Polypharmacy in older adults: the role of the multidisciplinary team

The Feasibility and Acceptability of a Clinical Pharmacist-delivered Intervention to Reduce Bothersome Health Symptoms from Polypharmacy and Alcohol Use and Communicate Risk among People with HIV: Pilot Study Protocol

Among persons with HIV (PWH), unhealthy alcohol use and polypharmacy contribute to bothersome symptoms (e.g., fatigue, dizziness, memory loss). However, effective risk communication targeting these associations is challenging. The HIV and Alcohol Research center focused on Polypharmacy (HARP) is conducting a pilot study that will generate feasibility and acceptability data on a clinical pharmacist-delivered counseling intervention targeting the modification of unhealthy alcohol use and polypharmacy in PWH. Counseling is guided by the Information-Motivation-Behavioral Skills-Motivational Interviewing (IMB-MI) model. Herein, we describe the study protocol. This pilot uses a one-group pre-test/post-test design. We will recruit 50 participants from those who participated in the consented cohort of the Veterans Aging Cohort Study. Participants must be prescribed ≥ 5 long-term medications, have a self-reported Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test score > 0, and be living with HIV. We will exclude those with moderate-severe alcohol use disorder as identified by an Alcohol Symptom Checklist score ≥ 4. Data are collected using three self-administered surveys (baseline, immediately after booster intervention, and 30-days post-intervention), two PEth blood tests (baseline, 30 days post-intervention), and medication data from the electronic health record (baseline). The intervention includes a 60-minute IMB-MI-based counseling session followed by a booster session 2 weeks later. Some participants will also be asked to participate in a qualitative interview to provide feedback on the intervention. The pilot investigates the impact of an intervention on alcohol consumption and the use of multiple medications among PWH, exploring how best to reduce bothersome symptoms, communicate risk, and support behavior change in this population.

Optipharm: Enhancing pharmacological management skills in healthcare students for geriatric care through gamified e-learning

BACKGROUND

Complexities in older patient care and frequent polypharmacy requires tailored tools, specific skills and interdisciplinary collaborations. Traditional disease-centered education often overlooks these issues. Despite digital gamification's relevance in health education, limited exploration exists for gamified platforms addressing polypharmacy, especially within comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA).

OBJECTIVE

This study outlines Optipharm's design, a gamified e-learning tool designed to enhance health students' education in managing polypharmacy among older adults. It also assesses its usability using a validated scale.

METHODS

Optipharm development utilized gamification techniques guided by pedagogical principles. Learning objectives addressed clinical and educational gaps in older adult care. Hosted on a Moodle system, the platform housed a structured clinical case as a SCORM file, a usability scale, a certificate of achievement, and a literature library. Optipharm was assessed by 304 medical students from the University of Navarre, Spain, using the SUS-G-Sp scale.

RESULTS

An immersive gamified e-learning tool simulating clinical practice settings was developed, requiring users to assume the role of healthcare professionals in multidisciplinary outpatient consultations. The interface, with a 2D cartoon-style aesthetic, aligns with learning objectives, integrating engaging storytelling and clear instructions for CGA in Phase 1 and pharmacological optimization in Phase 2. The evaluation of Optipharm's usability revealed very positive perceptions among users, with high agreement rates on usability items.

CONCLUSION

Optipharm represents a pioneering gamified tool designed to simulate clinical scenarios, allowing users to engage as healthcare professionals within multidisciplinary teams and address medication-related challenges in older patients with polypharmacy. It provides a secure, interactive learning environment with clear educational objectives and seamless integration of gamification elements, enhancing users' knowledge and skills in managing complex medication regimens. As a platform for experiential learning and knowledge exchange, Optipharm contributes to shaping the future of health education and fostering a culture of patient-centred care among future healthcare professionals.

The prevalence of polypharmacy and hyper-polypharmacy among middle-aged vs. older patients in Saudi Arabia: a cross-sectional study

Introduction

Polypharmacy, the use of multiple medications, is a growing concern among middle-aged and older patients, posing potential risks and challenges in healthcare management.

Aim

This study aimed to identify the prevalence of polypharmacy and hyper-polypharmacy among populations of middle-aged vs. older patients and identify its associated common comorbidities and prescribed medications in Qatif Central Hospital (QCH), Saudi Arabia.

Methods

Patients aged 40 years or older who presented to an outpatient medical care clinic at QCH, Saudi Arabia, between 1 January and 31 December 2021 were included, and their comorbidities, prescribed medications, and recent clinical laboratory test results were collected. The Charlson comorbidity index (CCI) score was calculated to predict the risk of mortality. Logistic regression was used to compute the association between the prevalence of polypharmacy and patient characteristics. The results were presented as odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs).

Results

A total of 14,081 patients were included; 31% of the cohort comprised older patients, and 66% of the cohort was identified with polypharmacy. The majority of the polymedicated patients were presented to an internal medicine care unit (34%). The prevalence of polypharmacy was positively associated with CCI (OR = 3.4, 95% CI 3.3-3.6), having a disease related to the musculoskeletal system (MSD) (OR = 4.2, 95% CI 3.8-4.7), and alimentary tract and metabolism (ATM) (OR = 3.8, 95% CI 3.4-4.2). Conversely, the prevalence of polypharmacy was negatively associated with age (OR = 0.9, 95% CI 0.89-0.91) and patients with cardiovascular diseases (OR = 0.6, 95% CI 0.5-0.7).

Conclusion

Polypharmacy is still an ongoing concern. Patients, particularly those with diseases related to MSD or ATM, should be considered for reviewing prescriptions by pharmacists to reduce the risk of adverse drug reactions and future consequences of polypharmacy.

