Impact of non-medical switching of prescription medications on health outcomes: an e-survey of high-volume medicare and medicaid physician providers

Downstream Effects of Market Changes on Inhalers: Impacts on Individuals With Chronic Lung Disease

COPD and asthma are two of the most common chronic lung diseases, affecting over 545 million people globally and 34 million in the United States. Annual health care costs related to chronic lung disease are estimated at €380 billion in the European Union, and $24-$50 billion in the United States averaging to $4,000 in out-of-pocket costs per person in the U.S. A full-text literature search was conducted for English publications between January 1, 2005-March 18, 2024. It returned over 5,000 publications that were further narrowed using key search words, resulting in 172 peer-reviewed articles. Using their experience and subject expertise, the authors further narrowed the peer-reviewed articles to 55 that were in their opinion relevant. Also, 38 recently published industry reports and news articles specific to downstream effects of inhaler market changes and the future impact were included. The literature suggests that individuals with chronic lung disease face increased challenges with access to inhaled medication due to rising medication costs, discontinuation of branded medications, introduction of generic medications not covered by insurance, exclusionary preferred drug list tactics that force health care providers into non-medical switching of medication or devices, and ongoing medication shortages. Providers experience ongoing hurdles in prescribing appropriate inhaled medications for individuals with chronic lung disease, including increased time and costs spent on administrative tasks due to inhaler denials, a loss of patient trust, and limits on their ability to prescribe appropriate inhaled medication for individuals with chronic lung disease.

Non-Medical Switching or Discontinuation Patterns among Patients with Non-Valvular Atrial Fibrillation Treated with Direct Oral Anticoagulants in the United States: A Claims-Based Analysis

This study assessed direct-acting oral anticoagulant (DOAC) switching/discontinuation patterns in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) in 2019, by quarter (Q1-Q4), and associated socioeconomic risk factors. Adults with NVAF initiating stable DOAC treatment (July 2018-December 2018) were selected from Symphony Health Solutions' Patient Transactional Datasets (April 2017-January 2021). Switching/discontinuation rates were reported in 2019 Q1-Q4, separately. Non-medical switching/discontinuation (NMSD) was defined as the difference between switching/discontinuation rates in Q1 and mean rates across Q2-Q4. The associations of socioeconomic factors with switching/discontinuation were assessed. Of 46,793 patients (78.7% ≥ 65 years; 52.6% male; 7.7% Black), 18.0% switched/discontinued their initial DOAC in Q1 vs. 8.8% on average in Q2-Q4, corresponding to an NMSD of 9.2%. During the quarter following the switch/discontinuation, more patients who switched/discontinued in Q1 remained untreated (Q1: 77.0%; Q2: 74.3%; Q3: 71.2%) and fewer reinitiated initial DOAC (Q1: 17.6%; Q2: 20.8%; Q3: 24.0%). Factors associated with the risk of switching/discontinuation in Q1 were race, age, gender, insurance type, and household income (all p < 0.05). More patients with NVAF switched/discontinued DOACs in Q1 vs. Q2-Q4, and more of them tended to remain untreated relative to those who switched/discontinued later in the year, suggesting a potential long-term impact of NMSD. Findings on factors associated with switching/discontinuation highlight potential socioeconomic discrepancies in treatment continuity.

Manufacturer-sponsored drug coupon use and drug-switching behavior among patients with type 2 diabetes

BACKGROUND

Patients often use manufacturer-sponsored coupons to reduce their out-of-pocket spending. However, little is known whether coupon use is associated with medication-switching behaviors.

OBJECTIVE

To examine if using a manufacturer-sponsored coupon to initiate a medication is associated with patterns of medication-switching behaviors among patients with type 2 diabetes.

METHODS

Using IQVIA's retail pharmacy claims data from October 2017 to September 2019, we analyzed commercially insured patients with type 2 diabetes who had newly started taking the following noninsulin diabetes drugs: generic metformin (nearly no coupon use), Sodium-glucose Cotransporter-2 (SGLT2) Inhibitors (SGLT2, high coupon use), and dipeptidyl peptidase IV inhibitors (DPP-IV inhibitors, moderate coupon use). We assessed if drug-switching behaviors, defined as no switching, switching to a same-class drug, or switching to a drug in a different class, differed among patients who did and did not use coupons to initiate treatments. We performed multinomial logistic regression to estimate the probability of each switching type associated with patients' initial coupon use.

