1
|
Theeuwen D, Schoenmakers D, Scholtes M, Kalaai S, Schotanus M, Boonen B. First long-term analysis of survival and clinical outcome in patient-specific instrumentation for total knee arthroplasty: follow-up of a prospective cohort study. Acta Orthop Belg 2024; 90:51-56. [PMID: 38669649 DOI: 10.52628/90.1.11822] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/28/2024]
Abstract
Patient-specific instrumentation (PSI) was introduced to improve post-operative alignment, and consequently the revision rate and clinical results after total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Short- to mid-term data are conflicting regarding these theoretical advantages of PSI. The purpose of this retrospective analysis was to evaluate the survival rate and clinical outcome in PSI TKA 8.4 years after initial surgery. To our knowledge, no other study investigated long-term follow-up of TKA procedures using PSI. From a total cohort of 184 consecutive patients (200 TKA) 136 patients (144 TKA, 72%) were prospectively analysed at a mean follow-up of 8.4 years (±0.4). A survival analysis with all-cause revision of TKA as endpoint was performed. Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) were obtained preoperatively and after 1-, 2-, 5-, and 8.4-years of follow-up. Differences between these moments of follow-up were analysed. At final follow-up, 4 TKAs (2%) had undergone revision, all between 2-4 years after primary surgery. Reasons for revision were late infection, aseptic loosening, instability and polyethylene insert breakage. The median score of certain PROMs (WOMAC, VAS, EQ-index, EQ-VAS) decreased compared to previous follow-up scores but were significantly higher than preoperative scores. After 8.4 years of follow-up, no additional revision surgery was performed compared to 5-years postoperatively. Certain PROMs at 8.4-year follow-up decreased compared to earlier moments of follow-up, but all PROMs improved compared to preoperative PROMs.
Collapse
|
2
|
Vaziri AS, Karimpour M, Tahmasebi MN, Hosseini SR, Moradkhani G, Javidmehr S, Vosoughi F. Ipsilateral Concurrent Knee Arthroplasty and Tibial Osteotomy with 3D-Printed Patient-Specific Instrumentation: A Case Report. JBJS Case Connect 2023; 13:01709767-202312000-00021. [PMID: 37917765 DOI: 10.2106/jbjs.cc.23.00176] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/04/2023]
Abstract
CASE A 70-year-old woman presented with knee pain and instability and was diagnosed with advanced knee osteoarthritis and bifocal tibial deformities. The complexity of the case challenged our team to perform a significant sagittal correction (>60°) and restore her ability to walk independently. We performed ipsilateral total knee arthroplasty and anterior closed wedge tibial osteotomy using virtual planning and 3D-printed patient-specific instrumentation. CONCLUSION Using 2 separate 3D-printed patient-specific cutting guides for this patient with a complex deformity and managing the whole planning process in close collaboration between the surgeons and engineers resulted in a satisfactory postoperative outcome, optimal implant positioning and leg alignment, and minimal soft-tissue damage.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Arash Sharafat Vaziri
- Center for Orthopedic Trans-Disciplinary Applied Research, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Morad Karimpour
- School of Mechanical Engineering, College of Engineering, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran
| | - Mohammad Naghi Tahmasebi
- Center for Orthopedic Trans-Disciplinary Applied Research, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Seyedeh Reihaneh Hosseini
- Center for Orthopedic Trans-Disciplinary Applied Research, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Ghazaleh Moradkhani
- School of Mechanical Engineering, College of Engineering, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran
| | - Sina Javidmehr
- Center for Orthopedic Trans-Disciplinary Applied Research, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Fardis Vosoughi
- Department of Orthopaedic and trauma surgery, Shariati Hospital, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Keskinis A, Paraskevopoulos K, Diamantidis DE, Ververidis A, Fiska A, Tilkeridis K. The Role of 3D-Printed Patient-Specific Instrumentation in Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Literature Review. Cureus 2023; 15:e43321. [PMID: 37700954 PMCID: PMC10493459 DOI: 10.7759/cureus.43321] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 08/11/2023] [Indexed: 09/14/2023] Open
Abstract
Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is currently one of the most common orthopedic surgeries due to the ever-increasing average life expectancy. The constant need for effective and accurate techniques was contributed to the development of three-dimensional (3D) printing in that field, especially for patient-specific instrumentation (PSI) and custom-made implants fabrication. PSI may offer numerous benefits, such as resection accuracy, mechanical axis alignment, cost-effectiveness, and time economy. Nonetheless, the results of existing studies are controversial. For this purpose, a review article of the published articles was conducted to summarize the role of 3D-printed PSI in TKA.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anthimos Keskinis
- Orthopedic Surgery Department, University General Hospital of Alexandroupolis, Democritus University of Thrace, Alexandroupolis, GRC
| | - Konstantinos Paraskevopoulos
- Orthopedic Surgery Department, University General Hospital of Alexandroupolis, Democritus University of Thrace, Alexandroupolis, GRC
| | | | - Athanasios Ververidis
- Orthopedic Surgery Department, University General Hospital of Alexandroupolis, Democritus University of Thrace, Alexandroupolis, GRC
| | - Aliki Fiska
- Anatomy Laboratory, Democritus University of Thrace, Alexandroupolis, GRC
| | - Konstantinos Tilkeridis
- Orthopedic Surgery Department, University General Hospital of Alexandroupolis, Democritus University of Thrace, Alexandroupolis, GRC
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Tibesku CO, Haas SB, Saunders C, Harwood DA. Comparison of clinical outcomes of VISIONAIRE patient-specific instrumentation with conventional instrumentation in total knee arthroplasty: a systematic literature review and meta-analysis. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 2023; 143:4379-4393. [PMID: 36449066 PMCID: PMC10293358 DOI: 10.1007/s00402-022-04698-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/09/2022] [Accepted: 11/10/2022] [Indexed: 12/05/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Malalignment and resulting complications are major challenges in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) which patient-specific instrumentation (PSI) is proposed to alleviate. Previous PSI meta-analyses of TKA outcomes typically do not differentiate between PSI systems and assess relatively few outcomes, so the value of their findings is limited. VISIONAIRE™ cutting guides (Smith + Nephew Inc., Memphis, TN, USA) is a PSI system based on preoperative magnetic resonance and X-ray imaging. A systematic literature review (SLR) and meta-analysis, focussed specifically on VISIONAIRE, were conducted to assess TKA accuracy, intraoperative outcomes, and postoperative outcomes, compared with conventional instrumentation (CI). MATERIALS AND METHODS The SLR was performed using PubMed, Embase, and Google Scholar databases to identify relevant studies published until March 2022. Depending on statistical heterogeneity, meta-analyses were performed for outcome measures with fixed effect (I2 < 50%) or random-effects models (I2 ≥ 50%). Dichotomous outcomes were reported as odds ratios and continuous outcomes were reported as mean differences. Descriptive analyses were performed for outcomes not amenable to meta-analysis. RESULTS Outcomes for VISIONAIRE versus CI were reported in 25 studies. Compared with CI, VISIONAIRE reduced odds of mechanical outliers by 40% (p < 0.0001), with no statistically significant differences in odds of overall coronal, sagittal, or rotational plane component outliers. VISIONAIRE improved surgical efficiency (operating room, turnover, and tourniquet times reduced by 7.3% (p = 0.02), 42% (p = 0.022), and 15.9% (p = 0.01), respectively), lowering the odds of blood transfusion by 53% (p = 0.01) and shortening patients' hospital stays (11.1% reduction; p < 0.0001). There were no significant differences between groups in incidence of postoperative complications and (descriptively analyzed) return-to-function outcomes. CONCLUSION Options for PSI in TKA differ substantially, and it is important to assess the outcomes of individual systems. The current findings suggest that VISIONAIRE guides can lead to improved alignment accuracy and surgical efficiency compared with CI, without compromising postoperative safety and return-to-function outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Steven B Haas
- Knee Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
5
|
Rak D, Klann L, Heinz T, Anderson P, Stratos I, Nedopil AJ, Rudert M. Influence of Mechanical Alignment on Functional Knee Phenotypes and Clinical Outcomes in Primary TKA: A 1-Year Prospective Analysis. J Pers Med 2023; 13:jpm13050778. [PMID: 37240948 DOI: 10.3390/jpm13050778] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/31/2023] [Revised: 04/27/2023] [Accepted: 04/28/2023] [Indexed: 05/28/2023] Open
Abstract
In total knee arthroplasty (TKA), functional knee phenotypes are of interest regarding surgical alignment strategies. Functional knee phenotypes were introduced in 2019 and consist of limb, femoral, and tibial phenotypes. The hypothesis of this study was that mechanically aligned (MA) TKA changes preoperative functional phenotypes, which decreases the 1-year Forgotten Joint (FJS) and Oxford Knee Score (OKS) and increases the 1-year WOMAC. All patients included in this study had end-stage osteoarthritis and were treated with a primary MA TKA, which was supervised by four academic knee arthroplasty specialists. To determine the limb, femoral, and tibial phenotype, a long-leg radiograph (LLR) was imaged preoperatively and two to three days after TKA. FJS, OKS, and WOMAC were obtained 1 year after TKA. Patients were categorized using the change in functional limb, femoral, and tibial phenotype measured on LLR, and the scores were compared between the different categories. A complete dataset of preoperative and postoperative scores and radiographic images could be obtained for 59 patients. 42% of these patients had a change of limb phenotype, 41% a change of femoral phenotype, and 24% a change of tibial phenotype of more than ±1 relative to the preoperative phenotype. Patients with more than ±1 change of limb phenotype had significantly lower median FJS (27 points) and OKS (31 points) and higher WOMAC scores (30 points) relative to the 59-, 41-, and 4-point scores of those with a 0 ± 1 change (p < 0.0001 to 0.0048). Patients with a more than ±1 change of femoral phenotype had significantly lower median FJS (28 points) and OKS (32 points) and higher WOMAC scores (24 points) relative to the 69-, 40-, and 8-point scores of those with a 0 ± 1 change (p < 0.0001). A change in tibial phenotype had no effect on the FJS, OKS, and WOMAC scores. Surgeons performing MA TKA could consider limiting coronal alignment corrections of the limb and femoral joint line to within one phenotype to reduce the risk of low patient-reported satisfaction and function at 1-year.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dominik Rak
- Orthopädische Klinik König-Ludwig-Haus, Lehrstuhl für Orthopädie der Universität Würzburg, 97074 Würzburg, Germany
| | - Lukas Klann
- Orthopädische Klinik König-Ludwig-Haus, Lehrstuhl für Orthopädie der Universität Würzburg, 97074 Würzburg, Germany
| | - Tizian Heinz
- Orthopädische Klinik König-Ludwig-Haus, Lehrstuhl für Orthopädie der Universität Würzburg, 97074 Würzburg, Germany
| | - Philip Anderson
- Orthopädische Klinik König-Ludwig-Haus, Lehrstuhl für Orthopädie der Universität Würzburg, 97074 Würzburg, Germany
| | - Ioannis Stratos
- Orthopädische Klinik König-Ludwig-Haus, Lehrstuhl für Orthopädie der Universität Würzburg, 97074 Würzburg, Germany
| | - Alexander J Nedopil
- Orthopädische Klinik König-Ludwig-Haus, Lehrstuhl für Orthopädie der Universität Würzburg, 97074 Würzburg, Germany
| | - Maximilian Rudert
- Orthopädische Klinik König-Ludwig-Haus, Lehrstuhl für Orthopädie der Universität Würzburg, 97074 Würzburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Hinloopen JH, Puijk R, Nolte PA, Schoones JW, de Ridder R, Pijls BG. The efficacy and safety of patient-specific instrumentation in primary total knee replacement: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Expert Rev Med Devices 2023; 20:245-252. [PMID: 36736371 DOI: 10.1080/17434440.2023.2177152] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/05/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Patient-specific instrumentation (PSI) for primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA) surgery has been shown to increase accuracy of component positioning. However, it is unclear whether this also translates to actual benefits for patients in terms of better outcomes (efficacy) or less complications such as revisions (safety). We therefore systematically reviewed the literature to determine the efficacy and safety of PSI in primary TKA. METHODS Randomized controlled trials comparing PSI to non-PSI in primary TKA were included. A random effects model was used with meta-regression in case of heterogeneity. RESULTS Forty-three studies were included with a total of 1816 TKA in the PSI group and 1887 TKA in the control group. There were no clinically relevant differences between the PSI-group and non-PSI group regarding all outcomes. There was considerable heterogeneity: meta-regression analyses showed that the year the study was published was an important effect modifier. Early publications tended to show a positive effect for PSI compared to non-PSI TKA, whereas later studies found the opposite. CONCLUSION Based on evidence of moderate certainty, our study suggested that there were no clinically relevant differences in efficacy and safety between patients treated with PSI TKA and patients treated with non-PSI TKA.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J H Hinloopen
- Department of Orthopaedics, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - R Puijk
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Spaarne Gasthuis, Hoofddorp, the Netherlands
| | - P A Nolte
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Spaarne Gasthuis, Hoofddorp, the Netherlands.,Department Oral Cell Biology, Academic Centre for Dentistry (ACTA), University of Amsterdam and Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - J W Schoones
- Directorate of Research Policy (Formerly: Walaeus Library), Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - R de Ridder
- Department of Orthopaedics, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.,Department of Orthopaedics, Reinier Haga Orthopaedic Centre, Zoetermeer, Netherlands
| | - B G Pijls
- Department of Orthopaedics, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Does the use of patient-specific instrumentation improve resource use in the operating room and outcome after total knee arthroplasty?–A multicenter study. PLoS One 2022; 17:e0277464. [DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0277464] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/07/2020] [Accepted: 10/27/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Patient-specific instrumentation (PSI) in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) has been introduced to reduce instruments and surgical time and to improve implant alignment. The aim of this study was to compare TKA with patient-specific and conventional instrumentation with regard to the use of resources in the operating room (OR), alignment and patient-reported outcome. A total of 139 TKA with PSI or conventional instrumentation were included in three centers. Economic variables of the surgery (number of instrument trays, setup and cut-sew-time), radiological alignment and patient reported outcomes (VAS Pain Scale, Oxford Knee Score, EQ-5D) were assessed after 6 weeks, 6 and 12 months. There was a significant reduction of instrument trays and of time in the OR in the PSI group. The reduction varied between the centers. With strict reorganization, more than 50% of the instrument trays could be reduced while using PSI. There were no significant differences in cut-sew-time, implant position, leg axis, pain and function. The use of PSI was associated with significantly less OR resources. However, the savings did not compensate the costs for this technology.
