Trapeziectomy with LRTI or joint replacement for CMC1 arthritis, a randomised controlled trial

Simple trapeziectomy for thumb basal joint arthrosis. Forty-four thumbs re-reviewed after 7.5 years

Background

Due to favorable results in the literature we changed our standard procedure in 2010 from trapeziectomy with LRTI to simple trapeziectomy for thumb basal joint arthrosis. A review of 49 operated hands after two years showed good results, similar to those we had obtained after LRTI.

Objective

We have now re-reviewed these patients to see if the good results persist over time.

Methods

All patients from the earlier study were contacted and 40 patients with 44 operated thumbs were re-reviewed after a mean of 7.5 years.

Results

The mean pain score (0-100) was 14 (SD:22) compared to 18 (25) at the earlier review. There was no significant change in ability to perform ADL activities between reviews. Mean VAS (0-100) for clumsiness fell significantly between early and late review (67 (SD:18) versus 45(27); p ​< ​0.019), although clumsiness was reported by an increased number of patients. VAS for general satisfaction had improved from 23 (SD:28) to 13 (22) between reviews (p ​< ​0.01). The mean QuickDASH and PRWHE scores were practically unchanged. There was significantly improved thumb abduction and ulnar/radial deviation at the wrist. There was a significant reduction in power grip and key pinch in both the operated and the contralateral un-operated hands compared to the earlier review. Radiographs showed a slightly reduced mean distance between the first metacarpal and the scaphoid.

Conclusion

We conclude that the good results after simple trapeziectomy persist.

De Quervain tendinitis after total trapeziometacarpal joint arthroplasty: Biomechanical evaluation of tendon excursion in the first extensor tendon compartment

De Quervain's tenosynovitis is the most common complication after total trapeziometacarpal joint replacement. Etiology is unclear. Implantation of a ball-in-socket implant changes the biomechanics of the normal trapeziometacarpal saddle joint and increases its range of motion. The present study demonstrates that this procedure also significantly increases excursion of the abductor pollicis longus and extensor pollicis brevis tendons during thumb flexion-extension, and not during thumb abduction-adduction. Increased tendon gliding under the retinaculum of the first extensor tendon compartment could predispose to the development frictional tenosynovitis and play a role in the development of de Quervain's syndrome after total trapeziometacarpal joint replacement. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Not applicable (laboratory study).

Mid- and long-term clinical results of the Elektra and Moovis prosthesis for trapeziometacarpal joint replacement

BACKGROUND

Total joint arthroplasty as a surgical treatment option for trapeziometacarpal joint arthritis is recently revived. The aim of this study is to report on mid- and long-term results of the Elektra (single-mobility) and Moovis (dual-mobility) prosthesis for treatment of primary thumb carpometacarpal joint arthritis.

METHODS

In this retrospective, monocentric, descriptive cohort study, 31 prostheses were evaluated that were implanted by a single surgeon in 26 patients between 2009 and 2019. Indication for surgery was trapeziometacarpal joint osteoarthritis (Eaton/Littler Stage II and III). Clinical and radiological follow-up was performed at a minimum of 24 months. The postoperative assessment included range of motion, pain, strength as well as functional scores (DASH, MHQ). Implant survival and complications were the primary endpoints.

RESULTS

10 Elektra and 21 Moovis prostheses were implanted between 2009 and 2019 with a mean follow-up of 74.2 months in the Elektra and 41.4 months in the Moovis group. The average patients' age at surgery was 64 years. Postoperative pain levels (VAS 0-10) were below 2 at rest and under stress in both groups. Grip/pinch strength and range of motion showed results comparable to the contralateral hand. Opposition was excellent with an average Kapandji index of 9.6 in both groups. Elektra achieved slightly better functional scores in the DASH and MHQ score. Satisfaction was high in both groups, and 96% of the patients would recommend the procedure. Metacarpophalangeal hyperextension > 15° was seen in 3 patients per group preoperatively and was corrected to < 5° post-surgery. 3 Elektra prostheses were revised due to cup loosening and dislocation for cup and/or neck replacement or secondary trapeziectomy. 1 Moovis prosthesis was revised with an exchange of the neck to a larger size due to restricted movement. After the mean follow-up of 7.9 years in Elektra and 3.5 years in MOOVIS, cumulative survival was 68.6% vs. 95.2%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

In this mid- to long-term retrospective analysis, total joint arthroplasty in primary trapeziometacarpal joint arthritis results in low pain levels, excellent mobility and clinical function. Patient satisfaction is overall high. While revision due to cup loosening occurred more often in patients with single-mobility implants, no cases of dislocation or loosening of components were observed in the dual-mobility group.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

The study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki, and approved by the Ethics Committee of the Medical Faculty of Heidelberg University, reference number S-150/2020.

