The delicate balance of graft versus leukemia and graft versus host disease after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation

Transplantation in adult patients with Epstein-Barr virus-associated hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis: yes or no?

ABSTRACT

Hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis (HLH) is a syndrome characterized by aberrant immunological activity with a dismal prognosis. Epstein-Barr virus (EBV)-associated HLH (EBV-HLH) is the most common type among adults. Patients with EBV infection to B cells could benefit from rituximab, whereas lethal outcomes may occur in patients with EBV infection to T cells, nature killer cells, or multilineages. The necessity of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) in adult patients with EBV-HLH remains controversial. A total of 356 adult patients with EBV-HLH entered this study. Eighty-eight received HSCT under medical recommendation. Four received salvage HSCT. The 5-year overall survival (OS) rate for patients who underwent HSCT was 48.7% (vs 16.2% in patients who did not undergo transplantation; P < .001). There was no difference in OS between patients who received transplantation at first complete response (CR1) and those at first partial response (PR1) nor between patients at CR1 and CR2. Patients who received transplantation at PR2 had inferior survival. The rate of reaching CR2 was significantly higher in patients with CR1 than PR1 (P = .014). Higher soluble CD25 levels, higher EBV-DNA loads in plasma after HSCT, poorer remission status, more advanced acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD), and the absence of localized chronic GVHD were associated with inferior prognosis (P < .05). HSCT improved the survival of adult EBV-HLH significantly. For patients who achieved PR after initial treatment, HSCT was recommended. A wait-and-see strategy could be adopted for patients who achieved CR after initial treatment but with the risk of failing to achieve CR2.

Perspective on oral medication adherence among patients with acute graft-versus-host disease: a qualitative descriptive study

PURPOSE

Despite the importance of adherence to immunosuppressants (IMMs) after an allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) for the treatment of acute graft-versus-host disease (aGvHD), no studies to date have reported the experiences of such patients concerning medication adherence (MA). Therefore, the aim of the study was to explore the perspective on MA to immunosuppressive oral therapy among allogeneic HSCT patients with aGvHD.

METHODS

A qualitative descriptive study following a reflexive thematic analysis methodological approach was performed involving a purposive sample of 16 patients with aGvHD who were being cared for in the outpatient setting of a bone marrow transplant centre and were willing to participate. Semi-structured audio-recorded interviews were conducted, transcribed verbatim and thematically analysed; member checking was performed. COnsolidated criteria for REporting Qualitative research (COREQ) and the ESPACOMP Medication Adherence Reporting Guideline were followed.

RESULTS

Participants aged 25-74 years and mostly males (62.5%) were recruited for this study; 56.2% developed grade I, 37.5% grade II and 6.3% grade III aGvHD; 56.2% were receiving treatment with both cyclosporine and prednisone. Patients' perspectives have been summarised into four themes, named: "Transiting from an external obligation to a habit"; "Being in the middle between the negative and positive effects of the IMMs"; "Failure to systematically respect the rules"; and "Adopting personal strategies to become adherent". After difficulties with the perception of feeling obliged, patients became used to adhering to IMMs. Although there were failures in systematically taking the medication correctly and there were episodes of non-adherence, the adoption of personal strategies helped patients to become adherent to their medication schedules.

CONCLUSIONS

MA in patients with aGvHD is a complex behaviour and is often a challenge. These results can help healthcare professionals and centres to understand how best to design tailored strategies and behavioural interventions to maximise patients' MA to IMMs.

