Trends in the rates of health-care providers' recommendation for HPV vaccine from 2012 to 2018: a multi-round cross-sectional analysis of the health information national trends survey

Disparities in HPV Vaccination Among Adolescents by Health Care Facility Type

Importance

Approximately 31 000 cases of human papillomavirus (HPV)-associated cancers are diagnosed annually in the US. The HPV vaccine can prevent more than 90% of these cancers, yet national uptake remains lower than the Healthy People 2030 target of 80% completion. To devise targeted interventions to increase the uptake of HPV vaccines, it is crucial to understand the vaccination rates across various health care settings.

Objective

To examine the association between health care facility type and adolescent HPV vaccine uptake and clinician recommendation for the vaccine in the US.

Design, Setting, and Participants

This cross-sectional study uses a complex sampling design of data from the 2020 National Immunization Survey-Teen. The study included adolescents aged 13 to 17 years. The data analysis was completed between March 1 and May 31, 2022.

Exposure

Health care facility type classified as public, hospital-based, private, mixed (more than 1 type), and other facilities (eg, military health care facility; Women, Infants, and Children clinic; school-based health center; pharmacy).

Main Outcomes and Measures

Initiation of HPV vaccination was defined as the receipt of at least 1 dose of the HPV vaccine and completion as receipt of at least 2 or 3 doses, depending on age of initiation. Parent or guardian self-reported clinician recommendation was categorized as yes or no. Weighted, multivariable logistic regression models were used to estimate the odds of initiating and completing the HPV vaccine series and receiving clinician recommendation by health care facility type adjusted for adolescent and maternal characteristics.

Results

A total of 20 162 adolescents (mean [SD] age, 14.9 [1.4] years; 51.0% male) were included. Clinician recommendation for the HPV vaccine was received by 81.4% of adolescents, and 75.1% initiated and 58.6% completed the HPV vaccine series. In the adjusted analyses, adolescents who received recommended vaccinations at public facilities had lower odds of initiating (adjusted odds ratio [AOR], 0.71; 95% CI, 0.58-0.88) and completing (AOR, 0.62; 95% CI, 0.51-0.76) HPV vaccination compared with those who received recommended vaccinations at private facilities. Similarly, adolescents who received recommended vaccinations at public facilities (AOR, 0.62; 95% CI, 0.51-0.77) had lower odds of receiving a clinician recommendation for the HPV vaccine compared with those who received recommended vaccinations at private facilities.

Conclusions and Relevance

These findings reveal health disparities in HPV vaccination among adolescent populations served by public health care facilities, suggesting that a greater focus is needed on vaccine recommendations and uptake in public facilities.

Barriers to the assessment and recommendation of HPV vaccination among healthcare providers in Texas

Background

Healthcare providers (HCPs) recommendations for HPV vaccination plays a critical role in increasing vaccination uptake. This study assesses the prevalence of reported barriers to HPV vaccination assessment and recommendation among HCPs in Texas.

Methods

Study data were obtained from a population-based survey of HCPs currently practicing in Texas. Participants were asked about their HPV vaccination assessment and recommendation practices and the reasons for not assessing or recommending the vaccine. Barriers were stratified by HCP characteristics including age, sex, race/ethnicity, location of practice, provider type, and type of facility.

Results

Among the 826 HCPs included in this study, 47.3 % never, 49.6 % sometimes, and 3.0 % often/always assessed a patient's HPV vaccination status. Similarly, 36.0 % never, 36.2 % sometimes, and 27.9 % often/always recommended HPV vaccination. The most frequently reported barriers to assessment and recommendation of HPV vaccination were time constraints (22.9 %), delegating the task to others (15.0 %), lack of effective tools and information to give patients (12.0 %), and requiring additional training (9.2 %). HCPs who were female, less than 35 years old, non-Hispanic black, and nonphysician HCPs (Physician Assistant, Nurse Practitioner) most frequently reported lacking effective tools and information and a need for additional training.

Conclusion

The assessment and recommendation for HPV vaccination among HCPs in Texas is suboptimal. Barriers reported varied based on the provider's characteristics. Addressing these barriers, such as by providing more effective tools and information and offering additional training to HCPs, could potentially increase HPV vaccination rates in Texas. The findings also suggest that interventions should be tailored to specific demographic groups.

