• Reference Citation Analysis
  • v
  • v
  • Find an Article
Find an Article PDF (4636017)   Today's Articles (3044)   Subscriber (50108)
For: Jaswal S, Logie RH. Configural encoding in visual feature binding. Journal of Cognitive Psychology 2011. [DOI: 10.1080/20445911.2011.570256] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/17/2022]
Number Cited by Other Article(s)
1
Gu Q, Dai A, Ye T, Huang B, Lu X, Shen M, Gao Z. Object-based encoding in visual working memory: A critical revisit. Q J Exp Psychol (Hove) 2021;75:1397-1410. [PMID: 34609217 DOI: 10.1177/17470218211052502] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
2
Deep learning helps EEG signals predict different stages of visual processing in the human brain. Biomed Signal Process Control 2021. [DOI: 10.1016/j.bspc.2021.102996] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
3
Bharti AK, Yadav SK, Jaswal S. Feature Binding of Sequentially Presented Stimuli in Visual Working Memory. Front Psychol 2020;11:33. [PMID: 32116892 PMCID: PMC7012789 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00033] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/30/2019] [Accepted: 01/07/2020] [Indexed: 11/13/2022]  Open
4
Azer L, Zhang W. Composite Face Effect Predicts Configural Encoding in Visual Short-Term Memory. Front Psychol 2019;10:2753. [PMID: 31920808 PMCID: PMC6917589 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02753] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/29/2019] [Accepted: 11/22/2019] [Indexed: 11/13/2022]  Open
5
No evidence for binding of items to task-irrelevant backgrounds in visual working memory. Mem Cognit 2018;45:1144-1159. [PMID: 28660397 PMCID: PMC5605597 DOI: 10.3758/s13421-017-0727-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/08/2022]
6
The role of attention in remembering important item-location associations. Mem Cognit 2018;46:1248-1262. [PMID: 29926393 DOI: 10.3758/s13421-018-0834-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/08/2022]
7
Yang L, Mo L, Wang X, Yu M. The effects of categorical similarity and feature-space proximity on visual working memory processing. VISUAL COGNITION 2017. [DOI: 10.1080/13506285.2017.1390515] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]
8
The role of top-down suppression in mitigating the disruptive effects of task-irrelevant feature changes in visual working memory. Mem Cognit 2017;45:1411-1422. [DOI: 10.3758/s13421-017-0738-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/08/2022]
9
Xie W, Zhang W. Discrete item-based and continuous configural representations in visual short-term memory. VISUAL COGNITION 2017. [DOI: 10.1080/13506285.2017.1339157] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
10
Brown LA, Niven EH, Logie RH, Rhodes S, Allen RJ. Visual feature binding in younger and older adults: encoding and suffix interference effects. Memory 2016;25:261-275. [DOI: 10.1080/09658211.2016.1156705] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/22/2022]
11
Marno H, Davelaar EJ, Csibra G. An object memory bias induced by communicative reference. Acta Psychol (Amst) 2016;163:88-96. [PMID: 26629673 DOI: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2015.11.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/19/2015] [Revised: 11/10/2015] [Accepted: 11/16/2015] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]  Open
12
Gajewski DA, Wallin CP, Philbeck JW. The Effects of Age and Set Size on the Fast Extraction of Egocentric Distance. VISUAL COGNITION 2015;23:957-988. [PMID: 27398065 DOI: 10.1080/13506285.2015.1132803] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/22/2022]
PrevPage 1 of 1 1Next
© 2004-2024 Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved. 7041 Koll Center Parkway, Suite 160, Pleasanton, CA 94566, USA