A review of wear debris in thumb base joint implants

AIM

Polymers and metals, such as polyethylene (PE) and cobalt chrome (CoCr), are common materials used in thumb-based joint implants, also known as CMC (Carpometacarpal) arthroplasty. The purpose of this review was to investigate the reported failure modes related to wear debris from these type of materials in CMC implants. The impact of wear debris on clinical outcomes of CMC implants was also examined. Potential adverse wear conditions and inflammatory particle characteristics were also considered.

METHOD

A literature search was performed using PRISMA guidelines and 55 studies were reviewed including 49 cohort studies and 6 case studies. Of the 55 studies, 38/55 (69%) focused on metal-on-polyethylene devices, followed by metal-on-metal (35%), and metal-on-bone (4%).

RESULTS

The summarized data was used to determine the frequency of failure modes potentially related to wear debris from metals and/or polymers. The most commonly reported incidents potentially relating to debris were implant loosening (7.1%), osteolysis (1.2%) and metallosis (0.6%). Interestingly the reported mechanisms behind osteolysis and loosening greatly varied. Inflammatory reactions, while rare, were generally attributed to metallic debris from metal-on-metal devices. Mechanisms of adverse wear conditions included implant malpositioning, over-tensioning, high loading for active patients, third-body debris, and polyethylene wear-through. No specific examination of debris particle characterization was found, pointing to a gap in the literature.

CONCLUSION

This review underscores the types of failure modes associated with wear debris in CMC implants. It was found that failure rates and adverse wear conditions of CMC implants of any design are low and the exact relationship between wear debris and implant incidences, such as osteolysis and loosening remains uncertain. The authors note that further research and specific characterization is required to understand the relationship between debris and implant failure.

Short-term recovery after implant versus resection arthroplasty in trapeziometacarpal joint osteoarthritis

We compared the short-term recovery of patients treated with trapeziometacarpal joint (TMJ) implant arthroplasty versus resection-suspension-interposition (RSI) arthroplasty. Implant patients (n = 147) had a better 3-month postoperative brief Michigan Hand Outcomes Questionnaire (MHQ) score (mean 82) compared to RSI patients (n = 127), who had a mean score of 69. Key pinch strength at 3 months was also higher in the implant group compared to the RSI group (6.8 kg vs. 3.1 kg). At 1 year, both groups had similar brief MHQ scores, but key pinch remained higher in the implant group (7.0 kg vs. 3.9 kg [RSI]). After implant arthroplasty, employed patients returned to work after a mean of 44 days, which was significantly faster than the 84 days for RSI patients. Patients after TMJ implant arthroplasty recover significantly faster in the first 3 postoperative months compared to RSI patients. However, 1-year postoperative outcomes are similar for both cohorts, with key pinch strength remaining higher for patients with TMJ implant arthroplasty.Level of evidence: II.

Total joint arthroplasty versus trapeziectomy in the treatment of trapeziometacarpal joint arthritis: a randomized controlled trial

The aim of this double anonymized, randomized controlled trial was to determine whether total joint arthroplasty has superior outcomes than trapeziectomy 1 year after surgery for trapeziometacarpal osteoarthritis. A total of 62 women aged 40 years and older, scheduled for surgery for stage II or III osteoarthritis of the trapeziometacarpal joint, were included and randomized to trapeziectomy or total joint arthroplasty. The primary outcome was the total score of the Michigan Hand Outcomes Questionnaire. Secondary outcomes were the Michigan Hand Outcomes Questionnaire subscale scores, Disability of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand Questionnaire, active range of motion, strength, return to work, patient satisfaction and complications. Data were collected at baseline and at 3 and 12 months. At 1 year, we found no superiority of total joint arthroplasty over trapeziectomy regarding the total score of the Michigan Hand Outcomes Questionnaire. The total joint arthroplasty did show a significant advantage in strength and range of motion.Level of evidence: I.

Systematic Comparison of Ligament Reconstruction With Tendon Interposition and Suture-Button Suspensionplasty for Trapeziometacarpal Osteoarthritis

