1
|
Maheshwari S, Arias M, Ubersax C, Tucker A, Bal S, Ravi G, Godby K, Costa LJ, Williams GR, Shrestha S, Bhatia S, Giri S. Understanding health outcome preferences of older adults diagnosed with multiple myeloma. J Geriatr Oncol 2024; 15:101781. [PMID: 38714092 DOI: 10.1016/j.jgo.2024.101781] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/18/2024] [Revised: 04/02/2024] [Accepted: 04/24/2024] [Indexed: 05/09/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Health outcome preferences of older adults with cancer vary based on burden/intensity of treatment and its impact on health outcomes such as survival, quality of life, and functional and cognitive well-being. We studied the association between age and health outcome preferences of adults with multiple myeloma (MM). MATERIALS AND METHODS Using a single center prospective cohort study, we identified adults ≥50y with MM who underwent geriatric assessment (GA) within 30 days of initiating a new line of therapy. We assessed health outcome preferences using a nine-item health outcome preference scale where patients were asked to prioritize varying treatment outcomes in a Likert scale. We compared the response patterns for each item by age group (50-69y vs ≥70y) using Mantel-Haenszel chi-squared test. For items significant in bi-variable analysis, we built proportional odds models to study the association between age and health outcome preferences adjusting for sex, race, frailty, and high risk cytogenetics. RESULTS We included 119 patients with a median age of 65y. Of these, 58% were male, 56% were non-Hispanic White, and 28% were frail. Older adults (≥70y) versus younger adults (50-69y) were more likely to prioritize health outcomes such as quality of life (53% vs. 34%), functional independence (74% vs. 33%), maintaining cognitive ability (79% vs. 54%), and living free from pain (50% vs 18%) over longer survival (all p values <0.05). In multivariable models, each one interquartile range (IQR) increase in age was associated with increased odds of prioritization of functional independence [adjusted odds ratio (aOR) 2.55, 95% confidence interval (CI) (1.44-4.53)], maintaining cognitive ability [aOR 1.75, 95% CI (1.01-3.02)], and willingness to take milder/ fewer treatments [aOR 2.40, 95% CI (1.36-4.26)] over longer survival. Similarly, each IQR increase in age was associated with decreased odds of prioritization of survival over quality of life [aOR 0.45, 95% CI (0.26-0.78)] and survival over being free from pain [aOR 0.39, 95% CI (0.22-0.69)]. DISCUSSION Three out of four older adults (age ≥ 70y) with MM rated other outcomes, particularly functional and cognitive well-being, above survival. Determining the most significant treatment outcomes for older adults with MM can aid in establishing treatment goals and enhance shared decision-making.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Supriya Maheshwari
- Institute for Cancer Outcomes and Survivorship, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA
| | - Miguel Arias
- Institute for Cancer Outcomes and Survivorship, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA
| | - Clare Ubersax
- Institute for Cancer Outcomes and Survivorship, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA
| | - Abigail Tucker
- Institute for Cancer Outcomes and Survivorship, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA
| | - Susan Bal
- Division of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA
| | - Gayathri Ravi
- Division of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA
| | - Kelly Godby
- Division of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA
| | - Luciano J Costa
- Division of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA
| | - Grant R Williams
- Institute for Cancer Outcomes and Survivorship, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA; Division of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA
| | - Sadeep Shrestha
- Department of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA
| | - Smita Bhatia
- Institute for Cancer Outcomes and Survivorship, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA; Division of Pediatric Hematology and Oncology, Department of Pediatrics, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA
| | - Smith Giri