Characterising incident opioid use among incident users of prescription sedative hypnotics: A national cohort study

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate co-prescribing of sedatives hypnotics and opioids.

DESIGN

Retrospective study evaluating the association of patient characteristics and comorbidities with coprescribing.

SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS

Using the national Merative MarketScan Database between 2005 and 2018, we identified patients who received an incident sedative prescription with or without subsequent, incident opioid prescriptions within a year of the sedative prescription in the USA.

OUTCOME MEASURES

Coprescription of sedative-hypnotics and opioids.

RESULTS

A total of 2 632 622 patients (mean (SD) age, 43.2 (12.34) years; 1 297 356 (62.5%) female) received incident prescriptions for sedatives over the course of the study period. The largest proportion of sedative prescribing included benzodiazepines (71.1%); however, z-drugs (19.9%) and barbiturates (9%) were also common. About 557 845 (21.2%) patients with incident sedatives also received incident opioid prescriptions. About 59.2% of these coprescribed patients received opioids coprescription on the same day. Multivariate logistic regression findings showed that individuals with a comorbidity index score of 1, 2 or ≥3 (aOR 1.19 (95% CI 1.17 to 1.21), 1.17 (95% C 1.14 to 1.19) and 1.25 (95% C 1.2 to 1.31)) and substance use disorder (1.21 (95% C 1.19 to 1.23)) were more likely to be coprescribed opioids and sedatives. The likelihood of receiving both opioid and sedative prescriptions was lower for female patients (aOR 0.93; 95% CI 0.92 to 0.94), and those receiving a barbiturate (aOR 0.3; 95% CI 0.29 to 0.31) or z-drugs (aOR 0.67; 95% CI 0.66 to 0.68) prescriptions at the index date.

CONCLUSIONS

Coprescription of sedatives with opioids was associated with the presence of comorbidities and substance use disorder, gender and types of sedatives prescribed at the index date. Additionally, more than half of the coprescribing occurred on the same day which warrants further evaluation of current prescribing and dispensing best practice guidelines.

The impact of hospitalization on inappropriate prescribing and polypharmacy in older patients: A descriptive cross-sectional study

BACKGROUND

Polypharmacy and the use of potentially inappropriate medications (PIMs) in older individuals are widespread phenomena that are associated with an increase in morbidity and mortality. The Beers Criteria is a tool that helps to identify patients that are prescribed with PIMs, thereby reducing the risk of associated harm. Amongst other populations, the criteria identify drugs that should not be used by the majority of older patients.

AIM

Determining the proportion of older inpatients who were discharged from hospitalization with polypharmacy (a prescription for more than seven drugs), or with a PIM as defined by the Beers Criteria.

METHODS

A descriptive cross-sectional study based on patients aged 65 and over who were hospitalized in the years 2019-2021 in the internal medicine, orthopedic and surgical wards at a medium-size hospital. Demographic information and details about drug treatment were collected from the electronic patient records system. Patients who died during hospitalization were excluded from the study group.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The proportion of inpatients with polypharmacy or a PIM as part of their regular prescription, at the time of admission and at discharge.

RESULTS

49 564 patients were included in the study cohort. At discharge, 19% of the patients were given a prescription for a PIM, with a small but significant decrease compared with the rate admission (22.1%). At discharge, 42.8% of patients had polypharmacy, representing a small but significant increase compared with the rate on admission (40.6%).

CONCLUSIONS

The study demonstrated high baseline rates of PIM prescription and polypharmacy. Hospitalization was associated with a decrease in PIM prescription and an increase in polypharmacy. This highlights the importance of medication review during admission to reduce the potential risk to older adults from polypharmacy and PIM prescription.

Association of Average Daily Morphine Milligram Equivalents and Falls in Older Adult Chronic Opioid Users

Opioids remain commonly prescribed in older adults, despite the known association with falls and fall-related injuries. This retrospective cohort study sought to determine the association of opioid use and falls in older adult opioid users. Using a one-year lookback period in electronic health records, daily morphine milligram equivalents (MMEs) were calculated using prescription orders. Fall history was based on patient self-reporting. A receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was used to identify the threshold of average daily MMEs at which the likelihood of falls was increased. Older opioid users were most often women and White, with 30% having fallen in the prior year. In ROC analyses (n = 590), the threshold where fall risk increased was 37 MMEs (p = 0.07). Older adults prescribed more than 37 MMEs daily may be at increased fall risk and should be targeted for deprescribing interventions. Additionally, analysis on patient characteristics and covariates suggest that sex, age, COPD, sleep apnea, cancer, and psychiatric conditions may indicate an increased risk of falls in older adults taking chronic opioids (p < 0.05). Multifactorial interventions may be needed to modify fall risk beyond medication use alone.

Deprescribing in primary care without deterioration of health-related outcomes: A real-life, quality improvement project

Medication reviews focusing on deprescribing can reduce potentially inappropriate medication; however, evidence regarding effects on health-related outcomes is sparse. In a real-life quality improvement project using a newly developed chronic care model, we investigated how a general practitioner-led medication review intervention focusing on deprescribing affected health-related outcomes. We performed a before-after intervention study including care home residents and community-dwelling patients affiliated with a large Danish general practice. The primary outcomes were changes in self-reported health status, general condition and functional level from baseline to 3-4 months follow-up. Of the 105 included patients, 87 completed the follow-up. From baseline to follow-up, 255 medication changes were made, of which 83% were deprescribing. Mean self-reported health status increased (0.55 [95% CI: 0.22 to 0.87]); the proportion with general condition rated as 'average or above' was stable (0.06 [95% CI: -0.02 to 0.14]); and the proportion with functional level 'without any disability' was stable (-0.05 [95% CI: -0.09 to 0.001]). In conclusion, this general practitioner-led medication review intervention was associated with deprescribing and increased self-reported health status without the deterioration of general condition or functional level in real-life primary care patients. The results should be interpreted carefully given the small sample size and lack of control group.