Ligament reconstruction tendon interposition (LRTI) and suture-button suspensionplasty (SBS) are both common treatment options for trapeziometacarpal osteoarthritis. The primary purpose of this systematic review was to compare the subjective improvement in patient-reported outcomes in regard to disability for patients undergoing LRTI and SBS for trapeziometacarpal osteoarthritis. A secondary purpose was to compare the subjective improvement, objective outcome scores, and complication rates following both procedures. We performed a systematic review using PubMed, Scopus, and Embase to compare the clinical outcomes of LRTI and SBS. Inclusion criteria were level I-IV evidence articles reporting postoperative Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) or QuickDASH scores. Study methodological quality, risk of bias, and recommendation strength were assessed. This systematic review included 31 studies for final analysis with 1289 thumbs undergoing LRTI (25 studies) and 113 thumbs undergoing SBS (6 studies). Both procedures demonstrated similar improvement in DASH and/or QuickDASH scores, while key pinch and grip strength inconsistently improved following both procedures. Complication rate was similar between the 2 procedures; LRTI 12% and SBS 13%. Although both LRTI and SBS seem to provide improved short-term patient-reported functional improvement and objective strength, there was significant heterogeneity within the included studies, and those studies discussing SBS were of lower quality evidence than those of LRTI. Thus, to truly delineate whether a difference exists between these 2 techniques for the treatment of first carpometacarpal joint arthritis, larger prospectively designed studies of high-quality evidence are necessary.

Wide-Awake Local Anesthesia No Tourniquet for Rhizarthrosis Surgery: Technique and Experience for 16 Consecutive Cases

Since it was described, wide-awake local anaesthesia no tourniquet (WALANT) has gained popularity. Our department has started using WALANT for hand surgery with increasing complexity. We present our results with WALANT rhizarthrosis surgery, including prosthetic replacement, trapeziectomy with suture button suspensionplasty and revision surgery. A retrospective review of all rhizarthrosis procedures under WALANT was performed from April 2021 to July 2022. We included patients who fulfilled inclusion criteria and had adequate imaging and clinical follow-up. A satisfaction survey was performed by telephone. Surgical time, complications, conversion to conventional anesthesia, pain, anxiety and global satisfaction were recorded. Tumescent anesthesia is performed 20-25 minutes before surgery, and is performed in four or five strategic locations that allow adequate anesthesia and vasoconstriction for the procedure to be comfortably carried out. We observed a series of 16 sequential surgeries involving 14 patients. All were female with a mean age of 65 years. Fourteen cases were performed due to primary rhizarthrosis, eight trapeziectomies with suture button suspensionplasty, six prosthetic replacements, and two revision surgeries. One patient needed to be converted to conventional anaesthesia due to anxiety during the procedure. Mean procedure time was 73 minutes. There were no WALANT-related complications. Mean patient-reported satisfaction with the anesthetic technique was a 9 (on a scale from 1 to 10) and 100% of patients would choose to undergo surgery with WALANT anesthesia for a future procedure. We find it useful to actively engage the patients during surgery to keep them comfortable and also help the surgeons assess stability and functional results. After wound closure, the hand is shown to the patient and he performs various tasks. There is somewhat of a learning curve for rhizarthrosis surgery under WALANT; patient comfort can be achieved through an adequate anesthetic technique and reassurance before and during surgery. We recommend that the first few cases be done in the presence of an anesthesiologist and a fasting patient in case there is a need to convert to conventional anesthesia. Wide awake rhizarthrosis surgery, even revision surgery, is safe and pain-free. Patient-reported satisfaction is also high. The authors find that including patient participation in their own surgery might be promising for post-op rehabilitation. There are limitations in this study such as the absence of a control conventional anesthesia group, the satisfaction questionnaire was not done immediately post-operatively, as such, a memory bias cannot be excluded, and it is not yet validated for the Portuguese population.

Cost-effectiveness of surgical treatment of thumb carpometacarpal joint arthritis: a value of information study

BACKGROUND

Thumb carpometacarpal (CMC) joint arthritis is one of the most prevalent arthritic conditions commonly treated with trapeziectomy alone or trapeziectomy with ligament reconstruction and tendon interposition (LRTI). We evaluate the cost-effectiveness and value of perfect and sample information of trapeziectomy alone, LRTI, and non-operative treatment.

METHODS

A societal perspective decision tree was modeled. To understand the value of future research in comparing quality-of-life after trapeziectomy, LRTI, and non-operative management we characterized uncertainty by fitting distributions to EQ-5D utility data published from the United Kingdom hand surgery registry. We used Monte Carlo simulation for the probabilistic sensitivity analysis and to evaluate the value of perfect and sample information.

RESULTS

Both trapeziectomy alone and LRTI were cost-effective compared to non-operative management ($2,540 and $3,511/QALY respectively). Trapeziectomy alone (base case total cost $8,251, QALY 14.08) was dominant compared to LRTI (base case total cost $8,798, QALY 13.34). However, probabilistic sensitivity analysis suggested there is a 12.5% chance LRTI may be preferred at a willingness-to-pay of $50,000/QALY. Sensitivity analysis revealed postoperative utilities are the most influential factors in determining cost-effectiveness. The value of perfect information was approximately $1,503/person. A study evaluating the quality-of-life of 1,000 patients in each arm undergoing trapeziectomy alone or LRTI could provide an expected $1,117 of information value. With approximately 40,000 CMC arthroplasties performed each year in the U.S., the annual value is close to $45 million.

