Precision medicine for metastatic colorectal cancer: an evolving era

Tissue Elasticity as a Diagnostic Marker of Molecular Mutations in Morphologically Heterogeneous Colorectal Cancer

The presence of molecular mutations in colorectal cancer (CRC) is a decisive factor in selecting the most effective first-line therapy. However, molecular analysis is routinely performed only in a limited number of patients with remote metastases. We propose to use tissue stiffness as a marker of the presence of molecular mutations in CRC samples. For this purpose, we applied compression optical coherence elastography (C-OCE) to calculate stiffness values in regions corresponding to specific CRC morphological patterns (n = 54). In parallel to estimating stiffness, molecular analysis from the same zones was performed to establish their relationships. As a result, a high correlation between the presence of KRAS/NRAS/BRAF driver mutations and high stiffness values was revealed regardless of CRC morphological pattern type. Further, we proposed threshold stiffness values for label-free targeted detection of molecular alterations in CRC tissues: for KRAS, NRAS, or BRAF driver mutation-above 803 kPa (sensitivity-91%; specificity-80%; diagnostic accuracy-85%), and only for KRAS driver mutation-above 850 kPa (sensitivity-90%; specificity-88%; diagnostic accuracy-89%). To conclude, C-OCE estimation of tissue stiffness can be used as a clinical diagnostic tool for preliminary screening of genetic burden in CRC tissues.

Targeting KRAS Oncogene for Patients With Colorectal Cancer: A New Step Toward Precision Medicine

KRAS mutations are common driver oncogenes associated with the development of several solid tumors. KRAS oncogene has been considered a highly challenging target for drug development because of structural features, including the lack of deep groove on its catalytic unit. However, by leveraging cysteine residues, covalent KRAS inhibitors irreversibly trap KRAS G12C mutants in their inactive GDP-bound state. These agents have resulted in significant clinical responses among patients with KRAS G12C-mutant solid tumors, including patients with colorectal cancer (CRC). Other allele-specific inhibitors of KRAS oncogene and panKRAS and panRAS inhibitors are also currently being investigated in clinical trials. This review article overviews recent clinical progress on KRAS G12C targeting for the management of patients with KRAS G12C-mutant CRC and provides an update on other RAS targeting approaches. We also discuss the unique biological features of RAS-mutant CRC, which require the combination of KRAS inhibitors and anti-epidermal growth factor receptor therapy, and elaborate on resistance mechanisms and novel therapeutic avenues that may define future treatment paradigms of patients with RAS-mutant CRC.

Construction and validation of "WCH-nomogram" for predicting the prognosis after resection of colorectal liver metastases

BACKGROUND

The prognostic predictive tool for patients with colorectal liver metastasis (CRLM) is limited and the criteria for administering preoperative neoadjuvant chemotherapy in CRLM patients remain controversial.

METHODS

This study enrolled 532 CRLM patients at West China Hospital (WCH) from January 2009 to December 2019. Prognostic factors were identified from the training cohort to construct a WCH-nomogram and evaluating accuracy in the validation cohort. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was used to compare the prediction accuracy with other existing prediction tools.

RESULTS

From the analysis of the training cohort, four independent prognostic risk factors, namely tumor marker score, KRAS mutation, primary lymph node metastasis, and tumor burden score were identified on which a WCH-nomogram was constructed. The C-index of the two cohorts were 0.674 (95% CI: 0.634-0.713) and 0.655 (95% CI: 0.586-0.723), respectively, which was better than the previously reported predication scores (CRS, m-CS and GAME score). ROC curves showed AUCs for predicting 1-, 3-, and 5-year overall survival (OS) of 0.758, 0.709, and 0.717 in the training cohort, and 0.860, 0.669, and 0.692 in the validation cohort, respectively. A cutoff value of 114.5 points was obtained for the WCH-nomogram total score based on the maximum Youden index of the ROC curve of 5-year OS. Risk stratification showed significantly better prognosis in the low-risk group, however, the high-risk group was more likely to benefit from neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

CONCLUSIONS

The WCH-nomogram demonstrates superior prognostic stratification compared to prior scoring systems, effectively identifying CRLM patients who may benefit the most from neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

Characterization of dabrafenib-induced drug insensitivity via cellular barcoding and collateral sensitivity to second-line therapeutics