Assessment of Hemoglobin A1c Management and Prescription Cost Due to Polypharmacy Among Patients With Diabetes in Iran Based on the STEPS Iran 2016 Survey and a Prescription Database: A Multi-level, Cross-sectional National Study

BACKGROUND

Diabetes frequently results in the need for multiple medication therapies, known as 'Polypharmacy'. This situation can incur significant costs and increase the likelihood of medication errors. This study evaluated the prescriptions of patients with diabetes regarding polypharmacy to assess its effect on the control of hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) levels and prescription costs.

METHODS

A cross-sectional national study was conducted based on data from linking the Iranians Health Insurance Service prescriptions in 2015 and 2016 with the STEPS 2016 survey in Iran. The association of the individual and sociodemographic factors, as well as polypharmacy, as independent variables, with control of HbA1c levels and the cost of the prescriptions were assessed among diabetic patients using logistic and linear regression, respectively.

RESULTS

Among 205 patients using anti-diabetic medications, 47.8% experienced polypharmacy. The HbA1c of 74 patients (36.1%) was equal to or less than 7, indicating controlled diabetes. HbA1c control showed no significant association with gender. However, prescription costs were notably lower in females (β=0.559 [0.324‒0.964], P=0.036). No significant correlation was found between the area of residence and prescription costs, but HbA1c was significantly more controlled in urban areas (OR=2.667 [1.132‒6.282], P=0.025). Prescription costs were significantly lower in patients without polypharmacy (β=0.211, [0.106‒0.423], P<0.001), though there was no significant association between polypharmacy and HbA1c levels.

CONCLUSION

Our results demonstrated that diabetics with polypharmacy paid significantly more for their prescriptions without experiencing a positive effect on the control of HbA1c levels.

Early Detection Screening of Cognitive Decline in Patients Over 60 Years: ELDERCARE Study

Background

Dementia is the fourth leading cause of death in people >  65 years old in western countries.

Objective

This cross-sectional assisted survey aimed to evaluate a multidisciplinary team approach of specialists of the Associazione Geriatri Extraospedalieri a favore di Anziani Svantaggiati and pharmacists to facilitate progress in the early identification and management of cognitive decline in patients >  60 years.

Methods

A multidisciplinary team conducted this cross-sectional assisted survey. Patients (>60 years) with independent and/or assisted walking, subjective memory impairment, mild cognitive impairment or mild Alzheimer's disease (AD) who regularly attended pharmacies underwent the survey. An internal medical examination, a cardiovascular visit, and a short neuropsychological evaluation were conducted for each patient. Demographic, anamnestic, and clinical data were collected anonymously.

Results

279 eligible patients underwent the screening phase. 44% were overweight, 23% obese and 29% hypertensive. 62% of cases showed alterations of supra-aortic trunk with different percentages of stenosis. The neuropsychological evaluation highlighted that 67% of cases were normal according to age and education level, while 18% were in a state condition of cognitive frailty. Mild/moderate cognitive decline, or probably AD, was identified in 14% of cases.

Conclusions

A multidisciplinary collaboration between pharmacists and specialist medical doctors is essential in early identification of prodromal symptoms of cognitive impairment and AD. The Prompt detection of the condition in this group of patients allowed the specialists to recommend in-depth diagnostic tests and follow-up procedures to slow the course of the disease. This would give time to carry out adequate caregiver training.

Mapping potentially inappropriate medications in older adults using the Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical (ATC) classification system

BACKGROUND

Potentially inappropriate medications (PIMs) in older adults are medications in which risks often outweigh benefits and are suggested to be avoided. Worldwide, many distinct guidelines and tools classify PIMs in older adults. Collating these guidelines and tools, mapping them to a medication classification system, and creating a crosswalk will enhance the utility of PIM guidance for research and clinical practice.

METHODS

We used the Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical (ATC) Classification System, a hierarchical classification system, to map PIMs from eight distinct guidelines and tools (2019 Beers Criteria, Screening Tool for Older Person's Appropriate Prescriptions [STOPP], STOPP-Japan, German PRISCUS, European Union-7 Potentially Inappropriate Medication [PIM] list, Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services [CMS] High-Risk Medication, Anticholinergic Burden Scale, and Drug Burden Index). Each PIM was mapped to ATC Level 5 (drug) and to ATC Level 4 (drug class). We then used the crosswalk (1) to compare PIMs and PIM drug classes across guidelines and tools to determine the number of PIMs that were index (drug-induced adverse event) or marker (treatment of drug-induced adverse event) drug of prescribing cascades, and (2) estimate the prevalence of PIM use in older adults continuously enrolled with fee-for-service Medicare in 2018 as use cases. Data visualization and descriptive statistics were used to assess guidelines and tools for both use cases.

RESULTS

Out of 480 unique PIMs identified, only three medications-amitriptyline, clomipramine, and imipramine and two drug classes-N06AA (tricyclic antidepressants) and N06AB (selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors), were noted in all eight guidelines and tools. Using the crosswalk, 50% of classes of index drugs and 47% of classes of marker drugs of known prescribing cascades were PIMs. Additionally, 88% of Medicare beneficiaries were dispensed ≥1 PIM across the eight guidelines and tools.

