The effects of thrombolysis and endovascular clot retrieval on dysphagia: a scoping review

Acute Dysphagia Following Reperfusion Therapies: A Prospective Pilot Cohort Study

Dysphagia is a well-documented sequela of stroke. Recent advancements in medical treatments for stroke include reperfusion therapies (endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) and thrombolysis). As outcomes following reperfusion therapies are typically measured via general functional scales, the pattern and progression of acute dysphagia following reperfusion therapies is less known. To determine the progression of acute dysphagia (0-72 h) following reperfusion therapies and relationships between various stroke parameters and dysphagia, twenty-six patients were prospectively recruited across two EVT and thrombolysis centres in Brisbane, Australia. Dysphagia was screened via the Gugging Swallowing Screen (GUSS) at the bedside at three timepoints: 0-24 h, 24-48 h, and 48-72 h post-reperfusion therapies. Across three groups (EVT only, thrombolysis only, or both), the incidence of any dysphagia within the first 24 h of reperfusion therapy was 92.31% (n = 24/26), 91.30% (n = 21/23) by 48 h, and 90.91% (n = 20/22) by 72 h. Fifteen patients presented with severe dysphagia at 0-24 h, 10 at 24-48 h, and 10 at 48-72 h. Whilst dysphagia was not significantly correlated to infarct penumbra/core size, dysphagia severity was significantly related to the number of passes required during EVT (p = 0.009).Dysphagia continues to persist in the acute stroke population despite recent advancements in technology aimed to reduce morbidity and mortality post-stroke. Further research is required to establish protocols for management of dysphagia post-reperfusion therapies.

Speech-language pathologists' perspectives of dysphagia following reperfusion therapies: An Australian mixed-methods study

PURPOSE

To investigate speech-language pathologists' (SLPs) perceptions and clinical experiences of dysphagia management following reperfusion therapies.

METHOD

A multi-staged mixed approach involving a two-phase cross-sectional design was used. Data generated during phase 1 (a purpose-built, online survey) guided the development of phase 2 (semi-structured interviews). Sixty-two SLPs participated in phase 1 and six SLPs participated in phase 2.

RESULT

SLPs in both phases reported perceived changes in dysphagia presentation according to the success of reperfusion therapy administered and had concerns regarding worsened dysphagia following unsuccessful procedures. Fluctuations in dysphagia were more frequently reported in the acute stage post-stroke. SLPs reported increased workload demands due to increased interhospital transfers between ECR/thrombolysis centres and referring facilities. The optimal timing for swallowing screening and assessment was not identified, with initial SLP involvement ranging from during the administration of thrombolysis to up to 24 hours post-reperfusion therapy.

CONCLUSION

Preliminary evidence suggests that SLPs perceive that the presentation of post-stroke dysphagia is changing, with increasing fluctuations and complexities in the acute stage of post-stroke care, within the context of increasing use of reperfusion therapies. There is a critical need for research investigating the trajectory of dysphagia in the acute stage to inform dysphagia management within this patient population.

Dysphagia assessment in ischemic stroke after mechanical thrombectomy: When and how?

Background

Dysphagia is a frequent symptom in acute ischemic stroke (AIS). Endovascular treatment (EVT) has become the standard of care for acute stroke secondary to large vessel occlusion. Although standardized guidelines for poststroke dysphagia (PSD) management exist, they do not account for this setting in which patients receive EVT under general anesthesia. Therefore, the aim of this study was to evaluate PSD prevalence and severity, as well as an appropriate time point for the PSD evaluation, in patients undergoing EVT under general anesthesia (GA).

Methods

We prospectively included 54 AIS patients undergoing EVT under GA. Fiberoptic Endoscopic Evaluation of Swallowing (FEES) was performed within 24 h post-extubation in all patients. Patients presenting significant PSD received a second FEES-assessment to determine the course of dysphagia deficits over time. Dysphagia severity was rated according the Fiberoptic Dysphagia Severity Scale (FEDSS).