CONCLUSIONS

Trapeziectomy without LRTI appears to be the most cost-effective procedure in treating late-stage CMC arthritis and should be considered as first-line surgical treatment. There is substantial societal value in conducting additional research to better understand the relative quality-of-life improvements gained from these two common hand surgeries.

A Meta-analysis of Surgical Interventions for Base of Thumb Arthritis

Background  There is a myriad of available surgical options for thumb carpometacarpal joint (CMCJ) arthritis and no robust evidence exists to guide the decisions of treating surgeons. Our aim was to assess the comparative effectiveness of different surgical interventions available for the treatment of thumb CMCJ arthritis. Methods  We performed a systematic review, pairwise, and network meta-analysis of all randomized studies comparing surgical interventions for thumb CMCJ arthritis. Our primary outcomes were pain, function, and key pinch strength at long-term follow-up (> 6 months). Risk of bias and certainty of evidence were assessed for each outcome measure of compared interventions separately. Clinical recommendations were based on evidence of strong or moderate certainty. Results  A total of 17 randomized studies were included in the systematic review. Where possible, pairwise and network meta-analyses were performed. Based on evidence of moderate certainty, trapeziectomy with a concomitant ligament reconstruction and tendon interposition (LRTI) does not appear to be associated with any long-term clinical benefits compared with simple trapeziectomy (function: mean difference [MD] -3.72 [-9.15, 1.71], p  = 0.64 favoring simple trapeziectomy; key pinch strength: MD 0.07 kg [-0.28, 0.43], p  = 0.68 favoring trapeziectomy with LRTI). Treatment rankings from the network meta-analysis favored trapeziectomy with and without LRTI, joint replacement, and arthrodesis. Trapeziectomy with LRTI appears to be associated with fewer major complications compared with joint replacement and arthrodesis, and more minor complications compared with simple trapeziectomy. Conclusion  Until further high-quality research indicates otherwise, simple trapeziectomy should be the preferred surgical modality for base of the thumb arthritis. Level of Evidence  This is a Level 1 study.

Our Treatment Strategy for CMC-1 Osteoarthritis

Osteoarthritis of the carpometacarpal joint of the thumb ( CMC-1) is a common problem and many patients will seek medical attention and may eventually need surgical treatment. As no treatment option has shown consistent superiority, a variety of surgical procedures have been proposed. In this review paper we present our algorithm for the approach of symptomatic CMC-1 osteoarthritis, supported by scientific evidence and our personal experience. It is primarily based on patient demands, status of CMC-1 disease and associated problems around the thumb. The selection of a successful surgical treatment plan with restoration of a pain free and fully functional thumb is the goal. We'll outline the pro's and con's of the surgical procedures and although trapeziectomy has long been the gold standard, the advent of reliable total joint arthroplasties with good short and long-term outcome reports has changed our treatment protocol completely.

Trapeziectomy with Ligament Reconstruction and Tendon Interposition versus Trapeziometacarpal Joint Replacement for Thumb Carpometacarpal Osteoarthritis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Background  The trapeziometacarpal articulation in the thumb is a joint that is second-most commonly affected by osteoarthritis, and this can lead to considerable hand pain and disability. Currently, there is a multiplicity of surgical options available to address this problem, yet none has proven to be significantly superior to the others. Objective  This study aims to compare the outcome of trapeziectomy with ligament reconstruction and tendon interposition versus trapeziometacarpal joint replacement for thumb carpometacarpal osteoarthritis. Materials and Methods  A systematic review and meta-analysis was performed according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement standards. The NICE Healthcare Databases Advanced Search (HDAS) tool was used to search articles. One randomized controlled trial (RCT), one prospective cohort study and two retrospective cohort studies were identified. Results  Our results demonstrate a significant difference in the Quick Disabilities of the Arm Shoulder and Hand (QDASH) score between the trapeziectomy with ligament reconstruction and tendon interposition (LRTI) and Joint Replacement groups with the joint replacement group exhibiting better QDASH scores than the LRTI group. We also found that those who had a joint replacement had a significantly better thumb opposition than those in the LRTI group, as demonstrated by a superior Kapandji score. However, the complication rate of joint replacement appears to be higher. Conclusion  Our study reveals that while both treatment options are valid, the limited body of evidence currently available shows that joint replacement carries more risks and thus should not replace the current standard treatment of trapeziectomy with LRTI. This study highlights the need for more trials to be performed to more accurately compare the two treatment modalities. For the time being, we advocate that joint replacement is only performed by surgeons who perform this procedure regularly to reduce the risk of complications.