Drug insensitivity is arguably one of the biggest challenges in cancer therapeutics. Although effective therapeutic solutions in cancer are limited due to the emergence of drug insensitivity, exploiting evolutionary understanding in this context can provide potential second-line therapeutics sensitizing the drug insensitive populations. Targeted therapeutic agent dabrafenib is used to treat CRC patients with BRAF V600E genotype and insensitivity to dabrafenib is often observed. Understanding underlying clonal architecture of dabrafenib-induced drug insensitivity and identification of potential second-line therapeutics that could sensitize dabrafenib insensitive populations remain to be elucidated. For this purpose, we utilized cellular barcoding technology to decipher dabrafenib-induced clonal evolution in BRAF V600E mutant HT-29 cells. This approach revealed the detection of both pre-existing and de novo barcodes with increased frequencies as a result of dabrafenib insensitivity. Furthermore, our longitudinal monitoring of drug insensitivity based on barcode detection from floating DNA within used medium enabled to identify temporal dynamics of pre-existing and de novo barcodes in relation to dabrafenib insensitivity in HT-29 cells. Moreover, whole-exome sequencing analysis exhibited possible somatic CNVs and SNVs contributing to dabrafenib insensitivity in HT-29 cells. Last, collateral drug sensitivity testing demonstrated oxaliplatin and capecitabine, alone or in combination, as successful second-like therapeutics in inducing collateral sensitivity in dabrafenib-insensitive HT-29 cells. Overall, our findings demonstrate clonal dynamics of dabrafenib-insensitivity in HT-29 cells. In addition, oxaliplatin and capecitabine, alone or in combination, were successful second-line therapeutics in inducing collateral sensitivity in dabrafenib-insensitive HT-29 cells.

Efficacy and safety of anlotinib plus XELOX regimen as first-line therapy for mCRC: a single-arm, multicenter, phase II study (ALTER-C-001)

Background

Anlotinib showed encouraging anti-tumor activity in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). This study was designed to assess the efficacy and safety of anlotinib plus XELOX as first-line therapy in mCRC patients.

Materials and Methods

Eligible patients aged ≥18 with mCRC were enrolled in this multicenter, single-arm, phase II, exploratory study. Patients received at least 6 cycles of anlotinib, oxaliplatin, and capecitabine as initial therapy. Subsequently, patients received anlotinib monotherapy as maintenance therapy until tumor progression or intolerable toxicity. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS).

Results

Thirty-one patients were included between December 2019 and March 2022. The median follow-up was 17.5 (95% CI, 3.0-17.5) months. The median PFS was 8.3 (95% CI, 6.3-10.0) months, with 6- and 12-month PFS rates of 82.3% (95% CI, 59.2%-93.0%) and 18.9% (95% CI, 4.8%-40.1%), respectively. Fifteen (48.4%) achieved partial response for an ORR of 48.4% (95% CI, 30.2%-66.9%). The disease control rate was 71.0% (95% CI, 52.0%-85.8%) due to 7 (22.6%) stable diseases. The median duration of response was 6.0 (95% CI, 3.6-8.0) months and 1 patient had the longest ongoing response of 17.3 months. Of 24 patients with evaluable imaging, 23 (74.2%) obtained tumor shrinkage. The median PFS (11.0 vs. 6.9 months) and ORR (66.7% vs. 60.0%) for patients with RAS/BRAF wild-type were numerically better than those with mutation. Three patients are still ongoing treatment. The grade 3 or more treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were mainly hypertension (12.9%) and decreased neutrophil count (12.9%). Four (12.9%) had serious TEAEs, primarily including abdominal pain and incomplete intestinal obstruction.

Conclusion

Anlotinib plus XELOX as first-line therapy in patients with mCRC showed anti-tumor activity and safety profile, which is worth further investigation.

Clinical Trial Registration

chictr.org.cn, identifier ChiCTR1900028417.

Targeted Therapies in Colorectal Cancer: Recent Advances in Biomarkers, Landmark Trials, and Future Perspectives

In 2022, approximately 600,000 cancer deaths were expected; more than 50,000 of those deaths would be from colorectal cancer (CRC). The CRC mortality rate in the US has decreased in recent decades, with a 51% drop between 1976 and 2014. This drop is attributed, in part, to the tremendous therapeutic improvements, especially after the 2000s, in addition to increased social awareness regarding risk factors and diagnostic improvement. Five-fluorouracil, irinotecan, capecitabine, and later oxaliplatin were the mainstays of mCRC treatment from the 1960s to 2002. Since then, more than a dozen drugs have been approved for the disease, betting on a new chapter in medicine, precision oncology, which uses patient and tumor characteristics to guide the therapeutic choice. Thus, this review will summarize the current literature on targeted therapies, highlighting the molecular biomarkers involved and their pathways.

Retrospective analysis of colorectal cancer patients with metachronous initially unresectable liver metastases (and no other) achieving no evidence of disease after first-line comprehensive therapy: a multicenter real-world study

PURPOSE

To explore the optimal timing of locoregional therapy in patients with colorectal cancer (CRC) recurrence after radical resection and initially unresectable liver metastases but no other metastases and whether maintenance therapy should be performed after achieving no evidence of disease (NED).

METHODS

This study was jointly carried out in six medical institutions in China to collect the clinical data of patients with primary CRC from January 2015 to December 2021. Research participants were identified according to the inclusion criteria of this study for statistical analysis of the clinical characteristics and recurrence time.