CONCLUSION

We created a crosswalk of eight PIM guidelines and tools to the ATC classification system and created two use cases. Our findings could be used to expand the ease of PIM identification and harmonization for research and clinical practice purposes.

Patient Perceptions of Opioids and Benzodiazepines and Attitudes Toward Deprescribing

BACKGROUND

Opioids and benzodiazepines (BZDs) pose a public health problem. Older adults are especially susceptible to adverse events from opioids and BZDs owing to an increased usage of opioids and BZDs, multiple comorbidities, and polypharmacy. Deprescribing is a possible, yet challenging, solution to reducing opioid and BZD use.

OBJECTIVE

We aimed to explore older adult patients' knowledge of opioids and BZDs, perceived facilitators and barriers to deprescribing opioids and BZDs, and attitudes toward alternative treatments for opioids and BZDs.

METHODS

We conducted 11 semi-structured interviews with patients aged 65+ years with long-term opioid and/or BZD prescriptions. The interview guide was developed by an interprofessional team and focused on patients' knowledge of opioids and BZDs, perceived ability to reduce opioid or BZD use, and attitudes towards alternative treatments.

RESULTS

Three patients had taken opioids, either currently or in the past, three had taken BZDs, and five had taken both opioids and BZDs. Generally, knowledge of opioids and BZDs was variable among patients; yet facilitators and barriers to deprescribing both opioids and BZDs were consistent. Facilitators of deprescribing included patient-provider trust and slow tapering of medications, while barriers included concerns about re-emergence of symptoms and a lack of motivation, particularly if medications and symptoms were stable. Patients were generally unenthusiastic about pursuing alternative pharmacologic and non-pharmacologic alternatives to opioids and BZDs for symptom management.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings indicate that patients are open to deprescribing opioids and BZDs under certain circumstances, but overall remain hesitant with a lack of enthusiasm for alternative treatments. Future studies should focus on supportive approaches to alleviate older adults' deprescribing concerns.

What happens when pharmacist independent prescribers lead on medicine management in older people's care homes: a qualitative study

OBJECTIVE

Older people in care homes frequently experience polypharmacy, increasing the likelihood of medicine-related burden. Pharmacists working within multidisciplinary primary care teams are ideally placed to lead on medication reviews. A randomised controlled trial placed pharmacists, with independent prescribing rights (PIPs), into older people care homes. In the intervention service, PIPs worked with general practitioners (GPs) and care home staff for 6 months, to optimise medicine management at individual resident and care home level. PIP activity included stopping medicines that were no longer needed or where potential harms outweighed benefits. This analysis of qualitative data examines health and social care stakeholders' perceptions of how the service impacted on care home medicine procedures and resident well-being.

DESIGN

Pragmatic research design with secondary analysis of interviews.

SETTING

Primary care pharmacist intervention in older people care homes in England, Scotland and Northern Ireland.

PARTICIPANTS

Recruited from intervention arm of the trial: PIPs (n=14), GPs (n=8), care home managers (n=9) and care home staff (n=6).

RESULTS

There were resonances between different participant groups about potential benefits to care home residents of a medicine service provided by PIPs. There were small differences in perceptions about changes related to communication between professionals. Results are reported through three themes (1) 'It's a natural fit'-pharmacists undertaking medication review in care homes fitted within multidisciplinary care; (2) 'The resident is cared for'-there were subjective improvements in residents' well-being; (3) 'Moving from "firefighting" to effective systems'-there was evidence of changes to care home medicine procedures.

CONCLUSION

This study suggests that pharmacist independent prescribers in primary care working within the multidisciplinary team can manage care home residents' medicines leading to subjective improvements in residents' well-being and medicine management procedures. Care home staff appreciated contact with a dedicated person in the GP practice.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ISRCTN 17847169.

Prevalence of Polypharmacy of Older People in a Large Brazilian Urban Center and its Associated Factors

BACKGROUND

With the aging population comes greater risks associated with polypharmacy, a significant public health problem.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to identify the prevalence of polypharmacy and its associated factors through Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment (CGA) among older adults treated in primary health care (PHC) in a large Brazilian urban center.

METHODS

We conducted a cross-sectional study with a random sampling of 400 older adults using primary health care. Polypharmacy was defined as the cumulative use of five or more daily medications. An assessment of a sociodemographic and health survey, fear of falling, and physical disabilities affecting activities of daily living and instrumental activities of daily living was conducted.

RESULTS

The mean age was 75.23 (SD: 8.53) years. The prevalence of polypharmacy and hyperpolypharmacy was 37% (n = 148) and 1% (n = 4), respectively. The adjusted logistic regression showed that participants with chronic non-communicable diseases (CNCDs) (OR = 9.24; p = 0.003), diabetes (OR = 1.93; p = 0.003), and obesity (OR = 2.15; p = 0.005) were associated with a greater propensity to use polypharmacy.

CONCLUSION

Our results show that older adults with CNCDs, diabetes, and obesity were more likely to use polypharmacy. The results reinforce the importance of using CGA in clinical practice in PHC.

