1
|
Hutton P, Kelly J, Taylor CDJ, Williams B, Emsley R, Alexander CH, Vikram A, Saddington D, McCann A, Burke J, Eliasson E, Harper S, Karatzias T, Taylor PJ, Watson A, Dougall N, Stavert J, O'Rourke S, Glasgow A, Murphy R, Palmer K, Zaidi N, Bidwell P, Pritchard J, Carr L, Woodrow A. Accelerating the development of a psychological intervention to restore treatment decision-making capacity in patients with schizophrenia-spectrum disorder: a study protocol for a multi-site, assessor-blinded, pilot Umbrella trial (the DEC:IDES trial). Pilot Feasibility Stud 2023; 9:117. [PMID: 37422659 PMCID: PMC10329297 DOI: 10.1186/s40814-023-01323-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/13/2023] [Accepted: 05/26/2023] [Indexed: 07/10/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND A high proportion of patients diagnosed with schizophrenia-spectrum disorders will at some point in their lives be assessed as not having the capacity to make their own decisions about pharmacological treatment or inpatient care ('capacity'). Few will be helped to regain it before these interventions proceed. This is partly because effective and safe methods to do so are lacking. Our aim is to accelerate their development by testing, for the first time in mental healthcare, the feasibility, acceptability and safety of running an 'Umbrella' trial. This involves running, concurrently and under one multi-site infrastructure, multiple assessor-blind randomised controlled trials, each of which is designed to examine the effect on capacity of improving a single psychological mechanism ('mechanism'). Our primary objectives are to demonstrate feasibility of (i) recruitment and (ii) data retention on the MacArthur Competence Assessment Tool-Treatment (MacCAT-T; planned primary outcome for a future trial) at end-of-treatment. We selected three mechanisms to test: 'self-stigma', low self-esteem and the 'jumping to conclusions' bias. Each is highly prevalent in psychosis, responsive to psychological intervention, and hypothesised to contribute to impaired capacity. METHODS Sixty participants with schizophrenia-spectrum diagnoses, impaired capacity and one or more mechanism(s) will be recruited from outpatient and inpatient mental health services in three UK sites (Lothian, Scotland; Lancashire and Pennine; North West England). Those lacking capacity to consent to research could take part if the key criteria were met, including either proxy consent (Scotland) or favourable Consultee advice (England). They will be allocated to one of three randomised controlled trials, depending on which mechanism(s) they have. They will then be randomised to receive, over an 8-week period and in addition to treatment as usual (TAU), 6 sessions of either a psychological intervention which targets the mechanism, or 6 sessions of assessment of the causes of their incapacity (control condition). Participants are assessed at 0 (baseline), 8 (end-of-treatment) and 24 (follow-up) weeks post-randomisation using measures of capacity (MacCAT-T), mechanism, adverse events, psychotic symptoms, subjective recovery, quality of life, service use, anxiety, core schemata and depression. Two nested qualitative studies will be conducted; one to understand participant and clinician experiences and one to investigate the validity of MacCAT-T appreciation ratings. DISCUSSION This will be the first Umbrella trial in mental healthcare. It will produce the first 3 single-blind randomised controlled trials of psychological interventions to support treatment decision-making in schizophrenia-spectrum disorder. Demonstrating feasibility will have significant implications not only for those seeking to support capacity in psychosis, but also for those who wish to accelerate the development of psychological interventions for other conditions. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04309435 . Pre-registered on 16 March 2020.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Paul Hutton
- School of Health & Social Care, Edinburgh Napier University, Edinburgh, UK.
- Edinburgh Research & Innovation Centre for Complex and Acute Mental Health Problems, Edinburgh, UK.
