of bone resected and according to ligament stability.

POSTOPERATIVE MANAGEMENT

Sterile dressings and elastic compression bandaging. No limitation of active/passive range of motion. Full weight-bearing or partial weight-bearing for 2 weeks postoperatively in the presence of bone or soft tissue defects.

RESULTS

Between 2008 and 2019, 84 patients underwent revision of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. The mean follow-up was 64 months (range 3-132 months). Implant survival after revision of UKA to TKA was 92% (95% CI = 82-97%) at 5 years of follow-up and 86% (95% CI = 69-93%) at 10 years of follow-up. The mean Oxford knee score was 20.1 (6-39, SD ± 6.5) preoperatively and 30.2 (3-48, SD ± 11.3) postoperatively. The mean visual analogue scale was 6.9 (range 1-10, SD ± 1.8) preoperatively and 3.9 (range 0-9, SD ± 2.6) postoperatively.

Similar revision rates in clinical studies and arthroplasty registers and no bias for developer publications in unicompartmental knee arthroplasty

PURPOSE

Our aim was to assess the outcome with respect to cumulative revision rates of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) by comparing published literature and arthroplasty registry data. Our hypothesis was that there is a superior outcome of UKA described in dependent clinical studies compared to independent studies or arthroplasty registers.

METHODS

A systematic review of all clinical studies on UKA in the past decade was conducted with the main endpoint revision rate. Revision rate was calculated as "revision per 100 component years (CY)". The respective data were analysed with regard to a potential difference of the percentage of performed revision surgeries as described in dependent and independent clinical studies. Clinical data were further compared to arthroplasty registers in a systematic search algorithm.

RESULTS

In total, 48 study cohorts fulfilled our inclusion criteria and revealed 1.11 revisions per 100 CY. This corresponds to a revision rate of 11.1% after 10 years. No deviations with regard to revision rates for UKA among dependent and independent clinical literature were detected. Data from four arthroplasty registers showed lower survival rates after 10 years compared to published literature without being significant.

CONCLUSIONS

The outcomes of UKA in dependent and independent clinical studies do not differ significantly and are in line with arthroplasty register datasets. We cannot confirm biased results and the authors recommend the use of UKAs in properly selected patients by experts in their field.

No Differences in Outcomes Scores or Survivorship of Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty Between Patients Younger or Older than 55 Years of Age at Minimum 10-Year Followup

BACKGROUND

Although patients who have undergone unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) report improvements in functional outcomes, orthopaedic surgeons tend to avoid UKA in younger patients due to implant survivorship concerns. As a result, few studies specifically have examined the outcomes of patients 55 years and younger.

QUESTIONS/PURPOSES

Is there a difference between two cohorts of patients: those 55 years and younger and those 56 years and older who underwent UKA in terms of: (1) functional outcomes scores, (2) quality-of-life scores, and (3) implant survivorship free from all-cause revision.

METHODS

Between 2004 and 2007, 100 patients 55 years and younger underwent UKA at one institution. Of those, three (3%) died, and 13 (13%) were lost to followup before the 10-year minimum required for this study, leaving 84 patients available for propensity score matching. During that same period, 343 patients older than 56 years underwent UKA; 48 (14%) died, and 59 (17%) were lost to followup before 10 years, leaving 236 patients available in that group for potential inclusion. After propensity score matching to account for confounding preoperative variables (surgeon, patient's body mass index, and sex), the patients were divided into two groups based on age: (1) 55 years and younger, (2) 56 years and older. There were 71 patients in each group, with minimum followup of 10 years. The mean age in the group of patients 55 years and younger was 52 years (range, 45-55 years) and that of the older patients was 64 years (range, 56-80 years). The mean (range) followup in both groups was 13 years (range, 11-15 years). Patient functional outcomes, quality of life scores, and implant survivorship were assessed for both groups of patients. To detect a minimum clinically important difference of 5 points in the Oxford Knee Score (OKS), a sample size of at least 68 patients in each group would be required to achieve a power of 0.95.

RESULTS

With the numbers available, there were no differences between patients 55 years and younger and those 56 years and older in terms of OKS (18 ± 6 versus 20 ± 8, mean difference -1.8; 95% CI, -4.1 to 0.5; p = 0.133) and Knee Society Knee Score (84 ± 16 versus 79 ± 21, mean difference 4.7; 95% CI, -1.8 to 11.2; p = 0.157) at 10 years postoperatively. With the numbers available, there were no differences between patients 55 years and younger and those 56 years and older in terms of the physical component summary (PCS) (47 ± 10 versus 48 ± 11, mean difference -0.4; 95% CI, -4.0 to 3.2; p = 0.827) and the mental component summary (MCS) (52 ± 12 versus 51 ± 12, mean difference 1.4; 95% CI, -2.6 to 5.4; p = 0.491) of the SF-36 at 10 years postoperatively. Finally, we found no differences with the numbers available between patients 55 years and younger and those 56 years and older in terms of survivorship free from all-cause revision at a minimum of 10 years followup (both groups had the same 10-year revision-free rate of 0.96; 95% CI, 0.91-1.00).

CONCLUSIONS

Because we found few differences between patients 55 years and younger and those older than that in terms of functional outcomes, quality of life, and implant survivorship after UKA, we believe that appropriately selected younger patients should not be excluded from the potential benefits of undergoing UKA, especially in the hands of high-volume surgeons.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III, therapeutic study.