Sarcopenia is associated with a greater risk of polypharmacy and number of medications: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Polypharmacy in older adults is associated with multiple negative consequences that may affect muscular function, independently from the presence of medical conditions. The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to investigate the association of sarcopenia with polypharmacy and higher number of medications. A systematic literature search of observational studies using PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus and Cochrane Library databases was conducted from inception until June 2022. To determine if sarcopenia is associated with a higher risk of polypharmacy and increased number of medications, a meta-analysis using a random-effects model was used to calculate the pooled effects (CRD42022337539). Twenty-nine studies were included in the systematic review and meta-analysis. Sarcopenia was associated with a higher prevalence of polypharmacy (odds ratio [OR]: 1.65, 95% confidence interval [CI] [1.23, 2.20], I2  = 84%, P < 0.01) and higher number of medications (mean difference: 1.39, 95% CI [0.59, 2.19], I2  = 95%, P < 0.01) compared with individuals without sarcopenia. Using meta-regression, a high variance was observed due to different populations (i.e., community-dwelling, nursing home residents, inpatients, outpatients) for both outcomes of polypharmacy (r = -0.338, SE = 0.1669, 95% CI [-0.67, -0.01], z = -2.03, P = 0.04) and number of medications (r = 0.589, SE = 0.2615, 95% CI [0.08, 1.10], z = 2.25, P = 0.02). This systematic review and meta-analysis reported a significantly increased risk of polypharmacy and higher number of medications in people with sarcopenia compared with individuals without this condition. Future research should clarify whether the specificity and number of medications is a direct contributor in accelerating the progression of muscle wasting and dysfunction contributing to sarcopenia in older adults.

An Overview of Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses on the Effect of Medication Interventions Targeting Polypharmacy for Frail Older Adults

Frailty refers to the lack of resilience and a reduction in a person's ability to recover following a health problem, and it is increasingly becoming a challenging aspect of ageing populations. Many older adults are exposed to polypharmacy; i.e., they continue to be on medications without timely re-evaluation. Medication reviews have proven successful in managing polypharmacy in the general population, but there is uncertainty regarding their effect among frail older adults. This overview of published systematic reviews assesses the impact of medication reviews on polypharmacy in frail older adults. Embase was searched from its inception to January 2021 and 28 systematic reviews were identified, out of which 10 were included in the overview. Medication reviews were the most common intervention in 8 out of 10 systematic reviews. The frailty score was reported as an outcome in one systematic review that found no evidence for fundamental pharmacological effects on frailty. Six systematic reviews reported a statistically significant reduction in the number of inappropriately prescribed medications. Four systematic reviews reported on hospital admissions, with two of them reporting a decrease in hospitalisations. The quality assessment was moderate in six and critically low in four of the systematic reviews. We conclude that medication reviews help in reducing the use of inappropriate medications in frail older adults, but that there is insufficient evidence in terms of frailty score and hospital admissions.

Characterization of Potentially Inappropriate Medications That Need Special Attention in the Elderly with Dementia by Analyzing Pharmacy Claims Data

Community pharmacists may play a key role in promoting deprescribing of potential inappropriate medications (PIMs) that are highly prevalent among community-dwelling elderly with dementia. To characterize PIMs categories that need a special attention for dementia patients, in the present study, we analyzed the anonymized pharmacy claims data of patients aged 65 years and older (n = 333869) who visited nationwide 905 community-based pharmacies of Sugi Pharmacy Co., Ltd. during December 1-31, 2019. A dementia group was defined as patients who received typical dementia medications marketed in Japan, i.e., donepezil, galantamine, memantine or rivastigmine, and a non-dementia group was defined as patients who received no such medications. After propensity score matching on the basis of patients' age, gender and home healthcare insurance usage, the data of 11486 patients in each group were subjected to logistic regression analyses, to identify PIMs categories particularly important for dementia patients. Univariate analysis indicated that the proportions of dementia patients who received 1 and 2≤ of PIMs were significantly (p < 0.001) greater than those of non-dementia patients (odds ratios were 1.35 and 1.47, respectively). Multivariate analyses identified 5 categories of PIMs that were significantly more frequently prescribed in dementia patients, i.e., 'H2 blockers,' 'drugs for overactive bladder,' 'anti-diabetes drugs' and 'sulpiride' listed as PIMs categories for non-specific cases (adjusted odds ratios (aORs): 1.29, 1.91, 1.17, and 1.38, respectively), in addition to 'antipsychotics' listed only for dementia patients (aOR: 4.29). These results provide useful information to establish strategies for pharmacist-led deprescribing of PIMs in dementia patients.

Prospective Association between Multimorbidity and Falls and Its Mediators: Findings from the Irish Longitudinal Study on Ageing

This study including older adults from Ireland aimed to analyze the prospective association between multimorbidity and falls and to identify the mediators in this relationship. The present study used data from two consecutive waves of the Irish Longitudinal Study on Ageing (TILDA) survey. Multimorbidity was assessed at Wave 1 (2009–2011) and was defined as the presence of at least two chronic conditions. Falls occurring at Wave 2 (2012–2013) were self-reported. Mediating variables considered were polypharmacy, cognitive impairment, sleep problems, pain, low handgrip strength, difficulty in activities of daily living (ADL), obesity, and underweight. Multivariable binary logistic regression and mediation analysis using the Karlson Holm Breen method were conducted. This study included 6900 adults aged ≥50 years (51.6% women; mean [SD] age 63.1 [8.9] years). Compared to no chronic conditions at baseline, there was a positive and significant association between multimorbidity and falls at follow-up, with ORs ranging from 1.32 (95% CI = 1.06–1.64) for 2 conditions to 1.92 (95% CI = 1.54–2.38) for ≥4 conditions. Pain (23.5%), polypharmacy (13.3%), and difficulty in ADL (10.7%) explained the largest proportion of the multimorbidity-fall relationship. Multimorbidity increased risk for incident falls in older adults from Ireland. Interventions should be implemented to reduce fall risk in people with multimorbidity, especially targeting the identified mediators.

Pharmacist interventions to deprescribe opioids and benzodiazepines in older adults: A rapid review

BACKGROUND

Many older adults are prescribed opioids and benzodiazepines (BZDs), despite increased susceptibility to adverse events. Challenges of deprescribing include fragmented care and lack of knowledge or time. Pharmacists are well-positioned to overcome these challenges and facilitate deprescribing of these medications.