- Institute for Cancer Outcomes and Survivorship, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA; Division of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Ayto R, Annibali O, Biedermann P, Roset M, Sánchez E, Kotb R. The EASEMENT study: A multicentre, observational, cross-sectional study to evaluate patient preferences, treatment satisfaction, quality of life, and healthcare resource use in patients with multiple myeloma receiving injectable-containing or fully oral therapies. Eur J Haematol 2024; 112:889-899. [PMID: 38389468 DOI: 10.1111/ejh.14180] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/31/2023] [Revised: 01/17/2024] [Accepted: 01/18/2024] [Indexed: 02/24/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE As multiple myeloma (MM) therapies advance, understanding patients', caregivers', and physicians' perspectives on, and satisfaction with, available treatment options and their impact on quality of life (QoL), is important. METHODS EASEMENT is a real-world, observational, cross-sectional study conducted in 19 sites within the UK, Canada, and Italy using retrospective chart reviews and surveys. Enrolled patients had clinical history available since diagnosis and had received ≥1 cycle of their current line of therapy. Primary objectives were to describe patient/caregiver QoL (EQ-5D-5L questionnaire), patient preference for oral/injectable therapies (single discrete-choice question), and patient satisfaction (TSQM-9 questionnaire). RESULTS Between October 2018 and March 2020, 399 patients were enrolled (n = 192 newly diagnosed multiple myeloma [NDMM], n = 206 relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma [RRMM], n = 1 missing). Among NDMM and RRMM patients, 78%/22% and 42%/58% were receiving injectables/orals, respectively. Both NDMM and RRMM patients significantly preferred orals versus injectables (p < .0001). No significant differences were reported in treatment satisfaction or QoL, but treatment convenience favoured orals over injectables with near significance (p = .053). CONCLUSION MM patients perceived greater convenience and preference for orals versus injectables. Oral treatments are useful for patients who cannot or prefer not to travel to clinics, or cannot perform self-injection within the community.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Robert Ayto
- Department of Haematology, Queen Alexandra Hospital, Portsmouth, UK
| | - Ombretta Annibali
- Hematology, Stem Cell Transplantation, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Campus Bio Medico di Roma, Rome, Italy
| | - Patricia Biedermann
- Medical Affairs, Europe & Canada, Takeda Pharmaceuticals International AG, Zurich, Switzerland
| | | | | | - Rami Kotb
- Medical Oncology & Hematology, CancerCare Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Clarke NA, Braverman J, Worthy G, Shaw JW, Bennett B, Dhanda D, Cocks K. A Review of Meaningful Change Thresholds for EORTC QLQ-C30 and FACT-G Within Oncology. VALUE IN HEALTH : THE JOURNAL OF THE INTERNATIONAL SOCIETY FOR PHARMACOECONOMICS AND OUTCOMES RESEARCH 2024; 27:458-468. [PMID: 38191023 DOI: 10.1016/j.jval.2023.12.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/13/2023] [Revised: 12/11/2023] [Accepted: 12/22/2023] [Indexed: 01/10/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES This literature review provides an overview of meaningful change thresholds for the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (QLQ-C30) and the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - General (FACT-G) used across hematological cancers and solid tumors (melanoma, lung, bladder, and prostate). METHODS Embase, MEDLINE, and PubMed were searched to identify relevant oncology publications from 2016 to 2021. Label claims from the US Food and Drug Administration and the European Medicines Agency for 7 recently approved drugs (pembrolizumab, atezolizumab, glasdegib, gilteritinib, tisagenlecleucel, axicabtagene ciloleucel, and daratumumab plus hyaluronidase-fihj) were reviewed. RESULTS Publications providing guidance on meaningful change thresholds for the QLQ-C30 displayed a growing trend away from broad "legacy" thresholds of 10 points for all QLQ-C30 scales), toward deriving "contemporary" thresholds (eg, subscale specific, population specific). Contemporary publications generally provide guidance on selecting thresholds for specific scales that account for improved or worsening thresholds (eg, QLQ-C30 subscales). This trend was not clear for FACT-G, with less new guidance available. Most clinical trials used in regulatory label submissions have used thresholds of 10 points for the QLQ-C30 subscales and 3 to 7 points for the FACT-G total score. Despite the availability of more recent guidelines, contemporary meaningful change thresholds seem slow to emerge in the published literature and regulatory labels. CONCLUSIONS Trialists should consider using contemporary thresholds, rather than legacy thresholds, for QLQ-C30 endpoints. Thresholds derived for a similar patient-population should be used where available. Further work is required to provide these across a broader range of cancer sites.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nathan A Clarke
- Statistics and Programming, Adelphi Values, Bollington, Cheshire, England, UK.