Minimally invasive Oxford unicompartmental knee arthroplasty ensures excellent functional outcome and high survivorship in the long term

PURPOSE

Whether unicompartimental or total knee arthroplasty is superior for treatment of anteromedial knee osteoarthritis, is still uncertain. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to evaluate clinical and radiological outcome as well as long-term survivorship of medial Oxford unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (OUKA) at an independent center with a minimum follow-up of 10 years.

METHODS

This single-center retrospective cohort study reports the 10-15 years follow-up results of 113 consecutive patients (126 knees) after medial OUKA. Survivorship analysis was performed with several different endpoints and clinical outcome was measured using the Oxford Knee Score (OKS), American Knee Society Score (AKSS-O), range of motion (ROM), Tegner activity score and UCLA score. Radiological analysis was performed with focus on progression of arthritis in the lateral compartment.

RESULTS

A total of 16 patients (16 knees) underwent revision surgery resulting in a survival rate of 92.4% at 10 years and 88.6% at 15 years with the endpoint device-related revisions. The main reason for revision surgery was progression of arthritis in five patients (31.3%) followed by persistency of pain in three patients (18.7%). Clinical outcome was good to excellent with an OKS of 39.9 at 11 years, an AKSS-O of 89.3 and a mean range of motion of 122°. The radiological analysis revealed a significant progression of degenerative changes in the lateral compartment, however without any impact on the functional outcome.

CONCLUSION

Oxford UKA of the medial compartment ensures good long-term survivorship with an excellent functional outcome. Therefore, the results of this study support the continued use of OUKA in patients with anteromedial osteoarthritis.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Retrospective cohort study, Level III.

Obliquity of tibial component after unicompartmental knee arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

The native knee joint line is varus relative to the tibia and remains parallel to the floor during gait even with varus lower-limb alignment. We investigated the desired degree of frontal obliquity for positioning the tibial component during unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA).

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed full-leg, standing, hip to ankle digital radiographs from 107 osteoarthritic knees. We measured the hip-knee-ankle (HKA) angle, the tibial joint-line orientation angle (JLOA), which indicates the angle of the joint line (tibial component) relative to the floor, and the medial proximal tibial angle (MPTA), which is the angle of the joint line (tibial component) relative to the tibial mechanical axis, before and after UKA in the coronal plane.

RESULTS

The preoperative HKA angle (mean 7.3°, standard deviation (SD) 3.0) was significantly higher than the postoperative HKA angle (mean 3.4°, SD 3.0, P < 0.0001). The preoperative MPTA (mean 4.8°, SD 2.1) did not significantly differ from the postoperative MPTA (mean 4.5°, SD 3.0, P = 0.47). The mean postoperative JLOA was parallel to the floor (JLOA; 0.2°, SD 3.6).

CONCLUSION

When the tibial component is positioned along the natural joint slope restoring pre-disease alignment of the overall lower limb in the coronal plane, the tibial component was positioned parallel to the floor. When UKA is indicated for the medial osteoarthritis patient, the surgeon should install the tibial component four to five degrees varus to the tibial mechanical axis to maintain joint-line parallelism.

Outcome of revision UKR to TKR when compared to a matched group of TKR of same total arthroplasty lifespan

AIM

To compare outcomes of revision uni-compartmental knee replacement (UKR) with a defined revision cause with a matched group of primary total knee replacements (TKR).

BACKGROUND

UKR accounts for 8.7% of knee arthroplasty in the UK each year. It has better functional outcome than total knee replacement for isolated single compartment arthritis but can result in complex surgery when revision is required. This is feared to result in poorer patient reported outcomes when compared to primary TKR. We aim to compare the clinical results of revised UKR with primary TKR, taking into account the survival length of the UKR.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Forty-five patients (27 female) were retrospectively identified from our arthroplasty database that had undergone revision from UKR to TKR (1999-2014) and had a minimum of two years of follow-up post-revision. These patients were then matched with regards to age at primary procedure, sex, BMI and total arthroplasty life (UKR + Revision TKR) up to point of follow-up.

RESULTS

In the UKR revision group (mean arthroplasty life 8.6 years) the mean Oxford knee score (OKS) was 31.8. In the primary knee group (mean arthroplasty life 8.4 years) the mean OKS was 32.8. This difference was not statistically significant. Fifteen out of 45 patients undergoing revision surgery required stemmed components.

CONCLUSION

UKR provides comparable clinical outcome even after revision surgery to TKR as primary TKRs and should be considered in all patients meeting the selection criteria. Revision is complex and revision components should be available.

Patient relevant outcomes of unicompartmental versus total knee replacement: systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

To present a clear and comprehensive summary of the published data on unicompartmental knee replacement (UKA) or total knee replacement (TKA), comparing domains of outcome that have been shown to be important to patients and clinicians to allow informed decision making.

DESIGN

Systematic review using data from randomised controlled trials, nationwide databases or joint registries, and large cohort studies.

DATA SOURCES

Medline, Embase, Cochrane Controlled Register of Trials (CENTRAL), and Clinical Trials.gov, searched between 1 January 1997 and 31 December 2018.

ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA FOR SELECTING STUDIES

Studies published in the past 20 years, comparing outcomes of primary UKA with TKA in adult patients. Studies were excluded if they involved fewer than 50 participants, or if translation into English was not available.

