Intraoperative prevention of Surgical Site Infections as experienced by operating room nurses

Navigating Uncertainty with Compassion: Healthcare Assistants' Reflections on Balancing COVID-19 and Routine Care through Adversity

The coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic created unprecedented challenges for healthcare systems around the world. Healthcare assistants played a vital role in the provision of frontline patient care during this crisis. Despite their important contribution, there exists limited research that specifically examines the healthcare assistant's experiences and perspectives of care provision during the COVID-19 pandemic. This study explored healthcare assistants' caring experiences and perspectives on resilience and self-efficacy during the COVID-19 pandemic in Hong Kong. A qualitative descriptive study with semi-structured interviews was conducted with 25 healthcare assistants from public hospitals. Interview recordings were analyzed using thematic analysis. Five main themes emerged from the data: frontline reinforcement: supporting HCAs through resourcing and education amidst the COVID-19 crisis, confronting uncertainty: building personal fortitude in the face of the COVID-19 pandemic, fostering collective resilience through shared support, self-efficacy as a catalyst for adaptive growth, and paving the way for transformation. These findings advocate for the resilience and self-efficacy of healthcare assistants; this may potentially strengthen healthcare system preparedness for navigating unpredictable challenges in the future.

Optimizing the Relationship Between Perioperative Personnel and Infection Preventionists to Reduce Surgical Site Infections

Prevention of surgical site infections (SSIs) is a critical aspect of ensuring positive patient outcomes. One of the challenges of SSI prevention is the communication barrier between perioperative staff members and infection preventionists (IPs), which may lead to frontline staff members who are primarily responsible for infection prevention being unaware of pertinent hospital SSI data. To overcome this challenge, IPs and perioperative staff members should develop a partnership that facilitates the sharing of feedback on SSI case review data and effective key performance indicators. A partnership also can help engage perioperative staff members in quality improvement efforts and increase collaboration with IPs. Perioperative leaders should identify effective methods to improve data transparency, SSI case reviews, audit and feedback programs, and education for perioperative team members. A strong perioperative-IP partnership and increased sharing of data in accessible formats may improve engagement and interest in SSI prevention.

Effects of a fixed nurse team in the orthopaedic surgery operating room on work efficiency and patient outcomes: a propensity score-matched historically controlled study

Background

The work value of operating room (OR) nurses is directly reflected in nursing quality. However, evaluating the work value of these nurses has not been sufficiently investigated. This study evaluated the effects of a fixed nurse team (FNT) in an orthopaedic surgery OR on work efficiency and patient outcomes.

Methods

A propensity score-matched historically controlled study conducted from 1 July 2015 to 30 June 2018 was used to investigate the difference in nursing quality between an FNT period and a non-FNT period in the orthopaedic surgery OR at a tertiary care hospital in China. The primary outcome was surgical site infections (SSIs) during in-hospital visits, and as a secondary outcome, other nursing-sensitive quality indicators were assessed with historically controlled data. A multifactor logistic regression model was constructed to examine the primary outcome differences between the FNT and non-FNT periods before and after propensity score matching.

Results

In total, 5365 patients and 33 nurses were included in the final analysis. The overall SSI rate was 2.1% (110/5365; the non-FNT period 2.6% [64/2474], the FNT period 1.6% [46/2891]). A lower incidence of SSIs in patients (odds ratio 0.57, 95% CI 0.36 to 0.88, P=0.013), a lower turnover time of the surgical procedure (odds ratio 0.653, 95% CI 0.505 to 0.844, P<0.001), and improvement in surgeon satisfaction (odds ratio 1.543, 95% CI 1.039 to 2.292, P=0.031), were associated with the FNT period compared with the non-FNT period. However, we did not find significant differences between the FNT period and the non-FNT period in terms of the other indicators.

Conclusions

The presence of an FNT in an OR reduces the incidence of SSIs in surgical patients and the turnover time of surgical procedures and improves surgeon satisfaction. Further implementation of an advanced-practice nurse model with nurse specialists is encouraged.

The safety of a novel single-drape cover for sterile back tables in the operating room compared to the standard two-drape method: an experimental study

BACKGROUND

Covering the prepared sterile back tables (PSBTs) during periods of nonuse and during active surgeries may decrease contamination of sterile surgical instruments that have direct contact to surgical wound. The Association of periOperative Registered Nurses (AORN) declared that an easy method for covering and removing the drape will ultimately be most effective (e.g. standard two-drape method). Hence, this study was designed to test the hypothesis that using a novel single-drape cover had more efficiency and safety in decreasing airborne bacteria-carrying particles (ABCPs) settling on the PSBTs during static and dynamic periods than the standard two-drape method.

METHODS

This experimental study was conducted with using 918 agar plates to detect contamination of the PSBTs with ABCPs on two conditions (static and dynamic) at an academic medical center in Kashan, Iran, from September 25, 2021, to January 20, 2022. The contamination of PSBTs was evaluated by 6 agar settle plates (n = 918 in total) on each PSBT in static and dynamic operating room (OR) conditions. At each time-point, this set-up was repeated on two occasions else during data collection, establishing 81 PSBTs in total. Tested groups included the PSBTs covered with the standard two-drape method, the novel single-drape cover, or no cover. The plates were collected after 15, 30, 45, 60, 120, 180, 240 min and 24 h. The primary outcome measured was comparison of mean bioburden of ABCPs settling on covered PSBTs on two conditions by using agar settle plates. The secondary outcomes measured were to determine the role of covering in decreasing contamination of PSBTs and the estimation of time-dependent surgical instrument contamination in the uncovered PSBTs on two conditions by using agar settle plates.

RESULTS

Covering the PSBTs during static and dynamic OR conditions lead to a significantly decreased bioburden of ABCPs on them (P < 0.05). No differences were seen between the standard two-drape method and the novel single-drape cover (P > 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

We found that there is no preference for using the novel single-drape cover than the standard two-drape method. Our results showed a significant decrease in bioburden of ABCPs on the PSBTs when those were covered during static and dynamic OR conditions, indicating the efficiency for covering the PSBTs during periods of nonuse and during active surgery.

Covering surgical instruments with single- or double-layer drape pending surgery: an experimental study in a perioperative setting

Background:

Surgical site infections (SSI) constitute a severe threat to surgery patients. The surgical environment must be as free of contaminating microorganisms as possible. Using sterile surgical instruments while performing surgery is an absolute necessity for ensuring quality of care in perioperative settings.

Aim:

To compare bacterial contamination of agar plates after 15 h on set surgical instrument tables covered with a single- or double-layer drape.

Methods:

An experimental design was used consisting of set instrument tables with six agar plates on each table: four instrument tables were covered with a single-layer drape and four instrument tables were covered with a double-layer drape. This set-up was repeated on nine occasions during the period of data collection, making 76 set instrument tables in total. As a control, one instrument table was uncovered on four of those occasions.

Results:

The double-layer drape cover showed a significantly (P = 0.03) lower number of colony forming units (CFU) per agar plate than the single-layer drape covering. As expected, the uncovered instrument tables were highly contaminated.

Discussion:

Our results indicate that it is good practice to cover instruments properly with at least a single-layer drape before a surgical procedure. If there is difficulty achieving optimal conditions while setting the instrument tables (e.g. positioning the patient for general anaesthesia), it is a better option to set the instrument tables earlier and cover them with a double-layer drape. These precautions will help protect the patient from harm and unnecessary SSI by lowering microbiological burden, a key factor in developing SSI.