RESULTS

625 patients CRC with metachronous initially unresectable liver metastases but no other metastases were enrolled. Multivariate analysis showed that the number of metastases in the liver and the time from the start of first-line chemotherapy to locoregional therapy significantly affected the progression-free survival (PFS, P < 0.05) following the first-line treatment, and continued maintenance therapy reduced the risk of tumor progression in the patients (P < 0.05). Furthermore, stratified analysis showed that the median PFS of patients with 3-5 metastases in the liver was maximized when the time from the start of first-line chemotherapy to locoregional therapy was 3-4 months. Patients with > 6 metastases in the liver should extend the duration between the start of first-line chemotherapy and locoregional therapy to more than four months. Similarly, with the significant increase in the number of metastases in the liver, subsequent maintenance therapy significantly extended the PFS of the patients.

CONCLUSIONS

The overall therapeutic plan in patients with CRC recurrence after radical resection and initially unresectable liver metastases but no other metastases should consider the individual patients' situations, especially the number of metastases in the liver at initial recurrence.

SLC27A2 mediates FAO in colorectal cancer through nongenic crosstalk regulation of the PPARs pathway

BACKGROUND

Peroxisome proliferator activated receptors (PPARs) are a nuclear hormone receptors superfamily that is closely related to fatty acid (FA) metabolism and tumor progression. Solute carrier family 27 member 2 (SLC27A2) is important for FA transportation and metabolism and is related to cancer progression. This study aims to explore the mechanisms of how PPARs and SLC27A2 regulate FA metabolism in colorectal cancer (CRC) and find new strategies for CRC treatment.

METHODS

Biological information analysis was applied to detect the expression and the correlation of PPARs and SLC27A2 in CRC. The protein-protein interaction (PPI) interaction networks were explored by using the STRING database. Uptake experiments and immunofluorescence staining were used to analyse the function and number of peroxisomes and colocalization of FA with peroxisomes, respectively. Western blotting and qRT‒PCR were performed to explore the mechanisms.

RESULTS

SLC27A2 was overexpressed in CRC. PPARs had different expression levels, and PPARG was significantly highly expressed in CRC. SLC27A2 was correlated with PPARs in CRC. Both SLC27A2 and PPARs were closely related to fatty acid oxidation (FAO)‒related genes. SLC27A2 affected the activity of ATP Binding Cassette Subfamily D Member 3 (ABCD3), also named PMP70, the most abundant peroxisomal membrane protein. We found that the ratios of p-Erk/Erk and p-GSK3β/GSK3β were elevated through nongenic crosstalk regulation of the PPARs pathway.

CONCLUSIONS

SLC27A2 mediates FA uptake and beta-oxidation through nongenic crosstalk regulation of the PPARs pathway in CRC. Targeting SLC27A2/FATP2 or PPARs may provide new insights for antitumour strategies.

Neoadjuvant Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Therapy for Patients With Microsatellite Instability-High Colorectal Cancer: Shedding Light on the Future

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have revolutionized the treatment paradigm of mismatch repair-deficient/microsatellite instability-high (MMMR-D/MSI-H) colorectal cancer (CRC). Unique molecular features of MMR-D/MSI-H CRC with frameshift alterations, which result in mutation-associated neoantigen (MANA) generation, create an ideal molecular framework for MANA-driven T-cell priming and antitumor immunity. These biologic characteristics of MMR-D/MSI-H CRC resulted in rapid drug development with ICIs for patients with MMR-D/MSI-H CRC. Observed deep and durable responses with the use of ICIs in advanced-stage disease have stimulated the development of clinical trials with ICIs for patients with early-stage MMR-D/MSI-H CRC. Most recently, neoadjuvant dostarlimab monotherapy for nonoperative management of MMR-D/MSI-H rectal cancer and neoadjuvant NICHE trial with nivolumab and ipilimumab for MMR-D/MSI-H colon cancer resulted in groundbreaking results. Although nonoperative management of patients with MMR-D/MSI-H rectal cancer with ICIs will potentially define our current therapeutic approach, therapeutic goals of neoadjuvant ICI therapy for patients with MMR-D/MSI-H colon cancer may differ given that nonoperative management has not been well established for colon cancer. Herein, we overview recent advancements in ICI-based therapies for patients with early-stage MMR-D/MSI-H colon and rectal cancer and elaborate on the future treatment paradigm of this unique subgroup of CRC.