Individual, systemic and state factors associated with provider recommendation of HPV vaccination: Findings from NIS-Teen, 2020

The most important determinant of HPV vaccination uptake is healthcare provider recommendation, yet not all eligible patients receive HPV vaccination recommendations. We used data from the 2020 National Immunization Survey-Teen to determine individual, systemic, and state factors associated with provider recommendation of HPV vaccination. A total of 18,534 teens were included, with 81.4% receiving provider recommendations for HPV vaccination. HPV vaccination recommendation was higher among females compared to males (AOR: 1.57; 95% CI: 1.27-1.93), teens who received a well-child exam at 11 or 12 years compared to those who did not (AOR: 2.10; 95% CI: 1.61-2.74), and teens whose mothers had college, some college or at least a high school education compared to those with less than high school education. In addition to individual factors, provider recommendation of HPV vaccination was higher in hospitals (AOR: 1.51; 95% CI: 1.00-2.29) and STD/school/teen clinics (AOR: 2.47; 95% CI: 1.05-5.78) compared to public facilities. However, the odds of provider recommendation were lower when none of the teen's providers ordered vaccines from the state compared to when all teen providers ordered vaccines from the state (AOR: 0.69; 95% CI: 0.52-0.93). Moreover, the state's mean prevalence of provider recommendations of HPV vaccination was 7.2% lower (Coefficient: -0.072; 95% CI: -0.107 - -0.036) in states with high religious ideology compared to those with low religious ideology. Interventions to increase provider recommendation of HPV vaccination should take a multiprong and comprehensive approach that addresses religious and systemic barriers to HPV vaccination recommendation.

Health inequities in human papillomavirus prevention, diagnostics and clinical care in the USA: a scoping review

BACKGROUND

Human papillomavirus (HPV) represents the most common STI in the USA. HPV inequities in prevention, diagnostics and clinical care persist. We define inequities as systematic, avoidable and unfair differences in health outcomes.

OBJECTIVES

The objectives of this scoping review are to chart existing data on HPV-related inequities, identify gaps in existing literature and guide future research to reduce these inequities.

METHODS

We completed a scoping review following guidelines from the Joanna Briggs Institute and the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses scoping reviews extension. We performed a literature search on PubMed and Ovid Embase in July 2022 for articles pertaining to HPV and evaluating populations within the USA. We included English language publications from 2018 to 2022 evaluating at least one health inequity outlined by the National Institutes of Health. General publication characteristics and health inequity data were charted in a masked, duplicate fashion using a pilot-tested Google Form. We analysed frequencies of health inequities and summarised main findings from included studies.

RESULTS

Our final sample included 170 publications. The most common inequities examined were race/ethnicity (140 studies), sex or gender (97 studies), and income (69 studies). Many historically marginalised racial/ethnic groups had lower rates of HPV-related knowledge, vaccination and worse overall outcomes related to HPV. Compared with women, men had lower rates of HPV vaccination and provider recommendation, and higher rates of HPV-infection. Results regarding income were largely conflicting.

CONCLUSION

Findings from our review demonstrate clear gaps in HPV-related inequity research. Vaccine completion, provider recommendation and intersectionality should continue to be evaluated to implement targeted interventions.

Healthcare Provider's Perceived Self-Efficacy in HPV Vaccination Hesitancy Counseling and HPV Vaccination Acceptance

BACKGROUND

HPV vaccine hesitancy is a key contributor to the sub-optimal HPV vaccination uptake in the United States. We aimed to determine the association between healthcare providers' self-efficacy in HPV vaccination hesitancy counseling and HPV vaccination acceptance after initial and follow-up counseling sessions.

METHODS

Population-based cross-sectional study of healthcare providers (HCPs) practicing in Texas. Logistic regression analyses were used to determine the odds of HPV vaccination acceptance by vaccine-hesitant patients. Additionally, generalized estimating equations were used to compare HPV vaccination acceptance by hesitant patients after follow-up versus initial counseling sessions.

RESULTS

1283 HCPs completed the survey with a mean (SD) age of 47.1 (11.3) years. HCPs who believed that they were very/completely confident in counseling HPV-vaccine-hesitant parents had higher odds of observing HPV vaccination acceptance very often/always after an initial counseling session (adjusted odds ratio (AOR): 3.50; 95% CI: 2.25-5.44) and after follow-up counseling sessions (AOR: 2.58; 95% CI: 1.66-4.00) compared to HCPs that perceived they were not at all/somewhat/moderately confident. The odds of HPV vaccination being accepted very often/always by vaccine-hesitant parents was 61% (AOR: 1.61; 95% CI: 1.32-1.95) higher after follow-up counseling sessions compared to an initial counseling session. The results were similar for the counseling of HPV-vaccine-hesitant adult patients.