Collapse
|
8
|
Mandal P, Ambade R. Surgery Training and Simulation Using Virtual and Augmented Reality for Knee Arthroplasty. Cureus 2022; 14:e28823. [PMID: 36225417 PMCID: PMC9535617 DOI: 10.7759/cureus.28823] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/09/2022] [Accepted: 09/06/2022] [Indexed: 11/28/2022] Open
Abstract
A range of extended reality technology integration, including immersive virtual reality (IVR), augmented reality (AR), as well as mixed reality, has lately acquired favour in orthopaedics. The utilization of extended reality machinery in knee arthroplasty is examined in this review study. Virtual reality (VR) and AR are usually exercised together in orthopaedic surgical training as alluring training outside of the operation theatre is acknowledged as a good surgical training tool. The use of this technology, its consequences for orthopaedic surgeons and their patients, and its moral and practical issues are also covered. Head-mounted displays (HMDs) are a potential addition directed toward improving surgical precision along with instruction. Although the hardware is cutting-edge, substantial effort needs to be done to develop software that enables seamless, trustworthy integration into clinical practice and training. Remote virtual rehabilitation has drawn increasing attention in recent years, and its significance has increased in light of the recent outbreak of the COVID-19 epidemic. Numerous medical sectors have shown the benefits of telerehabilitation, gamification, VR, and AR. Given the rising demand for orthopaedic therapy and its rising costs, this is a requirement. A remote surgeon can impart knowledge without being present, by virtually placing his or her hands in the visual field of a local surgeon using AR technology. With the use of this innovation, orthopaedic surgery seems to have been able to participate in the telemedicine revolution. This technology may also have an impact on how surgeons collaborate and train for orthopaedic residencies in the future. Volatility in the HMD market will probably stall improvements in surgical education.
Collapse
|
9
|
Computer-assisted surgery and patient-specific instrumentation improve the accuracy of tibial baseplate rotation in total knee arthroplasty compared to conventional instrumentation: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2022; 30:2654-2665. [PMID: 33646370 DOI: 10.1007/s00167-021-06495-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/26/2020] [Accepted: 02/05/2021] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE To determine whether patient-specific instrumentation (PSI), computer-assisted surgery (CAS) or robot-assisted surgery (RAS) enable more accurate rotational alignment of the tibial baseplate in primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA) compared to conventional instrumentation, in terms of deviation from the planned target and the proportion of outliers from the target zone. METHODS The authors independently conducted three structured electronic literature searches using the PubMed, Embase®, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials databases from 2007 to 2020. Studies were included if they compared rotational alignment of the tibial baseplate during TKA using conventional instrumentation versus PSI, CAS, and/or RAS, and reported deviation from preoperatively planned rotational alignment of the tibial baseplate in terms of absolute angles and/or number of outliers. Methodological quality of eligible studies was assessed by two researchers according to the Downs and Black Quality Checklist for Health Care Intervention Studies. RESULTS Fifteen studies, that reported on 2925 knees, were eligible for this systematic review, of which 6 studies used PSI, and 9 used CAS. No studies were found for RAS. Of the studies that reported on angular deviation from preoperatively planned rotational alignment, most found smaller deviations using PSI (0.5° to 1.4°) compared to conventional instrumentation (1.0° to 1.6°). All studies that reported on proportions of outliers from a target zone (± 3°), found lower rates of outliers using PSI (0 to 22%) compared to conventional instrumentation (5 to 96%). Most studies reported smaller angular deviation from preoperatively planned rotational alignment using CAS (0.1° to 6.9°) compared to conventional instrumentation (1.1° to 7.8°). Of the studies that reported on proportions of outliers from a target zone (± 3°), most found fewer outliers using CAS (10 to 61%) compared to conventional instrumentation (17 to 78%). CONCLUSION This systematic review and meta-analysis revealed that both CAS and PSI can improve the accuracy of rotational alignment of the tibial baseplate by decreasing angular deviation from the preoperatively planned target and reducing the proportion of outliers from the target zone. The clinical relevance is that PSI and CAS can improve alignment, though the thresholds necessary to grant better outcomes and survival remain unclear. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE IV.
Collapse
|
10
|
León-Muñoz VJ, López-López M, Santonja-Medina F. Patient-specific instrumentation makes sense in total knee arthroplasty. Expert Rev Med Devices 2022; 19:489-497. [PMID: 35903900 DOI: 10.1080/17434440.2022.2108320] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/04/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Patient-specific instrumentation (PSI) for total knee arthroplasty (TKA) surgery was initially developed to increase accuracy. The potential PSI benefits have expanded in the last decade, and other advantages have been published. However, different authors are critical of PSI and argue that the advantages are not such and do not compensate for the extra cost. This article aims to describe the recently published advantages and disadvantages of PSI. AREAS COVERED Narrative description of the latest publications related to PSI in accuracy, clinical and functional outcomes, operative time, efficiency, and other benefits. EXPERT COMMENTARY We have published high accuracy of the system, with a not clinically relevant loss of accuracy, significantly higher precision with PSI than with conventional instruments, and a high percentage of cases in the optimal range and similar to that obtained with computer-assisted navigation, greater imprecision for tibial slope, a significant blood loss reduction, and time consumption, an acceptable and non-significant increase in the cost per procedure and no difference in complications during hospital admission and at 90 days. We think that PSI will not follow the Scott Parabola and that it will continue to be a valuable type of device in some instances of TKA surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vicente J León-Muñoz
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery and Traumatology. Hospital General Universitario Reina Sofía. Murcia (Spain)
| | - Mirian López-López
- Subdirección General de Tecnologías de la Información. Servicio Murciano de Salud. Murcia (Spain)
| | - Fernando Santonja-Medina
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery and Traumatology. Hospital Clínico Universitario Virgen de la Arrixaca. Murcia (Spain).,Department of Surgery, Pediatrics and Obstetrics & Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Murcia. Murcia (Spain)
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Wen L, Wang Z, Ma D, Qu T. Surgeon Dominated Design Can Improve the Accuracy of Patient-Specific Instruments in Kinematically Aligned TKA. J Pers Med 2022; 12:jpm12081192. [PMID: 35893286 PMCID: PMC9332028 DOI: 10.3390/jpm12081192] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/08/2022] [Revised: 07/04/2022] [Accepted: 07/16/2022] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Precise bone resection is mandatory for kinematically aligned total knee arthroplasty (KA-TKA). This study is to investigate whether surgeon-dominated design can alter the accuracy of patient-specific instrumentation (PSI) in KA-TKA compared with the engineer design. A total of 24 patients (24 knees) who underwent KA-TKA in our institution were assigned to an engineer design group (10 knees) and surgeon design group (14 knees) chronologically. A novel portable medical-engineer interactive application can greatly enhance the surgeon’s participation in PSI design. The bone resection discrepancies were used to evaluate the accuracy of PSI in bone resection. The overall discrepancy of bone resection was reduced by surgeon-designed PSI compared to engineer-designed PSI by 0.33 mm. Surgeon-designed PSI seems to reduce the outliers in terms of relative discrepancies in bone resection as well, but it does not reach statistical significance. Moreover, surgeon-designed PSI could significantly improve the accuracy of PSI in the restoration of the joint line in terms of medial proximal tibial angle and mechanical lateral distal femoral angle. This study indicates that the dominance of surgeons in both PSI design and subsequent surgical operation should be emphasized in efforts to improve the accuracy of PSI.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Liang Wen
- Department of Orthopeadics, Beijing Chaoyang Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100020, China; (L.W.); (D.M.)
| | - Zhiwei Wang
- Department of Orthopeadics, Beijing Chaoyang Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100020, China; (L.W.); (D.M.)
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +86-10-85231228
| | - Desi Ma
- Department of Orthopeadics, Beijing Chaoyang Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100020, China; (L.W.); (D.M.)
| | - Tiebing Qu
- The Center of Diagnosis and Treatment for Joint Disease, China Rehabilitation Research Center, Beijing 100068, China;
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Kazarian GS, Haddad FS, Donaldson MJ, Wignadasan W, Nunley RM, Barrack RL. Implant Malalignment may be a Risk Factor for Poor Patient-Reported Outcomes Measures (PROMs) Following Total Knee Arthroplasty (TKA). J Arthroplasty 2022; 37:S129-S133. [PMID: 35248754 DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2022.02.087] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/17/2022] [Revised: 02/14/2022] [Accepted: 02/21/2022] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Implant malalignment may be a risk factor for poor patient-reported outcomes measures (PROMs) following total knee arthroplasty (TKA). METHODS Postoperative surveys were administered to assess PROMs regarding satisfaction, pain, and function in 262 patients who underwent surgery at 4 centers in the U.S. and U.K (average age, 67.2) at a mean 5.5 years after primary TKA. Postoperative distal femoral angle (DFA), proximal tibial angle (PTA), and posterior tibial slope angle (PSA) were radiographically measured, and outliers were recorded. PROMs were compared between patients with aligned versus malaligned knees using univariate analysis. RESULTS Patients with DFA, PTA, and PSA outliers were more likely to experience similar or decreased activity levels postoperatively than patients with no alignment outliers, as were patients with 1 or 2 outliers of any kind (P < .05). Patients with DFA, PTA, and PSA outliers were significantly more likely to be dissatisfied with their ability to perform activities of daily living (ADLs), as were patients with 1 or 2 outliers of any kind (P < .05). Patients with DFA and PSA outliers were more likely to be dissatisfied with their degree of pain relief, as were patients with 2 outliers of any kind (P < .05). Finally, patients with DFA and PSA outliers, as well as those with 1 outlier of any kind, were more likely to be dissatisfied with their overall knee function (P < .05). CONCLUSION DFA, PTA, and PSA outliers represent a significant risk factor for decreased satisfaction with activities of daily living(ADLs), pain relief, and knee function, as well as decreased activity levels. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Level III.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gregory S Kazarian
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, Barnes-Jewish Hospital, St. Louis, MO; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY
| | - Fares S Haddad
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, Barnes-Jewish Hospital, St. Louis, MO
| | - Matthew J Donaldson
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, Barnes-Jewish Hospital, St. Louis, MO
| | - Warran Wignadasan
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, Barnes-Jewish Hospital, St. Louis, MO
| | - Ryan M Nunley
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, Barnes-Jewish Hospital, St. Louis, MO
| | - Robert L Barrack
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, Barnes-Jewish Hospital, St. Louis, MO
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
León-Muñoz VJ, López-López M, Lisón-Almagro AJ, Martínez-Martínez F, Santonja-Medina F. Computed Tomography-Based Patient-Specific Instrumentation Loses Accuracy with Significant Varus Preoperative Misalignment. J Knee Surg 2022; 35:574-582. [PMID: 32898903 DOI: 10.1055/s-0040-1716381] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
Patient-specific instrumentation (PSI) has been introduced to simplify and make total knee arthroplasty (TKA) surgery more precise, effective, and efficient. We performed this study to determine whether the postoperative coronal alignment is related to preoperative deformity when computed tomography (CT)-based PSI is used for TKA surgery, and how the PSI approach compares with deformity correction obtained with conventional instrumentation. We analyzed pre- and post-operative full length standing hip-knee-ankle (HKA) X-rays of the lower limb in both groups using a convention > 180 degrees for valgus alignment and < 180 degrees for varus alignment. For the PSI group, the mean (± SD) pre-operative HKA angle was 172.09 degrees varus (± 6.69 degrees) with a maximum varus alignment of 21.5 degrees (HKA 158.5) and a maximum valgus alignment of 14.0 degrees. The mean post-operative HKA was 179.43 degrees varus (± 2.32 degrees) with a maximum varus alignment of seven degrees and a maximum valgus alignment of six degrees. There has been a weak correlation among the values of the pre- and post-operative HKA angle. The adjusted odds ratio (aOR) of postoperative alignment outside the range of 180 ± 3 degrees was significantly higher with a preoperative varus misalignment of 15 degrees or more (aOR: 4.18; 95% confidence interval: 1.35-12.96; p = 0.013). In the control group (conventional instrumentation), this loss of accuracy occurs with preoperative misalignment of 10 degrees. Preoperative misalignment below 15 degrees appears to present minimal influence on postoperative alignment when a CT-based PSI system is used. The CT-based PSI tends to lose accuracy with preoperative varus misalignment over 15 degrees.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vicente Jesús León-Muñoz
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hospital Clinico Universitario Virgen de la Arrixaca, El Palmar, Spain
| | - Mirian López-López
- Subdirección General de Tecnologías de la Información, Servicio Murciano de Salud, Murcia, Spain
| | | | - Francisco Martínez-Martínez
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hospital Clinico Universitario Virgen de la Arrixaca, El Palmar, Spain.,Department of Surgery, Pediatrics and Obstetrics & Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Murcia, Murcia, Spain
| | - Fernando Santonja-Medina
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hospital Clinico Universitario Virgen de la Arrixaca, El Palmar, Spain.,Department of Surgery, Pediatrics and Obstetrics & Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Murcia, Murcia, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Comparative Cost Analysis of Four Different Computer-Assisted Technologies to Implant a Total Knee Arthroplasty over Conventional Instrumentation. J Pers Med 2022; 12:jpm12020184. [PMID: 35207672 PMCID: PMC8880057 DOI: 10.3390/jpm12020184] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/24/2021] [Revised: 01/26/2022] [Accepted: 01/27/2022] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Several computer-assisted technologies, such as navigation and robotics, have been introduced to Total Knee Arthroplasty (TKA) in order to increase surgical precision and reduce complications. However, these technologies are often criticized due to the increased costs and effort associated with them; however, comparative data are missing. The aim of the present study was to evaluate differences in intraoperative workflows and the related perioperative cost-profiles of four current computer-assisted technologies, used to implant a TKA, in order to gain a comparison to conventional instrumentation. For the cost analysis, additional preoperative imaging and instruments, increased operating room (OR) and planning-time, and expenditures for technical support of the equipment and disposals were calculated, in comparison to conventional TKA, for (1) standard computer-navigation, (2) patient specific instruments (PSI), (3) image-based robotic assistance, and (4) imageless robotic assistance. Workflows at four expert centers which use these technologies were reviewed by an independent observer. The total cost calculation was based on a 125 TKA per year unit in Switzerland. Computer-navigation resulted in 14 min (+23%) increased surgery time and, overall, USD 650 in additional costs. PSI technology saved 5 min (8%) OR time but it created USD 1520 in expenditures for imaging and disposals. The image-based robotic system was the most expensive technology; it created overall additional costs of USD 2600, which predominately resulted from technical support, disposals, the CT-Scan, and 14 min of increased OR time. The imageless robotic assistance resulted in the largest increase in OR-time, as it resulted in an additional 25 min (+42%) on average. Overall, additional costs of USD 1530 were calculated. Every one of the assistive technologies in this study increased the total cost of TKA when compared to a conventional technique, and the most important variables, related to cost, were technical support and additional disposables. The longer surgical times and additional surgical trays required for the techniques had a marginal effect on overall costs. This comparative cost analysis gives valuable information for future efforts to calculate the real costs of these technologies and the subsequent return on investment of each technique.