Current Targeted Therapy for Metastatic Colorectal Cancer

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the third most common type of cancer and the second leading cause of cancer deaths worldwide. Surgery or surgery plus radiotherapy and/or chemotherapy for patients with metastatic CRC (mCRC) were accepted as the main therapeutic strategies until the early 2000s, when targeted drugs, like cetuximab and bevacizumab, were developed. The use of targeted drugs in clinical practice has significantly increased patients' overall survival. To date, the emergence of several types of targeted drugs has opened new possibilities and revealed new prospects for mCRC treatment. Therapeutic strategies are continually being updated to select the most suitable targeted drugs based on the results of clinical trials that are currently underway. This review discusses the up-to date molecular evidence of targeted therapy for mCRC and summarizes the Food and Drug Administration-approved targeted drugs including the results of clinical trials. We also explain their mechanisms of action and how these affect the choice of a suitable targeted therapy.

Immunotherapy for Microsatellite Stable Colorectal Cancers: Challenges and Novel Therapeutic Avenues

With the development of immune checkpoint inhibitors, immunotherapy researchers have facilitated substantial progress for patients with mismatch repair deficient/microsatellite instability-high colorectal cancer, which has led to practice changes at a head-spinning pace. However, this benefit has not been translated into microsatellite stable colorectal cancer, which carries the hallmarks of chromosomal instability. So far, clinical trials have not shown any substantial clinical benefits of immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy for patients with microsatellite stable colorectal cancer, which has been disappointing. Recently, combinations of immune checkpoint inhibitors with tyrosine kinase inhibitors and targeted therapies have been investigated for potential synergistic effects that may increase antitumor activity in the tumor microenvironment and achieve more substantial clinical and radiologic responses. In this article, we discuss the current state of the science for the use of immune checkpoint inhibitors in microsatellite stable colorectal cancers, and we review the molecular underpinnings of inherited physiologic barriers for the delivery of effective immunotherapy. We also elaborate on existing therapeutic opportunities to convert microsatellite stable colorectal cancer into an "immune hot" cancer, which may define the future treatment paradigm of colorectal cancer for which there is a great unmet need.

Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2-Targeting Approaches for Colorectal Cancer: Clinical Implications of Novel Treatments and Future Therapeutic Avenues

The treatment paradigm for colorectal cancer (CRC) has changed significantly over the past decade with targeted therapeutics. Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) amplification is seen among 3%-4% of patients with metastatic CRC (mCRC). The biological discovery of HER2 amplification in cancer cells has led to practice-changing drug development for several solid tumors, including breast, gastric, and esophageal cancers. HER2 amplification is now highly actionable in CRC with distinct therapeutic combinations, including the combination of monoclonal antibodies and HER2 receptor-specific tyrosine kinase inhibitors, as well as antibody-drug conjugates, that delivers targeted cytotoxic agents. However, it is essential to define the therapeutic role and sequence of these different combinations, some of which are already part of standard clinical practice. In this review article, we discuss recent clinical studies demonstrating the clinical benefits of each distinct therapeutic approach and their impacts on the current management of HER2-amplified mCRC. We also review ongoing clinical trials targeting the HER2 pathway in mCRC and elaborate on novel therapeutic opportunities in this space that may further define the changing paradigm of HER2-targeted therapy for CRC.

Concurrent BRAFV600E and BRCA Mutations in MSS Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: Prevalence and Case Series of mCRC patients with prolonged OS

BACKGROUND

BRAF V600E+ microsatellite stable (MSS) metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) patients comprise up to 10% of advanced CRC. They have a poor prognosis with a median survival typically <1 year. Despite use of multi-agent 1^st line chemotherapy regimens and combination targeted therapies, outcomes are still poor. In our Institutional Molecular Tumor Board (MTB) database, we identified 3 mCRC patients with MSS/BRAF V600E who also had a BRCA1 or BRCA2 co-mutation and had relatively long overall survivals. Prior studies suggested that BRCA mutations are uncommon in CRC and we queried the Foundation Medicine (FM) genomic database to evaluate the prevalence of these cases as well as those with co-mutations in other homologous recombination genes.

METHODS

36,966 CRC pts were sequenced by FMI using hybrid capture comprehensive genomic profiling (CGP) to evaluate all classes of genomic alterations (GA) for pathogenic BRAF mutations and/or a mutation in BRCA1/2 or a co-mutation in other homologous recombination (HR) genes (BARD1, CDK12, FANCL, PALB2, ATM, RAD54L, CHEK2, BRAF, BRIP1, RAD51D, RAD51C, RAD51B, CHEK1). Selected cohort analysis of BRAF V600E co-mutated with BRCA1 and BRCA2 were separated into MSI-H and MSS cohorts. The clinicopathological features and genomic loss of heterozygosity (gLOH) of those with a BRAF V600E and a BRCA1/BRCA2 mutation were collected and analyzed. We also describe 3 consecutive cases of mCRC patients, identified through the Inova Schar Cancer Institute (ISCI) MTB registry, whom had prolonged OS.