| | - Julia Braverman
- Worldwide Health and Economic Outcomes Research, Bristol Myers Squib, Princeton, NJ, USA
| | - Gill Worthy
- Statistics and Programming, Adelphi Values, Bollington, Cheshire, England, UK
| | - James W Shaw
- Worldwide Health and Economic Outcomes Research, Bristol Myers Squib, Princeton, NJ, USA
| | - Bryan Bennett
- Worldwide Health and Economic Outcomes Research, Bristol Myers Squib, Uxbridge, England, UK
| | - Devender Dhanda
- Worldwide Health and Economic Outcomes Research, Bristol Myers Squib, Princeton, NJ, USA
| | - Kim Cocks
- Statistics and Programming, Adelphi Values, Bollington, Cheshire, England, UK
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Shawahna R, Amer R, Salameh H, Shawahna AR, Aljondy M, Zain-Aldain M. Predictors of health-related quality of life of the patients treated for MM: the first study in the Palestinian healthcare system. Ann Hematol 2023; 102:3543-3554. [PMID: 37801084 DOI: 10.1007/s00277-023-05482-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/03/2023] [Accepted: 09/25/2023] [Indexed: 10/07/2023]
Abstract
Little studies were conducted to assess the health -related quality of life (HR-QoL) of patients with multiple myeloma (MM) in developing and resource-limited countries. This study assessed the HR-QoL of patients with MM who received treatment in the Palestinian healthcare system as an example of healthcare systems in developing and resource-limited countries. Predictors of deteriorated HR-QoL of the affected patients were also identified. In this cross-sectional study, the tool was a questionnaire that collected the demographic and disease variables of the patients. The questionnaire also contained the EORTC QLQ-MY24 items. The questionnaire was piloted to ensure readability, clarity, and comprehensibility. Additionally, the test-retest reliability and internal consistency were also assessed. In this study, 45.5% of patients with MM who were treated in the Palestinian healthcare system returned usable questionnaires. The mean age of the patients was 60.7 ± 7.5 years and the mean time elapsed since diagnosis was 2.6 ± 1.7 years. Of the patients, 54.3%, 47.8%, 46.7%, 66.3%, 46.7%, and 46.7% reported frequent bone pain, pain that increased with activity, back pain, feeling ill, lost hair, and feeling restless or agitated, respectively. Higher disease symptom scores were predicted by low self-rated satisfaction with the ability to do daily life activities and low self-rated satisfaction with overall health. The side effects of treatment scores were predicted by longer time elapsed since diagnosis and low self-rated satisfaction with overall health. Future perspective scores were predicted by low self-rated satisfaction with overall health. On the other hand, social support scores were predicted by having a university education and not receiving radiotherapy. Patients with MM who were treated in the Palestinian healthcare system reported a heavy burden of disease symptoms, treatment adverse effects, and dissatisfaction with the information they received about their disease. The findings reported in this study are informative to hemato-oncologists and other healthcare providers who care for patients with MM in Palestine and other developing and resource-limited countries. Policymakers might use the findings reported in this study to design interventions to improve the HR-QoL of the patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ramzi Shawahna
- Department of Physiology, Pharmacology and Toxicology, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, An-Najah National University, New Campus, Building: 19, Office: 1340, P.O. Box 7, Nablus, Palestine.
- Clinical Research Center, An-Najah National University Hospital, Nablus, 44839, Palestine.
| | - Riad Amer
- Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, An-Najah National University, P.O. Box 7, Nablus, Palestine
- Hematology and Oncology, An-Najah National University Hospital, Nablus, 44839, Palestine
| | - Husam Salameh
- Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, An-Najah National University, P.O. Box 7, Nablus, Palestine.
- Hematology and Oncology, An-Najah National University Hospital, Nablus, 44839, Palestine.
| | - Abdul-Rahman Shawahna
- Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, An-Najah National University, P.O. Box 7, Nablus, Palestine
| | - Mohmmad Aljondy
- Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, An-Najah National University, P.O. Box 7, Nablus, Palestine
| | - Mohmmad Zain-Aldain
- Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, An-Najah National University, P.O. Box 7, Nablus, Palestine
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Martínez-Lopez J, Bailey A, Lambert A, Luke E, Ribbands A, Erler-Yates N, Valluri S, Haefliger B, Gay F. Real-world treatment patterns, healthcare resource use and disease burden in patients with multiple myeloma in Europe. Future Oncol 2023; 19:2103-2121. [PMID: 37706245 DOI: 10.2217/fon-2023-0021] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 09/15/2023] Open
Abstract
Aim: To investigate treatment patterns, healthcare resource utilization and disease burden in patients with multiple myeloma (MM). Methods: Point-in-time survey of physicians and their patients presenting in a real-world clinical setting, collected across Europe between May and November 2021. Results: In total, 173 physicians provided data for 2179 patients with MM. Treatments received became more diverse as line of therapy increased, dictated by previous treatment choices. Overall, 25% of all patients were tri-exposed, and experienced a higher degree of healthcare resource utilization, disease burden and impairment than non-tri-exposed patients. Conclusion: The treatment landscape in MM is complex and evolving. There is an unmet need for more effective therapies to reduce disease burden, particularly in tri-exposed patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Emily Luke