CONCLUSIONS

The confidence level of HCPs in counseling hesitant parents and adult patients impacts HPV vaccination acceptance. Importantly, acceptance was higher after follow-up counseling sessions than initial counseling sessions. HCPs should receive training in HPV vaccination counseling to enhance their confidence in counseling hesitant patients and should utilize every visit to counsel hesitant patients.

An Opportunity in Cancer Prevention: Human Papillomavirus Vaccine Delivery in the Hospital

OBJECTIVE

Pediatric hospitalizations are a missed opportunity for delivery of the human papilloma virus (HPV) vaccination. In this study, the authors' aim was to increase HPV vaccination rates among adolescents cared for by the pediatric hospital medicine (PHM) service at our academic children's hospital.

METHODS

This quality improvement (QI) study included adolescents ≥13 years who were discharged from PHM. Interventions included: modification of discharge order sets to include vaccination status and provider training seminars regarding the delivery of the HPV vaccine. Follow-up materials were distributed to providers by e-mail. The primary outcome measure was adolescent HPV vaccination rates. Secondary outcome measures were adolescent meningococcal vaccination rates and accuracy of immunization status documentation. The balancing measure was length of stay (LOS). Data were collected via chart review. Statistical process control charts were used to analyze for special cause variation.

RESULTS

From May 2019 through February 2020, 440 patients were included in this analysis. Throughout the study, HPV and meningococcal vaccination rates increased from a baseline median of 4.6% to 21.2% and 8.3% to 26.6%, respectively. HPV vaccination was not significantly associated with sex, HPV dose due, or admitting service. Accuracy of immunization status documentation and LOS remained unchanged.

CONCLUSIONS

Using QI methodology we were successful in increasing HPV and meningococcal vaccination rates among hospitalized adolescents. Considering the relationship of these 2 vaccines is a potential topic of future work. Discerning the correct immunization status at time of admission may be a potential opportunity for improvement in future work.

Trends in HPV and HPV Vaccine Awareness among Gay and Bisexual Males in the U.S

Human papillomavirus (HPV) is the most common sexually transmitted infection in the United States (US). It is often discussed within the context of women’s sexual health due to its association with cervical cancer. However, HPV is also associated with other cancers and conditions which affect men. Gay and bisexual males (GBM) in the US have higher risks of HPV infection and a higher incidence of HPV-associated anal cancer than heterosexual males. In addition, GBM in the US have a higher prevalence of some high-risk strains of HPV than in other regions. HPV vaccination is highly effective at preventing HPV-associated cancers and genital warts. Several resources have been directed towards improving HPV awareness in the US over the past couple of years to improve vaccination rates. Given the low rates of HPV vaccination among GBM in the US, this study aimed to assess the trends in HPV and HPV vaccine awareness using a nationally representative sample of GBM. We found an overall increase in HPV and HPV vaccine awareness between 2017 and 2020. However, the sociodemographic differences in awareness levels highlight the need for more interventions to improve vaccination rates, especially in this high-risk population.

Assessing the Relationship between Socioeconomic Status, Race, and Psychological Distress in Cancer Survivors: A Population Based Study

Psychological distress is more common in cancer survivors than the general population, and is associated with adverse outcomes. This cross-sectional study aimed to assess the relationship between socioeconomic status (SES), race and psychological distress, using data from a nationally representative sample of cancer survivors in the United States. Outcomes of interest were mild, moderate, and severe psychological distress as assessed by the Patient Health Questionnaire-4 (PHQ-4). In our univariate model, there was no statistically significant difference in the PHQ-4 scores of Caucasian and African American respondents. On the other hand, a lower SES correlated with a higher likelihood of psychological distress, and this persisted in our multivariate model. This study brings additional awareness to the negative impact of a lower socioeconomic status on mental health outcomes in cancer survivors, and further highlights the importance of the timely identification and screening of individuals at a high risk of psychological distress, in order to limit missed opportunities for relevant mental health interventions in this population.