Tiered intake assessment for food colours

Effects of two food colorants on catalase and trypsin: Binding evidences from experimental and computational analysis

Recently, growing concern has been paid to the toxicity of additives in food. The present study investigated the interaction of two commonly used food colorants, quinoline yellow (QY) and sunset yellow (SY), with catalase and trypsin under physiological conditions by fluorescence, isothermal titration calorimetry (ITC), ultraviolet-vis absorption, synchronous fluorescence techniques as well as molecular docking. Based on the fluorescence spectra and ITC data, both QY and SY could significantly quench the intrinsic fluorescence of catalase or trypsin spontaneously to form a moderate complex driven by different forces. Additionally, the thermodynamics results demonstrated QY bind more tightly to both catalase and trypsin than SY, suggesting QY poses more of a threat to two enzymes than SY. Furthermore, the binding of two colorants could not only lead to the conformational and microenvironmental alterations of both catalase and trypsin, but also inhibit the activity of two enzymes. This study provides an important reference for understanding the biological transportation of synthetic food colorants in vivo, and enhancing their risk assessment on food safety.

Risk assessment of azo dyes as food additives: Revision and discussion of data gaps toward their improvement

The food industry uses dyes mainly to overcome color loss during the processing and storage of products, with the azo dyes currently being the most employed. Studies on the safety of using these dyes in foods started in the 1950s and have indicated the potential for concern. This review discusses the risk assessment of food intake containing artificial azo dyes. There are case reports and, subsequently, double-blind placebo-controlled trials in some individuals who may experience adverse effects from the intake of azo dyes, but it is unclear whether these adverse effects are restricted to specific populations or more generalized. In view of this, different toxicological endpoints are evaluated to verify toxic effects in in vitro and in vivo models and to establish the no observed adverse effect level. Exposure estimation studies have shown that human exposure to azo dyes via oral intake is mainly below the acceptable daily intake established by advisory bodies. However, most countries do not have studies that estimate the oral intake of azo dyes. In this case, local food diversity and racial-ethnic specificities are not considered when stating the exposure estimate is below the acceptable daily intake for the human population and thus may not represent actual intake. Concerning the scenario established above, this review discusses the most critical gaps to be overcome to contribute to the direction of future studies and the development of more effective public policies concerning the safety of the intake of artificial azo dyes.

Screening level intake estimates of low and no-calorie sweeteners in Argentina, Chile, and Peru

As obesity rates increase, several countries in Latin America have implemented strategies to curb the consumption of sugars, resulting in reformulations of products with low and no-calorie sweeteners (LNCS). The increased availability of LNCS-containing products raises concerns about the potential risk of exceeding the Acceptable Daily Intake (ADI). Information on the intake of LNCS among Latin American countries are limited by the lack of publicly available national consumption data. Using the Budget Method, screening level intake estimates of six LNCS (acesulfame potassium, aspartame, cyclamate, saccharin, steviol glycosides, and sucralose) were derived for Argentina, Chile, and Peru based on national sales data and product labels. Four tiered assessments were conducted where assumption of LNCS use ranged from the most conservative Tier 1 to the more refined yet conservative LNCS use and concentrations in subsequent tiers. The estimated intakes, applicable to the total population as well as children, were below their ADIs for all tiers. For Tier 2 where average LNCS concentrations were assumed present in all LNCS-containing products, intakes were <60% of the ADI. Estimates for the more refined tiers were comparable to published estimates based on select subpopulations in these countries, validating the approach used in this study.

An updated estimate of benzoate intakes from non-alcoholic beverages in Canada and the United States

In 2017, the results of a comprehensive assessment of intake for benzoic acid and its salts from non-alcoholic beverages were published for four regions (Brazil, Canada, Mexico, and the United States [U.S.]). These regions were among those identified as having the most prevalent use of benzoates in beverages globally. The results of the 2017 study did not indicate a safety concern relative to the acceptable daily intake (ADI) established for benzoates (5 mg kg body weight^-1 day^-1, as benzoic acid), and supported maintaining the Codex maximum benzoate level in water-based beverages (250 mg kg^-1). Since this time, population-specific food consumption data have been released for public use for Canada, and updated beverage consumption data have become available for the U.S. To ensure estimated intakes remain relevant, these consumption data were incorporated with previously collected brand-specific benzoate use level and market volume data for beverages. Dietary exposure to benzoates from non-alcoholic beverages was assessed using statistical modelling, either probabilistic (non-brand loyal; considering the full distribution of use levels) or deterministic (brand loyal; assuming all regular carbonated soft drinks, the brand loyal beverage type, contain benzoates at the maximum use level, and all other beverage types in which benzoates are used contain benzoates at the market-weighted average use level). In both models, estimated daily intakes at the mean and 95^th percentile were below the ADI (≤76% of the ADI) in all Canadian and U.S. population groups with a statistically reliable population size. The findings from updated Canadian and U.S. consumption data continue to support the Codex maximum benzoate level in water-based flavoured drinks at 250 mg kg^-1.

Tiered intake assessment for low- and no-calorie sweeteners in beverages

A tiered intake assessment approach is presented and applied to derive the maximum potential global low- and no-calorie sweeteners (LNCS) intake estimates. The US and Uk markets served as representative for the world and the EU region, respectively, to determine the maximum potential exposure for acesulfame potassium (AceK), aspartame, saccharin, steviol glycosides, and sucralose in various subpopulations, including brand-loyal consumers. Conservative intake estimates for LNCS used in non-alcoholic beverages were calculated for the general population 2 + y, toddlers (12-35 months (US) or 18-35 months (UK)), young children 3-9 y, adolescents 10-17 y, adults 18-64 y, elderly 65-74 y, and very elderly 75 + y based on assumed uses in high beverage consumption markets, leveraging either the 2-day food consumption data from the 2013-2016 US National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey or the 4-day food consumption data from the 2008-2017 UK National Diet and Nutrition Survey Rolling Programme. Strong concordance between the refined budget method and the brand-loyal deterministic approach was shown, the latter assumes the maximum industry-reported global LNCS use level is present in 100% of non-alcoholic beverages. This study shows that safety of LNCS in beverages at proposed use levels can be supported for any geography, with all intake estimates falling below the acceptable daily intake in refined assessments. Importantly, this study shows the refined budget method to be a valid first-tier screening assessment in prioritising those LNCS that may benefit from more refined intake assessments when warranted.