RESULTS

Among 9,781 patients in our sample, 83.7% of them initiated treatments with metformin, 8.2% with SGLT2, and 8.1% with DPP-IV inhibitors. The overall switching rate was the lowest for generic metformin (40%) than brand-name drugs (56%-57%). Among the brand-name drug users, patients who used a coupon to initiate these drugs were less likely to switch to any drug compared with patients without coupon use (SGLT2 = -18% [95% CI = -24% to -13%]; DPP-IV inhibitors = -9% [-16% to -2%]). These patients were also less likely to switch to drugs in other competing classes (SGLT2 = -16% [95% CI = -22% to -10%]; DPP-IV inhibitors = -9% [-16% to -2%]).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients who started their treatment with generic metformin had the lowest rate of drug switching. Using coupons to initiate brand-name drugs in classes with prevalent coupons was associated with reduced medication switching to other class drugs.

Update on Non-Interchangeability of Botulinum Neurotoxin Products

The growing use of botulinum neurotoxins (BoNTs) for medical and aesthetic purposes has led to the development and marketing of an increasing number of BoNT products. Given that BoNTs are biological medications, their characteristics are heavily influenced by their manufacturing methods, leading to unique products with distinct clinical characteristics. The manufacturing and formulation processes for each BoNT are proprietary, including the potency determination of reference standards and other features of the assays used to measure unit potency. As a result of these differences, units of BoNT products are not interchangeable or convertible using dose ratios. The intrinsic, product-level differences among BoNTs are compounded by differences in the injected tissues, which are innervated by different nerve fiber types (e.g., motor, sensory, and/or autonomic nerves) and require unique dosing and injection sites that are particularly evident when treating complex therapeutic and aesthetic conditions. It is also difficult to compare across studies due to inherent differences in patient populations and trial methods, necessitating attention to study details underlying each outcome reported. Ultimately, each BoNT possesses a unique clinical profile for which unit doses and injection paradigms must be determined individually for each indication. This practice will help minimize unexpected adverse events and maximize efficacy, duration, and patient satisfaction. With this approach, BoNT is poised to continue as a unique tool for achieving individual goals for an increasing number of medical and aesthetic indications.

Switching from One Biosimilar to Another Biosimilar of the Same Reference Biologic: A Systematic Review of Studies

BACKGROUND

Multiple switches (transitions) between biosimilars of the same reference biologic are now a reality, and they are expected to become more common in the future as more biosimilars enter the market. Switching between two biosimilars of the same reference biologic is generally driven by affordability, formulary requirements, or the relocation/travel of the patient. Evidence of whether switching between biosimilars of the same reference biologic provides similar safety and efficacy profiles is reviewed here.

METHODS

A systematic search was undertaken using electronic databases (to December 2021): Biosis, Embase, MEDLINE, and EBM Reviews/Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews via Ovid. Publications were evaluated for effectiveness and/or safety data linked to switching from one biosimilar to another.

RESULTS

The systematic search yielded 982 citations. After eliminating duplicates, 626 citations remained for the initial title/abstract screening phase. Following the initial screening, 240 records were chosen; more thorough examination yielded 35 citations. After comprehensive screening and expert advice, 23 studies were selected, of which 13 were published in peer-reviewed journals; the remainder have been published as abstracts. Overall, 3657 patients were included in these studies. All studies were observational in nature; no randomized clinical trials were identified. The studies were heterogeneous in size, design, and endpoints. Across the studies, data are provided on safety, effectiveness, immunogenicity, pharmacokinetics, patient retention, patient and physician perceptions, and drug-use patterns. The majority of studies examined switches between biosimilar infliximabs, although switches between biosimilar adalimumabs, etanercepts, and rituximabs were also identified. Two use-pattern studies and one case report were also detected and are discussed.

CONCLUSION

Within the limitations of this systematic review, available data suggests that biosimilar-to-biosimilar switching is a safe and effective clinical practice, although it is not covered by current health authority regulations or guidance. No reduction in effectiveness or increase in adverse events was detected in biosimilar-to-biosimilar switching studies conducted to date.

Switching from one reference biological to another in stable patients for non-medical reasons: a literature search and brief review

Background: The practice of non-medical switch (NMS) from a reference biological (originator) to a biosimilar is widely accepted in some countries. However, there is little documentation on the impact of NMS from one originator to another originator. Objectives: To assess the consequences for patients of NMS from one biological originator to another, based on existing literature. The focus was on efficacy and cost of treatment with TNF-α-inhibitors in three disease areas. Methods: A literature search was conducted in Ovid (PubMed, EMBASE) and abstracts from meetings in key therapeutic areas, to identify studies reporting efficacy, safety or costs by switching between originator biologics. Results: 167 references were identified and abstracts screened; 36 papers reviewed in full text, and 6 fulfilled the inclusion criteria. Three clinical studies of NMS had very small sample sizes, but suggested that NMS is beneficial. The remaining three studies used administrative data with little clinical information, indicating that NMS was disadvantageous and associated with increased health care utilization and costs. Conclusions: There is very limited documentation on NMS from one originator biological to another, and the literature suffers from methodological limitations. The results are mixed and preclude drawing an overriding conclusion. Future studies, are warranted.