Trial Watch: combination of tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) and immunotherapy

Trial watch: bispecific antibodies for the treatment of relapsed or refractory large B-cell lymphoma

Immunotherapy has shaped the treatment approach to diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL), with rituximab leading to remarkable improvements in outcomes for both relapsed and treatment-naïve patients. Recently, groundbreaking immunotherapies like chimeric antigen receptor T-cells have entered the treatment arena for relapsed/refractory (R/R) DLBCL and gained regulatory approval in several countries. The concept of harnessing a patient's own T-cells to combat cancer has been further explored through the development of bispecific antibodies (BsAbs), a class of engineered antibody products designed to simultaneously target two different antigens. These novel drugs have demonstrated impressive single-agent activity and manageable toxicity in patients with heavily pretreated B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma. In this review, we provide an up-to-date overview of recently completed or ongoing BsAbs trials in patients with R/R DLBCL, including single-agent results, emerging combination data, and novel constructs.

Structural basis and selectivity of sulfatinib binding to FGFR and CSF-1R

Acquired drug resistance poses a challenge for single-target FGFR inhibitors, leading to the development of dual- or multi-target FGFR inhibitors. Sulfatinib is a multi-target kinase inhibitor for treating neuroendocrine tumors, selectively targeting FGFR1/CSF-1R. To elucidate the molecular mechanisms behind its binding and kinase selectivity, we determined the crystal structures of sulfatinib with FGFR1/CSF-1R. The results reveal common structural features and distinct conformational adaptability of sulfatinib in response to FGFR1/CSF-1R binding. Further biochemical and structural analyses disclose sensitivity of sulfatinib to FGFR/CSF-1R gatekeeper mutations. The insensitivity of sulfatinib to FGFR gatekeeper mutations highlights the indispensable interactions with the hydrophobic pocket for FGFR selectivity, whereas the rotatory flexibility may enable sulfatinib to overcome CSF-1RT663I. This study not only sheds light on the structural basis governing sulfatinib's FGFR/CSF-1R inhibition, but also provides valuable insights into the rational design of dual- or multi-target FGFR inhibitors with selectivity for CSF-1R and sensitivity to gatekeeper mutations.

Reigniting hope in cancer treatment: the promise and pitfalls of IL-2 and IL-2R targeting strategies

Interleukin-2 (IL-2) and its receptor (IL-2R) are essential in orchestrating immune responses. Their function and expression in the tumor microenvironment make them attractive targets for immunotherapy, leading to the development of IL-2/IL-2R-targeted therapeutic strategies. However, the dynamic interplay between IL-2/IL-2R and various immune cells and their dual roles in promoting immune activation and tolerance presents a complex landscape for clinical exploitation. This review discusses the pivotal roles of IL-2 and IL-2R in tumorigenesis, shedding light on their potential as diagnostic and prognostic markers and their therapeutic manipulation in cancer. It underlines the necessity to balance the anti-tumor activity with regulatory T-cell expansion and evaluates strategies such as dose optimization and selective targeting for enhanced therapeutic effectiveness. The article explores recent advancements in the field, including developing genetically engineered IL-2 variants, combining IL-2/IL-2R-targeted therapies with other cancer treatments, and the potential benefits of a multidimensional approach integrating molecular profiling, immunological analyses, and clinical data. The review concludes that a deeper understanding of IL-2/IL-2R interactions within the tumor microenvironment is crucial for realizing the full potential of IL-2-based therapies, heralding the promise of improved outcomes for cancer patients.

Hypoxia: syndicating triple negative breast cancer against various therapeutic regimens

Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is one of the deadliest subtypes of breast cancer (BC) for its high aggressiveness, heterogeneity, and hypoxic nature. Based on biological and clinical observations the TNBC related mortality is very high worldwide. Emerging studies have clearly demonstrated that hypoxia regulates the critical metabolic, developmental, and survival pathways in TNBC, which include glycolysis and angiogenesis. Alterations to these pathways accelerate the cancer stem cells (CSCs) enrichment and immune escape, which further lead to tumor invasion, migration, and metastasis. Beside this, hypoxia also manipulates the epigenetic plasticity and DNA damage response (DDR) to syndicate TNBC survival and its progression. Hypoxia fundamentally creates the low oxygen condition responsible for the alteration in Hypoxia-Inducible Factor-1alpha (HIF-1α) signaling within the tumor microenvironment, allowing tumors to survive and making them resistant to various therapies. Therefore, there is an urgent need for society to establish target-based therapies that overcome the resistance and limitations of the current treatment plan for TNBC. In this review article, we have thoroughly discussed the plausible significance of HIF-1α as a target in various therapeutic regimens such as chemotherapy, radiotherapy, immunotherapy, anti-angiogenic therapy, adjuvant therapy photodynamic therapy, adoptive cell therapy, combination therapies, antibody drug conjugates and cancer vaccines. Further, we also reviewed here the intrinsic mechanism and existing issues in targeting HIF-1α while improvising the current therapeutic strategies. This review highlights and discusses the future perspectives and the major alternatives to overcome TNBC resistance by targeting hypoxia-induced signaling.