Collapse
|
15
|
Goh GS, Lohre R, Parvizi J, Goel DP. Virtual and augmented reality for surgical training and simulation in knee arthroplasty. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 2021; 141:2303-2312. [PMID: 34264380 DOI: 10.1007/s00402-021-04037-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/09/2021] [Accepted: 07/01/2021] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Immersive virtual reality (IVR), augmented reality and mixed reality form a spectrum of extended reality technology integration that has gained popularity in orthopaedics recently. This review article examines the role of extended reality technologies in knee arthroplasty. METHODS Existing literature on the applications of extended reality technologies in preoperative planning and intraoperative navigation were reviewed. A sample workflow of a novel IVR simulator for improving surgical training was also provided to demonstrate its utility in educating trainees on knee arthroplasty techniques. RESULTS Extended reality technologies enable the surgeon to visualise patient-specific anatomy in real-time, enhancing preoperative planning and providing intraoperative guidance. IVR technology has the potential to revolutionise modern surgical training and optimise surgical performance in a cost-efficient manner, with current evidence demonstrating favourable immediate skill acquisition and transfer. CONCLUSIONS Extended reality technologies have a myriad of potential applications in orthopaedic surgery. Further research is needed to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of its incorporation into training programmes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Graham S Goh
- Rothman Orthopaedic Institute at Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Ryan Lohre
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Javad Parvizi
- Rothman Orthopaedic Institute at Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Danny P Goel
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada. .,Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of British Columbia, 321 Water Street, Suite 500, Vancouver, BC, V6B 1B8, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Austin MS, Ashley BS, Bedard NA, Bezwada HP, Hannon CP, Fillingham YA, Kolwadkar YV, Rees HW, Grosso MJ, Zeegen EN. What is the Level of Evidence Substantiating Commercial Payers' Coverage Policies for Total Joint Arthroplasty? J Arthroplasty 2021; 36:2665-2673.e8. [PMID: 33867209 DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2021.03.036] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/11/2020] [Revised: 03/08/2021] [Accepted: 03/14/2021] [Indexed: 02/02/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The prevalence of total joint arthroplasty (TJA) in the United States has drawn the attention of health care stakeholders. The payers have also used a variety of strategies to regulate the medical necessity of these procedures. The purpose of this study was to examine the level of evidence of the coverage policies being used by commercial payers in the United States. METHODS The references of the coverage policies of four commercial insurance companies were reviewed for type of document, level of evidence, applicability to a TJA population, and success of nonoperative treatment in patients with severe degenerative joint disease. RESULTS 282 documents were reviewed. 45.8% were primary journal articles, 14.2% were level I or II, 41.2% were applicable to patients who were candidates for TJA, and 9.9% discussed the success of nonoperative treatment in patients who would be candidates for TJA. CONCLUSION Most of the references cited by commercial payers are of a lower level of scientific evidence and not applicable to patients considered to be candidates for TJA. This is relatively uniform across the reviewed payers. The dearth of high-quality literature cited by commercial payers reflects the lack of evidence and difficulty in conducting high level studies on the outcomes of nonoperative versus operative treatment for patients with severe, symptomatic osteoarthritis. Patients, surgeons, and payers would all benefit from such studies and we encourage professional societies to strive toward that end through multicenter collaboration.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matthew S Austin
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rothman Orthopaedic Institute at Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Blair S Ashley
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rothman Orthopaedic Institute at Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Nicholas A Bedard
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Iowa Hospitals & Clinics, Iowa City, IA
| | | | - Charles P Hannon
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, The Mayo Clinic, Ochester, MN
| | - Yale A Fillingham
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rothman Orthopaedic Institute at Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Yogesh V Kolwadkar
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, VA Central California Health Care System, Fresno, CA
| | - Harold W Rees
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Loyola University Medical Center, Maywood, IL
| | - Matthew J Grosso
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rothman Orthopaedic Institute at Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA; Connecticut Joint Replacement Institute, Hartford, CT
| | - Erik N Zeegen
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of California Los Angeles, Santa Monica, CA
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Patientenspezifische Instrumentierung und Totalendoprothesen am Knie. ARTHROSKOPIE 2021. [DOI: 10.1007/s00142-021-00460-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/21/2022]
Abstract
Zusammenfassung
Hintergrund
Die patientenspezifische Instrumentierung (PSI) ist eine vielversprechende neue Technologie in der orthopädischen Chirurgie, die das Ziel verfolgt, die Implantationstechnik der Knietotalendoprothese (Knie-TEP) im Vergleich zur konventionellen Instrumentierung zu vereinfachen und präziser zu machen. Ziel dieses Artikels ist es, Vorteile und Grenzen der PSI für die primäre Knie-TEP zu beschreiben.
Material und Methoden
Es erfolgte eine umfassende Literaturrecherche zum Thema PSI in der Knieprothetik hinsichtlich Evidenz für Planung, Präzision, klinische Ergebnisse, intraoperative Parameter sowie Kosten und Effizienz.
Ergebnisse
Die dreidimensionale Computertomographie (CT) weist in der präoperativen Planung der Knie-TEP eine höhere Genauigkeit auf als 2‑D-Röntgenaufnahmen. Die meisten Arbeiten postulierten keine signifikanten Effekte zugunsten der Genauigkeit der PSI gegenüber der Standard-Knie-TEP. Aber sie berichteten auch nicht, dass die Genauigkeit mit PSI schlechter sei. Hinsichtlich des klinischen Outcomes gibt es genügend Konsens unter den veröffentlichten Studien, um festzuhalten, dass es kurz- und mittelfristig keinen Unterschied zwischen Patienten gibt, die mit PSI oder konventioneller Technik operiert wurden. Eine große Metaanalyse konnte weder eine kürzere Operationszeit noch eine geringere Komplikationsrate für die PSI-Knie-TEP feststellen. Lediglich der intraoperative Blutverlust erwies sich als niedriger im Vergleich zur Standardtechnik, jedoch mit unveränderter Transfusionsrate. Kosteneffektivitätsanalysen lassen schlussfolgern, dass die PSI aktuell (noch) nicht kosteneffektiv ist.
Diskussion
Obwohl die aktuell vorliegenden Studienergebnisse die PSI-Technologie hinsichtlich vieler messbaren Kriterien nicht eindeutig von der Standardtechnik abheben, zeigt die PSI viele theoretische und praktische Vorteile.
Collapse
|
18
|
Sezer HB, Bohu Y, Hardy A, Lefevre N. Knee Prosthesis in the Computer Era. Orthop Surg 2021; 13:395-401. [PMID: 33506615 PMCID: PMC7957434 DOI: 10.1111/os.12762] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/03/2020] [Revised: 06/24/2020] [Accepted: 06/25/2020] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
Over the past two decades, computer assistance has revolutionalized surgery and has enabled enormous advancements in knee prosthesis surgery. Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is a hot topic of orthopaedic research. Reflecting population dynamics, its use continues to increase, especially in high demand populations. Therefore, efforts to achieve the best fit and precise alignment in TKA continue. Computer assistance is valuable for knee prosthesis surgeons in this regard. This manuscript investigated the use of computer assistance in knee prosthesis surgery. The effects of computer use on important facets of knee prosthesis surgery, such as precision, clinical aspects, and costs, were examined. Moreover, an overall review of the recent literature on the navigation and personalized cutting guides was conducted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Yoann Bohu
- Clinique du Sport Paris VParisFrance
- Institut de L'Appareil Locomoteur NolletParisFrance
| | - Alexandre Hardy
- Clinique du Sport Paris VParisFrance
- Institut de L'Appareil Locomoteur NolletParisFrance
| | - Nicolas Lefevre
- Clinique du Sport Paris VParisFrance
- Institut de L'Appareil Locomoteur NolletParisFrance
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
León-Muñoz VJ, Parrinello A, Manca S, Galloni G, López-López M, Martínez-Martínez F, Santonja-Medina F. Patient-Specific Instrumentation Accuracy Evaluated with 3D Virtual Models. J Clin Med 2021; 10:jcm10071439. [PMID: 33916110 PMCID: PMC8036812 DOI: 10.3390/jcm10071439] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/09/2021] [Revised: 03/20/2021] [Accepted: 03/24/2021] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Abstract
There have been remarkable advances in knee replacement surgery over the last few decades. One of the concerns continues to be the accuracy in achieving the desired alignment. Patient-specific instrumentation (PSI) was developed to increase component placement accuracy, but the available evidence is not conclusive. Our study aimed to determine a PSI system’s three-dimensional accuracy on 3D virtual models obtained by post-operative computed tomography. We compared the angular placement values of 35 total knee arthroplasties (TKAs) operated within a year obtained with the planned ones, and we analyzed the possible relationships between alignment and patient-reported outcomes. The mean (SD) discrepancies measured by two experienced engineers to the planned values observed were 1.64° (1.3°) for the hip–knee–ankle angle, 1.45° (1.06°) for the supplementary angle of the femoral lateral distal angle, 1.44° (0.97°) for the proximal medial tibial angle, 2.28° (1.78°) for tibial slope, 0.64° (1.09°) for femoral sagittal flexion, and 1.42° (1.06°) for femoral rotation. Neither variables related to post-operative alignment nor the proportion of change between pre-and post-operative alignment influenced the patient-reported outcomes. The evaluated PSI system’s three-dimensional alignment analysis showed a statistically significant difference between the angular values planned and those obtained. However, we did not find a relevant effect size, and this slight discrepancy did not impact the clinical outcome.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vicente J. León-Muñoz
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Traumatology, Hospital Clínico Universitario Virgen de la Arrixaca, Ctra. Madrid-Cartagena, s/n, 30120 Murcia, Spain; (F.M.-M.); (F.S.-M.)
- Correspondence:
| | - Andrea Parrinello
- Product Management Department, Medacta International SA, Strada Regina, 6874 Castel San Pietro, Switzerland;
| | - Silvio Manca
- Patient Matched Technology Department, Medacta International SA, Strada Regina, 6874 Castel San Pietro, Switzerland; (S.M.); (G.G.)
| | - Gianluca Galloni
- Patient Matched Technology Department, Medacta International SA, Strada Regina, 6874 Castel San Pietro, Switzerland; (S.M.); (G.G.)
| | - Mirian López-López
- Subdirección General de Tecnologías de la Información, Servicio Murciano de Salud, Avenida Central, 7, Edificio Habitamia, Espinardo, 30100 Murcia, Spain;
| | - Francisco Martínez-Martínez
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Traumatology, Hospital Clínico Universitario Virgen de la Arrixaca, Ctra. Madrid-Cartagena, s/n, 30120 Murcia, Spain; (F.M.-M.); (F.S.-M.)
- Department of Surgery, Pediatrics and Obstetrics & Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Murcia, 30100 Murcia, Spain
| | - Fernando Santonja-Medina
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Traumatology, Hospital Clínico Universitario Virgen de la Arrixaca, Ctra. Madrid-Cartagena, s/n, 30120 Murcia, Spain; (F.M.-M.); (F.S.-M.)
- Department of Surgery, Pediatrics and Obstetrics & Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Murcia, 30100 Murcia, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
The Bony Resection Accuracy with Patient-Specific Instruments during Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Retrospective Case Series Study. BIOMED RESEARCH INTERNATIONAL 2021; 2021:8674847. [PMID: 33644230 PMCID: PMC7902140 DOI: 10.1155/2021/8674847] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/04/2020] [Revised: 12/23/2020] [Accepted: 01/27/2021] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
Purpose Bony resection is the primary step during total knee arthroplasty. The accuracy of bony resection was highly addressed because it was deemed to have a good relationship with mechanical line. Patient-specific instruments (PSI) were invented to copy the bony resection references from the preoperative surgical plan during a total knee arthroplasty (TKA); however, the accuracy still remains controversial. This study was aimed at finding out the accuracy of the bony resection during PSI-assisted TKA. Methods Forty-two PSI-assisted TKAs (based on full-length leg CT images) were analyzed retrospectively. Resected bones of every patient were given a CT scan, and three-dimensional radiographs were reconstructed. The thickness of each bony resection was measured with the three-dimensional radiographs and recorded. The saw blade thickness (1.27 mm) was added to the measurements, and the results represented intraoperative bone resection thickness. A comparison between intraoperative bone resection thickness and preoperatively planned thickness was conducted. The differences were calculated, and the outliers were defined as >3 mm. Results The distal femoral condyle had the most accurate bone cuts with the smallest difference (median, 1.0 mm at the distal medial femoral condyle and 0.8 mm at the distal lateral femoral condyle) and the least outliers (none at the distal medial femoral condyle and 1 (2.4%) at the distal lateral femoral condyle). The tibial plateau came in second (median difference, 0.8 mm at the medial tibial plateau and 1.4 mm at the lateral tibial plateau; outliers, none at the medial tibial plateau and 1 (2.6%) at the lateral tibial plateau). Regardless of whether the threshold was set to >2 mm (14 (17.9%) at the tibial plateau vs. 12 (14.6%) at the distal femoral condyle, p > 0.05) or >3 mm (1 (1.3%) at the tibial plateau vs. 1 (1.2%) at the distal femoral condyle, p > 0.05), the accuracy of tibial plateau osteotomy was similar to that of the distal femoral condyle. Osteotomy accuracy at the posterior femoral condyle and the anterior femoral condyle were the worst. Outliers were up to 6 (15.0%) at the posterior medial femoral condyle, 5 (12.2%) at the posterior lateral femoral condyle, and 6 (15.8%) at the anterior femoral condyle. The percentages of overcut and undercut tended to 50% in most parts except the lateral tibial plateau. At the lateral tibial plateau, the undercut percentage was twice that of the overcut. Conclusion The tibial plateau and the distal femoral condyle share a similar accuracy of osteotomy with PSI. PSI have a generally good accuracy during the femur and tibia bone resection in TKA. PSI could be a kind of user-friendly tool which can simplify TKA with good accuracy. Level of Evidence. This is a Level IV case series with no comparison group.