- Adelphi Real World, Bollington, SK10 5JB, UK
| | | | | | | | | | - Francesa Gay
- Division of Hematology 1, Clinical trial unit AOU città della salute e della scienza, University of Torino, Torino, I-10125, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Chen Q, Jin Y, Li X, Zhang P, Pan W, Zhang D, Lin D, Chen W, Lin J. Comparison of tumor-derived total RNA and cell lysate on antitumor immune activity. Biomed Pharmacother 2023; 160:114377. [PMID: 36764134 DOI: 10.1016/j.biopha.2023.114377] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/30/2022] [Revised: 02/01/2023] [Accepted: 02/03/2023] [Indexed: 02/10/2023] Open
Abstract
Tumor-derived total RNA (TdRNA) and cell lysate (TCL), with almost all the relevant tumor antigens, represent attractive alternative sources of antigens in antitumor immunotherapy. However, the comparison of their capacity to elicit immune responses against breast cancer is still lacking. In this study, the antitumor immune effects of TdRNA and TCL were systematically compared. We isolated TdRNA and TCL from 4T1 mouse breast cancer cells, and found that both sources of antigens could stimulate the maturation of dendritic cells (DCs) at the cellular and in vivo levels, and induce robust cellular immune responses, as evidenced by the increased percentages of both CD4+ and CD8+ T cells in the inguinal lymph nodes and spleen. But TdRNA performed stronger immunoactivities than TCL on the increase of T cell population through DCs activation. Additionally, the synergistic antitumor efficacy of paclitaxel (PTX) with TdRNA and TCL respectively was further evaluated in the murine 4T1 tumor model. Compared with TCL, TdRNA could inhibit tumor growth more effectively with low systemic toxicity when combined with PTX, which was, at least in part, attributable to the improvement of systemic immune function and tumor immune infiltration. Overall, TdRNA outperforms TCL in antitumor immunity, and is expected to be a promising candidate for application as the source of tumor antigens.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Qi Chen
- The Clinical Department, College of Veterinary Medicine, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100193, China; Center of Research and Innovation of Chinese Traditional Veterinary Medicine, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100193, China
| | - Yipeng Jin
- The Clinical Department, College of Veterinary Medicine, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100193, China
| | - Xinqiu Li
- The Clinical Department, College of Veterinary Medicine, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100193, China
| | - Peihua Zhang
- The Clinical Department, College of Veterinary Medicine, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100193, China; Center of Research and Innovation of Chinese Traditional Veterinary Medicine, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100193, China
| | - Wanbing Pan
- The Clinical Department, College of Veterinary Medicine, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100193, China; Center of Research and Innovation of Chinese Traditional Veterinary Medicine, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100193, China
| | - Di Zhang
- The Clinical Department, College of Veterinary Medicine, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100193, China
| | - Degui Lin
- The Clinical Department, College of Veterinary Medicine, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100193, China
| | - Wen Chen
- Department of Pathology, The 8th Medical Center, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing 100091, China.
| | - Jiahao Lin
- The Clinical Department, College of Veterinary Medicine, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100193, China; Center of Research and Innovation of Chinese Traditional Veterinary Medicine, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100193, China.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Salek S, Ionova T, Oliva EN, Andreas M, Skoetz N, Kreuzberger N, Laane E. The Reporting, Use, and Validity of Patient-Reported Outcomes in Multiple Myeloma in Clinical Trials: A Systematic Literature Review. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:cancers14236007. [PMID: 36497488 PMCID: PMC9741479 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14236007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/24/2022] [Revised: 12/01/2022] [Accepted: 12/02/2022] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) are becoming increasingly important in supporting clinical outcomes in clinical trials. In multiple myeloma (MM), PRO measurement is useful to reveal how treatment affects physical, psychosocial, and functional behaviour as well as symptoms and treatment-related adverse events to evaluate the benefit-risk ratio of a particular drug or drug combination. We report the types of PRO instruments used in MM, the frequency in which they are utilised in randomised controlled trials (RCTs), and the consistency of their reporting. METHODS The European Hematology Association (EHA) supports the development of guidelines for the use of PROs in adult patients with haematological malignancies. The first step is the present systematic review of the literature. MEDLINE and CENTRAL were searched for RCTs in MM between 2015 and 2020. Study design, characteristics of MM and its treatment, the primary outcomes, and the types of PRO instrument(s) were extracted using a predefined template. Additionally, in a stepwise approach, it was assessed whether the identified instruments had been validated for multiple myeloma patients, patients with haematological malignancies, or cancer patients. RESULTS Following screening for RCTs, 283 