RESULTS

Of 36,966 colorectal cancer pts, 6.6% were BRAF V600E+ and 1.5% had any co-occurring HR gene mutation(s) with 0.6% of the total mCRC population having co-ocurring BRAF V600E and BRCA1/2 alterations. BRCA co-mutations were higher in MSI-High BRAF V600E, however 24.1% of co-occurrences were observed in MSS samples. BRCA1 co-mutation was more commonly associated with MSS BRAF V600E and was associated with a higher gLOH than MSI-H BRAF V600E (18.7% vs 2.8%; p <0.001). In our institutional MTB database, (3/241;1.2%) CRC patients were MSS, BRAF V600E+ with BRCA1 or BRCA2 co-mutations, all somatic in origin, with an average gLOH of 21.4% and overall survivals of 72+(alive), 17+(alive), and 30 months, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Co-existence of BRAF V600E/BRCA1/2 may represent a unique subset of advanced MSS CRC that may have a better prognosis and represent an opportunity to test novel targeted therapies. The elevated gLOH in these cases may also be a valuable biomarker for these pts. Larger prospective clinical validation trials in this subset is warranted.

Immune-related genes STIM1, ITPKC and PELI1 polymorphisms are associated with risk of colorectal cancer

OBJECTIVES

STIM1, ITPKC and PELI1 are all immune-related genes that take part in the T cell activation, toll-like receptor and IL1 receptor pathways. The goal of this study was to evaluate the associations between STIM1, ITPKC and PELI1 polymorphisms and colorectal cancer (CRC) risk.

METHODS

Six single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in STIM1, ITPKC and PELI1 were genotyped using a MassARRAY platform in a discovery cohort including 480 CRC cases and 480 healthy individuals and validated in a replication cohort including 505 CRC cases and 510 controls.

RESULTS

The minor alleles of rs3794050, rs3750996 and rs2607420 were associated with an increased CRC risk (P < 0.05). In contrast, the minor allele of rs329497 was correlated with reduced disease risk (P = 0.025). Genetic model analysis showed that rs3794050 was related to an increased risk of disease in recessive and log-additive models (P < 0.05); rs3750996 had a strong correlation with CRC risk under all genetic models (P < 0.02); rs2607420 was correlated with an increased risk of disease in dominant and log-additive models (P < 0.01); whereas the protective effect of rs329497 on CRC risk was observed in dominant and log-additive models (P < 0.05). Finally, the association between the above SNPs and CRC risk was validated in a replication cohort (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Our results could be helpful for the early screening of individuals with high CRC risk.

BRCA mutations and gastrointestinal cancers: When to expect the unexpected?

BRCA1/2 pathogenic variants are widely known as major risk factors mainly for breast and ovarian cancer, while their role in gastrointestinal (GI) malignancies such as colorectal cancer (CRC), gastric cancer and oesophageal cancer (OeC) is still not well established. The main objective of this review is to summarise the available evidence on this matter. The studies included in the review were selected from PubMed/GoogleScholar/ScienceDirect databases to identify published articles where BRCA1/2 pathogenic variants were assessed either as a risk factor or a prognostic/predictive factor in these malignancies. Our review suggests that BRCA1/2 might have a role as a risk factor for colorectal, gastric and OeC, albeit with differences among these diseases: In particular BRCA1 seems to be much more frequently mutated in CRC whereas BRCA2 appears to be much more closely associated with gastric and OeC. Early-onset cancer seems to be also associated with BRCA1/2 mutations and a few studies suggest a positive prognostic role of these mutations. The assessment of a potentially predictive role of these mutations is hampered by the fact that most patients with these diseases have been treated with platinum compounds, where it is expected that a higher probability of response should be seen. A few clinical trials focused on poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors use in GI cancers are currently ongoing.

Evidence-Based Second-Line Treatment in RAS Wild-Type/Mutated Metastatic Colorectal Cancer in the Precision Medicine Era

Target-oriented agents improve metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) survival in combination with chemotherapy. However, the majority of patients experience disease progression after first-line treatment and are eligible for second-line approaches. In such a context, antiangiogenic and anti-Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor (EGFR) agents as well as immune checkpoint inhibitors have been approved as second-line options, and RAS and BRAF mutations and microsatellite status represent the molecular drivers that guide therapeutic choices. Patients harboring K- and N-RAS mutations are not eligible for anti-EGFR treatments, and bevacizumab is the only antiangiogenic agent that improves survival in combination with chemotherapy in first-line, regardless of RAS mutational status. Thus, the choice of an appropriate therapy after the progression to a bevacizumab or an EGFR-based first-line treatment should be evaluated according to the patient and disease characteristics and treatment aims. The continuation of bevacizumab beyond progression or its substitution with another anti-angiogenic agents has been shown to increase survival, whereas anti-EGFR monoclonals represent an option in RAS wild-type patients. In addition, specific molecular subgroups, such as BRAF-mutated and Microsatellite Instability-High (MSI-H) mCRCs represent aggressive malignancies that are poorly responsive to standard therapies and deserve targeted approaches. This review provides a critical overview about the state of the art in mCRC second-line treatment and discusses sequential strategies according to key molecular biomarkers.