Results

At first FEES (FEES 1) assessment, performed in the median 13 h (IQR 5-17) post-extubation, 49/54 patients (90.7%) with dysphagia were observed with a median FEDSS of 4 (IQR 3-6). Severe dysphagia requiring tube feeding was identified in 28/54 (51.9%) subjects, whereas in 21 (38.9%) patients early oral diet with certain food restrictions could be initiated. In the follow up FEES examination conducted in the median 72 h (IQR 70-97 h) after initial FEES 34/49 (69.4%) patients still presented PSD. Age (p = 0.030) and ventilation time (p = 0.035) were significantly associated with the presence of PSD at the second FEES evaluation. Significant improvement of dysphagia frequency (p = 0.006) and dysphagia severity (p = 0.001) could be detected between the first and second dysphagia assessment.

Conclusions

PSD is a frequent finding both immediately within 24 h after extubation, as well as in the short-term course. In contrast to common clinical practice, to delay evaluation of swallowing for at least 24 h post-extubation, we recommend a timely assessment of swallowing function after extubation, as 50% of patients were safe to begin oral intake. Given the high amount of severe dysphagic symptoms, we strongly recommend application of instrumental swallowing diagnostics due to its higher sensitivity, when compared to clinical swallowing examination. Furthermore, advanced age, as well as prolonged intubation, were identified as significant predictors for delayed recovery of swallowing function.

The effects of endovascular clot retrieval and thrombolysis on dysphagia in an Australian quaternary hospital: A retrospective review

Dysphagia (impaired swallowing) is known to contribute to decreased quality of life, and increased length of hospital stay and mortality post-stroke. Despite the advancements in stroke treatment with the introduction of thrombolysis and endovascular clot retrieval (ECR), patients continue to present with high rates of dysphagia. Speech and language therapists and stroke teams should consider the presence of haemorrhagic transformation, success of reperfusion and presence of communication deficits as risk factors for dysphagia post-ECR and/or thrombolysis.

PURPOSE

To establish incidence rates and patterns of dysphagia following the administration of reperfusion therapies in acute ischaemic stroke management.

METHOD

A retrospective review of 193 patients admitted with acute ischaemic stroke to a quaternary stroke unit in Australia over a three year period was completed. Clinical information extracted included demographics, type (thrombolysis and/or endovascular clot retrieval) and success of reperfusion therapy, and the progression of dysphagia and related factors.

RESULTS

Over half of all patients treated with reperfusion therapies presented with dysphagia on initial assessment by speech-language pathology (SLP). The type of reperfusion therapy administered was not significantly correlated with the presence of dysphagia. Dysphagia on initial assessment was significantly correlated with the presence of aphasia on initial assessment, the presence of haemorrhagic transformation, and the success of reperfusion. Increased rates of enteral feeding were also found in this study compared to figures reported in literature.

CONCLUSION

This study identified ongoing high rates of dysphagia amongst this patient population regardless of treatment type, demonstrating the need for ongoing SLP management post stroke. Further research is required in this area to develop an evidence-base for SLPs and the wider medical team and to inform clinical practice guidelines.

WHAT THIS PAPER ADDS

What is already known on the subject Stroke is one of the leading causes of disability and death internationally. Dysphagia (impaired swallowing), a common sequalae of stroke, is known to contribute to decreased quality of life, increased length of hospital stay and mortality. With advancements in technology, treatments for acute ischaemic stroke (endovascular clot retrieval and thrombolysis) are increasing in popularity. However, limited research exists exploring the impact of these therapies on dysphagia. What this paper adds Despite the advancements in stroke treatment, patients continue to present with high rates of dysphagia. Dysphagia following thrombolysis and/or ECR was found to be significantly correlated to the presence of aphasia, haemorrhagic transformation, and the success of reperfusion (regardless of treatment type). Additionally, increased rates of enteral feeding were found amongst this patient population compared to figures reported in the literature for patients following traditional stroke management. Clinical implications of this study Speech-language pathologists and the wider medical team should consider dysphagia as an ongoing consequence of stroke following reperfusion therapies, with consideration for success of reperfusion and adverse outcomes i.e., haemorrhagic transformation. Further research is required to provide an evidence-base and specific guidelines for the management of dysphagia post reperfusion therapies, including use of enteral feeding.