Arthroscopic Hemitrapezectomy and Suspension with Mini TightRope for the Treatment of Rhizarthrosis: Outcome in patients in stages Eaton-Littler 2 to 3

Introduction Rhizarthrosis is a common cause of pain and impaired function of the hand. Most patients present an excellent response to the conservative treatment, although a small percentage requires a surgical procedure due to the persistence of symptoms. Different surgical procedures have been described; however, there is still no consensus in the literature regarding the superiority of one technique over the others.

Objective To evaluate the clinical and radiological results of patients with a diagnosis of rhizarthrosis in stages 2 to 3 of the Eaton-Littler classification, submitted to arthroscopic hemitrapezectomy and suspension with Mini TightRope (Arthrex, Naples, FL, US).

Materials and methods We conducted a retrospective evaluation of the clinical and radiological results of patients operated on through the technique proposed in Clínica INDISA, in Santiago, Chile, between 2017 and 2019. The pre- and postsurgical assessments were performed using the visual analog scale (VAS) for pain, the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) questionnaire, and the Kapandji score. The state of the articular cartilage was also evaluated intraoperatively according to the Badia classification.

Results A total of 12 patients (3 men and 9 women) met the inclusion criteria. Their mean age was 56 years, the mean duration of the follow-up was of 21 months. There were 7 patients in stage 2 and 5 in stage 3 according to the Eaton-Littler classification. Intraoperatively, there were 6 patients in stage II and 6 in stage III of the Badia classification. The mean preoperative score on the Kapandji index was of 3.6, and the mean postoperative score was of 9. The mean preoperative score on the VAS was of 8.8, and the mean postoperative score was of 1.2. The mean preoperative score on the DASH was of 33.3, and the mean postoperative score was of 4.7.

Conclusion Arthroscopic and suspension hemitrapezectomy with Mini TightRope for the treatment of stage 2-3 rhizarthrosis is a minimally-invasive, reproducible technique, effective in reducing pain and improving function, with sustained effects on the short and middle terms (6 to 36 months).

Comparison of 2 Postoperative Therapy Regimens After Trapeziectomy Due to Osteoarthritis: A Randomized, Controlled Trial

PURPOSE

The main aim of the present study was to evaluate whether early mobilization after trapeziectomy in the first carpometacarpal joint is noninferior to a postoperative regimen comprising the use of a rigid orthosis and mobilization after 6 weeks, with regards to patient-reported activity performance and the effect of surgery in patients with first carpometacarpal osteoarthritis.

METHODS

In this prospective, randomized, controlled noninferiority trial, participants were assessed at baseline (before group allocation) and at 3, 6, and 12 months after surgery. The primary outcomes were activity performance, measured using the Canadian Occupational Performance Measure (1-10, where 1 = unable to perform), and the patient-reported effect of surgery on a 6-point scale ranging from "much worse" to "completely recovered." A change of 2.0 points in the Canadian Occupational Performance Measure was used as a noninferiority margin. Secondary outcomes included hand function (patient-reported in the Measure of Activity Performance of the Hand questionnaire), pain on a numeric rating scale, grip and pinch strengths, and joint mobility. We performed both intention-to-treat and per-protocol analyses.

RESULTS

Of the 59 participants (88% women) with a mean age of 65 years, 55 (93%) completed all assessments. We found no differences between the groups in primary or secondary outcomes at any time point, except for more decreased pain at rest in the intervention group (n = 28) compared with the control group (n = 27) after 12 months. The per-protocol analyses did not change these results. Fifteen participants experienced 1 or more adverse events during the first 3 months, but the types and frequencies of adverse events were similar between the 2 groups.

CONCLUSIONS

A postoperative regimen with early mobilization after trapeziectomy is as safe and effective as a postoperative regimen with longer immobilization in patients with first carpometacarpal osteoarthritis.

TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic II.

SURGICAL TREATMENT FOR RHIZARTHROSIS: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW OF THE LAST 10 YEARS

Introduction

Comparison of different surgical techniques to treat patients with rhizarthrosis or carpometacarpal osteoarthritis of the thumb.

Materials and Methods

A systematic review was conducted using three electronic databases. Randomized, controlled trials in patients who underwent surgery for the treatment of rhizarthrosis were included. The literature review followed the PRISMA protocol.

Results

A total of 15 articles involving a total population of 958 patients were selected. Seven different surgical techniques were compared.

Conclusions

We conclude that no procedure is superior to another in terms of pain, physical function, overall patient assessment, range of motion, or strength. Outcome measurements should be standardized to enable better comparison between surgical techniques. Level of evidence II, Systematic Review.