OBJECTIVES

We sought to evaluate interventions utilizing pharmacists to deprescribe opioids and BZDs in older adults.

METHODS

We conducted a rapid review following a comprehensive literature search to identify interventions with pharmacist involvement for deprescribing opioids and BZDs in older adults. Studies were included based on: (1) inclusion of patients ≥ 65 years old receiving BZDs and/or opioids, (2) evaluation of feasibility or outcomes following deprescribing (3) pharmacists as part of the intervention. We included randomized, observational, cohort, and pilot studies. Studies that did not report specific results for BZD or opioids were excluded.

RESULTS

We screened 687 abstracts and included 17 studies. Most (n = 13) focused on BZD deprescribing. Few studies focused on opioids (n = 2) or co-prescribing of opioids and BZDs (n = 2). The most common intervention was educational brochures (n = 8), majority being the EMPOWER brochure for deprescribing BZDs. Other interventions included chart review with electronic notes (n = 4), pharmacist-led programs/services (n = 2), and multifactorial interventions (n = 3). Many studies were underpowered or lacked suitable control groups. Generally speaking, interventions utilizing educational materials and those in which pharmacists engaged with patients and providers were more effective. Interventions relying on electronic communication by pharmacists were less successful, due to low acceptance or acknowledgement.

CONCLUSIONS

We identified a number of feasible interventions to reduce BZD use, but fewer interventions to reduce opioid use in older adults. An optimal approach for deprescribing likely requires pharmacists to engage directly with patients and providers. Larger well-designed studies are needed to evaluate the effectiveness of deprescribing interventions beyond feasibility.

Case Report of an Interprofessional Intervention to Improve Quality of Life for a Fluid-Limited Patient

This was a case of an 81-year-old female, an amputee, who presented at hospital with a fractured neck of femur after a fall in the nursing home. The patient was being treated for several complex chronic conditions for which 30 regular medicines were prescribed and 100 tablets were being taken per day. The patient was fluid limited to 1500 mL per day but the need to swallow such a high number of tablets meant that there was no fluid allowance available for any other drinks, not even a cup of tea. In the nursing home, the patient had multiple prescribers, not all from the one surgery. The pharmacist conducted a multifaceted review of the patient’s medication and lifestyle factors. Working collaboratively with the wider health care team, the intervention was able to reduce the number of medications and improve the patient’s quality of life through improving the effectiveness of other lifestyle factors. This case not only showcases pharmacist interventions but also the synergistic benefit of interprofessional working with patients with chronic and complex conditions. This is arguably more critical in rural or remote areas where there is commonly a paucity of most health practitioners, health assistants and technicians.

Factors associated to potentially inappropriate prescribing in older patients according to STOPP/START criteria: MoPIM multicentre cohort study

OBJECTIVES

The objectives of the present analyses are to estimate the frequency of potentially inappropriate prescribing (PIP) at admission according to STOPP/START criteria version 2 in older patients hospitalised due to chronic disease exacerbation as well as to identify risk factors associated to the most frequent active principles as potentially inappropriate medications (PIMs).

METHODS

A multicentre, prospective cohort study including older patients (≥65) hospitalized due to chronic disease exacerbation at the internal medicine or geriatric services of 5 hospitals in Spain between September 2016 and December 2018 was conducted. Demographic and clinical data was collected, and a medication review process using STOPP/START criteria version 2 was performed, considering both PIMs and potential prescribing omissions (PPOs). Primary outcome was defined as the presence of any most frequent principles as PIMs, and secondary outcomes were the frequency of any PIM and PPO. Descriptive and bivariate analyses were conducted on all outcomes and multilevel logistic regression analysis, stratified by participating centre, was performed on the primary outcome.

RESULTS

A total of 740 patients were included (mean age 84.1, 53.2% females), 93.8% of them presenting polypharmacy, with a median of 10 chronic prescriptions. Among all, 603 (81.5%) patients presented at least one PIP, 542 (73.2%) any PIM and 263 (35.5%) any PPO. Drugs prescribed without an evidence-based clinical indication were the most frequent PIM (33.8% of patients); vitamin D supplement in older people who are housebound or experiencing falls or with osteopenia was the most frequent PPO (10.3%). The most frequent active principles as PIMs were proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) and benzodiazepines (BZDs), present in 345 (46.6%) patients. This outcome was found significantly associated with age, polypharmacy and essential tremor in an explanatory model with 71% AUC.

CONCLUSIONS

PIMs at admission are highly prevalent in these patients, especially those involving PPIs or BZDs, which affected almost half of the patients. Therefore, these drugs may be considered as the starting point for medication review and deprescription.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT02830425.

Abuse/Misuse of Prescription Medications in Older Adults

The world population is aging due to increasing life expectancy. The rate of drug use increases, and inappropriate prescribing is frequently encountered with advancing age. In addition, misuse and abuse of prescription drugs is a serious problem in older adults. It is challenging to detect substance and drug abuse in older patients because it may have fewer consequences in social, legal, and occupational fields. However, there is not enough information about the screening, evaluation, diagnosis, and treatment of abuse. Therefore, the awareness of health care professionals and others involved in older patients' care should be raised about the misuse and abuse of drugs.

Potentially inappropriate medication use in elderly patients treated in intensive care units: A cross-sectional study using 2019 Beers, STOPP/v2 Criteria and EU(7)-PIM List

OBJECTIVE

To determine the prevalence of and the risk factors for Potentially Inappropriate Medication (PIM), the drug groups most commonly evaluated as PIMs in elderly patients in the ICUs by using 2019 Beers Criteria, STOPP version 2 (v2) Criteria and EU(7)-PIM List. The relation between mortality rate and length of ICU stay with PIMs was also examined.

