Facilitating cells: Translation of hematopoietic chimerism to achieve clinical tolerance

Engineering Strategies for Allogeneic Solid Tissue Acceptance

Advances in allogeneic transplantation of solid organs and tissues depend on our understanding of mechanisms that mediate the prevention of graft rejection. For the past decades, clinical practice has established guidelines to prevent allograft rejection, which mostly rely on the intake of nontargeted immunosuppressants as the gold standard. However, such lifelong regimens have been reported to trigger severe morbidities and commonly fail in preventing late allograft loss. In this review, the biology of allogeneic rejection and self-tolerance is analyzed, as well as the mechanisms of cellular-based therapeutics driving suppression and/or tolerance. Bioinspired engineering strategies that take advantage of cells, biomaterials, or combinations thereof to prevent allograft rejection are addressed, as well as biological mechanisms that drive their efficacy.

A Large-Scale Bank of Organ Donor Bone Marrow and Matched Mesenchymal Stem Cells for Promoting Immunomodulation and Transplant Tolerance

Induction of immune tolerance for solid organ and vascular composite allografts is the Holy Grail for transplantation medicine. This would obviate the need for life-long immunosuppression which is associated with serious adverse outcomes, such as infections, cancers, and renal failure. Currently the most promising means of tolerance induction is through establishing a mixed chimeric state by transplantation of donor hematopoietic stem cells; however, with the exception of living donor renal transplantation, the mixed chimerism approach has not achieved durable immune tolerance on a large scale in preclinical or clinical trials with other solid organs or vascular composite allotransplants (VCA). Ossium Health has established a bank of cryopreserved bone marrow (BM), termed "hematopoietic progenitor cell (HPC), Marrow," recovered from deceased organ donor vertebral bodies. This new source for hematopoietic cell transplant will be a valuable resource for treating hematological malignancies as well as for inducing transplant tolerance. In addition, we have discovered and developed a large source of mesenchymal stem (stromal) cells (MSC) tightly associated with the vertebral body bone fragment byproduct of the HPC, Marrow recovery process. Thus, these vertebral bone adherent MSC (vBA-MSC) are matched to the banked BM obtained from each donor, as opposed to third-party MSC, which enhances safety and potentially efficacy. Isolation and characterization of vBA-MSC from over 30 donors has demonstrated that the cells are no different than traditional BM-MSC; however, their abundance is >1,000-fold higher than obtainable from living donor BM aspirates. Based on our own unpublished data as well as reports published by others, MSC facilitate chimerism, especially at limiting hematopoietic stem and progenitor cell (HSPC) numbers and increase safety by controlling and/or preventing graft-vs.-host-disease (GvHD). Thus, vBA-MSC have the potential to facilitate mixed chimerism, promote complementary peripheral immunomodulatory functions and increase safety of BM infusions. Both HPC, Marrow and vBA-MSC have potential use in current VCA and solid organ transplant (SOT) tolerance clinical protocols that are amenable to "delayed tolerance." Current trials with HPC, Marrow are planned with subsequent phases to include vBA-MSC for tolerance of both VCA and SOT.

Chimerism, Transplant Tolerance, and Beyond

The present review discusses current developments in tolerance induction for solid organ transplantation with a particular emphasis on chimerism-based approaches. It explains the basic mechanisms of chimerism-based tolerance and provides an update on ongoing clinical tolerance trials. The concept of "delayed tolerance" is presented, and ongoing preclinical studies in the nonhuman primate setting-including current limitations and hurdles regarding this approach-are illustrated. In addition, a brief overview and update on cell-based tolerogenic clinical trials is provided. In a critical approach, advantages, limitations, and potential implications for the future of these different regimens are discussed.

The intragraft vascularized bone marrow component plays a critical role in tolerance induction after reconstructive transplantation

The role of the vascularized bone marrow component as a continuous source of donor-derived hematopoietic stem cells that facilitate tolerance induction of vascularized composite allografts is not completely understood. In this study, vascularized composite tissue allograft transplantation outcomes between recipients receiving either conventional bone marrow transplantation (CBMT) or vascularized bone marrow (VBM) transplantation from Balb/c (H2d) to C57BL/6 (H2b) mice were compared. Either high- or low-dose CBMT (1.5 × 10⁸ or 3 × 10⁷ bone marrow cells, respectively) was applied. In addition, recipients were treated with costimulation blockade (1 mg anti-CD154 and 0.5 mg CTLA4Ig on postoperative days 0 and 2, respectively) and short-term rapamycin (3 mg/kg/day for the first posttransplant week and then every other day for another 3 weeks). Similar to high-dose conventional bone marrow transplantation, 5/6 animals in the vascularized bone marrow group demonstrated long-term allograft survival (>120 days). In contrast, significantly shorter median survival was noted in the low-dose CBMT group (~64 days). Consistently high chimerism levels were observed in the VBM transplantation group. Notably, low levels of circulating CD4⁺ and CD8⁺ T cells and a higher ratio of Treg to Teff cells were maintained in VBM transplantation and high-dose CBMT recipients (>30 days) but not in low-dose VBM transplant recipients. Donor-specific hyporesponsiveness was shown in tolerant recipients in vitro. Removal of the vascularized bone marrow component after secondary donor-specific skin transplantation did not affect either primary allograft or secondary skin graft survival.