| | - James Kelly
- Faculty of Health & Medicine, Lancaster University, Lancaster, UK
- Lancashire & South Cumbria NHS Foundation Trust, Preston, UK
| | - Christopher D J Taylor
- Pennine Care NHS Foundation Trust, Ashton-Under-Lyne, UK
- Division of Psychology & Mental Health, Manchester Academic Health Sciences Centre, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Brian Williams
- School of Health, Social Care & Life Sciences, University of the Highlands and Islands, Inverness, UK
| | - Richard Emsley
- Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, Kings College London, London, UK
| | | | - Anvita Vikram
- Pennine Care NHS Foundation Trust, Ashton-Under-Lyne, UK
| | | | - Andrea McCann
- Lancashire & South Cumbria NHS Foundation Trust, Preston, UK
| | - Joseph Burke
- School of Health & Social Care, Edinburgh Napier University, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Emma Eliasson
- NHS Lothian, Edinburgh, UK
- NHS Research Scotland Mental Health Network, Edinburgh, UK
- National Centre for Suicide Research and Prevention, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Sean Harper
- Edinburgh Research & Innovation Centre for Complex and Acute Mental Health Problems, Edinburgh, UK
- NHS Lothian, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Thanos Karatzias
- School of Health & Social Care, Edinburgh Napier University, Edinburgh, UK
- Edinburgh Research & Innovation Centre for Complex and Acute Mental Health Problems, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Peter J Taylor
- Division of Psychology & Mental Health, Manchester Academic Health Sciences Centre, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | | | - Nadine Dougall
- School of Health & Social Care, Edinburgh Napier University, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Jill Stavert
- School of Health & Social Care, Edinburgh Napier University, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Suzanne O'Rourke
- School of Health in Social Science, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | | | | | - Karen Palmer
- Lancashire & South Cumbria NHS Foundation Trust, Preston, UK
| | - Nosheen Zaidi
- Lancashire & South Cumbria NHS Foundation Trust, Preston, UK
| | - Polly Bidwell
- Lancashire & South Cumbria NHS Foundation Trust, Preston, UK
| | | | - Lucy Carr
- Pennine Care NHS Foundation Trust, Ashton-Under-Lyne, UK
| | - Amanda Woodrow
- School of Health & Social Care, Edinburgh Napier University, Edinburgh, UK
- Edinburgh Research & Innovation Centre for Complex and Acute Mental Health Problems, Edinburgh, UK
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Keij SM, Lie HC, Laidsaar-Powell R, Kunneman M, de Boer JE, Moaddine S, Stiggelbout AM, Pieterse AH. Patient-related characteristics considered to affect patient involvement in shared decision making about treatment: A scoping review of the qualitative literature. PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING 2023; 111:107677. [PMID: 36857803 DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2023.107677] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/15/2022] [Revised: 02/13/2023] [Accepted: 02/16/2023] [Indexed: 05/17/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To identify patient-related characteristics considered to affect patient involvement in shared decision making (SDM) about treatment. METHODS We conducted a scoping review of qualitative studies. We searched for literature across seven databases until March 2022, and included qualitative studies that focused on associations between patient-related characteristics and SDM about treatment in adults. We analyzed studies using an inductive thematic approach. RESULTS The search yielded 5948 articles, of which 70 were included. We identified many different patient-related characteristics, which we grouped into four categories related to: (1) the individual who is facing the decision, (2) the decision, (3) the relationship between the patient and the clinician and others involved in the decision, and (4) the healthcare context. CONCLUSIONS Studies report a variety of patient-related characteristics that may affect patient involvement in SDM. Amongst others, patients may need to feel informed, to understand their role in SDM, and be able to communicate. Involvement may be challenging with characteristics such as perceived time pressure, poor patient-clinician relationships, emotional distress, and severe illness. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS In order to truly involve patients in SDM, we might need to focus on characteristics such as patient emotions and relationship building, besides information provision and values clarification.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sascha M Keij
- Medical Decision Making, Department of Biomedical Data Sciences, Leiden University Medical Center, the Netherlands.