Landscape of Current Targeted Therapies for Advanced Colorectal Cancer

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is one of the most frequent and lethal cancer types worldwide. While surgery with chemotherapy and radiotherapy remains the only curative approach for localized CRC, for metastatic disease the therapeutic landscape has significantly evolved over the last years. Development and approval of novel targeted therapies, such as monoclonal antibodies against EGFR and VEGF, have significantly increased the median survival of patients with metastatic disease, with some trials reporting a benefit over 40 months. Increasing accessibility of high throughput sequencing has unraveled several new therapeutic targets. Actionable alterations, such as HER2 overexpression, BRAF mutations, and NTRK fusions, are currently available in metastatic disease, providing significant therapeutic opportunities for these patients, while new emerging agents, as immune checkpoint inhibitors, promise better treatment options in the near future. In this chapter, an overview of established and future CRC targeted therapies in the clinical setting is provided, as well as their mechanism of action, limitations, and future applicability.

Defining the current role of immune checkpoint inhibitors in the treatment of mismatch repair-deficient/microsatellite stability-high colorectal cancer and shedding light on future approaches

Introduction: Mismatch repair deficient (MMR-D)/microsatellite instability-high (MSI-H) colorectal cancer (CRC) carries unique biologic features including high tumor mutation burden, increased amount of mutation-associated neoantigen generation, and the presence of marked tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes. Immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) therapy has rapidly changed the treatment algorithm of MMR-D/MSI-H CRC.Areas covered: In this review article, we discuss the recent data regarding the use of ICIs in metastatic MMR-D/MSI-H CRC patients. We also elaborated on potential biomarkers of ICI response and innovative therapeutic approaches that may prevail resistance mechanisms for the treatment of MMR-D/MSI-H colorectal cancer.Expert opinion: Pembrolizumab was recently granted approval by the FDA as first-line therapy for metastatic MMR-D/MSI-H CRC based on the results of the Keynote 177 study. The combination of nivolumab and ipilimumab will also likely be a choice for the initial therapy of MMR-D/MSI-H CRC in the near future. More therapeutic modalities with novel immunomodulatory agents as well as targeted therapy directed to immune resistance pathways are needed. The novel approaches discussed in this review article will define potential treatment options for the management of MMR-D/MSI-H CRC patients who progress on first-line ICI therapy.

Anlotinib Monotherapy for Refractory Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: A Double-Blinded, Placebo-Controlled, Randomized Phase III Trial (ALTER0703)

BACKGROUND

Treatment options for refractory metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) were limited. Anlotinib is a novel multitarget tyrosine kinase inhibitor. ALTER0703 study was conducted to assess efficacy and safety of anlotinib for patients with refractory mCRC.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This was a multicenter, double-blinded, placebo-controlled, randomized phase III trial involving 33 hospitals in China. Patients had taken at least two lines of therapies were 2:1 randomized to receive oral anlotinib (12 mg/day; days 1-14; 21 days per cycle) or placebo, plus best supportive care. Randomization was stratified by previous VEGF-targeting treatments and time from diagnosis to metastases. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS). The secondary endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), quality of life (QoL), and safety.

RESULTS

A total of 419 patients (anlotinib: 282; placebo: 137) were treated from December 2014 to August 2016. The median PFS was improved in anlotinib group (4.1 months; 95% confidence interval [CI], 3.4-4.5) over placebo group (1.5 months; 95% CI, 1.4-1.5), with a hazard ratio (HR) of 0.34 (95% CI, 0.27-0.43; p < .0001). However, median OS was similar between two groups (8.6 months; 95% CI, 7.8-9.7 vs. 7.2 months; 95% CI, 6.2-8.8; HR, 1.02; p = .870). Improvements of ORR and DCR were observed in anlotinib over placebo. The most common grade ≥ 3 anlotinib related adverse events were hypertension (20.92%), increased γ-GT (7.09%), and hand-foot skin reaction (6.38%).

CONCLUSION

Anlotinib was tolerated in Chinese patients with refractory mCRC. Although OS did not reach significant difference, anlotinib still provided clinical benefits by substantially prolonged PFS in these patients.

IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE

In this randomized clinical trial that included 419 patients with refractory metastatic colorectal cancer, substantial prolonged in progression-free survival was noted in patients who received anlotinib compared with those given placebo. Improvements on objective response rate and disease control rate was also observed in anlotinib group. However, overall survival was similar between the two groups. In a word, in third-line or above treatment of Chinese patients with refractory metastatic colorectal cancer, anlotinib provided clinical benefit by significantly prolonged progression-free survival.