Collapse
|
21
|
Cantré D, Langner S, Kaule S, Siewert S, Schmitz KP, Kemmling A, Weber MA. Three-dimensional imaging and three-dimensional printing for plastic preparation of medical interventions. Radiologe 2021; 60:70-79. [PMID: 32926194 DOI: 10.1007/s00117-020-00739-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
Three-dimensional (3D) imaging has been available for nearly four decades and is regarded as state of the art for visualization of anatomy and pathology and for procedure planning in many clinical fields. Together with 3D image reconstructions in the form of rendered virtual 3D models, it has helped to better perceive complex anatomic and pathologic relations, improved preprocedural measuring and sizing of implants, and nowadays enables even photorealistic quality. However, presentation on 2D displays limits the 3D experience. Novel 3D printing technologies can transfer virtual anatomic models into true 3D space and produce both patient-specific models and medical devices constructed by computer-aided design. Individualized anatomic models hold great potential for medical and patient education, research, device development and testing, procedure training, preoperative planning, and fabrication of individualized instruments and implants. Hand in hand with 3D imaging, medical 3D printing has started to revolutionize medicine in certain fields and new applications are developed and introduced regularly. The demand for medical 3D printing will likely continue to rise, as it is a promising tool for plastic preparation of medical interventions. However, there is ongoing debate on the appropriateness of medical 3D printing and further research on its efficiency is needed. As experts in 3D imaging, radiologists are not only capable of advising on adequate imaging parameters, but should also become adept in 3D printing to participate in on-site 3D printing facilities and randomized controlled trials on the topic, thus contributing to improving patient outcomes via personalized medicine through patient-specific preparation of medical interventions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniel Cantré
- Institute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Pediatric Radiology and Neuroradiology, Rostock University Medical Center, Ernst-Heydemann-Str. 6, 18057, Rostock, Mecklenburg Western Pomerania, Germany.
| | - Sönke Langner
- Institute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Pediatric Radiology and Neuroradiology, Rostock University Medical Center, Ernst-Heydemann-Str. 6, 18057, Rostock, Mecklenburg Western Pomerania, Germany
| | - Sebastian Kaule
- Institute for Implant Technology and Biomaterials e. V., associated Institution of the University of Rostock, Friedrich-Barnewitz-Straße 4, 18119, Rostock-Warnemünde, Germany
| | - Stefan Siewert
- Institute for Implant Technology and Biomaterials e. V., associated Institution of the University of Rostock, Friedrich-Barnewitz-Straße 4, 18119, Rostock-Warnemünde, Germany
| | - Klaus-Peter Schmitz
- Institute for Implant Technology and Biomaterials e. V., associated Institution of the University of Rostock, Friedrich-Barnewitz-Straße 4, 18119, Rostock-Warnemünde, Germany.,Institute for Biomedical Engineering, Rostock University Medical Center, Friedrich-Barnewitz-Straße 4, 18119, Rostock-Warnemünde, Germany
| | - André Kemmling
- Institute of Neuroradiology, University Hospital Luebeck, Ratzeburger Allee 160, 23562, Luebeck, Germany
| | - Marc-André Weber
- Institute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Pediatric Radiology and Neuroradiology, Rostock University Medical Center, Ernst-Heydemann-Str. 6, 18057, Rostock, Mecklenburg Western Pomerania, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
High intra- and inter-observer reliability of planning implant size in MRI-based patient-specific instrumentation for total knee arthroplasty. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2021; 29:573-578. [PMID: 32232539 PMCID: PMC7892674 DOI: 10.1007/s00167-020-05946-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/20/2019] [Accepted: 03/17/2020] [Indexed: 11/21/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Patient-specific instrumentation (PSI) in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) uses individually designed disposable guides to determine intraoperative bone cuts. The manufacturer provides the surgeon with proposed planning which can be modified and should be approved by the surgeon before the guides are produced. This study aims to assess the intra- and inter-observer reliability among preoperative planning by orthopaedic surgeons using PSI. The authors hypothesize a high intra- and inter-observer reliability in planning TKA using PSI. METHODS Four orthopaedic surgeons modified and approved 40 preoperative MRI-based PSI plannings three times. The surgeons were blinded to their own and each other's results. Intra- and inter-observer reliability was obtained for planned implant size, resection, and position of the implant. RESULTS Intra-observer reliability Intraclass Correlation Coefficients (ICC) were excellent for femoral and tibial implant size with a range of 0.948-0.995 and 0.919-0.988, respectively. Inter-observer reliability for femoral and tibial implant size showed an ICC range of 0.953-0.982 and 0.839-0.951, respectively. Next to implant size, intra- and inter-observer reliability demonstrated good to an excellent agreement (ICC > 0.75) for 7 out of 12 remaining parameters and 6 out of 12 remaining parameters, respectively. CONCLUSION Preoperative planning of TKA implant size using MRI-based PSI showed excellent intra- and inter-observer reliability. Further research on the comparison of predicted implant size preoperatively to intraoperative results is needed.
Collapse
|
23
|
Broberg JS, Naudie DDR, Howard JL, Vasarhelyi EM, McCalden RW, Teeter MG. Contact kinematics of patient-specific instrumentation versus conventional instrumentation for total knee arthroplasty. Knee 2020; 27:1501-1509. [PMID: 33010767 DOI: 10.1016/j.knee.2020.07.092] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/14/2020] [Revised: 06/24/2020] [Accepted: 07/30/2020] [Indexed: 02/02/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The goal was to evaluate the joint contact kinematics of total knee arthroplasties implanted using patient-specific instrumentation (PSI) compared to conventional instrumentation (CI). We hypothesized that use of PSI would not significantly alter contact kinematics. METHODS The study was a prospective randomized controlled trial, with equal allocation of fifty patients to PSI and CI groups. At two years post-operation, patients underwent weight-bearing stereo X-ray examinations at 0°, 20°, 40°, 60°, 80°, and 100° of flexion. The shortest tibiofemoral distance on each condyle determined the contact location. Magnitude of the shortest distance was measured and condylar separation was analyzed using thresholds of 0.5 and 0.75 mm. Kinematic measurements derived from the shortest distance included anteroposterior (AP) translation, excursion, axial rotation, and paradoxical anterior motion. Pivot position and cam/post contact were also investigated. RESULTS There were no differences (p > 0.05) in medial and lateral AP contact locations, excursions, and magnitude of anterior motion, or in axial rotation, pivot patterns, frequency of cam/post engagement, frequency of medial anterior motion, and condylar separation at a 0.75 mm threshold. Significant differences were found in frequency of lateral anterior motion (p = 0.048) and condylar separation at a 0.5 mm threshold (p = 0.010). Both groups displayed typical kinematics for a fixed-bearing posterior-stabilized implant. CONCLUSIONS We found no major differences in knee kinematics between PSI and CI groups, which suggest that PSI does not provide a significant kinematic advantage over conventional instruments.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jordan S Broberg
- Department of Medical Biophysics, Schulich School of Medicine and Dentistry, Western University, 1151 Richmond Street, London, ON N6A 3K7, Canada; Imaging Research Laboratories, Robarts Research Institute, Schulich School of Medicine and Dentistry, Western University, 1151 Richmond Street, London, ON N6A 3K7, Canada; Surgical Innovation Program, Lawson Health Research Institute, 750 Base Line Road East, Suite 300, London, ON N6C 2R5, Canada.
| | - Douglas D R Naudie
- Department of Medical Biophysics, Schulich School of Medicine and Dentistry, Western University, 1151 Richmond Street, London, ON N6A 3K7, Canada; Imaging Research Laboratories, Robarts Research Institute, Schulich School of Medicine and Dentistry, Western University, 1151 Richmond Street, London, ON N6A 3K7, Canada; Division of Orthopaedic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Schulich School of Medicine and Dentistry, Western University and London Health Sciences Centre, 339 Windermere Road, London, ON N6A 5A5, Canada
| | - James L Howard
- Division of Orthopaedic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Schulich School of Medicine and Dentistry, Western University and London Health Sciences Centre, 339 Windermere Road, London, ON N6A 5A5, Canada
| | - Edward M Vasarhelyi
- Division of Orthopaedic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Schulich School of Medicine and Dentistry, Western University and London Health Sciences Centre, 339 Windermere Road, London, ON N6A 5A5, Canada
| | - Richard W McCalden
- Division of Orthopaedic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Schulich School of Medicine and Dentistry, Western University and London Health Sciences Centre, 339 Windermere Road, London, ON N6A 5A5, Canada
| | - Matthew G Teeter
- Department of Medical Biophysics, Schulich School of Medicine and Dentistry, Western University, 1151 Richmond Street, London, ON N6A 3K7, Canada; Imaging Research Laboratories, Robarts Research Institute, Schulich School of Medicine and Dentistry, Western University, 1151 Richmond Street, London, ON N6A 3K7, Canada; Surgical Innovation Program, Lawson Health Research Institute, 750 Base Line Road East, Suite 300, London, ON N6C 2R5, Canada; Division of Orthopaedic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Schulich School of Medicine and Dentistry, Western University and London Health Sciences Centre, 339 Windermere Road, London, ON N6A 5A5, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Are There Differences in Accuracy or Outcomes Scores Among Navigated, Robotic, Patient-specific Instruments or Standard Cutting Guides in TKA? A Network Meta-analysis. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2020; 478:2105-2116. [PMID: 32530896 PMCID: PMC7431275 DOI: 10.1097/corr.0000000000001324] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/31/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Several kinds of cutting guides, including patient-specific instrumentation, navigation, standard cutting guides, accelerometer-based navigation, and robotic guidance, are available to restore a planned alignment during TKA. No previous study has simultaneously compared all of these devices; a network meta-analysis is an especially appealing method because it allows comparisons across approaches that were not compared head-to-head in individual randomized controlled trials. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES We performed a network meta-analysis to determine whether novel approaches to achieving implant alignment, such as patient-specific instrumentation, navigation, accelerometer-based navigation, and robotic guidance, provide any advantage over standard cutting guides in terms of: (1) hip-knee-ankle (HKA) alignment outliers greater than ± 3°, (2) outcome scores (1989 - Knee Society Score and WOMAC score) measured 6 months after surgery, or (3) femoral and tibial implant malalignment (greater than ± 3°), taken separately, in the frontal and sagittal plane, as well as other secondary outcomes including validated outcome scores 1 and 2 years after surgery. METHODS In our network meta-analysis, we included randomized controlled trials comparing the different cutting guides by using at least one of the previously specified criteria, without limitation on language or date of publication. We searched electronic databases, major orthopaedic journals, proceedings of major orthopaedic meetings, ClinicalTrials.gov, and the World Health Organization's International Clinical Trials Registry Platform until October 1, 2018. This led to the inclusion of 90 randomized controlled trials involving 9389 patients (mean age 68.8 years) with 10,336 TKAs. Two reviewers independently selected trials and extracted data. The primary outcomes were the proportion patients with malalignment of the HKA angle (defined as HKA > 3° from neutral) and the Knee Society Score and WOMAC scores at 6 months postoperatively. We combined direct and indirect comparisons using a Bayesian network meta-analysis framework to assess and compare the effect of different cutting guides on outcomes. Bayesian estimates are based on the posterior distribution of an endpoint and are called credible intervals. Usually the 95% credible interval, corresponding to a posterior probability of 0.95 that the endpoint lies in the interval, is computed. Unlike the frequentist approach, the Bayesian approach does not allow the calculation of the p value. RESULTS The proportion of HKA outliers was lower with navigation than with patient-specific instrumentation (risk ratio 0.46 [95% credible interval (CI) 0.34 to 0.63]) and standard cutting guides (risk ratio 0.45 [95% CI 0.37 to 0.53]); however, this corresponded to an actual difference of only 12% of patients for navigation versus 21% of patients for patient-specific instrumentation, and 12% of patients for navigation versus 25% for standard cutting guides. We found no differences for other comparisons between different cutting guides, including robotics and the accelerometer. We found no differences in the Knee Society Score or WOMAC score between the different cutting guides at 6 months. Regarding secondary outcomes, navigation reduced the risk of frontal and sagittal malalignments for femoral and tibial components compared with the standard cutting guides, but none of the other cutting guides showed superiority for the other secondary outcomes. CONCLUSIONS Navigation resulted in approximately 10% fewer patients having HKA outliers of more than 3°, without any corresponding improvement in validated outcomes scores. It is unknown whether this incremental reduction in the proportion of patients who have alignment outside a window that itself has been called into question will justify the increased costs and surgical time associated with the approach. We believe that until or unless these new approaches either (1) convincingly demonstrate superior survivorship, or (2) convincingly demonstrate superior outcomes, surgeons and hospitals should not use these approaches since they add cost, have a learning curve (during which some patients may be harmed), and have the risks associated with uncertainty of novel surgical approaches. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Level I, therapeutic study.