studies were included for review from 10,707 records retrieved, and 118 of these planned the use of PRO measures. Thirty-eight PRO instruments were reported. The most frequently used instrument (92 studies) was the EORTC QLQ-30. The EORTC-MY20 MM-specific questionnaire was the second most frequently used (50 studies), together with the EQ-5D (50 studies). Only 19 PRO instruments reported were consistent with the trial registry. Furthermore, in 58 publications, the information on PRO instruments differed between the publication and the trial registry. Further, information on PRO in HTA reports was available for 26 studies, of which 18 reports were consistent with the trial registries. Out of the 38 instruments used, six had been validated for patients with multiple myeloma (the most frequently used), six for patients with haematological malignancies, and 10 for cancer patients in general. CONCLUSIONS The findings indicate that the measurement of PROs in RCTs for MM is underutilised, underreported, and often inconsistent. Guidelines for the appropriate use of PROs in MM are needed to ensure standardisation in selection and reporting. Furthermore, not all PRO instruments identified have been validated for myeloma patients or patients with haematological malignancies. Thus, guidelines for the appropriate use and reporting of PROs are needed in MM to ensure standardisation in the selection and reporting of PROs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sam Salek
- School of Life and Medical Sciences, University of Hertfordshire, Hatfield AL10 9AB, UK
- Correspondence:
| | - Tatiana Ionova
- Quality of Life Monitoring Department, Saint-Petersburg State University Hospital, 190103 Saint-Petersburg, Russia
| | - Esther Natalie Oliva
- Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Bianchi Melacrino Morelli, 89124 Reggio Calabria, Italy
| | - Marike Andreas
- Evidence-Based Medicine, Department I of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, 50937 Cologne, Germany
| | - Nicole Skoetz
- Evidence-Based Medicine, Department I of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, 50937 Cologne, Germany
| | - Nina Kreuzberger
- Evidence-Based Medicine, Department I of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, 50937 Cologne, Germany
| | - Edward Laane
- Hematology-Oncology Clinic, Tartu University, 50406 Tartu, Estonia
- Kuressaare Hospital, 93815 Kuressaare, Estonia
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Fischer J, Knop S, Danhof S, Einsele H, Keller D, Löffler C. The influence of baseline characteristics, treatment and depression on health-related quality of life in patients with multiple myeloma: a prospective observational study. BMC Cancer 2022; 22:1032. [PMID: 36192719 PMCID: PMC9528097 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-022-10101-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/27/2021] [Accepted: 09/13/2022] [Indexed: 12/09/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Multiple myeloma (MM) is the third most common hematologic malignancy with increasing importance due to improving treatment strategies and long-term outcomes in an aging population. This study aims to analyse influencing factors on health-related quality of life (HRQoL), such as treatment strategies, participation in a clinical trial and patient characteristics like anxiety, depression, gender, and age. A better understanding of the individual factors in context with HRQoL could provide a helpful instrument for clinical decisions. Methods In this prospective observational study, the HRQoL of MM patients with different therapies (first-line and relapse) was quantified by standardized questionnaires (EORTC QLQ-C30 and -MY20) in the context of sociodemographic data, individual anxiety and depressiveness (PHQ-4), and a selected number of clinical parameters and symptoms at defined time-points before, during, and after therapy. Results In total, 70 patients were included in the study. The median age of the study cohort was 62 years. 44% were female and 56% were male patients. More than half of the patients were fully active with an ECOG 0. Global health status was significantly higher in patients with first-line treatment and even increased after start of therapy, while the pain level decreased. In contrast, patients with relapsed MM reported a decreasing global health status and increasing pain. Additionally, there was a higher global health status in less anxious/depressive patients. HRQoL decreased significantly after start of chemotherapy in the parameters body image, side effects of treatment, and cognitive functioning. Tandem stem-cell transplantation was not found to be a risk factor for higher impairment of HRQoL. Participation in a clinical study led to an improvement of most aspects of HRQoL. Among others, increased anxiety and depression, female gender, older age, impaired performance status, and recurrent disease can be early indicators for a reduced HRQoL. Conclusion This study showed the importance of regular longitudinal assessments of patient reported outcomes (PROs) in routine clinical care. For the first time, to our knowledge, we were able to demonstrate a potential impact between participation in clinical trials and HRQoL. However, due to frequently restrictive inclusion criteria for clinical trials, these MM patients might not be directly comparable with patients treated within standard therapy concepts. Further studies are needed to clarify the relevance of this preliminary data in order to develop an individualized, patient-centred, therapy concept. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12885-022-10101-9.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Julia Fischer
- Department of Pediatrics, Wuerzburg University Medical Center, Josef-Schneider-Straße 2, 97080, Würzburg, Germany.