BRAF Mutations as Actionable Targets: A Paradigm Shift in the Management of Colorectal Cancer and Novel Avenues

BRAF mutations in colorectal cancer have been studied over the past several decades. BRAF V600E mutation, a class I mutation, is the most common oncogenic BRAF alteration in colorectal cancer. Until recently, the BRAF V600E mutation was not among actionable genes for colorectal cancer. However, recent discoveries have revealed therapeutic opportunities. The BRAF with or without MEK inhibition combined with epidermal growth factor receptor-directed therapy was recently found to be an effective therapy choice for patients with advanced-stage BRAF V600-mutant colorectal cancer. However, it is essential to distinguish patients with BRAF V600E-mutant mismatch repair-deficient colorectal cancer from those with mismatch repair-proficient colorectal cancer, as immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy is more appealing in this subset of patients with colorectal cancer. This review article discusses the molecular characteristics of class I, II, and III BRAF mutants and their impact on the clinical behavior of colorectal cancer. We also review the recent progress in the targetability of BRAF mutations in colorectal cancer, which has led to changes in clinical practice and elaborates on innovative therapeutic approaches to enhance the efficacy of BRAF-targeting therapies, to achieve more durable responses.

Tumor Microenvironment in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: The Arbitrator in Patients' Outcome

Simple Summary

Colorectal cancer accounts for approximately 10% of all annually diagnosed cancers worldwide being liver metastasis, the most common cause of death in patients with colorectal cancer. The interplay between tumor and stromal cells in the primary tumor microenvironment and at distant metastases are rising in importance as potential mechanisms of the tumor progression. In this review we discuss the new biomarkers derived from tumor microenvironment and liquid biopsy as emerging prognostic and treatments response markers for metastatic colorectal cancer. We also review the developing new clinical strategies based on tumor microenvironmental cells to tackle metastatic disease in metastatic colorectal cancer patients.

Abstract

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is one of the most common cancers in western countries. Its mortality rate varies greatly, depending on the stage of the disease. The main cause of CRC mortality is metastasis, which most commonly affects the liver. The role of tumor microenvironment in tumor initiation, progression and metastasis development has been widely studied. In this review we summarize the role of the tumor microenvironment in the liver pre-metastatic niche formation, paying attention to the distant cellular crosstalk mediated by exosomes. Moreover, and based on the prognostic and predictive capacity of alterations in the stromal compartment of tumors, we describe the role of tumor microenvironment cells and related liquid biopsy biomarkers in the delivery of precise medication for metastatic CRC. Finally, we evaluate the different clinical strategies to prevent and treat liver metastatic disease, based on the targeting of the tumor microenvironment. Specifically, targeting angiogenesis pathways and regulating immune response are two important research pipelines that are being widely developed and promise great benefits.

GUCY2C as a biomarker to target precision therapies for patients with colorectal cancer

Introduction

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is one of the most-deadly malignancies worldwide. Current therapeutic regimens for CRC patients are relatively generic, based primarily on disease type and stage, with little variation. As the field of molecular oncology advances, so too must therapeutic management of CRC. Understanding molecular heterogeneity has led to a new-found promotion for precision therapy in CRC; underlining the diversity of molecularly targeted therapies based on individual tumor characteristics.

Areas covered

We review current approaches for the treatment of CRC and discuss the potential of precision therapy in advanced CRC. We highlight the utility of the intestinal protein guanylyl cyclase C (GUCY2C), as a multi-purpose biomarker and unique therapeutic target in CRC. Here, we summarize current GUCY2C-targeted approaches for treatment of CRC.

Expert opinion

The GUCY2C biomarker has multi-faceted utility in medicine. Developmental investment of GUCY2C as a diagnostic and therapeutic biomarker offers a variety of options taking the molecular characteristics of cancer into account. From GUCY2C-targeted therapies, namely cancer vaccines, CAR-T cells, and monoclonal antibodies, to GUCY2C agonists for chemoprevention in those who are at high risk for developing colorectal cancer, the utility of this protein provides many avenues for exploration with significance in the field of precision medicine.

Identification of BCL-XL as highly active survival factor and promising therapeutic target in colorectal cancer

Since metastatic colorectal cancer (CRC) is a leading cause of cancer-related death, therapeutic approaches overcoming primary and acquired therapy resistance are an urgent medical need. In this study, the efficacy and toxicity of high-affinity inhibitors targeting antiapoptotic BCL-2 proteins (BCL-2, BCL-XL, and MCL-1) were evaluated. By RNA sequencing analysis of a pan-cancer cohort comprising >1500 patients and subsequent prediction of protein activity, BCL-XL was identified as the only antiapoptotic BCL-2 protein that is overactivated in CRC. Consistently, pharmacologic and genetic inhibition of BCL-XL induced apoptosis in human CRC cell lines. In a combined treatment approach, targeting BCL-XL augmented the efficacy of chemotherapy in vitro, in a murine CRC model, and in human ex vivo derived CRC tissue cultures. Collectively, these data show that targeting of BCL-XL is efficient and safe in preclinical CRC models, observations that pave the way for clinical translation.