RESULTS

60 eligible studies were separated into three methodological groups: seven publications from six randomised controlled trials, 17 national joint registries and national database studies, and 36 cohort studies. Results for each domain of outcome varied depending on the level of data, and findings were not always significant. Analysis of the three groups of studies showed significantly shorter hospital stays after UKA than after TKA (-1.20 days (95% confidence interval -1.67 to -0.73), -1.43 (-1.53 to -1.33), and -1.73 (-2.30 to -1.16), respectively). There was no significant difference in pain, based on patient reported outcome measures (PROMs), but significantly better functional PROM scores for UKA than for TKA in both non-trial groups (mean difference -0.58 (-0.88 to -0.27) and -0.32 (-0.48 to -0.15), respectively). Regarding major complications, trials and cohort studies had non-significant results, but mortality after TKA was significantly higher in registry and large database studies (risk ratio 0.27 (0.16 to 0.45)), as were venous thromboembolic events (0.39 (0.27 to 0.57)) and major cardiac events (0.22 (0.06 to 0.86)). Early reoperation for any reason was higher after TKA than after UKA, but revision rates at five years remained higher for UKA in all three study groups (risk ratio 5.95 (1.29 to 27.59), 2.50 (1.77 to 3.54), and 3.13 (1.89 to 5.17), respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

TKA and UKA are both viable options for the treatment of isolated unicompartmental osteoarthritis. By directly comparing the two treatments, this study demonstrates better results for UKA in several outcome domains. However, the risk of revision surgery was lower for TKA. This information should be available to patients as part of the shared decision making process in choosing treatment options.

SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION

PROSPERO number CRD42018089972.

Age and Outcomes of Medial Meniscal-Bearing Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

National joint registries report increasing revision rates with decreasing patient age for all types of joint arthroplasty. This study aimed to explore the effect of age on function and revision risk in patients undergoing medial meniscal-bearing UKA.

METHODS

A prospectively followed cohort of 1000 consecutive medial meniscal-bearing UKAs at a designer center was analyzed. All knees were implanted for recommended indications and had mean 10-year follow-up. Patients were grouped by age at surgery (<55, 55 to <65, 65 to <75, 75+). Oxford Knee Scores (OKS) were assessed at 5 and 10 years. Component-time revision incidence rates and Kaplan-Meier implant survival were calculated.

RESULTS

Mean patient age at surgery was 66.6 years (range, 33-88). All age-groups had significant (P < .001) improvement in OKS over time, and at 5 years achieved a median OKS of 44. At 10 years, median OKS, from youngest group to eldest, were 44, 45, 42, and 39, with the eldest group having a significantly lower OKS (P < .01). Ten-year implant survival rates were 97%, 94%, 94%, and 93%, respectively, and was not significantly associated with age at UKA.

CONCLUSION

Medial meniscal-bearing UKA provides good functional outcomes in all age-groups; however, in older patients (75+), the functional outcome deteriorated at 10 years presumably due to deteriorating health. Contrary to registry observations, the revision rate was not higher in younger patients. These results suggest that, with correct indications, patient age should not be considered a contraindication to medial meniscal-bearing UKA.

Robotic-Assisted Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty: State-of-the Art and Review of the Literature

BACKGROUND

Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty is a successful treatment for unicompartmental knee osteoarthritis that has lower complication rates, faster recovery, and a more natural feeling knee compared to total knee arthroplasty. However, long-term survival has been a persistent concern. As more surgeon-controlled variables have been linked to survival, interest in robotic-assisted surgery has continued to grow.

METHODS

A review and synthesis of the literature on the subject of robotic-assisted unicompartmental knee arthroplasty was performed.

RESULTS

We present the driving factors behind the development of robotic-assisted techniques in unicompartmental knee arthroplasty and the current state-of-the art. The ability of surgeons to achieve intraoperative targets with robotic assistance and the outcomes of robotic-assisted surgery are also described.

CONCLUSION

Robotic-assisted surgery has become increasingly popular in unicompartmental knee arthroplasty, as it allows surgeons to more accurately and reproducibly plan and achieve operative targets during surgery. Cost remains a concern, and it remains to be seen whether robotic-assisted surgery will improve long-term survivorship after unicompartmental knee arthroplasty.

High Rate of Early Revision After Custom-Made Unicondylar Knee Arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

There has been a recent interest in custom-made partial knee arthroplasties to provide patient-specific instrumentation and better fit of the prosthesis. While unicondylar knee arthroplasties (UKAs) have demonstrated good outcomes and durable results in many studies, there is little evidence on outcomes of these custom-made implants.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective review of all custom-made UKAs performed at our institution by one surgeon from 2008 to 2015. We analyzed preoperative demographics, clinical follow-up evaluations, and radiographs and performed an analysis of risk factors including age, gender, height, weight, body mass index, and tibial insert thickness. The incidence of revision surgery, radiographic failures indicating component loosening, and symptomatic clinically failed implants was calculated at an average of 54.0 months of follow-up.

RESULTS

We analyzed 115 consecutive custom-made medial UKAs from a single surgeon at our institution and found 29 (25.2%) UKAs had failed at an average of 33.1 months after surgery. Reasons for failure included aseptic femoral loosening (10), aseptic tibial loosening (8), loosening of both components (4), infection (3), progression of osteoarthritis (2), pain (1), and dislodged polyethylene insert (1). We found a significant relationship between implant failure and body mass index; no other study variables were statistically significant.

CONCLUSION

We found a relatively high rate of aseptic loosening and particularly femoral component loosening in the short- to intermediate-term follow-up period. While further study of larger numbers of custom-made UKA from multiple institutions may help verify these findings, we recommend careful consideration of the use of this implant.

