Avoidance behaviour generalizes to eye processing in posttraumatic stress disorder

Variations in the Appearance and Interpretation of Interpersonal Eye Contact in Social Categorizations and Psychiatric Populations Worldwide: A Scoping Review with a Critical Appraisal of the Literature

BACKGROUND

Eye contact is one of the most fundamental forms of interhuman communication. However, to date, there has been no comprehensive research comparing how eye contact is made and interpreted in all possible populations worldwide. This study presents a summary of the existing literature on these modalities stratified to social categorizations and psychiatric disorders.

METHOD

A scoping review with critical appraisal of the literature according to the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) methodology. Databases AnthroSource, Medline, CINAHL, the Psychology and Behavioral Sciences Collection (EBSCO) and PsychInfo were searched.

RESULTS

7068 articles were screened for both the grey literature and reference lists, of which 385 were included, 282 for social categorizations and 103 for psychiatric disorders. In total, 603 thematic clustered outcomes of variations were included. Methodological quality was generally moderate to good.

CONCLUSIONS

There is a great degree of variation in the presentation and interpretation of eye contact between and within populations. It remains unclear why specific variations occur in populations. Additionally, no gold standard for how eye contact should be used or interpreted emerged from the studies. Further research into the reason for differences in eye contact between and within populations is recommended.

Association of Cardiovascular Diseases With Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder: An Updated Review

The intricate relationship between post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and cardiovascular disease (CVD) has garnered increasing attention due to its bidirectional impact and potential for significant health consequences. Epidemiological evidence suggests that PTSD may serve as a risk factor for incident CVD, while acute CVD events can trigger PTSD, subsequently increasing the risk of recurrent cardiovascular events. This dynamic interplay is characterized by the human stress response, disrupted behavioral and lifestyle factors, and potential physiological mechanisms. Notably, the immediate aftermath of a cardiovascular event presents a critical window for intervention, offering the possibility of preventing the development of PTSD and its associated physiological and behavioral sequelae. However, while candidate mechanisms linking PTSD and CVD have been identified, determining which mechanisms are most amenable to intervention remains a challenge. This article emphasizes the urgency of addressing key unanswered questions in this domain. Despite an evolving understanding of the association between PTSD and CVD, causal relationships remain to be firmly established. Comprehensive investigations into the intricate interplay of behavioral and biological mechanisms are essential for identifying precise targets for intervention. Innovations in research methodologies, including the exploration of PTSD symptom dynamics and their impact on cardiovascular function, hold the potential for identifying crucial intervention points. Drawing parallels from prior challenges in translating identified risk factors into effective interventions, the field must prioritize systematic investigations and early-phase intervention trials. By doing so, researchers and clinicians can potentially develop strategies to mitigate CVD risk in the context of PTSD and improve both cardiovascular and mental health outcomes.

The impact of COVID-19 pandemic on individuals at clinical high-risk for psychosis: Evidence from eye-tracking measures

Emerging evidence suggested that people with severe mental disorders were more vulnerable to the negative effects of the COVID-19 pandemic. However, few researches investigated the influence of global pandemics on people at clinical high risk (CHR) for psychosis. This study aimed to investigate the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on clinical symptoms, psychological distress, and eye-tracking characteristics in CHR individuals and healthy participants. Forty-nine CHR individuals and 50 healthy controls (HC) were assessed by PTSD Checklist for DSM-5 (PCL-5), Perceived Stress Scale, 10-item version (PSS-10), and Coronavirus Impact Scale (CIS). Eye movement performances were measured by the tests of fixation stability, free-viewing, and anti-saccade. According to the mean score of CIS, participants were stratified into high-impact (n = 35) and low-impact (n = 64) subgroups. Compared with the HC group, CHR participants reported significantly higher levels of post-traumatic symptoms caused by the COVID-19 pandemic and showed abnormalities in most of the eye movement indexes. Among the altered indexes, the saccade amplitude of fixation stability test (far distractor), the scan path length of free-viewing test, and the accuracy of anti-saccade test were negatively affected by the severity of impact level in the CHR group. Moreover, the altered eye movement indexes were significantly associated with the total scores of CIS, PCL-5, and subscales of the Scale of Prodromal Syndromes (SOPS) among CHR individuals. Overall, our findings suggested the negative impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the eye movement characteristics of CHR individuals. The present study provides valuable information on physiological distress related to the COVID-19 pandemic and sensitive neuropsychological biomarkers that interacted with social and environment stress in the CHR population.