| | - Hanne C Lie
- Department of Behavioural Medicine, Institute of Basic Medical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Norway
| | - Rebekah Laidsaar-Powell
- Centre for Medical Psychology and Evidence-Based Decision-Making (CeMPED), School of Psychology, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Marleen Kunneman
- Medical Decision Making, Department of Biomedical Data Sciences, Leiden University Medical Center, the Netherlands; Knowledge and Evaluation Research Unit, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Joyce E de Boer
- Medical Decision Making, Department of Biomedical Data Sciences, Leiden University Medical Center, the Netherlands
| | - Saïda Moaddine
- Medical Decision Making, Department of Biomedical Data Sciences, Leiden University Medical Center, the Netherlands
| | - Anne M Stiggelbout
- Medical Decision Making, Department of Biomedical Data Sciences, Leiden University Medical Center, the Netherlands; Erasmus School of Health Policy and Management, Erasmus University Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Arwen H Pieterse
- Medical Decision Making, Department of Biomedical Data Sciences, Leiden University Medical Center, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Smith P, Simpson L, Madill A. Service user experiences of a novel in-reach rehabilitation and recovery service for people with profound and enduring mental health needs. Int J Ment Health Nurs 2021; 30:1106-1116. [PMID: 33772984 DOI: 10.1111/inm.12861] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 02/28/2021] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
This article provides an organizational case study using exploratory qualitative and visual research methods. We address the research question: What are the experiences of service users who use a novel in-reach rehabilitation and recovery service for people with severe and enduring mental health needs? Fifteen purposefully sampled service users were recruited from across a Service that is novel in embedding community sectors within inpatient provision. The sample reflects approximately the demographic of the Service and comprises: 10 men, 5 women; 12 white British, 3 ethnic minority; aged 18-60 years; and across inpatient care and supported community living. Photo-elicitation was used to enrich data collection through lightly structured interviews focused on the images brought by participants. Interview transcripts were analysed using interpretative phenomenological analysis. Analysis indicates that participants oriented towards four 'meta-questions': What does mental well-being mean to you? What difficulties have you encountered? What do you appreciate about the Service? What do you need for change to occur? We also identified six themes which told the story of a journey. The journey begins with challenge and moves towards making connections with others. Here, power dynamics are often experienced and addressed in the development of a greater sense of independence. This then provides opportunities for raised awareness around possibilities of recovery and a new-found hope. Our three main conclusions are all relevant to clinical practice: service users (a) place great importance on building relationships; (b) aspire to make informed choices throughout their recovery journey; and (c) desire greater transparency regarding treatment options.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Penn Smith
- School of Psychology, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Lisa Simpson
- Community Links part of the Inspire North Group, Leeds, UK
| | - Anna Madill
- School of Psychology, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Berry N, Machin M, Ainsworth J, Berry K, Edge D, Haddock G, Lewis S, Morris R, Bucci S. Developing a Theory-Informed Smartphone App for Early Psychosis: Learning Points From a Multidisciplinary Collaboration. Front Psychiatry 2020; 11:602861. [PMID: 33362612 PMCID: PMC7758439 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyt.2020.602861] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/04/2020] [Accepted: 10/19/2020] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: Actissist is a smartphone app designed to deliver an intervention grounded in cognitive behavior therapy for early psychosis. Actissist was developed by a multidisciplinary team of academics, clinicians, experts by experience and software engineers. Actissist has been tested in two trials, the first a proof-of-concept trial where Actissist was safe, acceptable and feasible, the second, a powered randomized controlled trial. Objective: This article describes how our multidisciplinary team designed and developed Actissist. This article describes: (i) how Actissist was informed by initial qualitative interviews and focus groups and an expert reference group; (ii) refinements made to the app based on ongoing user feedback; (iii) successes and challenges encountered; and (iv) learning points and recommendations for involving stakeholders in digital health interventions. Methods: Expert reference group meetings informed the development of Actissist and design of subsequent trials, which included individuals with lived experience of psychosis, clinicians, academics, computer scientists and software engineers. Person-centered stakeholder involvement was promoted using focus groups and qualitative interviews prior to the development of the app, which informed version one of Actissist. Interviews were carried out with participants who had used Actissist. Two further versions of Actissist were developed following additional rounds of testing. Results: Multidisciplinary working throughout the Actissist project led to the development, inclusion and improvement of the app design and content. These changes and features included