Comparison of simulated key pinch after three surgical procedures for trapeziometacarpal osteoarthritis: a cadaver study

We performed a cadaver study using 18 fresh-frozen adult forearms and hands to compare the tendon loads required to generate progressively greater key pinch (0.5 kg to 2 kg) after three different surgical procedures to treat trapeziometacarpal osteoarthritis: isolated trapeziectomy, trapeziectomy followed by ligament reconstruction with tendon interposition and total joint arthroplasty using a Touch® implant. Thumb pinch was simulated by loading the main actuator tendons involved in the key pinch. Six specimens were randomly assigned to each of the three surgical procedure groups. Measurements were made before and after the joint surgery. Specimens that underwent trapeziectomy with or without ligament reconstruction with tendon interposition required significantly higher tendon loads than those with the implant to achieve the same pinch force. There was no significant difference between the isolated trapeziectomy and ligament reconstruction groups. Using the implant resulted in similar median tendon loads compared with those of the intact sample. Total joint arthroplasty with a Touch® prosthesis may yield a superior biomechanical profile in which the tendon loads needed to achieve a certain key pinch force are lower and better distributed between the actuator muscles compared with trapeziectomy with or without ligament reconstruction.

Revision rates of trapeziometacarpal total joint arthroplasty in relation to occupational hand force requirements

The purpose was to determine revision rates after trapeziometacarpal total joint arthroplasty in working age patients, hypothesizing that higher occupational hand force requirements lead to higher revision rates. We conducted a follow-up study of patients operated 2003-2015. Self-reported job titles at the time of primary surgery were linked with a job exposure matrix to estimate occupational hand force requirements. Time until revision was analysed using Cox regression. The study comprised 222 patients aged 39-65 years (mean 55, SD 6), including 133 patients in the labour market. The median follow-up period was 5 years (interquartile range 4-7) and the overall revision rate was 5/100 person-years. For high versus low occupational hand force requirements, the hazard ratio was 1.5 (95% confidence interval 0.5-4.4). For patients outside the labour market, the hazard ratio was 2.3 (0.9-5.6). Our results did not indicate large effects of high occupational hand force requirements on revision rates.Level of evidence: IV.

Trapeziectomy versus joint replacement for first carpometacarpal (CMC 1) joint osteoarthritis: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Purpose

This systematic review and meta-analysis directly compares joint replacement (JR) and trapeziectomy techniques to provide an update as to which surgical intervention is superior for first carpometacarpal (CMC-1) joint osteoarthritis.

Methods

In August 2020, MEDLINE, Embase and Web of Science were searched for eligible studies that compared these two techniques for the treatment of CMC-1 joint osteoarthritis (PROSPERO registration ID: CRD42020189728). Primary outcomes included the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH), QuickDASH (QDASH) and pain visual analogue scale (VAS) scores. Secondary outcomes, such as total complication, dislocation and revision surgery rates, were also measured.

Results

From 1909 studies identified, 14 studies (1005 patients) were eligible. Our meta-analysis found that post-operative QDASH scores were lower for patients in the JR group (five studies, p = 0.0004). Similarly, significantly better postoperative key pinch strength in favour of JR was noted (three studies, p = 0.001). However, pain (VAS) scores were similar between the two groups (five studies, p = 0.21). Moreover, JR techniques had significantly greater odds of overall complications (12 studies; OR 2.12; 95% CI 1.13–3.96, p = 0.02) and significantly greater odds of revision surgery (9 studies; OR 5.14; 95% CI 2.06–12.81, p = 0.0004).

Conclusion

Overall, based on very low- to moderate-quality evidence, JR treatments may result in better function with less disability with comparable pain (VAS) scores; however, JR has greater odds of complications and greater odds of requiring revision surgery. More robust RCTs that compare JR and TRAP with standardised outcome measures and long-term follow-up would add to the overall quality of evidence.

Low rates of serious complications and further procedures following surgery for base of thumb osteoarthritis: analysis of a national cohort of 43 076 surgeries

OBJECTIVES

To determine the incidence of further procedures and serious adverse events (SAEs) requiring admission to hospital following elective surgery for base of thumb osteoarthritis (BTOA), and the patient factors associated with these outcomes.

DESIGN

Population based cohort study.

SETTING

National Health Service using the national Hospital Episode Statistics data set linked to mortality records over a 19-year period (01 April 1998-31 March 2017).

PARTICIPANTS

43 076 primary surgeries were followed longitudinally in secondary care until death or migration on 37 329 patients over 18 years of age.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Incidence of further thumb base procedures (including revision surgery or intra-articular steroid injection) at any time postoperatively, and local wound complications and systemic events (myocardial infarction, stroke, respiratory tract infection, venous thromboembolic events, urinary tract infection or renal failure) within 30 and 90 days. To identify patient factors associated with outcome, Fine and Gray model regression analysis was used to adjust for the competing risk of mortality in addition to age, overall comorbidity and socioeconomic status.

