Sneaky side effects and ineffectiveness of an immunotherapy with ipilimumab in a case of metastatic melanoma

"Skin rashes" and immunotherapy in melanoma: distinct dermatologic adverse events and implications for therapeutic management

Immune checkpoint inhibitors have shown efficacy in the treatment of different cancers by stimulating the antitumoral activity of the patient’s immune system, representing a major breakthrough in the field of cancer therapy. Monoclonal antibodies including anti-cytotoxic T-lymphocyte–associated protein 4, anti–programmed cell death protein 1 and its ligand inhibitors have been approved for advanced melanoma among other solid cancers. Although immunotherapy demonstrated a good safety profile, a new spectrum of multisystemic immune-related adverse events has been recently reported due to their use. Cutaneous reactions represent one of the leading adverse events, often reported in literature as “skin rash”, and rarely further characterized in distinct dermatologic entities. Herein we describe the distinctive cutaneous rashes occurring during immunotherapies for advanced melanoma, discussing implications in the treatment management.

Angioedema late in the course of adjuvant nivolumab therapy for melanoma

Although immune checkpoint inhibitors improve survival in cancer patients, they have also been linked with unusual side effects. The most common side effects of these agents are immune-mediated phenomena such as itching, skin rash, arthralgias, mild transaminitis and asymptomatic thyroid dysfunction. We describe herein a case of facial angioedema occurring 20 weeks after initiating adjuvant nivolumab therapy for melanoma. The patient had full resolution of symptoms with cessation of nivolumab and a short steroid course. As the causality of an association between nivolumab and angioedema seems legitimate, we expect further similar cases to surface in patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors. Prompt drug withdrawal and steroids are crucial to ensure favorable clinical outcomes in these patients.

Advances in targeting co-inhibitory and co-stimulatory pathways in transplantation settings: the Yin to the Yang of cancer immunotherapy

In the past decade, the power of harnessing T-cell co-signaling pathways has become increasingly understood to have significant clinical importance. In cancer immunotherapy, the field has concentrated on two related modalities: First, targeting cancer antigens through highly activated chimeric antigen T cells (CAR-Ts) and second, re-animating endogenous quiescent T cells through checkpoint blockade. In each of these strategies, the therapeutic goal is to re-ignite T-cell immunity, in order to eradicate tumors. In transplantation, there is also great interest in targeting T-cell co-signaling, but with the opposite goal: in this field, we seek the Yin to cancer immunotherapy's Yang, and focus on manipulating T-cell co-signaling to induce tolerance rather than activation. In this review, we discuss the major T-cell signaling pathways that are being investigated for tolerance induction, detailing preclinical studies and the path to the clinic for many of these molecules. These include blockade of co-stimulation pathways and agonism of coinhibitory pathways, in order to achieve the delicate state of balance that is transplant tolerance: a state which guarantees lifelong transplant acceptance without ongoing immunosuppression, and with preservation of protective immune responses. In the context of the clinical translation of immune tolerance strategies, we discuss the significant challenge that is embodied by the fact that targeted pathway modulators may have opposing effects on tolerance based on their impact on effector vs regulatory T-cell biology. Achieving this delicate balance holds the key to the major challenge of transplantation: lifelong control of alloreactivity while maintaining an otherwise intact immune system.