Therapeutic Inducers of Natural Killer cell Killing (ThINKK): preclinical assessment of safety and efficacy in allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant settings

BACKGROUND

Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) remains the standard of care for chemotherapy-refractory leukemia patients, but cure rates are still dismal. To prevent leukemia relapse following HSCT, we aim to improve the early graft-versus-leukemia effect mediated by natural killer (NK) cells. Our approach is based on the adoptive transfer of Therapeutic Inducers of Natural Killer cell Killing (ThINKK). ThINKK are expanded and differentiated from HSC, and exhibit blood plasmacytoid dendritic cell (pDC) features. We previously demonstrated that ThINKK stimulate NK cells and control acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) development in a preclinical mouse model of HSCT for ALL. Here, we assessed the cellular identity of ThINKK and investigated their potential to activate allogeneic T cells. We finally evaluated the effect of immunosuppressive drugs on ThINKK-NK cell interaction.

METHODS

ThINKK cellular identity was explored using single-cell RNA sequencing and flow cytometry. Their T-cell activating potential was investigated by coculture of allogeneic T cells and antigen-presenting cells in the presence or the absence of ThINKK. A preclinical human-to-mouse xenograft model was used to evaluate the impact of ThINKK injections on graft-versus-host disease (GvHD). Finally, the effect of immunosuppressive drugs on ThINKK-induced NK cell cytotoxicity against ALL cells was tested.

RESULTS

The large majority of ThINKK shared the key characteristics of canonical blood pDC, including potent type-I interferon (IFN) production following Toll-like receptor stimulation. A minor subset expressed some, although not all, markers of other dendritic cell populations. Importantly, while ThINKK were not killed by allogeneic T or NK cells, they did not increase T cell proliferation induced by antigen-presenting cells nor worsened GvHD in vivo. Finally, tacrolimus, sirolimus or mycophenolate did not decrease ThINKK-induced NK cell activation and cytotoxicity.

CONCLUSION

Our results indicate that ThINKK are type I IFN producing cells with low T cell activation capacity. Therefore, ThINKK adoptive immunotherapy is not expected to increase the risk of GvHD after allogeneic HSCT. Furthermore, our data predict that the use of tacrolimus, sirolimus or mycophenolate as anti-GvHD prophylaxis regimen will not decrease ThINKK therapeutic efficacy. Collectively, these preclinical data support the testing of ThINKK immunotherapy in a phase I clinical trial.

Graft-versus-leukaemia immunity is retained following treatment with post-transplant cyclophosphamide alone or combined with tocilizumab in humanised mice

Objectives

Donor haematopoietic stem cell transplantation treats leukaemia by inducing graft-versus-leukaemia (GVL) immunity. However, this benefit is often mitigated by graft-versus-host disease (GVHD), which is reduced by post-transplant cyclophosphamide (PTCy) alone or combined with tocilizumab (TOC) in humanised mice. This study established a preclinical humanised mouse model of GVL and investigated whether PTCy alone or combined with TOC impacts GVL immunity.

Methods

NOD-scid-IL2Rγnull mice were injected with 2 × 107 human peripheral blood mononuclear cells (hPBMCs) on day 0 and with 1 × 106 THP-1 acute myeloid leukaemia cells on day 14. In subsequent experiments, mice were also injected with PTCy (33 mg kg-1) or Dulbecco's phosphate buffered saline (PBS) on days 3 and 4, alone or combined with TOC or control antibody (25 mg kg-1) twice weekly for 28 days. Clinical signs of disease were monitored until day 42.

Results

Mice with hPBMCs from three different donors and THP-1 cells showed similar survival, clinical score and weight loss. hCD33+ leukaemia cells were minimal in mice reconstituted with hPBMCs from two donors but present in mice with hPBMCs from a third donor, suggesting donor-specific GVL responses. hPBMC-injected mice treated with PTCy alone or combined with TOC (PTCy + TOC) demonstrated prolonged survival compared to control mice. PTCy alone and PTCy + TOC-treated mice with hPBMCs showed minimal hepatic hCD33+ leukaemia cells, indicating sustained GVL immunity. Further, the combination of PTCy + TOC reduced histological damage in the lung and liver.

Conclusion

Collectively, this research demonstrates that PTCy alone or combined with TOC impairs GVHD without compromising GVL immunity.