non-directive and compassionate content, co-designed recovery videos, relaxation exercises, psychoeducation material, ability to "favorite" areas of the app that users found helpful, and goal-setting. Challenges to collaborative working included discrepancies between what stakeholders want and what is technically possible to deliver, resource pressures, trying to deliver desired features within the boundaries of fundamental trial design considerations, and power imbalances associated with multidisciplinary working. Conclusions: The involvement of stakeholders in the design and development and delivery of Actissist has been fundamental to our development approach. Through this collaborative process, we have identified different perspectives and ideas that would have not been generated by the research team alone. Clinical Trial Registrations: Proof-of-concept trial: http://www.isrctn.com/ISRCTN34966555 Fully-powered randomized controlled trial: https://www.isrctn.com/ISRCTN76986679.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Natalie Berry
- Division of Psychology and Mental Health, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, School of Health Sciences, Manchester Academic Health Sciences, The University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom
| | - Matthew Machin
- Division of Informatics Imaging and Data Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, School of Health Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom
| | - John Ainsworth
- Division of Informatics Imaging and Data Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, School of Health Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom
| | - Katherine Berry
- Division of Psychology and Mental Health, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, School of Health Sciences, Manchester Academic Health Sciences, The University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom
- Greater Manchester Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, United Kingdom
| | - Dawn Edge
- Division of Psychology and Mental Health, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, School of Health Sciences, Manchester Academic Health Sciences, The University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom
| | - Gillian Haddock
- Division of Psychology and Mental Health, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, School of Health Sciences, Manchester Academic Health Sciences, The University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom
- Greater Manchester Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, United Kingdom
| | - Shon Lewis
- Division of Psychology and Mental Health, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, School of Health Sciences, Manchester Academic Health Sciences, The University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom
| | - Rohan Morris
- Division of Psychology and Mental Health, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, School of Health Sciences, Manchester Academic Health Sciences, The University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom
| | - Sandra Bucci
- Division of Psychology and Mental Health, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, School of Health Sciences, Manchester Academic Health Sciences, The University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom
- Greater Manchester Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Allan S, Bradstreet S, McLeod HJ, Gleeson J, Farhall J, Lambrou M, Clark A, Gumley AI. Perspectives of patients, carers and mental health staff on early warning signs of relapse in psychosis: a qualitative investigation. BJPsych Open 2019; 6:e3. [PMID: 31826793 PMCID: PMC7001464 DOI: 10.1192/bjo.2019.88] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/03/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Relapse prevention strategies based on monitoring of early warning signs (EWS) are advocated for the management of psychosis. However, there has been a lack of research exploring how staff, carers and patients make sense of the utility of EWS, or how these are implemented in context. AIMS To develop a multiperspective theory of how EWS are understood and used, which is grounded in the experiences of mental health staff, carers and patients. METHOD Twenty-five focus groups were held across Glasgow and Melbourne (EMPOWER Trial, ISRCTN: 99559262). Participants comprised 88 mental health staff, 21 patients and 40 carers from UK and Australia (total n = 149). Data were analysed using constructivist grounded theory. RESULTS All participants appeared to recognise EWS and acknowledged the importance of responding to EWS to support relapse prevention. However, recognition of and acting on EWS were constructed in a context of uncertainty, which appeared linked to risk appraisals that were dependent on distinct stakeholder roles and experiences. Within current relapse management, a process of weighted decision-making (where one factor was seen as more important than others) described how stakeholders weighed up the risks and consequences of relapse alongside the risks and consequences of intervention and help-seeking. CONCLUSIONS Mental health staff, carers and patients speak about using EWS within a weighted decision-making process, which is acted out in the context of relationships that exist in current relapse management, rather than an objective response to specific signs and symptoms.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stephanie Allan
- Student, Glasgow Institute of Health and Wellbeing, University of Glasgow, UK
| | - Simon Bradstreet
- Trial Manager, Glasgow Institute of Health and Wellbeing, University of Glasgow, UK
| | - Hamish J McLeod
- Professor, Glasgow Institute of Health and Wellbeing, University of Glasgow, UK
| | - John Gleeson