| | - Stefan Knop
- Department of Haematology and Oncology, Wuerzburg University Medical Center, Oberdürrbacher Straße 6, 97080, Würzburg, Germany
| | - Sophia Danhof
- Department of Haematology and Oncology, Wuerzburg University Medical Center, Oberdürrbacher Straße 6, 97080, Würzburg, Germany
| | - Hermann Einsele
- Department of Haematology and Oncology, Wuerzburg University Medical Center, Oberdürrbacher Straße 6, 97080, Würzburg, Germany
| | - Daniela Keller
- "Daniela Keller - Statistik und Beratung", Prosselsheimer Straße 4, 97273, Kuernach, Germany
| | - Claudia Löffler
- Department of Haematology and Oncology, Wuerzburg University Medical Center, Oberdürrbacher Straße 6, 97080, Würzburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Opportunities for Participation in Randomized Controlled Trials for Patients with Multiple Myeloma: Trial Access Depends on Restrictive Eligibility Criteria and Patient Expectations. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:cancers14092147. [PMID: 35565276 PMCID: PMC9106039 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14092147] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/08/2022] [Revised: 04/19/2022] [Accepted: 04/20/2022] [Indexed: 02/04/2023] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary Over the past decade, randomized controlled trials as an established instrument of evidence-based medicine have contributed fundamentally to the development and approval of new substances. However, it has been frequently shown that less than 5% of adult cancer patients enroll in clinical trials. Barriers to trial participation have been extensively studied, but the rate of trial participation has not changed substantially. In this retrospective analysis, we found that 53% of newly diagnosed multiple myeloma patients met the eligibility criteria, while only 38% of relapsed refractory patients were eligible. Moreover, our data show for the first time that eligible patients tend to become more reluctant to participate over the course of the disease, with 42% of newly diagnosed patients consenting, and only 7% of relapsed/refractory patients consenting. Thus, our results may assist with trial design improvements and address patient expectations and priorities in order to increase enrollment. Abstract Randomized controlled trials (RCT) are the driver of therapeutic innovations. However, it has been frequently shown that less than 5% of adult cancer patients enroll in clinical trials, although 70% of patients are considered as being willing to participate. Barriers to trial participation have been extensively studied. Although there is evidence that trial participation correlates with improved survival and reduced mortality, the rate of participation has not changed substantially. We provide retrospective data from a single-center analysis of 411 patients with multiple myeloma (MM) who were treated at the University Hospital Duesseldorf in Germany between January 2014 and December 2016. Each patient was analyzed for the real-world possibility of participating in a clinical study, based on the inclusion and exclusion (I/E) criteria and the recruiting period of open studies. The overall rate of study participation was 19%. A total of 53% of NDMM patients were eligible for first-line studies (GMMG-HD6, LenaMain). Of these, 80% consented to enrolment (42% of all). In contrast, only 38% of the RRMM population was eligible (GMMG-Relapse, Castor, Tourmaline, Admyre). Of these, only 22% (7% of all) consented. This was confirmed by virtual analysis, showing that only 29% of all RRMM patients would have been eligible for six internationally recruiting trials leading to later drug approval. The majority of cases were rendered ineligible by only one I/E criterion. The most common criteria were study-specific (prior therapies or refractory disease to a specific drug), kidney disease, and previous malignancy, followed by internal, neurologic, and infectious disease. In summary, this single-center analysis showed that I/E criteria permit study participation for most NNDM patients, with a dramatic decrease in the RRMM population. This is aggravated by the fact that the willingness for study participation also significantly declines in RRMM. Thus, addressing patient expectations and priorities seems to be the most promising approach to increasing patient enrollment in clinical trials.
Collapse
|
10
|
Bahlis NJ, Siegel DS, Schiller GJ, Samaras C, Sebag M, Berdeja J, Ganguly S, Matous J, Song K, Seet CS, Acosta-Rivera M, Bar M, Quick D, Anz B, Fonseca G, Chung W, Lee K, Mouro J, Agarwal A, Reece D. Pomalidomide, dexamethasone, and daratumumab immediately after lenalidomide-based treatment in patients with multiple myeloma: updated efficacy, safety, and health-related quality of life results from the phase 2 MM-014 trial. Leuk Lymphoma 2022; 63:1407-1417. [PMID: 35133221 DOI: 10.1080/10428194.2022.2030477] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
Abstract
Patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) need proven subsequent therapies after early-line lenalidomide treatment failure. The phase 2 MM-014 trial (NCT01946477) investigated pomalidomide, dexamethasone, and daratumumab after 1 to 2 prior treatment lines (62.5%, 1 prior line) in patients with RRMM and prior lenalidomide (75.0%, lenalidomide refractory). With a median follow-up of 28.4 months, overall response rate was 77.7% (52.7% achieved very good partial response or better) and median progression-free survival was 30.8 months. For patients with lenalidomide-refractory disease, these outcomes were 76.2%, 47.6%, and 23.7 months, respectively. No new safety signals were observed; 64.3% experienced grade 3/4 neutropenia. Health-related quality of life was preserved or trended toward improvement through 12 treatment cycles. Pomalidomide, dexamethasone, and daratumumab given immediately after early-line lenalidomide-based treatment continues to demonstrate safety and efficacy, supporting pomalidomide-dexamethasone as a foundation of combination therapy in RRMM and providing evidence that the immunomodulatory agent class delivers benefit after lenalidomide treatment failure.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - David S Siegel
- John Theurer Cancer Center, Hackensack University Medical Center, Hackensack, NJ, USA