Collapse
|
25
|
León-Muñoz VJ, Parrinello A, López-López M, Martínez-Martínez F, Santonja-Medina F. Revision of total knee arthroplasty with the use of patient-specific instruments: an alternative surgical technique. Expert Rev Med Devices 2020; 17:795-806. [PMID: 32729346 DOI: 10.1080/17434440.2020.1803737] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Accuracy in the placement of components in revision total knee arthroplasty (R-TKA) surgery is sometimes challenging. The applicability of patient‑specific instruments (PSI) in knee surgery has progressively expanded to types of surgery other than primary arthroplasty. Could this assistive technology be used to facilitate accurate R-TKA surgery? The aim of the current manuscript is to describe this new application of PSI for revision of TKA-to-TKA and to provide a step-by-step technical guideline for use. AREAS COVERED We will describe the application and a detailed description of PSI technology to TKA revision surgery, step-by-step, from CT images acquisition for preoperative planning and PSI blocks production to the surgery. EXPERT COMMENTARY The system can facilitate the accomplishment of the bony cuts for optimal implant placement and that can be useful in minimally altering the femoral and the tibial joint line. It is obvious that technology alone will not replace surgical skill and that accuracy of the system will also depend on the quality of the CT images and the ability of the software to prevent metal artifacts. Despite that, our initial results are promising and prove that the concept of applying PSI technology to the R-TKA surgery is feasible.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vicente J León-Muñoz
- Orthopaedic Surgery and Traumatology Department, Hospital Clínico Universitario Virgen de la Arrixaca , Murcia, Spain
| | | | - Mirian López-López
- Subdirección General de Tecnologías de la Información. Servicio Murciano de Salud , Murcia, Spain
| | - Francisco Martínez-Martínez
- Orthopaedic Surgery and Traumatology Department, Hospital Clínico Universitario Virgen de la Arrixaca , Murcia, Spain.,Faculty of Medicine, University of Murcia , Murcia, Spain
| | - Fernando Santonja-Medina
- Orthopaedic Surgery and Traumatology Department, Hospital Clínico Universitario Virgen de la Arrixaca , Murcia, Spain.,Faculty of Medicine, University of Murcia , Murcia, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
León-Muñoz VJ, López-López M, Martínez-Martínez F, Santonja-Medina F. Impact of surgical instrumentation on hospital length of stay and cost of total knee arthroplasty. Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res 2020; 21:299-305. [PMID: 32564699 DOI: 10.1080/14737167.2020.1778468] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND We aimed to analyze the impact of two different types of surgical instrumentation (conventional manual instrumentation (CI) and patient-specific instrumentation (PSI)) on length of stay (LOS) and objectify differences in cost. We hypothesized that there are no differences in the LOS and cost due to the instrumentation system used. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS LOS was registered using inpatient admission data provided by the Institutional Management Control Department. We recorded the costs associated with each procedure that could be influenced by the use of one system or another during the in-hospital stay. We conducted a prospectively single-center cohort study of 305 TKAs. Surgery was performed with conventional CI in 122 cases and with PSI in 183 cases. RESULTS The mean LOS for the CI group was 4.29 days (SD 1.65) and 4.22 days (SD 1.26), for the PSI group. No significant difference among both instrumentation systems was obtained. When comparing global costs, the mean cost was slightly higher (without a significant difference) for the PSI cases (€3110.24 vs. €2852.7 for the CI cases). CONCLUSIONS LOS and overall cost, in hospitals with a low annual TKA surgery volume, are unrelated to conventional or patient-specific instrumentation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vicente J León-Muñoz
- Department of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Hospital Clínico Universitario Virgen de la Arrixaca, Murcia, Spain
| | - Mirian López-López
- Subdirección General de Tecnologías de la Información, Servicio Murciano de Salud, Murcia, Spain
| | - Francisco Martínez-Martínez
- Department of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Hospital Clínico Universitario Virgen de la Arrixaca, Murcia, Spain.,Faculty of Medicine, University of Murcia, Murcia, Spain
| | - Fernando Santonja-Medina
- Department of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Hospital Clínico Universitario Virgen de la Arrixaca, Murcia, Spain.,Faculty of Medicine, University of Murcia, Murcia, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Patient-Specific or Conventional Instrumentations: A Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. BIOMED RESEARCH INTERNATIONAL 2020; 2020:2164371. [PMID: 32258107 PMCID: PMC7085852 DOI: 10.1155/2020/2164371] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/11/2019] [Accepted: 02/13/2020] [Indexed: 02/05/2023]
Abstract
Objective To conduct a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to compare knee arthroplasty with patient-specific instrumentation (PSI) with the conventional instrumentation (CI). Methods RCTs were selected in PubMed and Embase from 2012 to 2018. Key data extracted included malalignment of mechanical axis, blood loss, surgical time, Oxford Knee Score (OKS), Knee Society Score (KSS), length of stay, and complications. Subgroup analysis was also performed regarding different PSI systems and different image processing methods. Results 29 RCTs with 2487 knees were eligible for the meta-analysis. Results showed that PSI did not improve the alignment of the mechanical axis compared with CI, but MRI-based PSI and Visionaire-specific PSI decrease the risk of malalignment significantly (P = 0.04 and P = 0.04 and P = 0.04 and P = 0.04 and P = 0.04 and Conclusion PSI reduced the blood loss and improved KSS. MRI-based PSI reduced operative time and risk of malalignment of mechanical axis compared with CT-based PSI. Moreover, Visionaire-specific PSI achieves better alignment result of the mechanical axis than other systems.
Collapse
|
28
|
Zahn RK, Graef F, Conrad JL, Renner L, Perka C, Hommel H. Accuracy of tibial positioning in the frontal plane: a prospective study comparing conventional and innovative techniques in total knee arthroplasty. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 2020; 140:793-800. [PMID: 32124032 PMCID: PMC7244465 DOI: 10.1007/s00402-020-03389-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/18/2019] [Indexed: 12/05/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Coronal alignment of the tibial component determines functional outcome and survival in total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Innovative techniques for tibial instrumentation have been developed to improve accuracy and reduce the rate of outliers. METHODS In a prospective study, 300 patients were allocated to four different groups using a randomization process (two innovative and two conventional) techniques of tibial instrumentation (conventional: extramedullary, intramedullary; innovative: navigation and patient-specific instrumentation (PSI); n = 75 for each group). The aims were to reconstruct the medial proximal tibial angle (MPTA) to 90° and the mechanical tibio-femoral axis (mTFA) to 0°. Both angles were evaluated and compared between all groups three months after the surgery. Patients who presented with a postoperative mTFA > 3° were classified as outliers. RESULTS The navigation and intramedullary technique both demonstrated that they were significantly more precise in reconstructing a neutral mTFA and MPTA compared to the other two techniques. The odd's ratio (OR) for producing outliers was highest for the PSI method (PSI OR = 5.5, p < 0.05; extramedullary positioning OR = 3.7, p > 0.05; intramedullary positioning OR = 1.7, p > 0.05; navigation OR = 0.04, p < 0.05). We could only observe significant differences between pre- and postoperative MPTA in the navigation and intramedullary group. The MPTA showed a significant negative correlation with the mTFA in all groups preoperatively and in the extramedullary, intramedullary and PSI postoperatively. CONCLUSION The navigation and intramedullary instrumentation provided the precise positioning of the tibial component. Outliers were most common within the PSI and extramedullary technique. Optimal alignment is dependent on the technique of tibial instrumentation and tibial component positioning determines the accuracy in TKA since mTFA correlated with MPTA pre- and postoperatively.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- R. K. Zahn
- Center for Musculoskeletal Surgery, Charité–University Medicine Berlin, Charitéplatz 1, 10115 Berlin, Germany
| | - F. Graef
- Center for Musculoskeletal Surgery, Charité–University Medicine Berlin, Charitéplatz 1, 10115 Berlin, Germany ,Berlin Institute of Health, Anna-Louisa-Karsch-Straße 2, 10178 Berlin, Germany
| | - J. L. Conrad
- Center for Musculoskeletal Surgery, Charité–University Medicine Berlin, Charitéplatz 1, 10115 Berlin, Germany
| | - L. Renner
- Center for Musculoskeletal Surgery, Charité–University Medicine Berlin, Charitéplatz 1, 10115 Berlin, Germany
| | - C. Perka
- Center for Musculoskeletal Surgery, Charité–University Medicine Berlin, Charitéplatz 1, 10115 Berlin, Germany
| | - H. Hommel
- Center for Musculoskeletal Surgery, Charité–University Medicine Berlin, Charitéplatz 1, 10115 Berlin, Germany ,Department of Orthopaedics, Märkisch-Oderland Hospital, Brandenburg Medical School Theodor Fontane, Wriezen, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Pauzenberger L, Munz M, Brandl G, Frank JK, Heuberer PR, Laky B, Schwameis E, Anderl W. Patient-specific instrumentation improved three-dimensional accuracy in total knee arthroplasty: a comparative radiographic analysis of 1257 total knee arthroplasties. J Orthop Surg Res 2019; 14:437. [PMID: 31831022 PMCID: PMC6909617 DOI: 10.1186/s13018-019-1465-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/30/2019] [Accepted: 11/08/2019] [Indexed: 01/19/2023] Open
Abstract
Background The purpose of this study was to compare restoration of mechanical limb alignment and three-dimensional component-positioning between conventional and patient-specific instrumentation in total knee arthroplasty. Methods Radiographic data of patients undergoing mobile-bearing total knee arthroplasty (n = 1257), using either conventional (n = 442) or patient-specific instrumentation (n = 812), were analyzed. To evaluate accuracy of axis restoration and 3D-component-positioning between conventional and patient-specific instrumentation, absolute deviations from the targeted neutral mechanical limb alignment and planned implant positions were determined. Measurements were performed on standardized coronal long-leg and sagittal knee radiographs. CT-scans were evaluated for accuracy of axial femoral implant rotation. Outliers were defined as deviations from the targeted neutral mechanical axis of > ± 3° or from the intraoperative component-positioning goals of > ± 2°. Deviations greater than ± 5° from set targets were considered to be severe outliers. Results Deviations from a neutral mechanical axis (conventional instrumentation: 2.3°± 1.7° vs. patient-specific instrumentation: 1.7°± 1.2°; p < 0.001) and numbers of outliers (conventional instrumentation: 25.8% vs. patient-specific instrumentation: 10.1%; p < 0.001) were significantly lower in the patient-specific instrumentation group. Significantly lower mean deviations and less outliers were detected regarding 3D-component-positioning in the patient-specific instrumentation compared to the conventional instrumentation group (all p < 0.05). Conclusions Patient-specific instrumentation prevented from severe limb malalignment and component-positioning outliers (> ± 5° deviation). Use of patient-specific instrumentation proved to be superior to conventional instrumentation in achieving more accurate limb alignment and 3D-component positioning, particularly regarding femoral component rotation. Furthermore, the use of patient-specific instrumentation successfully prevented severe (> 5° deviation) outliers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Leo Pauzenberger
- Vienna Shoulder & Sports Clinic, Vienna, Austria.,Sports Surgery Clinic, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Martin Munz
- Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Georg Brandl
- Vienna Shoulder & Sports Clinic, Vienna, Austria
| | | | - Philipp R Heuberer
- Vienna Shoulder & Sports Clinic, Vienna, Austria.,Austrian Research Group for Regenerative and Orthopedic Medicine (AURROM), Vienna, Austria.,Health Pi, Vienna, Austria
| | - Brenda Laky
- Vienna Shoulder & Sports Clinic, Vienna, Austria.,Austrian Research Group for Regenerative and Orthopedic Medicine (AURROM), Vienna, Austria.,MedSciCare, Vienna, Austria
| | | | - Werner Anderl
- Vienna Shoulder & Sports Clinic, Vienna, Austria. .,Austrian Research Group for Regenerative and Orthopedic Medicine (AURROM), Vienna, Austria. .,Shoulder & Sports Center, Mödling, Austria.
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Kazarian GS, Lawrie CM, Barrack TN, Donaldson MJ, Miller GM, Haddad FS, Barrack RL. The Impact of Surgeon Volume and Training Status on Implant Alignment in Total Knee Arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2019; 101:1713-1723. [PMID: 31577676 DOI: 10.2106/jbjs.18.01205] [Citation(s) in RCA: 37] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/01/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Implant malalignment may predispose patients to prosthetic failure following total knee arthroplasty (TKA). A more thorough understanding of the surgeon-specific factors that contribute to implant malalignment following TKA may uncover actionable strategies for improving implant survival. The purpose of this study was to determine the impact of surgeon volume and training status on malalignment. METHODS In this retrospective multicenter study, we performed a radiographic analysis of 1,570 primary TKAs performed at 4 private academic and state-funded centers in the U.S. and U.K. Surgeons were categorized as high-volume (≥50 TKAs/year) or low-volume (<50 TKAs/year), and as a trainee (fellow/resident under the supervision of an attending surgeon) or a non-trainee (attending surgeon). On the basis of these designations, 3 groups were defined: high-volume non-trainee, low-volume non-trainee, and trainee. The postoperative medial distal femoral angle (DFA), medial proximal tibial angle (PTA), and posterior tibial slope angle (PSA) were radiographically measured. Outlier measurements were defined as follows: DFA, outside of 5° ± 3° of valgus; PTA, >±3° deviation from the neutral axis; and PSA, <0° or >7° of flexion for cruciate-retaining or <0° or >5° of flexion for posterior-stabilized TKAs. "Far outliers" were defined as measurements falling >± 2° outside of these ranges. The proportions of outliers were compared between the groups using univariate and multivariate analyses. RESULTS When comparing the high and low-volume non-trainee groups using univariate analysis, the proportions of knees with outlier measurements for the PTA (5.3% versus 17.4%) and PSA (17.4% versus 28.3%) and the proportion of total outliers (11.8% versus 20.7%) were significantly lower in the high-volume group (all p < 0.001). The proportions of DFA (1.9% versus 6.5%), PTA (1.8% versus 5.7%), PSA (5.5% versus 12.6%), and total far outliers (3.1% versus 8.3%) were also significantly lower in the high-volume non-trainee group (all p < 0.001). Compared with the trainee group, the high-volume non-trainee group had significantly lower proportions of DFA (12.6% versus 21.6%), PTA (5.3% versus 12.0%), PSA (17.4% versus 33.3%), and total outliers (11.8% versus 22.3%) (all p < 0.001) as well as DFA (1.9% versus 3.9%; p = 0.027), PSA (5.5% versus 12.6%; p < 0.001), and total far outliers (3.1% versus 6.4%; p = 0.004). No significant differences were identified when comparing the low-volume non-trainee group and the trainee group, with the exception of PTA outliers (17.4% versus 12.0%; p = 0.041) and PTA far outliers (5.7% versus 2.6%; p = 0.033). Findings from multivariate analysis accounting for the effects of patient age, body mass index, and individual surgeon demonstrated similar results. CONCLUSIONS Low surgical volume and trainee status were risk factors for outlier and far-outlier malalignment in primary TKA, even when accounting for differences in individual surgeon and patient characteristics. Trainee surgeons performed similarly, and certainly not inferiorly, to low-volume non-trainee surgeons. Even among high-volume non-trainees, the best-performing cohort in our study, the proportion of TKA alignment outliers was still high. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Therapeutic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gregory S Kazarian
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Washington University in St. Louis School of Medicine, Barnes-Jewish Hospital, St. Louis, Missouri
| | - Charles M Lawrie
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Washington University in St. Louis School of Medicine, Barnes-Jewish Hospital, St. Louis, Missouri
| | - Toby N Barrack
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Washington University in St. Louis School of Medicine, Barnes-Jewish Hospital, St. Louis, Missouri
| | - Matthew J Donaldson
- Department of Trauma and Orthopaedic Surgery, University College London Hospitals, London, United Kingdom.,Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, The Princess Grace Hospital, London, United Kingdom