Cardiovascular toxicity profiles of immune checkpoint inhibitors with or without angiogenesis inhibitors: a real-world pharmacovigilance analysis based on the FAERS database from 2014 to 2022

Background

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) combined with angiogenesis inhibitors (AGIs) have become increasingly available for multiple types of cancers, although the cardiovascular safety profiles of this combination therapy in real-world settings have not been elucidated to date. Therefore, we aimed to comprehensively investigate the cardiovascular toxicity profiles of ICIs combined with AGIs in comparison with ICIs alone.

Methods

The Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) database from the 1^st quarter of 2014 to the 1^st quarter of 2022 was retrospectively queried to extract reports of cardiovascular adverse events (AEs) associated with ICIs alone, AGIs alone and combination therapy. To perform disproportionality analysis, the reporting odds ratios (RORs) and information components (ICs) were calculated with statistical shrinkage transformation formulas and a lower limit of the 95% confidence interval (CI) for ROR (ROR₀₂₅) > 1 or IC (IC₀₂₅) > 0 with at least 3 reports was considered statistically significant.

Results

A total of 18 854 cardiovascular AE cases/26 059 reports for ICIs alone, 47 168 cases/67 595 reports for AGIs alone, and 3 978 cases/5 263 reports for combination therapy were extracted. Compared to the entire database of patients without AGIs or ICIs, cardiovascular AEs were overreported in patients with combination therapy (IC₀₂₅/ROR₀₂₅ = 0.559/1.478), showing stronger signal strength than those taking ICIs alone (IC₀₂₅/ROR₀₂₅ = 0.118/1.086) or AGIs alone (IC₀₂₅/ROR₀₂₅ = 0.323/1.252). Importantly, compared with ICIs alone, combination therapy showed a decrease in signal strength for noninfectious myocarditis/pericarditis (IC₀₂₅/ROR₀₂₅ = 1.142/2.216 vs. IC₀₂₅/ROR₀₂₅ = 0.673/1.614), while an increase in signal value for embolic and thrombotic events (IC₀₂₅/ROR₀₂₅ = 0.147/1.111 vs. IC₀₂₅/ROR₀₂₅ = 0.591/1.519). For outcomes of cardiovascular AEs, the frequency of death and life-threatening AEs was lower for combination therapy than ICIs alone in noninfectious myocarditis/pericarditis (37.7% vs. 49.2%) as well as in embolic and thrombotic events (29.9% vs. 39.6%). Analysis among indications of cancer showed similar findings.

Conclusion

Overall, ICIs combined with AGIs showed a greater risk of cardiovascular AEs than ICIs alone, mainly due to an increase in embolic and thrombotic events while a decrease in noninfectious myocarditis/pericarditis. In addition, compared with ICIs alone, combination therapy presented a lower frequency of death and life-threatening in noninfectious myocarditis/pericarditis and embolic and thrombotic events.

Synergic Effect of Metformin and Everolimus on Mitochondrial Dynamics of Renal Cell Carcinoma

Renal cell carcinoma (RCC) frequently recurs or metastasizes after surgical resection. Everolimus, an mTOR inhibitor, is used as a second-line treatment, but the response of RCC to everolimus is insufficient. Metformin is an antidiabetic drug; recent reports have indicated its anti-cancer effects in various cancers, and it is known to have synergistic effects with other drugs. We investigated the possibility of coadministering everolimus and metformin as an effective treatment for RCC. RCC cells treated with a combination of the two drugs showed significantly inhibited cell viability, cell migration, and invasion, and increased apoptosis compared to those treated with each drug alone. An anti-cancer synergistic effect was also confirmed in the xenograft model. Transcriptome analysis for identifying the underlying mechanism of the combined treatment showed the downregulation of mitochondrial fusion genes and upregulation of mitochondrial fission genes by the combination treatment. Changes in mitochondrial dynamics following the combination treatment were observed using LysoTracker, LysoSensor, and JC-1 staining. In conclusion, the combination of everolimus and metformin inhibited RCC growth by disrupting mitochondrial dynamics. Therefore, we suggest that a treatment combining metformin and everolimus disrupts mitochondrial dynamics in RCC, and may be a novel strategy for RCC treatment.

Trial watch: Dendritic cell (DC)-based immunotherapy for cancer

Dendritic cell (DC)-based vaccination for cancer treatment has seen considerable development over recent decades. However, this field is currently in a state of flux toward niche-applications, owing to recent paradigm-shifts in immuno-oncology mobilized by T cell-targeting immunotherapies. DC vaccines are typically generated using autologous (patient-derived) DCs exposed to tumor-associated or -specific antigens (TAAs or TSAs), in the presence of immunostimulatory molecules to induce DC maturation, followed by reinfusion into patients. Accordingly, DC vaccines can induce TAA/TSA-specific CD8⁺/CD4⁺ T cell responses. Yet, DC vaccination still shows suboptimal anti-tumor efficacy in the clinic. Extensive efforts are ongoing to improve the immunogenicity and efficacy of DC vaccines, often by employing combinatorial chemo-immunotherapy regimens. In this Trial Watch, we summarize the recent preclinical and clinical developments in this field and discuss the ongoing trends and future perspectives of DC-based immunotherapy for oncological indications.