- Professor, Australian Catholic University, Australia
| | - John Farhall
- Associate Professor, La Trobe University, Australia
| | - Maria Lambrou
- Research Assistant, Australian Catholic University, Australia
| | - Andrea Clark
- Research Assistant, Glasgow Institute of Health and Wellbeing, University of Glasgow, UK
| | - Andrew I Gumley
- Professor, Glasgow Institute of Health and Wellbeing, University of Glasgow, UK
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Faith LA, Collins JO, Decker J, Grove A, Jarvis SP, Rempfer MV. Experiences of empowerment in a community cognitive enhancement therapy program: an exploratory qualitative study. PSYCHOSIS 2019. [DOI: 10.1080/17522439.2019.1632920] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/26/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Laura A. Faith
- Department of Psychology, The University of Missouri, Kansas City, MO, USA
| | - Jen O. Collins
- Department of Psychology, The University of Missouri, Kansas City, MO, USA
| | - Jenna Decker
- Department of Psychology, The University of Missouri, Kansas City, MO, USA
| | - Amber Grove
- Department of Psychology, The University of Missouri, Kansas City, MO, USA
| | - Stephen P. Jarvis
- Truman Medical Center Behavioral Health, Kansas City, MO, USA
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Missouri, Kansas City, MO, USA
| | - Melisa V. Rempfer
- Department of Psychology, The University of Missouri, Kansas City, MO, USA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Berry N, Lobban F, Bucci S. A qualitative exploration of service user views about using digital health interventions for self-management in severe mental health problems. BMC Psychiatry 2019; 19:35. [PMID: 30665384 PMCID: PMC6341527 DOI: 10.1186/s12888-018-1979-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 70] [Impact Index Per Article: 14.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/15/2018] [Accepted: 12/10/2018] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The development of digital health interventions (DHIs) for severe mental health problems is fast-paced. Researchers are beginning to consult service users to inform DHIs; however, much of this involvement has been limited to feedback on specific interventions post-DHI development. This study had two aims: 1. explore service user views towards DHIs for severe mental health problems; and 2. make recommendations for specific content within DHIs based on service user needs and suggestions. METHODS Qualitative interviews with eighteen people with severe mental health problems focussed on two domains: 1) views about DHIs for severe mental health problems; and 2) ideas for future DHI content and design features. Data were analysed thematically. RESULTS Participants responses were captured in five key themes: 1) DHIs could be empowering tools that instigate reflection and change; 2) society is already divided; DHIs will further increase this divide; 3) considerations must be made about who has access to DHI data and how this data may be used; 4) DHIs should not be delivered without other support options; and 5) DHIs should provide a positive, fun, practical and interactive method for self-management. CONCLUSIONS Participants found DHIs acceptable due to the empowering nature of self-management and ability to take ownership of their own healthcare needs. However, concerns included the potential for digital exclusion, privacy and confidentiality and fears about DHIs being used to replace other mental health services. Service users want tools to help them self-manage their mental health, but also provide positive and recovery-focussed content that can be used in conjunction with other support options.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Natalie Berry
- Division of Psychology and Mental Health, Medicine and Health, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Biology University of Manchester, Brunswick Street, Manchester, UK.
| | - Fiona Lobban
- 0000 0000 8190 6402grid.9835.7Spectrum Centre for Mental Health Research, Division of Health Research, School of Health and Medicine, Lancaster University, Lancaster, UK
| | - Sandra Bucci
- 0000000121662407grid.5379.8Division of Psychology and Mental Health, Medicine and Health, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Biology University of Manchester, Brunswick Street, Manchester, UK ,0000 0004 0581 2008grid.451052.7Greater Manchester Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Woodrow A, Sparks S, Bobrovskaia V, Paterson C, Murphy P, Hutton P. Decision-making ability in psychosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis of the magnitude, specificity and correlates of impaired performance on the Iowa and Cambridge Gambling Tasks. Psychol Med 2019; 49:32-48. [PMID: 30246669 DOI: 10.1017/s0033291718002660] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/26/2022]
Abstract
To identify factors which may help or hinder decision-making ability in people with psychosis, we did a systematic review and meta-analysis of their performance on the Iowa and Cambridge Gambling Tasks. Analysis of 47 samples found they had moderately poorer performance than healthy individuals (N = 4264, g = -0.57, 95% confidence interval (CI) -0.66 to -0.48). Few studies (k = 8) used non-psychotic clinical comparator groups, although very low-quality evidence (k = 3) found people with bipolar disorder may perform better. Negative symptoms (k = 13, N = 648, r = -0.17, 95% CI -0.26 to -0.07) and lower IQ (k = 11, N = 525, r = 0.20, 95% CI 0.29-0.10), but not positive symptoms (k = 10, N = 512, r = -0.01, 95% CI -0.11 to 0.08), each had small-moderate associations with poorer decision-making. Lower quality evidence suggested general symptoms, working memory, social functioning, awareness of