| | - Gary M Miller
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, John Cochran Veterans Hospital-VA St. Louis Health Care System, St. Louis, Missouri
| | - Fares S Haddad
- Department of Trauma and Orthopaedic Surgery, University College London Hospitals, London, United Kingdom.,Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, The Princess Grace Hospital, London, United Kingdom
| | - Robert L Barrack
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Washington University in St. Louis School of Medicine, Barnes-Jewish Hospital, St. Louis, Missouri
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Hernández-Vaquero D, Noriega-Fernandez A, Roncero-Gonzalez S, Perez-Coto I, Sierra-Pereira AA, Sandoval-Garcia MA. Agreement in component size between preoperative measurement, navigation and final implant in total knee replacement. J Orthop Translat 2019; 18:84-91. [PMID: 31508311 PMCID: PMC6718877 DOI: 10.1016/j.jot.2018.10.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/18/2018] [Revised: 10/23/2018] [Accepted: 10/29/2018] [Indexed: 10/27/2022] Open
Abstract
Background One of the possible causes of dissatisfaction reported by many patients after total knee replacement (TKR) is the lack of agreement between component size and bone structure. To avoid this complication and facilitate the procedure, preoperative planning with digitized templates is recommended. Surgical navigation indicates the best position and the most adequate size of arthroplasty and may therefore replace preoperative radiographic measurement. The objective of the study was to check agreement between the sizes of TKR components measured before surgery with digitized templates, the size recommended by the navigation and sizes actually implanted. Methods In 103 patients scheduled for TKR, preoperative full-limb radiography was performed to measure the mechanical and anatomical axes of the limb, femur and tibia. The most adequate size of the femoral and tibial components was planned by superimposing digitized templates. The size recommended in navigation and the size of the finally implanted components were also recorded. Results A high level of agreement was found between the sizes of femoral and tibial components measured by X-rays and in navigation (0.750 and 0.772, respectively) (intraclass correlation and Cronbach's alpha). Agreement between the sizes recommended by X-rays and navigation and those finally implanted was 0.886 for the femur and 0.891 for the tibia. Agreement levels were not different in cases with prior deformities of limb axis. Conclusions The high level of agreement found in component sizes between radiographic measurement with digitized templates and navigation suggests that preoperative X-ray measurement is not needed when navigation is used for placement of implants during TKR. The translational potential of this article Computer-assisted surgery may avoid preoperative measurement with templates in TKR.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Ivan Perez-Coto
- Department of Orthopaedics, St Agustin University Hospital, Aviles, Spain
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
32
|
Laende EK, Richardson CG, Dunbar MJ. A randomized controlled trial of tibial component migration with kinematic alignment using patient-specific instrumentation versus mechanical alignment using computer-assisted surgery in total knee arthroplasty. Bone Joint J 2019; 101-B:929-940. [PMID: 31362561 DOI: 10.1302/0301-620x.101b8.bjj-2018-0755.r3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 62] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/26/2022]
Abstract
AIMS Patient-specific instrumentation of total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is a technique permitting the targeting of individual kinematic alignment, but deviation from a neutral mechanical axis may have implications on implant fixation and therefore survivorship. The primary objective of this randomized controlled study was to compare the fixation of tibial components implanted with patient-specific instrumentation targeting kinematic alignment (KA+PSI) versus components placed using computer-assisted surgery targeting neutral mechanical alignment (MA+CAS). Tibial component migration measured by radiostereometric analysis was the primary outcome measure (compared longitudinally between groups and to published acceptable thresholds). Secondary outcome measures were inducible displacement after one year and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMS) over two years. The secondary objective was to assess the relationship between alignment and both tibial component migration and inducible displacement. PATIENTS AND METHODS A total of 47 patients due to undergo TKA were randomized to KA+PSI (n = 24) or MA+CAS (n = 23). In the KA+PSI group, there were 16 female and eight male patients with a mean age of 64 years (sd 8). In the MA+CAS group, there were 17 female and six male patients with a mean age of 63 years (sd 7). Surgery was performed using cemented, cruciate-retaining Triathlon total knees with patellar resurfacing, and patients were followed up for two years. The effect of alignment on tibial component migration and inducible displacement was analyzed irrespective of study group. RESULTS There was no difference over two years in longitudinal migration of the tibial component between the KA+PSI and MA+CAS groups (reaching median maximum total point motion migration at two years of 0.40 mm for the KA+PSI group and 0.37 mm for the MA+CAS group, p = 0.82; p = 0.68 adjusted for age, sex, and body mass index (BMI) for all follow-ups). Both groups had mean migrations below acceptable thresholds. There was no difference in inducible displacement (p = 0.34) or PROMS (p = 0.61 for the Oxford Knee Score) between groups. There was no correlation between alignment and tibial component migration or alignment and inducible displacement. These findings support non-neutral alignment as a viable option with this component, with no evidence that it compromises fixation. CONCLUSION Kinematic alignment using patient-specific instrumentation in TKA was associated with acceptable tibial component migration, indicating stable fixation. These results are supportive of future investigations of kinematic alignment. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2019;101-B:929-940.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- E K Laende
- Department of Surgery, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Canada.,QEII Health Sciences Centre, Nova Scotia Health Authority, Halifax, Canada
| | - C G Richardson
- Department of Surgery, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Canada.,QEII Health Sciences Centre, Nova Scotia Health Authority, Halifax, Canada
| | - M J Dunbar
- Department of Surgery, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Canada.,QEII Health Sciences Centre, Nova Scotia Health Authority, Halifax, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Tong F, Dannaway J, Enke O, Eslick G. Effect of preoperative psychological interventions on elective orthopaedic surgery outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. ANZ J Surg 2019; 90:230-236. [PMID: 31334592 DOI: 10.1111/ans.15332] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/07/2018] [Revised: 05/09/2019] [Accepted: 05/26/2019] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Orthopaedic surgery is largely successful; however, a proportion of patients are dissatisfied and report pain and poor function. Psychological factors have been shown to influence orthopaedic surgical outcomes. This systematic review and meta-analysis investigates the types and effectiveness of preoperative psychological interventions in elective orthopaedic surgery. METHODS A registered systematic review (PROSPERO CRD42017073833) was performed on literature (1960-January 2018) using eight databases. Prospective controlled clinical trials involving adult and adolescent elective orthopaedic surgery were included. Interventions examined included relaxation, cognitive behavioural therapy, hypnosis, emotional counselling and mixed psychotherapies; general procedural education was excluded. Outcomes extracted included pain, anxiety, quality of life and disability. RESULTS A total of 19 studies met the inclusion criteria (n = 1893 patients). Meta-analyses were performed for pain, anxiety and quality of life. Analysis did not find enough evidence to confirm reduction in post-operative pain (seven studies, 666 patients; g = -0.15 (95% CI -0.42, 0.13), P = 0.305). Pooled data from six studies on acute post-operative anxiety (589 patients) showed a moderate statistically significant benefit (g = -0.26 (-0.49, -0.03), P = 0.024). There was an improved quality of life (mental component) at longer term follow-up (g = 0.25 (0.02, 0.49), P = 0.034). CONCLUSIONS These studies provide evidence that psychological interventions have a positive effect on anxiety in the acute post-operative period, and on mental components of quality of life at longer term follow-up.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Felice Tong
- Nepean Clinical School, Sydney Medical Program, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Jasan Dannaway
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Nepean Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Oliver Enke
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Nepean Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Guy Eslick
- Nepean Clinical School, Sydney Medical Program, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Randelli PS, Menon A, Pasqualotto S, Zanini B, Compagnoni R, Cucchi D. Patient-Specific Instrumentation Does Not Affect Rotational Alignment of the Femoral Component and Perioperative Blood Loss in Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Prospective, Randomized, Controlled Trial. J Arthroplasty 2019; 34:1374-1381.e1. [PMID: 30979672 DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2019.03.018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/20/2018] [Revised: 02/17/2019] [Accepted: 03/06/2019] [Indexed: 02/01/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Proposed aims of patient-specific instrumentation (PSI) for total knee arthroplasty (TKA) are to improve accuracy of component alignment, while reducing blood loss and surgical time. The primary goal of this prospective, randomized, controlled, clinical trial is to verify whether PSI improves the rotational alignment of the femoral component in comparison to conventionally implanted TKA. METHODS One-hundred thirty-three consecutive patients were assessed for eligibility. Block randomization was performed to allocated patients in the treatment (PSI) or control group. During hospital stay, surgical times were recorded, and total blood volume loss and estimated red blood cell were calculated. Two months after surgery, a computed tomography of the knee was obtained to measure femoral component rotation to the transepicondylar axis and tibial component slope. RESULTS Sixty-nine patients were enrolled. PSI did neither result in a significant improvement in femoral component rotation nor result in a reduction of outliers, as compared with conventional instrumentation. No significant improvement in terms of tibial slope, blood loss, total surgical time, and ischemia time could be identified. The number of tibial recuts required in the PSI group was significantly higher than in the control group (P = .0003). CONCLUSION PSI does not improve the accuracy of femoral component rotation in TKA in comparison to conventional instrumentation. Moreover, PSI did not appear to influence any of the other variables investigated as secondary goals by this study. The results of this study do not support its routine use during standard TKA. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Level I, randomized, controlled trial.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pietro S Randelli
- Department of Biomedical Sciences for Health, Laboratory of Applied Biomechanics, Università degli Studi di Milano, Milan, Italy; 1° Clinica Ortopedica, ASST Centro Specialistico Ortopedico Traumatologico Gaetano Pini-CTO, Milan, Italy
| | - Alessandra Menon
- Department of Biomedical Sciences for Health, Laboratory of Applied Biomechanics, Università degli Studi di Milano, Milan, Italy; 1° Clinica Ortopedica, ASST Centro Specialistico Ortopedico Traumatologico Gaetano Pini-CTO, Milan, Italy
| | - Stefano Pasqualotto
- Divisione di Ortopedia e Traumatologia, IRCCS Ospedale Classificato Equiparato Sacro Cuore - Don Calabria, Negrar, Italy
| | - Beatrice Zanini
- Dipartimento di Scienze della Salute, Università del Piemonte Orientale A. Avogadro, Novara, Italy
| | - Riccardo Compagnoni
- 1° Clinica Ortopedica, ASST Centro Specialistico Ortopedico Traumatologico Gaetano Pini-CTO, Milan, Italy
| | - Davide Cucchi
- Department of Biomedical Sciences for Health, Laboratory of Applied Biomechanics, Università degli Studi di Milano, Milan, Italy; Department of Orthopaedics and Trauma Surgery, Universitätsklinikum Bonn, Bonn, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
León-Muñoz VJ, Martínez-Martínez F, López-López M, Santonja-Medina F. Patient-specific instrumentation in total knee arthroplasty. Expert Rev Med Devices 2019; 16:555-567. [PMID: 31154870 DOI: 10.1080/17434440.2019.1627197] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is one of the most commonly performed orthopedic procedures. During the past decade, patient-specific instrumentation (PSI) has been commercially introduced in order to simplify and make TKA surgery more effective, precise and efficient than conventional mechanical instrumentation (CI) and computer-assisted surgery (CAS). Nevertheless, there are critical arguments against PSI for routine use. The aim of the current manuscript is to describe advantages and limitations of PSI for primary TKA. AREAS COVERED By means of a description of the available literature different aspects are discussed (accuracy, clinical and functional outcomes, operative time, blood loss, efficiency and costs). EXPERT OPINION Most publications do not claim a significant increase in PSI accuracy over CI, but they also do not postulate PSIs accuracy is worse either. Regarding clinical aspects, PSI did not appear to give any advantage over standard techniques although, equally, it did not appear to show any disadvantages. PSI seems to reduce operative time, could reduce perioperative blood loss and provides logistical benefits in the operation room. Further studies will be required to more thoroughly assess all the advantages and disadvantages of this promising technology as an alternative to CI and CAS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vicente J León-Muñoz
- a Orthopaedic Surgery and Traumatology Department , Hospital Clínico Universitario Virgen de la Arrixaca , Murcia , Spain
| | - Francisco Martínez-Martínez
- a Orthopaedic Surgery and Traumatology Department , Hospital Clínico Universitario Virgen de la Arrixaca , Murcia , Spain.,b Faculty of Medicine , University of Murcia , Murcia , Spain
| | - Mirian López-López
- c Subdirección General de Tecnologías de la Información. Servicio Murciano de Salud , Murcia , Spain
| | - Fernando Santonja-Medina
- a Orthopaedic Surgery and Traumatology Department , Hospital Clínico Universitario Virgen de la Arrixaca , Murcia , Spain.,b Faculty of Medicine , University of Murcia , Murcia , Spain
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Attard A, Tawy GF, Simons M, Riches P, Rowe P, Biant LC. Health costs and efficiencies of patient-specific and single-use instrumentation in total knee arthroplasty: a randomised controlled trial. BMJ Open Qual 2019; 8:e000493. [PMID: 31206056 PMCID: PMC6542447 DOI: 10.1136/bmjoq-2018-000493] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/31/2018] [Revised: 03/19/2019] [Accepted: 03/20/2019] [Indexed: 01/17/2023] Open
Abstract
Aim To investigate whether patient-specific instrumentation (PSI) and single-use instrumentation (SUI) improve operating room efficiency in terms of time and cost to the healthcare provider over conventional/reusable instrumentation (CVR) when performing total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Patients and methods Patients requiring TKA were randomised into one of four surgical groups: CVR, CVS (conventional/SUI), PSR (PSI/reusable) and PSS (PSI/SUI). All surgical procedures were video recorded to determine specific surgical time intervals. Other variables reported included the number of instrument trays used, missing equipment, direct instrument costs and the weight of the instruments the staff had to handle. Oxford Knee Score (OKS), estimated blood loss and lengths of hospital stay were also recorded as markers of patient experience. Results PSR was significantly quicker in all the recorded time intervals, used less trays, experienced less missing equipment and resulted in lower blood loss and shorter hospital stays. SUI reported significantly slower operating room times and resulted in higher blood loss, but SUI was 88% lighter and 20% cheaper on average when compared with their reusable counterparts. Despite the economic advantages of PSI and SUI, the patients who reported greatest improvements in OKS were those allocated to the CVR group, but no clinically meaningful difference in OKS was found at any time point. Conclusions PSI and SUI for TKA have the potential of reducing operating room times over conventional, reusable sets. This reduction will benefit theatre personnel ergonomically, while presenting the healthcare provider with potential cost-saving benefits in terms of reduced sterilisation costs and surgical times.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andre Attard
