Migration, health, and socioenvironmental safety net among children of Dhaka, Bangladesh

A systematic review of the health of internal migrants in Bangladesh

Internal migrants are more disadvantaged than non-migrants in terms of their health. However, the extent of this difference is unclear. Following the PRISMA guideline, we conducted a systematic review to explore the existing evidence on the health of internal migrants of Bangladesh. We searched Pubmed, Web of Science and Google Scholar to identify peer-reviewed literature on health related issues of the internal migrant population and identified 29 papers for inclusion. Included studies reported health issues or risk factors relating to water, sanitisation and hygiene access and practice, risky sexual behaviour and sexually transmitted infection, mental health status, occupational health status, general healthcare availability, healthcare service utilisation and healthcare seeking behaviour. This systematic review reveals that research on health issues of internal migrants of Bangladesh is limited for common communicable and noncommunicable diseases like waterborne and skin disease, tuberculosis, hypertension and diabetes. Further, despite that many of these migrants are labourers, occupational health related issues like work place accidents, musculoskeletal disorders are insufficiently explored. Barriers to healthcare accessibility in this population are poor socioeconomic status, illiteracy and low general health knowledge. For improved development and implementation of health policies targeting this important population, future studies should focus on understudied diseases and disease prevalence and be designed to elicit from the perspectives of internal migrants, their key health needs around risk factors and health services accessibility.

Drinking-water efficiency, cost of illness, and peri-urban society: An economic household analysis

This study aims to measure the efficacy of drinking water in terms of the economic impacts and risk of illness involved in using perilous water sources. Socio-economic factors were also considered. A multidisciplinary approach was employed to analyze the data, including the cost of illness (COI), regression technique, and irrigation water efficiency methods. The primary data set consisted of 210 peri-urban and urban households. It was found that the average cost of illness was higher in peri-urban ($10.79 USD) areas, while willingness to pay for quality water was higher in urban residents. Social status, income, and family size was positively associated with the cost of illness, while education, the source of drinking water (ground water and others), and awareness about safe drinking were negatively associated with the cost of illness. Furthermore, urban residents were more efficient in terms of conveyance and water use. This is one of the first studies to apply irrigation water efficiency methods to measure drinking water efficiency. The results are timely and important with both practical and social implications, including guiding policy framework. It is suggested that family planning programs be made more effective to control family size. The filtration plants to enhance drinking water quality be installed in the central places of each town/division/union council. A public-private partnership could work to provide affordable quality drinking water.