Balancing mobile-bearing unicondylar knee arthroplasty in vitro

PURPOSE

Balancing mobile-bearing (MB) unicondylar knee arthroplasty (UKA) is challenging. If performed improperly, potential complications include pain, implant loosening, or progression of osteoarthritis in the preserved compartment. The purpose of this study was to document effects of improper balancing on knee kinematics and joint contact stress. It was hypothesized that over-stuffing would lead to more valgus and higher lateral contact force.

METHODS

Seven fresh-frozen cadaver legs were mounted in a kinematic rig that applied three motion patterns to the specimens: passive flexion-extension, open chain extension, and squatting. During testing, an infrared camera system recorded the trajectories of markers rigidly attached to femur and tibia, while a pressure sensor measured contact pressure in the lateral compartment. Prior computer tomography scans allowed identification of coordinate frames of the bones and calculations of anatomical rotations and translations. Collateral ligament strains were calculated, and quadriceps forces recorded. Following testing on the native knee, a medial MB UKA was implanted in each specimen and all motion trials were repeated. Three inlay thicknesses were tested to simulate optimal balancing as well as under- (1 mm thinner) and over-stuffing (1 mm thicker) of the medial compartment relative to the optimal thickness.

RESULTS

Under-stuffing of the medial compartment leads to kinematics closest to the native knee. Subjectively balanced and over-stuffed MB UKA knees were in more valgus. Lateral peak contact stress was higher from mid- to deep flexion following UKA in all three tested states; however, these results were not significant. Peak strain in the superficial medial collateral ligament (sMCL) was significantly higher in MB UKA, regardless of the inlay thickness mainly in mid-flexion. Inlay thickness had no significant impact on measured quadriceps force during squatting.

CONCLUSION

The results underline the importance of optimal balancing. Over-stuffing should be avoided as it results in the largest kinematic changes relative to the native condition and induces higher strains in the sMCL. Based on the kinematic findings, it is advisable to use thinner inlays, as long as this is not compromising stability or risking inlay luxation.

Technical feasibility of personalized articulating knee joint distraction for treatment of tibiofemoral osteoarthritis

BACKGROUND

Knee osteoarthritis is a highly prevalent degenerative joint disorder characterized by joint tissue damage and pain. Knee joint distraction has been introduced as a joint preserving surgical procedure to postpone knee arthroplasty. An often used standard externally fixation device for distraction poses a burden to patients due to the absence of joint flexion during the 6weeks treatment. Therefore, a personalized articulating distraction device was developed. The aim of this study was to test technical feasibility of this device.

METHODS

Based on an often applied rigid device, using equal bone pin positions and connectors, a hinge mechanism was developed consisting of a cam-following system for reproducing the complex joint-specific knee kinematics. In support, a device was developed for capturing the joint-specific sagittal plane articulation. The obtained kinematic data were translated into joint-specific cam shapes that were installed bilaterally in the hinge mechanism of the distraction device, as such providing personalized knee motion. Distraction of 5mm was performed within a range of motion of 30deg. joint flexion. Pre-clinical evaluation of the working principle was performed on human cadaveric legs and system stiffness characteristics were biomechanically evaluated.

FINDINGS

The desired range of motion was obtained and distraction was maintained under physiologically representative loading. Moreover, the joint-specific approach demonstrated tolerance of deviations from anatomical and alignment origin during initial placement of the developed distraction device.

INTERPRETATION

Articulation during knee distraction is considered technically feasible and has potential to decrease burden and improve acceptance of distraction therapy. Testing of clinical feasibility is warranted.

Midterm-Adjusted Survival Comparing the Best Performing Unicompartmental and Total Knee Arthroplasties in a Registry

BACKGROUND

Recent literature suggests that the difference in revision risk between unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) and total knee arthroplasty (TKA) can be influenced by surgeon volume and other confounders. We hypothesized that implant selection might decrease the relative risk of revision in an adjusted model.

METHODS

We selected the best performing (BP) primary UKAs and TKAs performed for osteoarthritis between January 2001 and December 2012 collected through a joint replacement registry. We compared aseptic and all-cause risk of revision using a surgeon-stratified Cox regression model with propensity score adjustment.

RESULTS

One thousand fifty-four UKAs were compared with 74,185 TKAs. The rate for all-cause revision was lower for UKAs (2.1%) than for TKAs (2.4%), whereas the rate for aseptic revision was higher for UKAs (2.0%) than TKAs (1.4%). The adjusted risk of aseptic revision was not significantly higher for UKA than TKA (hazard ratio = 2.02 [0.68, 5.96], P = .203) or all-cause revision (hazard ratio = 1.24 [0.52, 2.98], P = .603).

CONCLUSION

When comparing the survivorship of the BP UKAs to the BP TKAs in our registry, the adjusted risk of revision remained higher for UKAs than for TKAs, although the difference did not reach statistical significance.

Up to twelve year follow-up of the Oxford phase three unicompartmental knee replacement in China: seven hundred and eight knees from an independent centre

PURPOSE

There have been few large sample studies reporting the midterm outcome of Oxford phase 3 unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) in Asian patients.

METHODS

The study included 708 consecutive medial Oxford UKAs between February 2005 and May 2014 in Chinese patients. All cases were performed for the recommended indications with a minimally-invasive surgical technique. The functional and radiological outcomes were subsequently examined. In particular, we divided patients into the spontaneous osteonecrosis of the knee (SONK) group and the osteoarthritis (OA) group.

