Lessons from Vienna: stakeholder perceptions of functional electrical stimulation technology and a conceptual model for practice

End-User Perspectives of the Importance of Rehabilitation Technologies and Related Values for Implementation

Despite the increased availability of rehabilitation technologies (such as robotics) and evidence to support their use, their adoption is still limited in practice. To begin to address this issue, we sought to better understand the perspectives of end-users regarding the implementation of rehabilitation technologies through an online survey. Fifty unique responses across Client (e.g., people with disability and carers), Allied Health (e.g., occupational and physical therapists, podiatrists, psychologists, dieticians, audiologists, exercise physiologists), and Medical (i.e., physicians and nurses) groups were analyzed. Respondents considered rehabilitation technologies to be important (median across groups of 9 out of 10). Across groups, value statements related to the implementation of rehabilitation technologies ranked from most to least important related to: benefits of technology to its intended end-user with disability, practical use of technologies, the technologies themselves (e.g., innovative, established, stand-alone), and their impact on health professionals or the health system as a whole. There were similarities and differences in ranking within and across end-user groups. The prioritization of statements indicates where development efforts can be focused to address end-user goals, and disparity in results across groups supports rich stakeholder engagement during rehabilitation technology development.

Factors that influence the adoption of rehabilitation technologies: a multi-disciplinary qualitative exploration

BACKGROUND

Technological innovation is recognised as having the potential to enhance rehabilitation for people with disability. Yet, resistance to, and abandonment of, rehabilitation technology is prevalent and the successful translation of technology into rehabilitation settings remains limited. Therefore, the aim of this work was to develop an in-depth, multi-stakeholder perspective on what influences the adoption of rehabilitation technologies.

METHODS

Semi-structured focus groups were conducted as part of a larger research project aiming to facilitate the co-design of a novel neurorestorative technology. Focus group data were analysed using a five-phase hybrid deductive-inductive approach to qualitative data analysis.

RESULTS

Focus groups were attended by 43 stakeholders with expertise in one or more of the following fields: people with disability, allied health, human movement science, computer science, design, engineering, ethics, funding, marketing, business, product development, and research development. Six main themes influencing the adoption of technology in rehabilitation were identified: cost beyond the purchase price, benefits to all stakeholders, trust to be earned in technology, ease of technology operation, ability to access technology, and the 'co' in co-design. All six themes were found to be interrelated; in particular, the importance of direct stakeholder engagement in the development of rehabilitation technologies (the 'co' in co-design) was prevalent in all themes.

CONCLUSIONS

A range of complex and interrelated factors influence the adoption of rehabilitation technologies. Importantly, many of the issues that have the potential to negatively impact rehabilitation technology adoption may be addressed during development by utilising the experience and expertise of stakeholders who influence its supply and demand. Our findings state that a wider cohort of stakeholders needs to be actively engaged in the development of rehabilitation technologies to better address the factors that contribute to technology underutilisation and abandonment and facilitate better outcomes for people with disability.

A nation-wide survey exploring the views of current and future use of functional electrical stimulation in spinal cord injury

PURPOSE

Functional electrical stimulation (FES) can be effective in assisting physical and psychosocial difficulties experienced by people with spinal cord injury. Perceived benefits and barriers of the current and future use of FES within the wider spinal cord injury community is currently unknown. The main objective of this research was to explore the spinal cord injury community's views of the use of FES to decrease disability in rehabilitation programmes.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

An online and paper questionnaire was distributed to people with spinal cord injury, health care professionals and researchers working in spinal cord injury settings in the United Kingdom.

RESULTS

A total of 299 participants completed the survey (152 people with spinal cord injury, 141 health care professionals and 6 researchers). Common views between groups identified were: (1) FES can be beneficial in improving physical and psychosocial aspects and that (2) adequate support and training for FES application was provided to users. Barriers to FES use included a lack of staff time and training, financial cost and availability of the equipment. Sixty three percent of non-users felt they would use FES in the future if they had the opportunity.

CONCLUSIONS

Users' views were important in identifying that FES application can be beneficial for people with spinal cord injury but also has some resourceful barriers. In order to increase use, future research should focus on reducing the cost of FES clinical service and also address implementation of awareness and training programmes within spinal units and community rehabilitation settings.IMPLICATIONS FOR REHABILITATIONUsers of functional electrical stimulation think that it is beneficial for improving physical and psychosocial limitations after spinal cord injuryBarriers to FES use include a lack of staff time and training, financial cost and availability of the equipment have been suggested by people with spinal cord injury and health care professionals Education and implementation programs for health care professionals and people with spinal cord injury are now necessary to increase the awareness about functional electrical stimulation applicationReduction of FES cost could also increase its uptake in spinal cord injury clinical services.

Functional Electrical Stimulation Cycling Exercise for People with Multiple Sclerosis

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

There has been substantial interest in the role of exercise for managing impairments, limitations, and disability progression among persons with multiple sclerosis (MS). Despite established benefits of exercise training for persons who have mild-to-moderate MS, the ability to deliver exercise to persons who experience higher disability remains challenging. One promising approach for exercise in this population is functional electrical stimulation (FES) cycling. This review provides a summary of the current evidence for FES cycling as an exercise training modality in persons with MS with respect to prescription, safety, tolerability, and acute and chronic effects.

RECENT FINDINGS

We searched the literature for studies involving FES cycling exercise in persons with MS published in English up until July 2019. Eight studies were retrieved: two studies examined acute effects, two studies examined chronic effects, and four studies reported on both acute and chronic effects of FES cycling exercise. The overall quality of the studies was low, with only one, small, randomized controlled trial (RCT). There is limited but promising evidence for the application of FES cycling exercise among persons with MS who have moderate-to-severe disability. Participants were capable of engaging in regular FES cycling exercise (~ 30 min, 2-3×/week), with few, mild adverse events experienced. Preliminary evidence from small, mostly uncontrolled trials supports the potential benefits of FES cycling on physiological fitness, walking mobility, and symptoms of fatigue and pain. High-quality RCTs of FES cycling exercise are necessary for providing recommendations for integrating exercise training in the management of advanced MS.

Home FES: An Exploratory Review

This review of literature focuses on the multiple uses of Functional Electrical Stimulation (FES) and how this modality may be a valuable home-based therapy. Papers pertaining to home FES exercise were collected using the Web of Science, Google Scholar databases and collegial hints. In our opinion, the following statements summarize the results. FES may be used to induce health benefits in populations with paralysis, and in persons with musculoskeletal, cardiorespiratory and renal pathology. The EU Project Rise showed how FES could have a variety of encouraging outcomes for patients with denervated muscles following traumatic injuries. As suggested by recent literature, FES has proven to be a viable form of exercise for elderly individuals. Thus, Home FES may be an option for patients looking for an additional form of muscle and cardiopulmonary physical therapy.