Predictors of recurrent hypoglycemia following a severe hypoglycemic event among hospitalized patients

Predictors of Time-to-Repeat Point-of-Care Glucose Following Hypoglycemic Events in Hospitalized Patients

BACKGROUND

Previous studies have shown low adherence to the recommendation to repeat point-of-care glucose (POCG) within 15 minutes following the treatment of inpatient hypoglycemia. We sought to evaluate whether patient and clinical factors may predict time-to-repeat (TTR) POCG following hypoglycemic events in hospitalized adult patients.

METHODS

This was a retrospective cross-sectional analysis of 22 226 index hypoglycemic (≤70 mg/dL) readings (of 993 395 total POCG samples) from 6226 hospital admissions within the Johns Hopkins Health System over three years. Time-to-repeat was defined as the difference in time (minutes) between the index POCG and the next POCG sample. Multivariable logistic regression was used to evaluate the association of TTR with clinical, patient, and hospital factors.

RESULTS

The median (IQR) TTR was 49 (25-119) minutes, and 14.1% of index POCGs had a TTR ≤15. Severity of hypoglycemia, intensive care unit (ICU), intermediate care (IMC) and pediatrics admissions, and dextrose or glucagon administration were associated with higher adjusted odds of TTR ≤15 minutes. Admission to community hospitals, procedural units, surgery, and labor and delivery was associated with lower adjusted odds of TTR ≤15 minutes. Age, sex, insulin on board, secretagogue use, diabetes type, nutritional status, previous POCG value, and glycemic variability were not significantly associated.

CONCLUSION

There is low adherence to the recommendation to repeat a POCG within 15 minutes following the treatment of inpatient hypoglycemia, which may be mediated by both patient and hospital factors. Further studies are needed to understand the mediators and implications of this practice variability.

'We just dilute sugar and give' health workers' reports of management of paediatric hypoglycaemia in a referral hospital in Malawi

Background: Acutely sick children in resource-constrained settings who present with hypoglycaemia have poor outcomes. Studies have questioned the current hypoglycaemia treatment cut-off level of 2.5 mmol/l. Improved knowledge about health workers’ attitudes towards and management of hypoglycaemia is needed to understand the potential effects of a raised cut-off level.

Objective: This research explored health workers’ perceptions about managing acutely ill children with hypoglycaemia in a Malawian referral hospital. A secondary objective was to explore health workers’ opinions about a potential increase in the hypoglycaemia cut-off level.

Methods: We used a qualitative design with semi-structured individual interviews performed with health workers in the Paediatric Accident and Emergency Unit at Queen Elizabeth Central Hospital, Malawi, in October 2016. Data were analysed using latent content analysis. Ethical approval was obtained from the University of Malawi, College of Medicine Research and Ethics Committee P.01/16/1852.

Results: Four themes were formed that described the responses. The first, ‘Critical and difficult cases need easy treatment’, showed that health workers perceived hypoglycaemia as a severe condition that was easily manageable. The second, ‘Health system issues’, revealed challenges relating to staffing and resource availability. The third, ‘From parental reluctance to demand’, described a change in parents’ attitudes regarding intravenous treatments. The fourth, ‘Positive about the change but need more information’, exposed health workers’ concerns about potential risks of a raised cut-off level for hypoglycaemia treatment, as well as benefits for the patients.

Conclusions: Health workers perceived hypoglycaemia as a severe condition that is easy to manage when the required equipment and supplies are available. Due to the common lack of test equipment and dextrose supplies, health workers have adopted alternative strategies to diagnose and manage hypoglycaemia. A change to the hypoglycaemia treatment cut-off level raised concerns about potential risks, but was also thought to be of benefit for some patients.