RESULTS

All patients were reviewed with a mean follow-up of 6.2 years (range 2.7-12 years). At the latest follow up, the mean Oxford knee score (OKS) increased from 22.5 to 38.5 points, while the mean knee society score (KSS) increased from 43.6 to 86.1 points. The mean visual analogue scale pain score decreased from 7.9 to 1.5 points and the mean range of motion (ROM) increased from 112.5° to 125.2°. A total of 13 UKAs (1.88%) required revisions. The most common reason was bearing dislocation and osteoarthritis of the lateral compartment. Using revision for any cause as an endpoint, the five-year cumulative survival rate was 98.8% and the ten-year survival rate was 94.3%. There was no statistically significant difference between the SONK group and the OA group for the five-year cumulative survival rate (98.7% vs. 98.8%, P > 0.05).

CONCLUSION

This study demonstrates that Oxford UKA is a good option for the treatment of anteromedial OA and SONK of the knee in Asian patients.

Cementless versus cemented Oxford unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: early results of a non-designer user group

PURPOSE

Although fewer tibial radiolucent lines are observed in cementless Oxford unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) compared with cemented Oxford UKA, an independent comparative study on this topic is lacking.

METHODS

In this multicentre retrospective study, a cohort of 60 consecutive cases of cementless Oxford UKA is compared with a cohort of 60 consecutive cases of cemented Oxford UKA. Radiolucent lines, survival, perioperative data and clinical results were compared.

RESULTS

No complete tibial radiolucent lines were observed in either group. Seventeen per cent of partial tibial radiolucent lines were observed in the cementless group versus 21 % in the cemented group (n.s.). The percentage of tibial radiolucent zones was 4 versus 9 %, respectively (p = 0.036). Survival rates were 90 % at 34 months for the cementless group and 84 % at 54 months for the cemented group (n.s.). Mean operation time was 10 min shorter in the cementless group (p < 0.001), and clinical results were not significantly different.

CONCLUSIONS

Although no significant differences in radiolucent lines were found between both groups, they appear to be more common in the cemented group. This confirms previous results from reports by prosthesis designers. The presence of radiolucent lines after cemented Oxford UKA does not correlate with clinical outcome or survival.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III.

Ten- to 15-year results of the Oxford Phase III mobile unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: a prospective study from a non-designer group

Aims

The interest in unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) for medial osteoarthritis has increased rapidly but the long-term follow-up of the Oxford UKAs has yet to be analysed in non-designer centres. We have examined our ten- to 15-year clinical and radiological follow-up data for the Oxford Phase III UKAs.

Patients and Methods

Between January 1999 and January 2005 a total of 138 consecutive Oxford Phase III arthroplasties were performed by a single surgeon in 129 patients for medial compartment osteoarthritis (71 right and 67 left knees, mean age 72.0 years (47 to 91), mean body mass index 28.2 (20.7 to 52.2)). Both clinical data and radiographs were prospectively recorded and obtained at intervals. Of the 129 patients, 32 patients (32 knees) died, ten patients (12 knees) were not able to take part in the final clinical and radiological assessment due to physical and mental conditions, but via telephone interview it was confirmed that none of these ten patients (12 knees) had a revision of the knee arthroplasty. One patient (two knees) was lost to follow-up.

Results

The mean follow-up was 11.7 years (10 to 15). A total of 11 knees (8%) were revised. The survival at 15 years with revision for any reason as the endpoint was 90.6% (95% confidence interval (CI) 85.2 to 96.0) and revision related to the prosthesis was 99.3% (95% CI 97.9 to 100). The mean total Knee Society Score was 47 (0 to 80) pre-operatively and 81 (30 to 100) at latest follow-up. The mean Oxford Knee Score was 19 (12 to 40) pre-operatively and 42 (28 to 55) at final follow-up. Radiolucency beneath the tibial component occurred in 22 of 81 prostheses (27.2%) without evidence of loosening.

Conclusion

This study supports the use of UKA in medial compartment osteoarthritis with excellent long-term functional and radiological outcomes with an excellent 15-year survival rate.

Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2016;98-B(10 Suppl B):41–7.

Knee joint distraction compared with high tibial osteotomy: a randomized controlled trial

PURPOSE

Both, knee joint distraction as a relatively new approach and valgus-producing opening-wedge high tibial osteotomy (HTO), are knee-preserving treatments for knee osteoarthritis (OA). The efficacy of knee joint distraction compared to HTO has not been reported.

METHODS

Sixty-nine patients with medial knee joint OA with a varus axis deviation of <10° were randomized to either knee joint distraction (n = 23) or HTO (n = 46). Questionnaires were assessed at baseline and 3, 6, and 12 months. Joint space width (JSW) as a surrogate measure for cartilage thickness was determined on standardized semi-flexed radiographs at baseline and 1-year follow-up.

RESULTS

All patient-reported outcome measures (PROMS) improved significantly over 1 year (at 1 year p < 0.02) in both groups. At 1 year, the HTO group showed slightly greater improvement in 4 of the 16 PROMS (p < 0.05). The minimum medial compartment JSW increased 0.8 ± 1.0 mm in the knee joint distraction group (p = 0.001) and 0.4 ± 0.5 mm in the HTO group (p < 0.001), with minimum JSW improvement in favour of knee joint distraction (p = 0.05). The lateral compartment showed a small increase in the knee joint distraction group and a small decrease in the HTO group, leading to a significant increase in mean JSW for knee joint distraction only (p < 0.02).

CONCLUSION

Cartilaginous repair activity, as indicated by JSW, and clinical outcome improvement occurred with both, knee joint distraction and HTO. These findings suggest that knee joint distraction may be an alternative therapy for medial compartmental OA with a limited mechanical leg malalignment.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Randomized controlled trial, Level I.