| | - Gary J Schiller
- David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | | | - Michael Sebag
- McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | | | | | | | - Kevin Song
- Vancouver General Hospital, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Christopher S Seet
- David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | | | | | - Donald Quick
- Joe Arrington Cancer Research and Treatment Center, Lubbock, TX, USA
| | | | | | | | - Kim Lee
- Bristol Myers Squibb, Princeton, NJ, USA
| | - Jorge Mouro
- Celgene International Sàrl, A Bristol-Myers Squibb Company, Boudry, Switzerland
| | | | - Donna Reece
- Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Biran N, Zhai W, Jensen RE, Mandelblatt J, Kumka S, Unawane R, Graves KD, Vesole DH, Siegel DS, Potosky AL. Patient-reported outcomes following autologous stem cell transplant for patients with multiple myeloma. EJHAEM 2021; 2:488-492. [PMID: 35844688 PMCID: PMC9176031 DOI: 10.1002/jha2.231] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/23/2021] [Revised: 05/12/2021] [Accepted: 05/13/2021] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
Abstract
We evaluated changes in patient-reported outcomes and cognitive function from pre- to 3-6 months post-treatment among 42 newly diagnosed patients with multiple myeloma undergoing transplant with complete data using PROMIS-29. There were statistically significant improvements in physical (p < .001) and mental health (p < .001) but not cognition from pre-treatment to 3-6 month follow-up. Similar results were seen within age or comorbidity strata. Patients with myeloma undergoing transplant experienced generally improved short-term health outcomes with no significant declines in cognition.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Noa Biran
- Hackensack Meridian HealthJohn Theurer Cancer CenterHackensackNew JerseyUSA
| | - Wanting Zhai
- Cancer Prevention and Control Program, Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer CenterGeorgetown University Medical CenterWashingtonDistrict of ColumbiaUSA
| | - Roxanne E. Jensen
- Outcomes Research Branch, Healthcare Delivery Research ProgramNational Cancer InstituteBethesdaMarylandUSA
| | - Jeanne Mandelblatt
- Cancer Prevention and Control Program, Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer CenterGeorgetown University Medical CenterWashingtonDistrict of ColumbiaUSA
| | - Susan Kumka
- Hackensack Meridian HealthJohn Theurer Cancer CenterHackensackNew JerseyUSA
| | - Rashmi Unawane
- Hackensack Meridian HealthJohn Theurer Cancer CenterHackensackNew JerseyUSA
| | - Kristi D. Graves
- Cancer Prevention and Control Program, Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer CenterGeorgetown University Medical CenterWashingtonDistrict of ColumbiaUSA
| | - David H Vesole
- Hackensack Meridian HealthJohn Theurer Cancer CenterHackensackNew JerseyUSA
| | - David S Siegel
- Hackensack Meridian HealthJohn Theurer Cancer CenterHackensackNew JerseyUSA
| | - Arnold L. Potosky
- Cancer Prevention and Control Program, Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer CenterGeorgetown University Medical CenterWashingtonDistrict of ColumbiaUSA
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Terpos E, Mikhael J, Hajek R, Chari A, Zweegman S, Lee HC, Mateos MV, Larocca A, Ramasamy K, Kaiser M, Cook G, Weisel KC, Costello CL, Elliott J, Palumbo A, Usmani SZ. Management of patients with multiple myeloma beyond the clinical-trial setting: understanding the balance between efficacy, safety and tolerability, and quality of life. Blood Cancer J 2021; 11:40. [PMID: 33602913 PMCID: PMC7891472 DOI: 10.1038/s41408-021-00432-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 52] [Impact Index Per Article: 17.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/09/2020] [Revised: 01/22/2021] [Accepted: 01/28/2021] [Indexed: 12/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Treatment options in multiple myeloma (MM) are increasing with the introduction of complex multi-novel-agent-based regimens investigated in randomized clinical trials. However, application in the real-world setting, including feasibility of and adherence to these regimens, may be limited due to varying patient-, treatment-, and disease-related factors. Furthermore, approximately 40% of real-world MM patients do not meet the criteria for phase 3 studies on which approvals are based, resulting in a lack of representative phase 3 data for these patients. Therefore, treatment decisions must be tailored based on additional considerations beyond clinical trial efficacy and safety, such as treatment feasibility (including frequency of clinic/hospital attendance), tolerability, effects on quality of life (QoL), and impact of comorbidities. There are multiple factors of importance to real-world MM patients, including disease symptoms, treatment burden and toxicities, ability to participate in daily activities, financial burden, access to treatment and treatment centers, and convenience of treatment. All of these factors are drivers of QoL and treatment satisfaction/compliance. Importantly, given the heterogeneity of MM, individual patients may have different perspectives regarding the most relevant considerations and goals of their treatment. Patient perspectives/goals may also change as they move through their treatment course. Thus, the 'efficacy' of treatment means different things to different patients, and treatment decision-making in the context of personalized medicine must be guided by an individual's composite definition of what constitutes the best treatment choice. This review summarizes the various factors of importance and practical issues that must be considered when determining real-world treatment choices. It assesses the current instruments, methodologies, and recent initiatives for analyzing the MM patient experience. Finally, it suggests options for enhancing data collection on patients and treatments to provide a more holistic definition of the effectiveness of a regimen in the real-world setting.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Evangelos Terpos
- Plasma Cell Dyscrasias Unit, Department of Clinical Therapeutics, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, School of Medicine, Athens, Greece.