- Biomedical Engineering, University of Strathclyde, Glasgow, UK
| | - Gwenllian Fflur Tawy
- Division of Cell Matrix Biology and Regenerative Medicine, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Michiel Simons
- Clinical Surgery, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Philip Riches
- Biomedical Engineering, University of Strathclyde, Glasgow, UK
| | - Philip Rowe
- Biomedical Engineering, University of Strathclyde, Glasgow, UK
| | - Leela C Biant
- Division of Cell Matrix Biology and Regenerative Medicine, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Teeter MG, Marsh JD, Howard JL, Yuan X, Vasarhelyi EM, McCalden RW, Naudie DDR. A randomized controlled trial investigating the value of patient-specific instrumentation for total knee arthroplasty in the Canadian healthcare system. Bone Joint J 2019; 101-B:565-572. [DOI: 10.1302/0301-620x.101b5.bjj-2018-1323.r1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/05/2022]
Abstract
Aims The purpose of the present study was to compare patient-specific instrumentation (PSI) and conventional surgical instrumentation (CSI) for total knee arthroplasty (TKA) in terms of early implant migration, alignment, surgical resources, patient outcomes, and costs. Patients and Methods The study was a prospective, randomized controlled trial of 50 patients undergoing TKA. There were 25 patients in each of the PSI and CSI groups. There were 12 male patients in the PSI group and seven male patients in the CSI group. The patients had a mean age of 69.0 years (sd 8.4) in the PSI group and 69.4 years (sd 8.4) in the CSI group. All patients received the same TKA implant. Intraoperative surgical resources and any surgical waste generated were recorded. Patients underwent radiostereometric analysis (RSA) studies to measure femoral and tibial component migration over two years. Outcome measures were recorded pre- and postoperatively. Overall costs were calculated for each group. Results There were no differences (p > 0.05) in any measurement of migration at two years for either the tibial or femoral components. Movement between one and two years was < 0.2 mm, indicating stable fixation. There were no differences in coronal or sagittal alignment between the two groups. The PSI group took a mean 6.1 minutes longer (p = 0.04) and used a mean 3.4 less trays (p < 0.0001). Total waste generated was similar (10 kg) between the two groups. The PSI group cost a mean CAD$1787 more per case (p < 0.01). Conclusion RSA criteria suggest that both groups will have revision rates of approximately 3% at five years. The advantages of PSI were minimal or absent for surgical resources used and waste eliminated, and for meeting target alignment, yet had significantly greater costs. Therefore, we conclude that PSI may not offer any advantage over CSI for routine primary TKA cases. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2019;101-B:565–572.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M. G. Teeter
- Department of Surgery, Schulich School of Medicine & Dentistry, Western University and London Health Science Centre, London, Canada
- Department of Medical Biophysics, Schulich School of Medicine &Dentistry, Western University, London, Canada
- Surgical Innovation Program, Lawson Health Research Institute, London, Canada
- Imaging Research Laboratories, Robarts Research Institute, London, Canada
- Bone and Joint Institute, Western University, London, Canada
| | - J. D. Marsh
- Bone and Joint Institute, Western University, London, Canada
- School of Physical Therapy, Faculty of Health Sciences, Western University, London, Canada
| | - J. L. Howard
- Department of Surgery, Schulich School of Medicine & Dentistry, Western University and London Health Science Centre, London, Canada
| | - X. Yuan
- Imaging Research Laboratories, Robarts Research Institute, London, Canada
| | - E. M. Vasarhelyi
- Department of Surgery, Schulich School of Medicine & Dentistry, Western University and London Health Science Centre, London, Canada
| | - R. W. McCalden
- Department of Surgery, Schulich School of Medicine & Dentistry, Western University and London Health Science Centre, London, Canada
| | - D. D. R. Naudie
- Department of Surgery, Schulich School of Medicine & Dentistry, Western University and London Health Science Centre, London, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Cucchi D, Menon A, Aliprandi A, Soncini G, Zanini B, Ragone V, Compagnoni R, Ferrua P, Fossati C, Randelli P. Patient-specific Instrumentation Affects Rotational Alignment of the Femoral Component in Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial. Orthop Surg 2019; 11:75-81. [PMID: 30834703 PMCID: PMC6430487 DOI: 10.1111/os.12420] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/30/2018] [Revised: 12/10/2018] [Accepted: 12/13/2018] [Indexed: 12/04/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Davide Cucchi
- Department of Orthopaedics and Trauma Surgery, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany.,Laboratory of Applied Biomechanics, Department of Biomedical Sciences for Health, University of Milan, Monza, Italy
| | - Alessandra Menon
- Laboratory of Applied Biomechanics, Department of Biomedical Sciences for Health, University of Milan, Monza, Italy.,1° Clinica Ortopedica, ASST Centro Specialistico Ortopedico Traumatologico Gaetano Pini-CTO, Monza, Italy
| | | | | | - Beatrice Zanini
- IRCCS Policlinico San Donato, San Donato, Italy.,Department of Health Sciences, "Amedeo Avogadro" University of Eastern Piedmont, Novara, Italy
| | - Vincenza Ragone
- IRCCS Policlinico San Donato, San Donato, Italy.,Department of Health Sciences, "Amedeo Avogadro" University of Eastern Piedmont, Novara, Italy
| | - Riccardo Compagnoni
- 1° Clinica Ortopedica, ASST Centro Specialistico Ortopedico Traumatologico Gaetano Pini-CTO, Monza, Italy
| | - Paolo Ferrua
- Department of Knee Surgery, Azienda Socio Sanitaria Territoriale Centro Specialistico Ortopedico Traumatologico Gaetano Pini-CTO, Milan
| | - Chiara Fossati
- Laboratory of Applied Biomechanics, Department of Biomedical Sciences for Health, University of Milan, Monza, Italy.,1° Clinica Ortopedica, ASST Centro Specialistico Ortopedico Traumatologico Gaetano Pini-CTO, Monza, Italy
| | - Pietro Randelli
- Laboratory of Applied Biomechanics, Department of Biomedical Sciences for Health, University of Milan, Monza, Italy.,1° Clinica Ortopedica, ASST Centro Specialistico Ortopedico Traumatologico Gaetano Pini-CTO, Monza, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
The original Akagi line is the most reliable: a systematic review of landmarks for rotational alignment of the tibial component in TKA. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2019; 27:1018-1027. [PMID: 30203197 DOI: 10.1007/s00167-018-5131-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 39] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/05/2018] [Accepted: 09/05/2018] [Indexed: 10/28/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE There is no present consensus on the most reliable anatomical landmarks or axes for tibial rotational alignment in total knee arthroplasty (TKA). The goal was therefore to review the literature and compare accuracy and repeatability of different axes for tibial baseplate rotation in TKA. METHODS Medline and Embase were searched for articles that reported accuracy in terms of error or discrepancy from the trans-epicondylar axes (TEA), and/or repeatability in terms of intraclass correlation coefficient, of one or more axes used for tibial baseplate rotation in TKA. Twenty-one articles met criteria, and their data were extracted and tabulated. RESULTS The selected articles evaluated 15 different axes, 13 for reliability, 12 for repeatability. The lowest errors or discrepancies from the projected TEA were reported for the original 'Akagi line' (posterior cruciate ligament posteriorly to medial border of tibial tuberosity), its variant using the sulcus of the tibial spines as anterior landmark, as well as the anterior tibial border and the curve-on-curve technique. The best inter-observer repeatabilities were reported for 'Akagi line' variants that use the geometric centre of the tibial plateau posteriorly and the medial border of the tibial tuberosity, or the medial sixth of the patellar tendon anteriorly. Considering accuracy and repeatability simultaneously, only two axes were found to satisfy both criteria consistently: the original 'Akagi line' and the anterior tibial border. CONCLUSIONS Because of the small number of studies found, the collected evidence remains insufficient to recommend reference axes for intra-operative rotational alignment of the tibial baseplate in TKA. A combination of two or more anatomical landmarks or projected axes could be used to ensure adequate tibial baseplate rotation, while considering individual patient morphology and implant design to optimize knee kinematics and prevent prosthetic overhang. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Level IV, systematic review of level III and IV studies.
Collapse
|
40
|
Confalonieri N, Biazzo A. Computer-assisted surgery in total knee replacement: advantages, surgical procedure and review of the literature. ACTA BIO-MEDICA : ATENEI PARMENSIS 2019; 90:16-23. [PMID: 30889149 PMCID: PMC6502163 DOI: 10.23750/abm.v90i1.6319] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/26/2017] [Accepted: 05/03/2017] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
Abstract
Introduction: Total knee replacement (TKR) is one of the most frequent orthopaedic procedures performed every year. At the same time 20% of patients who underwent TKR are not satisfied with the outcome. The reasons are unknown; we think that a mechanical alignment beyond 3° of varus-valgus can represent the most important cause of failure of TKR and consequently patient dissatisfaction. Materials and Methods: Neutral mechanical alignment is the main goal in every TKR: this can be achieved through different tools, such as extramedullary and intramedullary guides, patient-specific instrumentation (PSI) and computer-assisted surgery (CAS). The aim of this review is to compare the different alignment techniques in TKR, to describe CAS procedure and CAS results in recent literature. Results: Regarding the intramedullary guide, there is an increased risk of fatty embolism; there are great limitations on its use, or even impossibility, in cases of bone deformity and sequelae of trauma. Regarding the extramedullary guide, it becomes more difficult to use in cases of great obesity or increased soft-tissue volume around the tibia. PSI for TKR has been introduced to improve alignment, reduce outliers, operation time and the risk of fatty embolism by avoidance of intramedullary canal violation. Recent randomized controlled trials and meta-analysis proved no advantage of PSI in improving mechanical axis and implant survivorship. Discussion: CAS has provided to be a useful tool in assisting the surgeon to achieve more accurate post-operative mechanical axis through precise and reproducible bone cuts and ligament balancing. Two meta-analyses definitively proved that CAS technique improves mechanical axis and implant survivorship and one recent meta-analysis demonstrated that CAS provides better mechanical alignment and higher functional scores at short-term follow-up. (www.actabiomedica.it)
Collapse
|
41
|
Gong S, Xu W, Wang R, Wang Z, Wang B, Han L, Chen G. Patient-specific instrumentation improved axial alignment of the femoral component, operative time and perioperative blood loss after total knee arthroplasty. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2019; 27:1083-1095. [PMID: 30377714 PMCID: PMC6435625 DOI: 10.1007/s00167-018-5256-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 39] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/04/2018] [Accepted: 10/19/2018] [Indexed: 12/29/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE The purpose of the present study was to compare patient-specific instrumentation (PSI) with standard instrumentation (SI) in patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty (TKA). PSI is hypothesized to have advantages with respect to component alignment; number of outliers (defined as alignment > 3° from the target alignment); operative time; perioperative blood loss; and length of hospital stay. This new surgical technique is expected to exhibit superior performance. METHODS A total of 23 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) involving 2058 knees that compared the clinical outcomes of TKA between PSI and SI were included in the present analysis; these RCTs were identified via a literature search of the PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases through March 1, 2018. The outcomes of interest included coronal, sagittal and axial component alignment (presented as the angle of deviation from the transcondylar line); number of outliers; operative time; perioperative blood loss; and length of hospital stay. RESULTS There was a significant difference in postoperative femoral axial alignment between PSI and SI patients (95% CI - 0.71 to - 0.21, p = 0.0004, I2 = 48%). PSI resulted in approximately 0.4° less deviation from the transcondylar line than SI. Based on our results, PSI reduced operative time by a mean of 7 min compared with SI (95% CI - 10.95 to - 3.75, p < 0.0001, I2 = 78%). According to the included literature, PSI reduced perioperative blood loss by approximately 90 ml compared with SI (95% CI - 146.65 to - 20.18, p = 0.01, I2 = 74%). We did not find any differences between PSI and SI with respect to any other parameters. CONCLUSIONS PSI has advantages in axial alignment of the femoral component, operative time, and perioperative blood loss relative to SI. No significant differences were found between PSI and SI with respect to alignment of the remaining components, number of outliers, or length of hospital stay. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Therapeutic study (systematic review and meta-analysis), Level I.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Song Gong
- 0000 0004 0368 7223grid.33199.31Department of Orthopaedics, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, 430022 China
| | - Weihua Xu
- Department of Orthopaedics, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, 430022, China.
| | - Ruoyu Wang
- 0000 0004 0368 7223grid.33199.31Department of Orthopaedics, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, 430022 China
| | - Zijian Wang
- 0000 0004 0368 7223grid.33199.31Department of Orthopaedics, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, 430022 China
| | - Bo Wang
- 0000 0004 0368 7223grid.33199.31Department of Rehabilitation, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, 430022 China
| | - Lizhi Han
- 0000 0004 0368 7223grid.33199.31Department of Orthopaedics, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, 430022 China
| | - Guo Chen
- 0000 0004 0368 7223grid.33199.31Department of Orthopaedics, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, 430022 China
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
A B, A M, N C. Computer-assisted versus intramedullary and extramedullary alignment system in total knee replacement: Long term follow-up. J Clin Orthop Trauma 2019; 10:555-559. [PMID: 31061589 PMCID: PMC6494757 DOI: 10.1016/j.jcot.2018.07.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/07/2017] [Accepted: 07/03/2018] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The aim of this work is to compare in a retrospective study, the radiological results of three series of different total knee replacements performed using Orthopilot computer-based alignment system (Group A, 31 patients), a totally intramedullary alignment system (Group B, 34 patients) and a totally extramedullary alignment system (Group C, 32 patients). MATERIALS AND METHODS At a medium follow-up of 15 years, all patients underwent call interview for clinical update. Of the 115 patients initially enrolled in the study, only 97 were available for radiological assessment. Both standing long-leg antero-posterior radiographs and lateral radiographs of the knee had been taken for every patient at 1 year-follow-up and at the last follow-up. RESULTS At the last follow-up, the mean hip-knee-ankle angle (HKA) was 179.1° (range: 176°-184°) for group A, 178.6° (range: 173°-186°) for group B and 177.8° (range: 172°-186°) for group C with no statistically significant difference among the 3 groups. The mean frontal femoral component angle (FFC) was 90.5° (range: 87°-94°) for group A, 91.05° (range: 85°-95°) for group B and 91.19° (range: 85°-96°) for group C and there was no statistically significant difference among the three groups. The mean frontal tibial component angle (FTC) was 89.9° (range: 83°-97°) for group A, 90.6° (range: 87°-95°) for group B and 90.8° (range: 86°-95°) for group C and there was no statistically significant difference among the three groups. The mean tibial component inclination in the sagittal plane was 1° (range: 3°-0°) for group A, 3.6° (range: 7°-0°) for group B and 3.1° (range: 6°-0°) for group C. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION Our results demonstrated statistically significant differences between computer-assisted and extramedullary group, in favour of navigated group in terms of implant position and mechanical alignment. Computer-assisted group showed superior but not statistically significant differences compared to intramedullary alignment system in terms of implant position and mechanical alignment. We advocate the use of computer-assisted system routinely in total knee replacement. As an alternative, we suggest the use of intramedullary system.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Biazzo A
- Orthopaedic Department, ASST Gaetano Pini-CTO, Via Bignami 1, 20126, Milano, Italy,Corresponding author.