METHODS

This was a cross sectional study conducted on patients aged ≥65 years, treated in ICUs (n = 139) between June 8, 2020, and January 11, 2021. Patients' demographic characteristics, clinical data and laboratory findings about the drugs used were collected prospectively. PIMs were evaluated according to each of the criteria applied. Relationship of dependent and independent variables was evaluated using chi-square analysis, t-test and logistic regression analysis. P < .05 was considered statistically significant.

RESULTS

The number of patients with at least 1 PIM according to three criteria was 118 (84.9%) (80.6%, 59.7%, 48.2%, Beers, STOPP/v2 and EU(7)-PIM List, respectively). In the univariate analysis, receiving renal replacement therapy and high number of drugs were the covariates that significantly affected the presence of PIM according to all three criteria (P < .05). Combined use of anxiolytics and opioids in Beers Criteria (58.3%), antipsychotics (26.6%) in STOPP/v2 Criteria, and antiarrhythmics (23.7%) in EU(7)-PIM List were the drugs that caused PIM at most. No relationship was found between the presence of PIM and mortality. The length of ICU stay was determined significantly longer in the presence of PIM according to Beers Criteria (P = .028).

CONCLUSIONS

In this study, the prevalence of PIM was determined higher in elderly patients in ICU. Our results supported that 2019 Beers Criteria for ICU patients seems to be more directive in detecting PIMs and determining the prognosis. Reducing the number of drugs administered may be the first step to decrease PIMs in elderly patients in ICU and to maintain the treatment safely.

Potentially inappropriate medications in older adults according to Beers criteria 2019: Prevalence and risk factors

AIM

Older patients are more prone to receive potentially inappropriate medications (PIMs) that are better to be avoided or dose adjusted to protect them from their unnecessary or harmful use. This study aims to detect the prevalence of PIMs among older patients discharged from Tawam hospital according to Beers criteria 2019. Moreover, the common risk factors of the older patients may subject them to PIMs use.

METHODS

A retrospective charts review study of older patients ≥65 years who were prescribed 5 or more medications and were discharged from Tawam hospital from 1 October 2018 to 31 December 2018. Each patient's medical record was scanned to detect PIMs. (PIMs) were classified according to Beers criteria 2019, and the predictors of PIMs were also assessed.

RESULTS

A total of 502 older patients (51.6% females and 48.4% males) medical charts were reviewed. The prevalence of PIMs among the study population was 34.7%. Antipsychotics (27.5%) and sulphonylurea's (16.8%) were among the most common avoided PIMs. Anticoagulants (40%) and ranitidine (35%) were the most PIMs based on the kidney function of the patient. Female gender [OR 1.8; 95% CI (1.22-2.66), P < .05] and increasing number of medications [OR 1.08; 95% CI (1.03-1.14), P < .05] were the independent predictors of PIMs.

CONCLUSION

Based on the prevalence of PIMs among older patients, it is recommended to revise each patient's medications prescription to avoid inappropriate prescribing and hence decrease the prevalence of PIMs.

Sarcopenia and polypharmacy among older adults: A scoping review of the literature

BACKGROUND

Sarcopenia and polypharmacy are both prevalent conditions in the geriatric population, leading to poor quality of life and adverse outcomes.

OBJECTIVE

To explore the evidence on the relationship between sarcopenia and polypharmacy and to summarize the findings and the gaps from the existing literature.

METHOD

A systematic scoping review was conducted between March and May 2021, with no restriction on publication date, using the Arksey and O'Malley framework and reported according to PRISMA-ScR. Four bibliographic databases, PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, Proquest One Academic, and four sources of gray literature were searched for studies written in English or Greek. Data were extracted quantitatively and using thematic analysis.

RESULTS

Of the 397 initially retrieved records, 22 studies were finally included in this review, 20 published articles and 2 posters-presentations. Most of the studies used cross-sectional data. The relationship between sarcopenia and polypharmacy should be interpreted on the basis of the definition of polypharmacy, the diagnostic criteria of sarcopenia used, and the population setting. Sarcopenia or risk for sarcopenia are associated with polypharmacy or the number of medications in community-dwelling older adults, regardless of diagnostic criteria used for sarcopenia.

CONCLUSION

There is an association between sarcopenia or risk for sarcopenia and polypharmacy or the number of medications in community-dwelling older adults but not among residents of nursing homes or inpatients. Specific widely accepted definitions of polypharmacy and sarcopenia, a consensus on the method of sarcopenia assessment, and prospective studies are needed to identify polypharmacy as a potential risk factor for sarcopenia.

Polypharmacy prevalence in older adults seen in United States physician offices from 2009 to 2016

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES

With an aging population suffering from increased prevalence of chronic conditions in the United States (U.S.), a large portion of these patients are on multiple medications. High-risk medications can increase the risk for drug-drug interactions and medication nonadherence. This study aims to describe the prevalence of polypharmacy and high-risk medication prescribing in U.S. physician offices.

METHODS

This was a cross-sectional study of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey from 2009 to 2016. All patients over 65 years old were included. Polypharmacy was categorized as no polypharmacy (< 2 medications), minor polypharmacy (2-3 medications), moderate polypharmacy (4-5 medications), and major polypharmacy (>5 medications). Medications were further categorized into high-risk medication categories (anticholinergics, cardiovascular agents, central nervous system (CNS) medications, pain medications, and other). Comparisons between the degrees of polypharmacy were performed utilizing chi-square or Wilcoxon rank-sum tests with JMP Pro 14® (SAS Institute, Cary, NC).