The tumor microenvironment of pancreatic adenocarcinoma and immune checkpoint inhibitor resistance: a perplex relationship

Pancreatic cancer is one of the most aggressive cancers with a high mortality rate even among patients with early-stage disease. Although recent studies with novel therapeutic approaches have led to modest improvement in survival outcomes, limited progress is achieved for the use of immunotherapeutics in this challenging cancer. Immune checkpoint inhibitors, thus far, single-agent or in combination, have not yielded significant improvement in survival outcomes except in mismatch repair-deficient pancreatic cancer. The tumor microenvironment of pancreatic cancer has been considered as an attractive target for over a decade based on preclinical studies that suggested it may adversely affect drug delivery and antitumor immunity. In this review article, we elaborate on the biology of pancreatic cancer microenvironment, its highly complicated interaction with cancer cells, and the immune system. We also discuss plausible explanations that led to the failure of immune checkpoint inhibitors as therapeutic agents and the potential impacts of pancreatic cancer stroma on these negative studies.

Distant Metastasis in Colorectal Cancer Patients-Do We Have New Predicting Clinicopathological and Molecular Biomarkers? A Comprehensive Review

Colorectal cancer (CRC) remains a serious health problem worldwide. Approximately half of patients will develop distant metastasis after CRC resection, usually with very poor prognosis afterwards. Because patient performance after distant metastasis surgery remains very heterogeneous, ranging from death within 2 years to a long-term cure, there is a clinical need for a precise risk stratification of patients to aid pre- and post-operative decisions. Furthermore, around 20% of identified CRC cases are at IV stage disease, known as a metastatic CRC (mCRC). In this review, we overview possible molecular and clinicopathological biomarkers that may provide prognostic and predictive information for patients with distant metastasis. These may comprise sidedness of the tumor, molecular profile and epigenetic characteristics of the primary tumor and arising metastatic CRC, and early markers reflecting cancer cell resistance in mCRC and biomarkers identified from transcriptome. This review discusses current stage in employment of these biomarkers in clinical practice as well as summarizes current experience in identifying predictive biomarkers in mCRC treatment.

Precision medicine for gastrointestinal cancers: a conference report

As cancer management evolves into precision medicine national/international cancer meetings bring novel therapeutic approaches and potentially practice-changing results of clinical studies are presented. This year, the ASCO GI Symposium 2020 had also several updates from ongoing and finalized clinical trials. Although there were no groundbreaking results that impact the daily practice directly, several highly important data from ongoing studies were shared with the audience. In this report, the highlights of the ASCO GI Symposium 2020 are presented with a future perspective.

A BRAF new world

BRAF is a rare targetable mutation in non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Emerging evidence underlines that, rather than a single point mutation, BRAF genes present with a wide array of mutations, essentially in lung adenocarcinoma. Different BRAF mutations have divergent clinical and therapeutic implications, with a particular distinction between V600E and non-V600E mutations. The latter are at least as frequent in NSCLC as V600E, but lack any proven targeted therapy. In this paper, we briefly review the current literature and provide an update of scientific knowledge about different types of BRAF mutations in NSCLC.

Progress in refining the clinical management of cancer of unknown primary in the molecular era

Cancer of unknown primary (CUP) is an enigmatic disease entity encompassing heterogeneous malignancies without a detectable primary tumour, despite a thorough diagnostic workup. A minority of patients with CUP (15-20%) can be assigned a putative primary tissue of origin according to clinical and histopathological findings and typically have a more favourable prognosis with the use of corresponding tumour type-specific therapies. Thus, the majority of patients with CUP have disease that cannot be assigned to a culprit primary tumour, are treated with empirical chemotherapy and have a poor prognosis. In the molecular era, the use of (epi)genomic or transcriptomic CUP classifiers and DNA or RNA sequencing offers two, sometimes overlapping, therapeutic strategies: tumour type-specific therapy and biomarker-guided therapy. Published data reveal that the accuracy of site-of-origin predictions made using CUP classifiers ranges between 54% and 98% when compared with the assignment made according to the recommended clinicopathological criteria. These advances have led to promising results in non-randomized prospective studies evaluating the efficacy of tumour type-specific therapy; however, the favourable outcomes were not confirmed in randomized controlled studies comparing this approach with standard empirical chemotherapy. Currently, the evidence supporting the use of biomarker-guided therapies is limited to case reports and small case series. In this Review, we discuss the clinical management of CUP in the era of precision medicine. We focus on the advances in understanding the biology of CUP, the implications for the diagnosis and classification of CUP according to the tissue of origin and the shift away from empirical therapy towards tailored therapy.