1
|
Yang H, Kolben T, Meister S, Paul C, van Dorp J, Eren S, Kuhn C, Rahmeh M, Mahner S, Jeschke U, von Schönfeldt V. Factors Influencing the In Vitro Maturation (IVM) of Human Oocyte. Biomedicines 2021; 9:1904. [PMID: 34944731 PMCID: PMC8698296 DOI: 10.3390/biomedicines9121904] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/11/2021] [Revised: 12/08/2021] [Accepted: 12/10/2021] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
In vitro maturation (IVM) of oocytes is a promising assisted reproductive technology (ART) deemed as a simple and safe procedure. It is mainly used in patients with impaired oocyte maturation and in fertility preservation for women facing the risk of losing fertility. However, to date, it is still not widely used in clinical practice because of its underperformance. The influencing factors, such as biphasic IVM system, culture medium, and the supplementation, have a marked effect on the outcomes of oocyte IVM. However, the role of different culture media, supplements, and follicular priming regimens in oocyte IVM have yet to be fully clarified and deserve further investigation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Huixia Yang
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital, Ludwig-Maximilians-University, 81377 Munich, Germany; (H.Y.); (T.K.); (S.M.); (C.P.); (J.v.D.); (S.E.); (C.K.); (M.R.); (S.M.); (V.v.S.)
| | - Thomas Kolben
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital, Ludwig-Maximilians-University, 81377 Munich, Germany; (H.Y.); (T.K.); (S.M.); (C.P.); (J.v.D.); (S.E.); (C.K.); (M.R.); (S.M.); (V.v.S.)
| | - Sarah Meister
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital, Ludwig-Maximilians-University, 81377 Munich, Germany; (H.Y.); (T.K.); (S.M.); (C.P.); (J.v.D.); (S.E.); (C.K.); (M.R.); (S.M.); (V.v.S.)
| | - Corinna Paul
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital, Ludwig-Maximilians-University, 81377 Munich, Germany; (H.Y.); (T.K.); (S.M.); (C.P.); (J.v.D.); (S.E.); (C.K.); (M.R.); (S.M.); (V.v.S.)
| | - Julia van Dorp
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital, Ludwig-Maximilians-University, 81377 Munich, Germany; (H.Y.); (T.K.); (S.M.); (C.P.); (J.v.D.); (S.E.); (C.K.); (M.R.); (S.M.); (V.v.S.)
| | - Sibel Eren
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital, Ludwig-Maximilians-University, 81377 Munich, Germany; (H.Y.); (T.K.); (S.M.); (C.P.); (J.v.D.); (S.E.); (C.K.); (M.R.); (S.M.); (V.v.S.)
| | - Christina Kuhn
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital, Ludwig-Maximilians-University, 81377 Munich, Germany; (H.Y.); (T.K.); (S.M.); (C.P.); (J.v.D.); (S.E.); (C.K.); (M.R.); (S.M.); (V.v.S.)
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital Augsburg, 86156 Augsburg, Germany
| | - Martina Rahmeh
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital, Ludwig-Maximilians-University, 81377 Munich, Germany; (H.Y.); (T.K.); (S.M.); (C.P.); (J.v.D.); (S.E.); (C.K.); (M.R.); (S.M.); (V.v.S.)
| | - Sven Mahner
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital, Ludwig-Maximilians-University, 81377 Munich, Germany; (H.Y.); (T.K.); (S.M.); (C.P.); (J.v.D.); (S.E.); (C.K.); (M.R.); (S.M.); (V.v.S.)
| | - Udo Jeschke
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital, Ludwig-Maximilians-University, 81377 Munich, Germany; (H.Y.); (T.K.); (S.M.); (C.P.); (J.v.D.); (S.E.); (C.K.); (M.R.); (S.M.); (V.v.S.)
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital Augsburg, 86156 Augsburg, Germany
| | - Viktoria von Schönfeldt
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital, Ludwig-Maximilians-University, 81377 Munich, Germany; (H.Y.); (T.K.); (S.M.); (C.P.); (J.v.D.); (S.E.); (C.K.); (M.R.); (S.M.); (V.v.S.)
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Blastocyst cryopreservation and cryopreservation-warming transfer is an effective embryo transfer strategy for day 1 rescue intracytoplasmic sperm injection cycles. Sci Rep 2021; 11:8260. [PMID: 33859312 PMCID: PMC8050289 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-87693-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/29/2020] [Accepted: 03/30/2021] [Indexed: 11/08/2022] Open
Abstract
This was a retrospective analysis of a total of 625 r-ICSI cycles using freeze-all-embryos and embryo transfers (ET) in subsequent cryopreservation-warming cycles to determine the effect of the ET method for day 1 rescue intracytoplasmic sperm injection cycles (r-ICSI). Two methods were used: in method 1, cleavage-stage embryos were frozen and were directly transferred in a subsequent cryopreservation-warming cycle (r-ICSI frozen cleavage), and 144 cleavage-stage ETs occurred. Similarly, in method 2, there were 188 blastocyst-stage ETs (r-ICSI frozen blast) performed. The live birth rate (LBR) for r-ICSI frozen blast was better than that for r-ICSI frozen cleavage in calculation of ET cycles (19.44% vs. 37.77%) and also remained better after the use of logistic regression analysis (OR = 2.721, 95% CI 1.604–4.616). Conservative cumulative LBR were compared between r-ICSI frozen cleavage and r-ICSI frozen blast with regard to oocyte retrieval cycles (17.39% vs. 15.30%). The same results were obtained for conservative cumulative LBR after logistic regression analysis (OR = 0.925, 95% CI 0.557–1.535). The results of this study confirmed that it was valuable to perform r-ICSI if using freeze-all-embryos. Further, r-ICSI embryos were cultured to blastocyst stage, cryopreserved, and used in subsequent cryopreservation-warming cycles, which was an effective embryo transfer strategy and obtained satisfactory results.
Collapse
|