RESULTS

Over 2 billion patient visits were included. Overall, Polypharmacy was common (65.1%): minor polypharmacy (16.2%), moderate polypharmacy (12.1%), and major polypharmacy (36.8%). Patients with major polypharmacy were older compared to those with moderate or minor polypharmacy (75 vs. 73 years, respectively) and were most frequently prescribed pain medications (477.3 per 1,000 total visits). NSAIDs were the most frequently prescribed, with 232.4 per 1,000 total visits resulting in one high-risk NSAID prescription, while 21.9 per 1,000 total visits resulted in two or more high-risk NSAIDs.

CONCLUSION

Most patients over 65 years experienced some degree of polypharmacy, with many experiencing major polypharmacy. This indicates an increased need for expanded pharmacist roles through medication therapy management and safety monitoring in this patient population.

[Descriptive study of delirium in the emergency department]

Objetivo

Conocer mejor las variables clínicas, funcionales y analíticas que se asocian al síndrome confusional agudo (SCA) en urgencias y la evolución de las mismas con el fin de obtener una mejora en el abordaje terapéutico del paciente anciano previniendo así la morbimortalidad en este tipo de pacientes.

Diseño

Se trata de un estudio descriptivo prospectivo de SCA en urgencias.

Emplazamiento

Hospital General Universitario de Ciudad Real.

Participantes

Se incluyó, en el intervalo de las 24 h siguientes al ingreso en el Servicio de Geriatría, a todos los pacientes procedentes del Servicio de Urgencias con diagnóstico de SCA.

Mediciones principales

Se realizó un análisis de las variables del conjunto de datos (variables sociodemográficas y clínicas), calculando tablas de frecuencias para variables de tipo cualitativo y estadísticos descriptivos para las variables cuantitativas. Posteriormente, se han empleado técnicas de inferencia estadística.

Resultados

El antecedente médico más frecuente fueron la enfermedad neurológica y la HTA, seguida de las enfermedades reumatológicas. Los motivos de consulta principales fueron el deterioro del estado general, la disnea, la disminución del nivel de consciencia y la fiebre. Se debe destacar la incidencia de la polifarmacia, especialmente de fármacos como los diuréticos, benzodiacepinas o hipnóticos. En relación con la etiología principal, destaca el papel de las infecciones de tipo urinario y respiratorio.

Conclusiones

Se destaca el papel fundamental de las enfermedades neurológicas (especialmente la demencia), la HTA, la polifarmacia (uso inadecuado de benzodiacepinas e hipnóticos) y las infecciones urinarias y respiratorias como factores tratables o prevenibles del delirium en el paciente de Atención Primaria en nuestro medio.

Comprehension of Prescriptions and Errors in Taking Prescribed Medicines by Veterans - Polypharmacy a Problem Underrated

Background:

Polypharmacy is a significant problem in the elderly. The veteran population is unique in terms of better access to health-care services and higher educational qualifications. However, the studies to assess the burden and effects of polypharmacy in this cohort are rare. Hence, the research was done to find the prevalence of polypharmacy in the veteran population.

Methods:

In this cross-sectional observational study, we included veterans with more than 35 years visiting the medical outpatient department. All participants were interviewed about polypharmacy after taking informed consent.

Results:

Out of 394 patients included in the study, 110 were prescribed five or more medicines for their illnesses (27.91%: 95% confidence interval [CI] 21.1%–30%). More than 95% (377/394) of the study participants were unaware of the concept of polypharmacy. There was high compliance to treatment in veterans (97.46%, 95% CI 95.1%–98.6%).

Conclusion:

This study shows that the prevalence of polypharmacy is significant in veterans, including patients in their fourth and fifth decades of life, despite fewer morbidities.

Delayed onset serotonin syndrome in the setting of polypharmacy

Serotonin syndrome is a rare but well-known condition that can be life-threatening if not diagnosed early. Onset is usually within 4 to 13 h of starting the offending medication. We present a case of delayed onset of serotonin syndrome that presented after 48 h. Polypharmacy played a role in causing the onset of symptoms. Clinicians should keep a high index of suspicion for serotonin syndrome when dealing with elderly confused patients who take multiple medications even when the onset is delayed or atypical because the outcome can be disastrous.

Qualitative study of medication review in Flanders, Belgium among community pharmacists and general practitioners

Objective Examining the implementation barriers and facilitators of this service as provided by Belgian community pharmacists in collaboration with general practitioners. Setting Community pharmacies in Flanders. Method Qualitative study through interviews of pharmacists and general practitioners. Main outcome measure Opinions and experiences of pharmacists and general practitioners about type 3 medication review. Results Sixteen community pharmacists and thirteen general practitioners were interviewed and generally gave a positive assessment of the project. The general practitioners saw the pharmaceutical and pharmacotherapeutic recommendations of the pharmacists as an added value for the patients. The pharmacists indicated that performing an medication review was time-consuming, but that it improved their professional relationship with general practitioners and patients. They reported obstacles in obtaining information: cumbersome access to individual patient data (laboratory values) and difficulties in finding and choosing adequate medical information sources. Moreover, pharmacists indicated that there is a need for adequate reimbursement and additional training to make the implementation sustainable. Conclusion Both pharmacists and general practitioners were enthusiastic about medication reviews. The implementation improved the interprofessional collaboration. However, important barriers remain, such as the considerable investment of time and the difficulty in gathering all the necessary information. The sustainable implementation of type 3 medication review in Belgium requires adequate reimbursement and additional training.