| | - Manzotti A
- Orthopaedic Department, Ospedale Luigi Sacco, Via Giovanni Battista Grassi, 74, 20157, Milano, Italy
| | - Confalonieri N
- Orthopaedic Department, ASST Gaetano Pini-CTO, Via Bignami 1, 20126, Milano, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Price AJ, Alvand A, Troelsen A, Katz JN, Hooper G, Gray A, Carr A, Beard D. Knee replacement. Lancet 2018; 392:1672-1682. [PMID: 30496082 DOI: 10.1016/s0140-6736(18)32344-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 376] [Impact Index Per Article: 62.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/16/2018] [Revised: 09/13/2018] [Accepted: 09/19/2018] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
Knee replacement surgery is one of the most commonly done and cost-effective musculoskeletal surgical procedures. The numbers of cases done continue to grow worldwide, with substantial variation in utilisation rates across regions and countries. The main indication for surgery remains painful knee osteoarthritis with reduced function and quality of life. The threshold for intervention is not well defined, and is influenced by many factors including patient and surgeon preference. Most patients have a very good clinical outcome after knee replacement, but multiple studies have reported that 20% or more of patients do not. So despite excellent long-term survivorship, more work is required to enhance this procedure and development is rightly focused on increasing the proportion of patients who have successful pain relief after surgery. Changing implant design has historically been a target for improving outcome, but there is greater recognition that improvements can be achieved by better implantation methods, avoiding complications, and improving perioperative care for patients, such as enhanced recovery programmes. New technologies are likely to advance future knee replacement care further, but their introduction must be regulated and monitored with greater rigour to ensure patient safety.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrew J Price
- Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Science, Nuffield Orthopaedic Centre, Oxford, UK.
| | - Abtin Alvand
- Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Science, Nuffield Orthopaedic Centre, Oxford, UK
| | - Anders Troelsen
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Copenhagen University Hospital Hvidovre, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Jeffrey N Katz
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery and Division of Rheumatology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Gary Hooper
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Musculoskeletal Medicine, University of Otago, Christchurch, New Zealand
| | - Alastair Gray
- Health Economics Research Centre, Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Andrew Carr
- Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Science, Nuffield Orthopaedic Centre, Oxford, UK
| | - David Beard
- Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Science, Nuffield Orthopaedic Centre, Oxford, UK
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Tian H, Zhao MW, Geng X, Zhou QY, Li Y. Patient-Specific Instruments Based on Knee Joint Computed Tomography and Full-Length Lower Extremity Radiography in Total Knee Replacement. Chin Med J (Engl) 2018; 131:583-587. [PMID: 29483393 PMCID: PMC5850675 DOI: 10.4103/0366-6999.226062] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/08/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: Restoring good alignment after total knee replacement (TKR) is still a challenge globally, and the clinical efficiency of patient-specific instruments (PSIs) remains controversial. In this study, we aimed to explore the value and significance of three-dimensional printing PSIs based on knee joint computed tomography (CT) and full-length lower extremity radiography in TKR. Methods: Between June 2013 and October 2014, 31 TKRs were performed using PSIs based on knee joint CT and full-length lower extremity radiography in 31 patients (5 males and 26 females; mean age: 67.6 ± 7.9 years; body mass index [BMI]: 27.4 ± 3.5 kg/m2). Thirty-one matched patients (4 males and 27 females; mean age: 67.4 ± 7.2 years; mean BMI: 28.1 ± 4.6 kg/m2) who underwent TKR using conventional instruments in the same period served as the control group. The mean follow-up period was 38 months (31–47 months). Knee Society Score (KSS), surgical time, and postoperative drainage volume were recorded. Coronal alignment was measured on full-length radiography. Results: Twenty-three (74.2%) and 20 (64.5%) patients showed good postoperative alignment in the PSI and control groups, respectively, without significant difference between the two groups (χ2= 0.68, P = 0.409). The mean surgical time was 81.48 ± 16.40 min and 72.90 ± 18.10 min for the PSI and control groups, respectively, without significant difference between the two groups (t = 0.41, P = 0.055). The postoperative drainage volume was 250.9 ± 148.8 ml in the PSI group, which was significantly less than that in the control group (602.1 ± 230.6 ml, t = 6.83, P < 0.001). No significant difference in the KSS at the final follow-up was found between the PSI and control groups (91.06 ± 3.26 vs. 90.19 ± 3.84, t = 0.95, P = 0.870). Conclusions: The use of PSIs based on knee joint CT and standing full-length lower extremity radiography in TKR resulted in acceptable alignment compared with the use of conventional instruments, although the marginal advantage was not statistically different. Surgical time and clinical results were also similar between the two groups. However, the PSI group had less postoperative drainage.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hua Tian
- Department of Orthopedics, Peking University Third Hospital, Peking University, Beijing 100191, China
| | - Min-Wei Zhao
- Department of Orthopedics, Peking University Third Hospital, Peking University, Beijing 100191, China
| | - Xiao Geng
- Department of Orthopedics, Peking University Third Hospital, Peking University, Beijing 100191, China
| | - Qi-Yun Zhou
- Department of Orthopedics, Peking University Third Hospital, Peking University, Beijing 100191, China
| | - Yang Li
- Department of Orthopedics, Peking University Third Hospital, Peking University, Beijing 100191, China
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Villatte G, Muller AS, Pereira B, Mulliez A, Reilly P, Emery R. Use of Patient-Specific Instrumentation (PSI) for glenoid component positioning in shoulder arthroplasty. A systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One 2018; 13:e0201759. [PMID: 30133482 PMCID: PMC6104947 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0201759] [Citation(s) in RCA: 37] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/07/2018] [Accepted: 07/20/2018] [Indexed: 01/25/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Total Shoulder Arthroplasty (TSA) anatomical, reverse or both is an increasingly popular procedure but the glenoid component is still a weak element, accounting for 30-50% of mechanical complications and contributing to the revision burden. Component mal-positioning is one of the main aetiological factors in glenoid failure and thus Patient-Specific Instrumentation (PSI) has been introduced in an effort to optimise implant placement. The aim of this systematic literature review and meta-analysis is to compare the success of PSI and Standard Instrumentation (STDI) methods in reproducing pre-operative surgical planning of glenoid component positioning. MATERIAL AND METHODS A search (restricted to English language) was conducted in November 2017 on MEDLINE, the Cochrane Library, EMBASE and ClinicalTrials.gov. Using the search terms "Patient-Specific Instrumentation (PSI)", "custom guide", "shoulder", "glenoid" and "arthroplasty", 42 studies were identified. The main exclusion criteria were: no CT-scan analysis results; studies done on plastic bone; and use of a reusable or generic guide. Eligible studies evaluated final deviations from the planning for version, inclination, entry point and rotation. Reviewers worked independently to extract data and assess the risk of bias on the same studies. RESULTS The final analysis included 12 studies, comprising 227 participants (seven studies on 103 humans and five studies on 124 cadaveric specimens). Heterogeneity was moderate or high for all parameters. Deviations from the pre-operative planning for version (p<0.01), inclination (p<0.01) and entry point (p = 0.02) were significantly lower with the PSI than with the STDI, but not for rotation (p = 0.49). Accuracy (deviation from planning) with PSI was about 1.88° to 4.96°, depending on the parameter. The number of component outliers (>10° of deviation or 4mm) were significantly higher with STDI than with PSI (68.6% vs 15.3% (p = 0.01)). CONCLUSION This review supports the idea that PSI enhances glenoid component positioning, especially a decrease in the number of outliers. However, the findings are not definitive and further validation is required. It should be noted that no randomised clinical studies are available to confirm long-term outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Guillaume Villatte
- Service d'Orthopédie-Traumatologie, Hôpital Gabriel Montpied, Clermont Ferrand, France
- Université Clermont Auvergne, SIGMA Clermont CNRS, UMR 6296, Clermont-Ferrand, France
| | - Anne-Sophie Muller
- Service d'Orthopédie-Traumatologie, Hôpital Gabriel Montpied, Clermont Ferrand, France
| | - Bruno Pereira
- DRCI, CHU de Clermont Ferrand, Clermont Ferrand, France
| | | | - Peter Reilly
- Bioengineering Department, Imperial College, London, United Kingdom
| | - Roger Emery
- Bioengineering Department, Imperial College, London, United Kingdom
- Division of Surgery, Imperial College, London, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Klasan A, Dworschak P, Heyse TJ, Lahner M, Malcherczyk D, Efe T, El-Zayat BF. Patient-specific instruments’ routine use over conventional total knee arthroplasty remains inconclusive: Analysis of 961 cases. Technol Health Care 2018; 26:523-528. [DOI: 10.3233/thc-171167] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Antonio Klasan
- Center for Orthopaedics and Traumatology, University Clinic Marburg, Marburg, Germany
| | - Philipp Dworschak
- Center for Orthopaedics and Traumatology, University Clinic Marburg, Marburg, Germany
| | - Thomas J. Heyse
- Center for Orthopaedics and Traumatology, University Clinic Marburg, Marburg, Germany
| | - Matthias Lahner
- Joint Center Hilden, Ruhr-University Bochum, Bochum, Germany
| | - Dominik Malcherczyk
- Center for Orthopaedics and Traumatology, University Clinic Marburg, Marburg, Germany
| | - Turgay Efe
- Center for Orthopaedics and Traumatology, University Clinic Marburg, Marburg, Germany
| | - Bilal Farouk El-Zayat
- Center for Orthopaedics and Traumatology, University Clinic Marburg, Marburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Mannan A, Vun J, Lodge C, Eyre-Brook A, Jones S. Increased precision of coronal plane outcomes in robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Surgeon 2018; 16:237-244. [PMID: 29439922 DOI: 10.1016/j.surge.2017.12.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 30] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/02/2017] [Revised: 12/10/2017] [Accepted: 12/18/2017] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Inaccuracy of component alignment in total knee arthroplasty adversely impacts outcomes. Robotic systems improve translation of pre-operative planning to intra-operative steps, theoretically resulting in greater accuracy and precision. In this study we systematically review literature data of alignment outcomes and apply meta-analysis methods to assess whether robotic-assisted knee arthroplasty provides superior outcomes when compared to conventional knee prostheses. METHODS A PRISMA compliant search comparing alignment outcomes in robotic vs conventional knee arthroplasty was performed. Primary outcome measures were; number of three degree outliers and mean deviation from a neutral post-operative mechanical axis. RESULTS In total, from five studies reporting upon 402 knees, a post-operative mechanical axis malalignment of >3° occurred in 1/181 (0.006%) of robotic knees, and 42/159 (26.4%) of conventional knees with a meta-analysis odds ratio of 0.04 (95% CI 0.01-0.14), p < 0.00001 favouring robotic-assisted instrumentation. Meta-analysis also demonstrated weighted mean differences of post-operative mechanical axis alignment to be significantly more accurate in the robotic knee group: mean difference -0.63 (95% CI: -1.18,-0.08), z = 2.25, p = 0.02. Sensitivity analysis with inclusion of only Level 1 studies showed similar findings. CONCLUSIONS This systematic review and meta-analysis demonstrates clear evidence of increased accuracy of alignment in robotic-assisted knee arthroplasty with specific regard to reconstituting a neutral mechanical axis and minimising number of outliers in the coronal plane. Further studies and long term data is required in order to conclude on survivorship and functional outcomes.
Collapse
|
48
|
Siddiqi A, Hardaker WM, Eachempati KK, Sheth NP. Advances in Computer-Aided Technology for Total Knee Arthroplasty. Orthopedics 2017; 40:338-352. [PMID: 28877327 DOI: 10.3928/01477447-20170831-02] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/13/2017] [Accepted: 04/17/2017] [Indexed: 02/03/2023]
Abstract
Technology such as computer-assisted navigation systems, robotic-assisted systems, and patient-specific instrumentation has been increasingly explored during the past decade in an effort to optimize component alignment and improve clinical outcomes. Computer-assisted navigation accurately restores mechanical-axis alignment, but clinical outcome data are inconsistent. Computer-assisted navigation gap balancing has shown early promise in establishing mechanical-axis alignment with improved functional outcomes. Robotic-assisted systems more accurately restore component alignment when compared with computer-assisted navigation, but clinical outcomes have yet to be determined. Patient-specific instrumentation does not consistently improve alignment, accuracy, or patient outcomes. Studies demonstrating implant survivorship, cost-efficiency, and improved clinical outcomes and patient satisfaction are needed. [Orthopedics. 2017; 40(6):338-352.].
Collapse
|
49
|
Affiliation(s)
- Gwo-Chin Lee
- 1Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Nabavi A, Olwill CM, Do M, Wanasawage T, Harris IA. Patient-specific instrumentation for total knee arthroplasty. J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong) 2017; 25:2309499016684754. [PMID: 28139190 DOI: 10.1177/2309499016684754] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/31/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To assess the accuracy of total knee replacements (TKRs) performed using CT-based patient-specific instrumentation by postoperative CT scan. METHOD Approval from the Ethics Committee was granted prior to commencement of this study. Fifty prospective and consecutive patients who had undergone TKR (Evolis, Medacta International) using CT-based patient-specific instrumentation (MY KNEE, Medacta International) were assessed postoperatively using a CT scan and the validated Perth protocol measurement technique. The hip-knee-ankle (HKA) angle of the lower limb in the coronal plane; the coronal, sagittal, and rotational orientation of the femoral component; and the coronal and sagittal orientation of the tibial component were measured. These results were then compared to each patient's preoperative planning. The percentage of patients found to be less than or equal to 3° of planned alignment was calculated. One patient was excluded as the femoral cutting block did not fit the femur as predicted by planning and therefore underwent a conventional TKR. RESULTS Ninety-eight percent of patients were within 3° of planned alignment in the coronal plane reproducing the predicted HKA angle. Predicted coronal plane orientation of the tibial and femoral component was achieved in 100% and 96% of patients, respectively. The sagittal orientation of the femoral component was within 3° in 98% of patients. The planned sagittal positioning of the tibial component was achieved in 92% of patients. Furthermore, 90% of patients were found to have a femoral rotation within 3° of planning. Eighty-six percent of patients achieved good-to-excellent outcome at 12 months (Oxford Knee Score > 34). CONCLUSION We have found that TKR using this patient-specific instrumentation accurately reproduces preoperative planning in all six of the parameters measured in this study.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Arash Nabavi
- 1 Sydney Bone and Joint Clinic, Chipping Norton, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Caroline M Olwill
- 1 Sydney Bone and Joint Clinic, Chipping Norton, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Mike Do
- 2 Ultrascan Radiology, Campbelltown Private Hospital, Campbelltown, NSW, Australia
| | - Tanya Wanasawage
- 2 Ultrascan Radiology, Campbelltown Private Hospital, Campbelltown, NSW, Australia
| | - Ian A Harris
- 3 Ingham Institute for Applied Medical Research, South Western Sydney Clinical School, UNSW Australia, Liverpool, NSW, Australia
| |
Collapse
|