emotional responses to information, and attentional bias towards gain are associated with decision-making, but not education, executive functioning or overall symptoms. Meta-regression suggested an inverse association between decision-making and depression severity (k = 6, Q = 6.41, R2 100%, p = 0.01). Those taking first-generation (k = 6, N = 305, g = -0.17, 95% CI -0.40 to 0.06, p = 0.147) or low-dose antipsychotics (k = 5, N = 442, g = -0.19, 95% CI -0.44 to 0.06, p = 0.139) had unimpaired decision-making. Although meta-regression found no linear association between dose and performance, non-reporting of the dose was common and associated with larger impairments (k = 46, Q = 4.71, R2 14%, p = 0.03). Those supporting people with psychosis to make decisions, including treatment decisions, should consider the potential effect of these factors. Interventionist-causal trials are required to test whether reducing antipsychotic dose and treating anxiety and depression can improve decision-making in this group.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amanda Woodrow
- School of Health and Social Care, Edinburgh Napier University,Edinburgh,UK
| | - Sarah Sparks
- School of Health in Social Science, University of Edinburgh,Edinburgh,UK
| | | | - Charlotte Paterson
- School of Health and Social Care, Edinburgh Napier University,Edinburgh,UK
| | - Philip Murphy
- School of Health and Social Care, Edinburgh Napier University,Edinburgh,UK
| | - Paul Hutton
- School of Health and Social Care, Edinburgh Napier University,Edinburgh,UK
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Bucci S, Morris R, Berry K, Berry N, Haddock G, Barrowclough C, Lewis S, Edge D. Early Psychosis Service User Views on Digital Technology: Qualitative Analysis. JMIR Ment Health 2018; 5:e10091. [PMID: 30381280 PMCID: PMC6236205 DOI: 10.2196/10091] [Citation(s) in RCA: 39] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/13/2018] [Revised: 05/31/2018] [Accepted: 06/17/2018] [Indexed: 12/16/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Digital technology has the potential to improve outcomes for people with psychosis. However, to date, research has largely ignored service user views on digital health interventions (DHIs). OBJECTIVE The objective of our study was to explore early psychosis service users' subjective views on DHIs. METHODS Framework analysis was undertaken with data obtained from 21 semistructured interviews with people registered with early intervention for psychosis services. Robust measures were used to develop a stable framework, including member checking, triangulation, independent verification of themes, and consensus meetings. RESULTS The following 4 themes were established a priori: acceptability of technology in psychosis and mental health; technology increasing access to and augmenting mental health support; barriers to adopting DHIs; and concerns about management of data protection, privacy, risk, and security of information. The following 2 themes were generated a posteriori: blending DHIs with face-to-face treatment and empowerment, control, and choice. DHIs were also viewed as potentially destigmatizing, overcoming barriers faced in traditional service settings, facilitating communication, and empowering service users to take active control of their health care. CONCLUSIONS In the first study of its kind, early psychosis service users' were largely positive about the potential use of DHIs supporting and managing mental health. Overall, service users felt that DHIs were a progressive, modern, and relevant platform for health care delivery. Concerns were expressed around privacy and data security and practical barriers inherent within DHIs, all of which require further attention. Future research should explore whether findings transfer to other service user groups, other technology delivery formats, and across a range of treatment modalities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sandra Bucci
- Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Division of Psychology and Mental Health, School of Health Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom.,Greater Manchester Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, United Kingdom
| | - Rohan Morris
- Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Division of Psychology and Mental Health, School of Health Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom
| | - Katherine Berry
- Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Division of Psychology and Mental Health, School of Health Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom.,Greater Manchester Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, United Kingdom
| | - Natalie Berry
- Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Division of Psychology and Mental Health, School of Health Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom
| | - Gillian Haddock
- Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Division of Psychology and Mental Health, School of Health Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom.,Greater Manchester Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, United Kingdom
| | - Christine Barrowclough
- Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Division of Psychology and Mental Health, School of Health Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom
| | - Shôn Lewis
- Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Division of Psychology and Mental Health, School of Health Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom.,Greater Manchester Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, United Kingdom
| | - Dawn Edge
- Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Division of Psychology and Mental Health, School of Health Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|