Does obesity influence early outcome of fixed-bearing unicompartmental knee arthroplasty?

Obesity is a known major contributing risk factor for knee osteoarthritis (OA). It is also believed that obese unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) patients tend to have poorer outcome and possible early failure. The purpose of this study is to investigate the early outcome of obese UKA patients in a single institution. Patients who underwent fixed bearing medial UKA in between year 2005 and 2010 were included in this study. They were divided into four groups based on Body Mass Index (BMI): 25 kg/m² (Control); 25-29.9 kg/m² (Overweight); 30-34.9 kg/m² (Obese); >35 kg/m² (Severely Obese). Functional outcome was assessed using Knee Society Score (KSS), Oxford Knee Score (OKS) and Short-form 36 (SF-36). One-way ANOVA with Bonferroni post-hoc test was used to compare the four groups for quantitative variables. There were 673 patients in this study, no significant difference between the four BMI groups for gender and side of operated knee ( p > 0.05). The functional outcome of all four groups at 2 years were comparable (all p > 0.05). At a mean follow up of 5.4 (range 2.5, 8.5) years, 9 revision surgeries (1.3%) were identified. The mean duration from initial surgery to revision surgery was 49 months (Range 6, 90). Patients' pre-operative BMI did not influence the early outcome of UKA patients. However, patients with higher BMI had relatively lower functional score prior to the surgery and tended to be younger. This did not translate to early failure and the functional improvement was similar among all four groups.

Unicondylar knee arthroplasty: Key concepts

The concept of unicondylar knee arthroplasty (UKA) has been described as early as 1950s following the introduction of the MacIntosh and McKeever hemiarthroplasty. With improvements in implant design, patient selection, and surgical technique, there has been an increase in utilization of UKA as a less-invasive alternative to total joint arthroplasty for the treatment of localized symptomatic osteoarthritis. The purpose of this review article is to highlight five trending concepts in UKA based on current evidence: bearing design, fixation technique, medial vs. lateral UKA, implant survivorship, and revision surgery.

A cost comparison of unicompartmental and total knee arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) is an alternative to total knee arthroplasty (TKA) in appropriately selected patients. There is a paucity of data comparing hospital resource utilization and costs for UKA versus TKA.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed 128 patients who underwent UKA or TKA for osteoarthritis by a single surgeon in the 2011 Fiscal Year. Sixty-four patients in each group were matched based on sex, age, race, body mass index, Charlson Comorbidity Index, and insurance type. Clinical data were obtained from medical records while costs were obtained from hospital billing. Bivariate analyses were used to compare outcomes.

RESULTS

Both anesthesia and operative time (minutes) were significantly shorter for patients undergoing UKA (125.7 vs. 156.4; p<0.001, and 81.4 vs. 112.2; p<0.001). UKA patients required fewer transfusions (0% vs. 11.0%; p=0.007) and had a shorter hospital stay (2.2 vs. 3.8days; p<0.001). 96% of UKAs were discharged home compared with 75% of TKAs (p<0.001). Hospital direct costs were lower for UKA ($7893 vs. $11,156; p<0.001) as were total costs (hospital direct costs plus overhead; $11,397 vs. $16,243; p<0.001). Supply costs and implant costs were similarly lower for UKA ($701 vs. $781; p<0.001, and $3448 vs. $5006; p<0.001).

CONCLUSION

Our data suggest that UKA provides a cost-effective alternative to TKA in appropriately selected patients. As the number of patients with end-stage arthritis of the knee requiring surgical care continues to rise, the costs of caring for these patients must be considered.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III, case control study.

Five-Year Survival of 20,946 Unicondylar Knee Replacements and Patient Risk Factors for Failure: An Analysis of German Insurance Data

BACKGROUND

Improvements in implant design and surgical technique of unicondylar knee arthroplasty have led to reduced revision rates, but patient selection seems to be crucial for success of such arthroplasties. The purpose of the present study was to analyze the 5-year implant survival rate of unicondylar knee replacements in Germany and to identify patient factors associated with an increased risk of revision, including >30 comorbid conditions.

METHODS

Using nationwide billing data of the largest German health-care insurance for inpatient hospital treatment, we identified patients who underwent unicondylar knee arthroplasty between 2006 and 2012. Kaplan-Meier survival curves with revision as the end point and log-rank tests were used to evaluate 5-year implant survival. A multivariable Cox regression model was used to determine factors associated with revision. The risk factors of age, sex, diagnosis, comorbidities, type of implant fixation, and hospital volume were analyzed. Hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) were calculated.

RESULTS

During the study period, a total of 20,946 unicondylar knee arthroplasties were included. The number of unicondylar knee arthroplasties per year increased during the study period from 2,527 in 2006 to 4,036 in 2012. The median patient age was 64 years (interquartile range, 56 to 72 years), and 60.4% of patients were female. During the time evaluated, the 1-year revision rate decreased from 14.3% in 2006 to 8.7% in 2011. The 5-year survival rate was 87.8% (95% CI, 87.3% to 88.3%). Significant risk factors (p < 0.05) for unicondylar knee arthroplasty revision were younger age (the HR was 2.93 [95% CI, 2.48 to 3.46] for patient age of <55 years, 1.86 [95% CI, 1.58 to 2.19] for 55 to 64 years, and 1.52 [95% CI, 1.29 to 1.79] for 65 to 74 years; patient age of >74 years was used as the reference); female sex (HR, 1.18 [95% CI, 1.07 to 1.29]); complicated diabetes (HR, 1.47 [95% CI, 1.03 to 2.12]); depression (HR, 1.29 [95% CI, 1.06 to 1.57]); obesity, defined as a body mass index of ≥30 kg/m² (HR, 1.13 [95% CI, 1.02 to 1.26]); and low-volume hospitals, denoted as an annual hospital volume of ≤10 cases (HR, 1.60 [95% CI, 1.39 to 1.84]), 11 to 20 cases (HR, 1.47 [95% CI, 1.27 to 1.70]), and 21 to 40 cases (HR, 1.31 [95% CI, 1.14 to 1.51]) (>40 cases was used as the reference).