RESULTS

Over the 19 years, there was an increasing trend in surgeries undertaken. The rate of further thumb base procedures after any surgery was 1.39%; the lowest rates after simple trapeziectomy (1.12%), the highest rates after arthroplasty (3.84%) and arthrodesis (3.5%). When matched for age, comorbidity and socioeconomic status, those undergoing arthroplasty and arthrodesis were 2.5 times more likely to undergo a further procedure (subHR 2.51 (95% CI 1.81 to 3.48) and 2.55 (1.91 to 3.40)) than those undergoing simple trapeziectomy. Overall complication rates following surgery were 0.22% for serious local complications and 0.58% for systemic events within 90 days of surgery.

CONCLUSIONS

The number of patients proceeding to BTOA surgery has increased over the last 19 years, with a low rate of further thumb base procedures and SAEs after surgery overall registered. Arthrodesis and arthroplasty had a significantly higher revision rate.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT03573765.

Primary endoprosthetic replacement of the arthritic CMC-1 joint

OBJECTIVE

Osteoarthritis of the carpometacarpal (CMC)-1 joint is a common condition that can cause significant pain and functional problems. When nonoperative management fails, surgery may be indicated. Resection of the trapezium, often combined with soft tissue stabilization, is still considered the gold standard. But recovery time is often prolonged and a significant number of patients remain unsatisfied in the long term. Knowing that total endoprosthetic joint replacement is one of the most successful achievements of orthopedic surgery, many attempts have been made to produce a replacement for the CMC‑1 joint that provides a better outcome than trapeziectomy.

INDICATIONS

Eaton-Glickel stage 2-3 CMC‑1 osteoarthritis.

CONTRAINDICATIONS

Symptomatic pan-trapezial osteoarthritis (Eaton-Glickel stage 4), infection, young manual worker, poor bone quality or insufficient trapezium size.

SURGICAL TECHNIQUE

A dorsoradial approach to the CMC‑1 joint is used. Minimal resection of the trapezial and metacarpal articular surfaces, including osteophytes and loose bodies. Reaming of the trapezium and broaching of the metacarpal stem with dedicated instruments. Implantation of the endoprosthetic components. Selection of the correct neck length to ensure a stable joint. Closure of the capsule and skin.

POSTOPERATIVE MANAGEMENT

Immobilization of thumb for 2 weeks in a splint. Followed by a removable thumb CMC brace for 4 weeks, starting with gentle mobilization exercises. No forceful gripping or pinching the first 6 weeks.

RESULTS

A specific design-the uncemented, ball in socket, metal on polyethylene total joint replacement-has stood the test of time and successful long-term clinical and radiographic outcome results have been published. Recent comparative trials have shown better pinch strength, better pain relief and faster functional recovery, when compared to trapeziectomy with ligament reconstruction and tendon interposition. The incidence of complications such as dislocation, polyethylene wear and cup loosening is acceptable.

Thumb CMCJ prosthetic total joint replacement: a systematic review

Thumb carpometacarpal joint (CMCJ) arthritis is a common and painful condition. Thumb CMCJ prosthetic replacement aims to restore thumb biomechanics and improve pain and function. Early reviews demonstrated a lack of high-quality studies, but more recently a significant number of higher-quality studies have been published. This review provides a concise and systematic overview of the evidence to date.

A systematic review of several databases was conducted according to PRISMA guidelines. Studies evaluating the outcomes of thumb CMCJ prosthetic total joint replacement were included. Data extracted included patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs), pain scores, range of motion, strength, survival rates and complications.

A total of 56 studies met all inclusion criteria and were analysed. There was one randomized controlled trial, three prospective comparative cohort studies, five retrospective comparative cohort studies, and 47 descriptive cohort studies. The reported studies included 2731 patients with 3048 thumb total CMCJ prosthetic joint replacements. Follow up ranged from 12 months to 13.1 years.

In general, good results were demonstrated, with improvements in PROMs, pain scores and strength. Failure rates ranged from 2.6% to 19.9% depending upon implant studied. Comparative studies demonstrated promising results for replacement when compared to resection arthroplasty, with modest improvements in PROMs but at a cost of increased rates of complications.

Studies reporting outcomes in thumb CMCJ prosthetic total joint replacement are increasing in both number and quality. Failure, in terms of loosening and dislocation, remains a concern, although in the medium-term follow up for modern implants this issue appears to be lower when compared to their predecessors.

Functional outcomes also look promising compared to resection arthroplasty, but further high-quality studies utilizing a standardized resection arthroplasty technique and modern implants, together with standardized core outcome sets, will be of value.