| | - Joseph Mikhael
- Applied Cancer Research and Drug Discovery, Translational Genomics Research Institute, City of Hope Cancer Center, Phoenix, AZ, USA
| | - Roman Hajek
- Department of Hemato-Oncology, University Hospital Ostrava, and Faculty of Medicine, University of Ostrava, Ostrava, Czech Republic
| | - Ajai Chari
- Tisch Cancer Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
| | - Sonja Zweegman
- Department of Hematology, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam University Medical Center, VU University Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Hans C Lee
- Department of Lymphoma and Myeloma, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - María-Victoria Mateos
- Department of Hematology, University Hospital of Salamanca, IBSAL, CIC, IBMCC (USAL-CSIC), Salamanca, Spain
| | - Alessandra Larocca
- Myeloma Unit, Division of Hematology, University of Torino, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Città della Salute e della Scienza di Torino, Torino, Italy
| | - Karthik Ramasamy
- Department of Haematology, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, RDM, Oxford University, NIHR BRC Blood Theme, Oxford, UK
| | - Martin Kaiser
- Department of Haematology, The Royal Marsden Hospital, and Division of Molecular Pathology, The Institute of Cancer Research (ICR), London, UK
| | - Gordon Cook
- Leeds Cancer Centre, Leeds Teaching Hospitals Trust, Leeds, UK
| | - Katja C Weisel
- Department of Oncology, Hematology and Bone Marrow Transplantation with Section of Pneumology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Caitlin L Costello
- Department of Medicine, Division of Blood and Marrow Transplantation, Moores Cancer Center, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA
| | - Jennifer Elliott
- Millennium Pharmaceuticals, Inc., a wholly owned subsidiary of Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Limited, Cambridge, MA, USA
| | - Antonio Palumbo
- Millennium Pharmaceuticals, Inc., a wholly owned subsidiary of Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Limited, Cambridge, MA, USA
| | - Saad Z Usmani
- Department of Hematologic Oncology and Blood Disorders, Levine Cancer Institute, Charlotte, NC, USA
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Oriol A, Ibarra G, Abella E, Motlló C, Cibeira MT, Garcia A, Escoda L, Granell M, Ben-Azaiz R, Cervera M, Cabezudo E, Fernandez C, Rosiñol L. Impact of response to treatment in health-related quality of life patient-reported outcomes in elderly patients with relapsed multiple myeloma. Leuk Lymphoma 2020; 62:125-135. [PMID: 32933355 DOI: 10.1080/10428194.2020.1817439] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022]
Abstract
Multiple myeloma (MM) is a recurrent malignancy with a high impact on quality of life. Improved survival relies on the combination of drugs and extended duration of therapy, raising concerns on its toxicity burden in elderly patients. Health-related quality of life measurements attent to capture health aspects relevant to patients other than efficacy. This prospective study aimed to understand the relationship between MM-related symptomatology and other quality of life dimensions using the EORTC QLQ-MY20 questionnaire in individuals with relapsed or refractory MM. Irrespective of treatment modality, over 50% of patients who responded to treatment had significant omprovements of reported scores in all domains. Conversely, disease progression was associated with score deterioration not only in the MM-related symptoms domain but also in all other domains. HRQoL adds valuable information to the established efficacy endpoints but an adequate interpretation of HRQoL outcomes in randomized trials should require stratification according to response.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Albert Oriol
- Institut Josep Carreras and Institut Catala d'Oncologia, Hospital Germans Trias i Pujol, Badalona, Spain
| | - Gladys Ibarra
- Institut Josep Carreras and Institut Catala d'Oncologia, Hospital Germans Trias i Pujol, Badalona, Spain
| | | | - Cristina Motlló
- Hematology Department, Hospital Sant Joan de Déu, Manresa, Spain
| | - Maria-Teresa Cibeira
- Amyloidosis and Myeloma Unit, Department of Hematology, Hospital Clínic of Barcelona, IDIBAPS, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Antoni Garcia
- Hospital Universitari Arnau de Vilanova, Lleida, Spain
| | - Lourdes Escoda
- Hematology Department, Hospital Universitari de Tarragona Joan XXIII-ICO-Tarragona, Tarragona, Spain
| | - Miquel Granell
- Hematology Service, Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau, Barcelona, Spain
| | | | - Marta Cervera
- Hematology Department, Hospital Universitari de Tarragona Joan XXIII-ICO-Tarragona, Tarragona, Spain
| | - Elena Cabezudo
- Hematology Department, Hospital Sant Joan de Déu, Manresa, Spain
| | - Carlos Fernandez
- Amyloidosis and Myeloma Unit, Department of Hematology, Hospital Clínic of Barcelona, IDIBAPS, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Laura Rosiñol
- Amyloidosis and Myeloma Unit, Department of Hematology, Hospital Clínic of Barcelona, IDIBAPS, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| |
Collapse
|