CONCLUSIONS

Apart from known risk factors, this study showed a significant negative influence of obesity, depression, and complicated diabetes on the 5-year unicondylar knee replacement survival rate. Surgical indications and preoperative patient counseling should consider these findings.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Prognostic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Balancing UKA: overstuffing leads to high medial collateral ligament strains

PURPOSE

Balancing unicondylar knee arthroplasty (UKA) is challenging. If not performed properly, it may lead to implant loosening or progression of osteoarthritis in the preserved compartment. This study was aimed to document the biomechanical effects of improper balancing. We hypothesised that overstuffing would lead to more valgus, higher strain in the medial collateral ligament (sMCL), and higher lateral contact force.

METHODS

Six fresh-frozen cadaver specimens were mounted in a kinematic rig. Three motion patterns were applied with the native knee and following medial UKA (passive motion, open-chain extension, and squatting), while infrared cameras recorded the trajectories of markers attached to femur and tibia. Three inlay thicknesses were tested (8, 9, 10 mm).

RESULTS

Overstuffed knees were in more valgus and showed less tibial rotation and higher strains in the sMCL (p < 0.05). Lateral contact forces were higher in some specimens and lower in others. Stiffening of the medial compartment by UKA, even well balanced, already leads to a knee more in valgus with a more stressed sMCL. Overstuffing increases these effects. Knees with a tight sMCL may even see lower lateral contact force. Biomechanics were closest to the native knee with understuffing.

CONCLUSION

The first two hypotheses were confirmed, but not the latter. This underlines the importance of optimal balancing. Overstuffing should certainly be avoided. Although kinematics is only slightly affected, contact forces and ligament strains are considerably changed and this might be of more clinical importance. It is advisable to use thinner inlays, if stability is not compromised.

Mid-term results of Oxford phase-3 medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty for medial arthritis in Chinese patients

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the mid-term results of an Oxford phase-3 unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) for medial arthritis in Chinese patients.

METHODS

The study included 64 patients who underwent a minimally invasive Oxford phase-3 UKA for medial knee arthritis. The patients were clinically evaluated preoperatively and at the final follow-up according to the clinical and functional components of the Knee Society Score (KSS), the Hospital for Special Surgery knee score and range of motion. A Kaplan-Meier survivorship analysis was performed with revision surgery as the end point.

RESULTS

The mean preoperative clinical KSSs increased from 63.2 to 91.4 post-operatively, and the mean functional KSSs increased from 54.9 to 86.5 post-operatively. In addition, the mean Hospital for Special Surgery scores increased from 59.5 to 86.4. The mean active knee flexion increased from 109.1° preoperatively to 123.6° post-operatively. A total of six patients (six knees) required revision surgery at the time of the maximum 10-year follow-up. Four conversions to total knee arthroplasty were performed because of arthritis progression in the lateral compartment. One revision to total knee arthroplasty was performed for aseptic loosening, and one liner exchange was performed for wear. The cumulative survival rates at the 6- and 8-year follow-ups were 97% and 93%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Oxford phase-3 UKA was largely applicable for medial arthritis in Chinese patients. However, the Oxford phase-3 medial UKA selection criteria for young Chinese males need further exploration to obtain the best treatment effect.

Open wedge high tibial osteotomy (HTO) versus mobile bearing unicondylar medial joint replacement: five years results

INTRODUCTION

Aim of this study was to compare clinical results after open wedge HTO (OW-HTO and medial unicondylar joint replacement (UKA) in patients aged between 55 and 65.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Fifty-four patients aged between 55 and 65 years with medial OA and varus malalignement who had been treated by either OW-HTO or UKA could be included. Minimum follow up was 5 years. The HSS knee score and the KOOS were used to evaluate clinical outcome.

RESULTS

There was no difference in the revision rate, the HSS knee score and the KOOS subscales Sports/Rec and ADL between the OW-HTO and UKA group. However, the KOOS subscales pain, Symptoms and QoL were significantly better in the UKA group compared to the OW-HTO.

CONCLUSIONS

The results of this study showed that 5 years after surgery patients after UKA had less residual pain and symptoms than patients after UKA. These advantages might result in a higher quality of life.

High tibial osteotomy for the treatment of medial osteoarthritis of the knee with new iBalance system: 2 years of follow-up

BACKGROUND

A new system for performing open-wedge high tibial osteotomy (HTO), the iBalance HTO System-Arthrex, has been recently developed in order to make the surgery more reproducible and safe. The aim of this study was to determine the short-term outcomes of the iBalance technique in medial compartment osteoarthritis and varus malalignment of the knee.

METHODS

Fifteen patients with a mean age of 50.7 years (SD 5.09), affected by symptomatic varus knee, with medial compartment osteoarthritis (1-2 Ahlbäck degree), were treated with iBalance HTO between July 2011 and February 2012 and evaluated retrospectively. Patients were assessed against the following benchmarks: subjective International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) score, Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS), and VAS for pain and Tegner scores, along with X-rays and MRI, before surgery and after a 2-year follow-up.