Cite this article: EFORT Open Rev 2021;6:316-330. DOI: 10.1302/2058-5241.6.200152

A radiostereometric and clinical long-term follow-up study of the surface replacement trapeziometacarpal joint prosthesis

Background

The aim of this study was to determine long-term survival and clinical outcomes of the surface replacement trapeziometacarpal joint prosthesis (SR™TMC) and to evaluate implant migration using radiostereometric analysis (RSA).

Methods

In this clinical long-term follow-up study outcomes of ten patients who received the SR™TMC joint prosthesis were evaluated using DASH and Nelson scores, Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) of pain, and key pinch strength. RSA-radiographs were obtained direct postoperatively and 6 months, 1, 5 and 10 years postoperatively and were analyzed using model-based RSA software.

Results

During follow-up, two early revisions took place. Mean pre-operative DASH and Nelson scores were 54 (SD 15) and 54 (SD 17), improved significantly after 6 months (DASH 25 (SD 20), Nelson 75 (SD 18)) and remained excellent during long-term follow-up in all patients with a stable implant. At final follow-up, clinical scores deteriorated clearly in two patients with a loose implant in situ.

Conclusions

Long-term survival of the SR™TMC joint prosthesis is relatively poor. However, clinical outcomes improved significantly in the short-term and remained excellent in the long-term in those patients with a stable implant, but deteriorated clearly in case of loosening. The role of RSA in TMC joint arthroplasty is potentially valuable but needs to be further investigated. Several challenges of RSA in the TMC joint have been addressed by the authors and suggestions to optimize RSA-data are given.

Trial registration

This study was registered in the Netherlands Trial Register (NL7126).

Joint replacement for trapeziometacarpal osteoarthritis: implants and outcomes

For thumb carpometacarpal osteoarthritis, trapeziectomy provides generally good results with reduction of pain and restoration of thumb mobility, but shortening of the thumb may at least in theory lead to reduction in grip and pinch strength. Furthermore, instability of the base of the first metacarpal and contact with the scaphoid may occur regardless of the several described techniques with ligament reconstruction and tendon interposition. Thus, for years alternatives to trapeziectomy have been explored and reported with disputable success. Often the road from idea to implantation in patients seems to have been short, and high complication rates and failure of new implant designs have been fairly common. This has led to the general impression that the implants do not provide sufficient benefits compared with simple trapeziectomy. More recent uncemented total joint replacement designs have shown rapid rehabilitation, reduction of pain, restoration of grip strength and movement, and much improved long-term implant survival. These factors may make total joint replacement a realistic alternative to trapeziectomy. Still, patient selection has to be improved, as the benefits may be small in the low activity elderly patient.

Two-year results of the Moovis trapeziometacarpal joint arthroplasty with focus on early complications

In this prospective study, we aimed to analyse the early results of 200 consecutive total trapeziometacarpal joint arthroplasties using the Moovis cup, a new generation, dual-mobility, uncemented conical cup, with special focus on early complications. At the 24-month follow-up, we found clinically relevant improvement of function and comfort. Among intraoperative complications were nine intraoperative trapezial fractures, which were treated by screw osteosynthesis; prolonged immobilization; and conversion to cemented cup fixation or primary or secondary trapeziectomy. One was left untreated as the loose cup did not cause notable symptoms. There were three implants with polyethylene wear and two with liner dislocation. We conclude that early outcomes of this new-generation implant are favourable, but its surgery is challenging and associated with important intraoperative and early postoperative complications related to the learning curve. Attentive reaming of the trapezium and careful cup impaction are crucial steps to avoid trapezial fracture and early cup failure. Level of evidence: II.

Surgeon level of expertise reported in Journal of Hand Surgery (American Volume) and (European Volume) publications

The purpose of the study was to evaluate the trend in documentation of surgeon level of expertise among the Journal of Hand Surgery (American Volume) and the Journal of Hand Surgery (European Volume) publications. A review of Journal of Hand Surgery (American Volume) and Journal of Hand Surgery (European Volume) databases for level of expertise between January 2015 and October 2019 was performed. Of 1042 articles identified, all 115 (20%) reporting level of expertise were published in Journal of Hand Surgery (European Volume). Since 2015, there has been an increase in reported level of expertise in Journal of Hand Surgery (European Volume) (2015: 8 (7%); 2016: 15 (13%); 2017: 22 (19%); 2018: 28 (24%); 2019: 42 (37%)). In the same period, no publications have reported level of expertise in Journal of Hand Surgery (American Volume). Documenting level of expertise may provide readers with additional information for incorporation of novel techniques into their practices. It may identify procedures that require a baseline level of expertise for effective performance. Further evaluation of level of expertise criteria may improve the reliability of the numeric scale, while widespread adoption of this scale will allow future outcome analysis by level of expertise.