RESULTS

No severe intraoperative complications or implant failures occurred. The mean preoperative scores were as follows: subjective IKDC 66.8 (SD 1.18), KOOS 61.3 (SD 0.86), Vas for pain 8.6 (SD 1.72) and Tegner 4.1 (SD 2.06), while at follow-up the scores were 73.6 (SD 1.01), 88.1 (SD 1.23), 2.9 (SD 2.35) and 3.1 (SD 1.83), respectively. Correction ranged between 3° and 8°. All patients showed complete articular recovery, no loss of correction, no substantial variation in A/P slope and no hardware problems.

CONCLUSIONS

iBalance proved to be effective and safe and produced good overall results. Consolidation and osseointegration of the system took place rapidly, while recovery was precocious, comparable with traditional methods and with no severe complications.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Case series, Level IV.

Does activity affect the outcome of the Oxford unicompartmental knee replacement?

BACKGROUND

High levels of activity are considered to be a contraindication to unicompartmental knee replacement (UKR) and are not recommended after UKR. To determine if these recommendations should apply to the mobile-bearing Oxford UKR, this study assessed the effect of post-operative activity level on the outcome of this device.

METHODS

The outcome of the first 1000 Phase 3 cemented Oxford UKRs implanted between 1998 and 2010 was assessed using survival analysis, the Oxford Knee Score (OKS) and the American Knee Society Objective (KSS-O) and Functional (KSS-F) Scores. Patients were grouped according to the maximum post-operative Tegner Activity Score.

RESULTS

The mean follow-up was 6.1 years (range 1 to 14). Overall, increasing activity was associated with superior survival (p=0.025). In the high activity group, with Tegner≥5 (n=115) 2.6% were revised and the 12-year survival was 97.3% (confidence interval (CI): 92.0% to 99.1%). In the low activity group, with Tegner≤4, (n=885) 4.3% were revised and the 12-year survival was 94.0% (CI: 91.4 to 95.8). The difference between the two groups was not significant (p=0.44). Although the final OKS and KSS-F were significantly better in the high activity group compared to the low activity group (OKS 45v40, KSS-F 95v78), there was no difference in the change in OKS or KSS-O.

CONCLUSIONS

High activity does not compromise the outcome of the Oxford UKR and may improve it. Activity should not be restricted nor considered to be a contraindication.

Evaluating patient education material regarding unicompartmental knee arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

Variability in quality and accuracy of information has been well documented in other orthopedic procedures. Given the growing role of the Internet in patient education, it is important to assess the quality of material provided. The purpose of this study was to evaluate online patient education materials regarding unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA).

METHOD

The first 50 websites generated from a search of the term, partial knee replacement, using three search engines, Google, Yahoo!, and Bing, were analyzed for quality, content, and authorship. Categorical data between the three search engines were compared using the Freeman-Halton extension for the Fisher's exact test. Fisher's exact test was used to compare categorical data between the search terms partial knee replacement and unicompartmental knee arthroplasty.

RESULTS

Most websites mentioned benefits of UKA (69%) but only a minority (39%) mentioned risks. A more technical search term, unicompartmental knee arthroplasty, yielded fewer websites authored by manufacturers/industry and miscellaneous sources (p=0.018 and p=0.039, respectively), more mentions of risks (p=0.0014), and more references to peer-reviewed literature (p=0.0026).

CONCLUSIONS

Overall, online information related to UKA is of questionable quality and may be geared more towards attracting patients than providing high-quality information.

[Revision after unicompartmental knee arthroplasty]

Unicompartmental arthroplasty is an efficient and approved treatment option of unicompartmental arthritis of the knee, being performed with increasing frequency worldwide. Compared to total knee replacement, there are several advantages such as faster recovery, lower blood loss, better functional outcome and lower infection rates. However, higher revision rates are a frequent argument against the use of unicompartmental arthroplasty. The following article gives an overview of failure mechanisms and strategies for revision arthroplasty. This article is based on a selective literature review including PubMed and relevant print media. Our own clinical experience is considered as well.

[Medial unicondylar knee replacement]

BACKGROUND

Unicondylar knee replacement (UKA) is a viable alternative to high tibial osteotomy (HTO) and total knee replacement in the treatment of medial osteoarthritis of the knee. With the correct indication, the results of UKA and HTO are comparable.

RESULTS

In comparison with the results of total knee replacements, UKA leads to faster rehabilitation, superior postoperative range of motion, and higher postoperative activity levels. Despite the excellent long-term results, the survival rate is inferior to the results of total knee replacement. The major causes for failure are progression of osteoarthritis in the lateral and patellofemoral joint as well as the loosening of the tibial component.

CONCLUSION

The conversion to total knee replacement can mostly be performed without problems. However, the expected results are inferior to primary total knee replacement and the reported revision rates are higher.

Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty: Does a Selection Bias Exist?

Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) is a minimally invasive option reported to allow a more rapid recovery and better patient outcomes. However, whether these outcomes are related to selection bias has not been fully investigated. This study examines whether a bias existed in selection of UKA candidates. We compared outcomes of patients who were scheduled for UKA but had the plan changed intraoperatively to total knee arthroplasty (TKA) to two randomly selected contemporaneous control groups: 1) patients planned as UKA who received UKA and 2) patients planned as TKA who received TKA. Our results not only showed a selection bias existed, but also showed patients converted to TKA intraoperatively had similar clinical results to patients receiving UKAs and better results than patients originally scheduled for TKA.